PDA

View Full Version : Obama will Resign and for Good Reason



Ares
22nd June 2011, 07:03 PM
http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/caruba061811.jpg

I always thought it was creepy the way Barack Hussein Obama has repeatedly referred to the likelihood of his being a one-term President. It is as if he knew, even as he campaigned in 2008, that all the loose ends and unanswered questions about his life would eventually disqualify him.

It is now widely acknowledged that the mainstream media ran interference for him, ignoring or disparaging those who questioned his eligibility.

After two and a half years in office, however, his arrogance and incompetence is so manifest that even they can no longer cover for him.

Obama has single handedly generated a mass political movement called the Tea Party and election results for governors and members of Congress have put opposition candidates into office.

On March 31, 1968, then-President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he would not run for reelection, responding to the massive opposition to the war in Vietnam. On August 9, 1974, Richard M. Nixon announced his resignation in the wake of the Watergate scandal to avoid impeachment.

I predict that Barack Hussein Obama will resign before the end of his first term. He may well do so prior to the September 2012 Democratic Party convention.

Obama was never eligible to run for the office. In his book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President”, Dr. Jerome R. Corsi, Phd, devotes 387 pages, complete with appendices and endnotes, to irrefutably make that case.

Anyone who reads Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution, however, can make that case in less than a minute. Only a “natural born” individual whose both parents were American citizens can be President. Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya. There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said “natural born.” Further clouding Obama’s eligibility is the time he spent in his youth in Indonesia as the adopted son of that nation’s nationality.

Corsi’s book explores all the other mysteries including a highly suspicious Social Security number, passports, and other documentation that any candidate for office would normally submit to public disclosure. A massive cover up that includes the national press corps, the Democratic Party, Congress and even the U.S. courts, permitted Obama to gain and hold the office.

Indeed, Corsi’s book is not the first to reveal the deceptions. At least three other books have meticulously examined the issue. They include “The Manchurian Candidate” by Aaron Klein with Brenda J. Elliot, “The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency” by Ken Blackwell and Ken Klukowski, and “The Post-American Presidency” by Pamela Geller with Robert Spencer.

Corsi, however, has the benefit of timing. As the nation enters the period following Obama’s announcement he is running for reelection and during the process of selecting a Republican opponent, the issue of his eligibility is gathering momentum.

The polling data is all against him. The failure of his policies, combined with the massive increase in the national debt, rising unemployment, the implosion of the housing market, and a growing perception of incompetence, are coalescing to give weight to the demand that he end his candidacy or resign.

“History has not been kind to U.S. Presidents that have attempted to hide behind a lie,” says Corsi.

When republics begin to ignore their founding documents, they are literally committing suicide and, in Obama’s case, it is an assisted suicide.

The recognized definition of a “natural born citizen”, a requirement to be President, does not require much more than common sense. In a May article published by Canada Free Press, Lawrence B. Solum, the John E. Cribbett Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, is quoted as having written in September 2008, “Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen.”

Ironically, in 2008, his political opponent, Sen. John McCain, whose both parents were Americans when he was born in Panama Canal Zone, was the subject of a Senate Resolution confirming his eligibility to run. The then-Democrat controlled Senate took up no such action regarding Obama. If they had, they would have had to hold a convention to pick a new candidate!

Lawrence Sellin, the author of the Canada Free Press article cited above, warned “Whether through cowardice or arrogance, both Republican and Democrats fail to appreciate the fact that ordinary Americans are reaching a tipping point. Imagine a Tea Party on steroids.”

“If the Constitutional crisis is not soon addressed, the present political polarization will inevitably lead to political fragmentation. Erosion of the Constitution will inevitably lead to the collapse of the rule of law.”

There is no documentation to support the myths about his life that Obama has carefully devised. Indeed, the President has reportedly spent millions to deny public access to his birth certificate and all other records.

If he resigns, he may be able to assert the legitimacy of every piece of legislation, every executive order, signed into law, but if he is found to have been ineligible, every one of them would become null and void.

The nation can be put right again as a Constitutional Republic. Obama has led an unlawful regime. America has been drunk on socialism since the 1930s. It’s time to sober up.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37677

palani
23rd June 2011, 04:58 AM
The recognized definition of a “natural born citizen”, a requirement to be President, does not require much more than common sense. In a May article published by Canada Free Press, Lawrence B. Solum, the John E. Cribbett Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, is quoted as having written in September 2008, “Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen.”

Odd. A "natural born child" is defined as one born out of wedlock (a bastard). A "natural born citizen" in similar context would be one born without a country (stateless or lacking allegiance to any state). This latter definition would seem to suit Obama's psychy.

Canadian-guerilla
23rd June 2011, 06:28 AM
if obama doesn't finish out his first term, it gonna be because of a " whitey " conspiracy

midnight rambler
23rd June 2011, 06:47 AM
Odd. A "natural born child" is defined as one born out of wedlock (a bastard). A "natural born citizen" in similar context would be one born without a country (stateless or lacking allegiance to any state). This latter definition would seem to suit Obama's psychy.

That's not how Vattel defined the term 'natural born citizen' at section 212 of Book I of his Law of Nations. And I'm convinced that Vattel's definition is what the framers were using when they used that term in the Constitution. Why would the framers specify that to be eligible for the office of the Presidency one must be born without a country? That just makes no sense at all.

big country
23rd June 2011, 06:53 AM
Odd. A "natural born child" is defined as one born out of wedlock (a bastard). A "natural born citizen" in similar context would be one born without a country (stateless or lacking allegiance to any state). This latter definition would seem to suit Obama's psychy.

Should we just take your word for that or do you have a source to back up your findings?

mrnhtbr2232
23rd June 2011, 07:05 AM
I still encounter people who support Obama blindly because he's not a Republican. The two party illusion has society snowed so well that these days it's just a matter of pushing political horses until they drop and get replaced like a relay race. Joe "I am a Zionist" Biden is the elite's insurance policy so no worries at the top if their basketball player loses his dribble. Until then, it's all hoops, Michelle getting fit, and talking down to the electorate like they were all a bunch of sophomores in high school. Every negative about Obama is the result of carefully crafted strategies and deliberate counter-reactions. If he falls on his sword, it won't be in the hands of justice it will be in the hands of his creators.

JDRock
23rd June 2011, 07:40 AM
I still encounter people who support Obama blindly because he's not a Republican. The two party illusion has society snowed so well that these days it's just a matter of pushing political horses until they drop and get replaced like a relay race. Joe "I am a Zionist" Biden is the elite's insurance policy so no worries at the top if their basketball player loses his dribble. Until then, it's all hoops, Michelle getting fit, and talking down to the electorate like they were all a bunch of sophomores in high school. Every negative about Obama is the result of carefully crafted strategies and deliberate counter-reactions. If he falls on his sword, it won't be in the hands of justice it will be in the hands of his creators.

well put sir! 2 thumbs up.

palani
23rd June 2011, 08:28 AM
That's not how Vattel defined the term 'natural born citizen' at section 212 of Book I of his Law of Nations. And I'm convinced that Vattel's definition is what the framers were using when they used that term in the Constitution. Why would the framers specify that to be eligible for the office of the Presidency one must be born without a country? That just makes no sense at all.

You might want to see what Vattel ACTUALLY wrote in Book 1 Sec 212 rather than relying upon a translation:

http://i54.tinypic.com/2v8qsnn.jpg

Les naturels (as HE writes) does not translate directly to "The natives". Best babelfish translation I could get was: The natural ones, or Indegenes are those which were born in the country, of Parens Citoyens.

The original 13 colonies were countries in international law. The United States is a municipality designed to attach territory to. Territory is land mass without country. The failing of the Articles of Confederation was that there was no method to deal with territory and the (now)continental U.S. was mostly unattached territory at the time.

It makes perfect sense that the leader of a municipality intended to deal with territory should be chosen with no attachment to any other (foreign) country.

horseshoe3
23rd June 2011, 08:30 AM
Obama has single handedly generated a mass political movement called the Tea Party

I disagree. GWB created the tea party. Now they have an enemy with a D behind his name so they no longer have to face the unpleasant fact that the worst president up to that point was a republican.

Dogman
23rd June 2011, 08:34 AM
I disagree. GWB created the tea party. Now they have an enemy with a D behind his name so they no longer have to face the unpleasant fact that the worst president up to that point was a republican.

Truth in your saying.

palani
23rd June 2011, 08:34 AM
Should we just take your word for that or do you have a source to back up your findings?

Feel free to do your own research. If you choose to do so in The New and Complete Dictionary of the English Language (late 1800's) you would find

http://i55.tinypic.com/24v426o.jpg

joboo
23rd June 2011, 09:39 AM
Honestly though who the fuck in their right mind would want that job in the current political climate?

You are a peon that's made to sing and dance all day long far worse, and depraved that you could have ever imagined.

Inside he's probably screaming because he can't do shit about anything outside of what the program is.

Balls in a vice, and nobody to talk to about it.

LastResort
23rd June 2011, 09:42 AM
I still encounter people who support Obama blindly because he's not a Republican. The two party illusion has society snowed so well that these days it's just a matter of pushing political horses until they drop and get replaced like a relay race. Joe "I am a Zionist" Biden is the elite's insurance policy so no worries at the top if their basketball player loses his dribble. Until then, it's all hoops, Michelle getting fit, and talking down to the electorate like they were all a bunch of sophomores in high school. Every negative about Obama is the result of carefully crafted strategies and deliberate counter-reactions. If he falls on his sword, it won't be in the hands of justice it will be in the hands of his creators.

Well put. Its the same crap here in Canada. The second Michael Ignatiff took the helm of the liberal party I knew the conservatives would get their majority. I told some people friends and family that "Iggy" was just brought in so the conservatives could get their majority and do all sorts of bad things behind closed doors unupposed. The responses were hilarious like "thats crazy talk" and "who exactly brought him in"..... Drives me crazy how people buy into this shit.

Twisted Titan
23rd June 2011, 12:22 PM
I disagree. GWB created the tea party. Now they have an enemy with a D behind his name so they no longer have to face the unpleasant fact that the worst president up to that point was a republican.

I wonder what the new political party ron paul forms will be called ?

I wonder how long it will be before it is. infiltrated from the top down amd complety co opted

Dogman
23rd June 2011, 12:29 PM
I wonder what the new political party ron paul forms will be called ?

I wonder how long it will be before it is. infiltrated from the top down amd complety co opted

Good chance , from the instant it is founded!