View Full Version : Rochester Police Department resort to petty retaliatory and intimidation tactics
joboo
26th June 2011, 06:38 PM
"Basking in the viral glory bestowed upon one of its officers this week (http://www.pixiq.com/article/rochester-police-arrest-woman-for-videotaping-them), the Rochester Police Department resorted to petty retaliatory and intimidation tactics against citizens attending a community meeting Thursday afternoon. The citizens were attending a meeting to discuss the arrest of Emily Good, the 28-year-old woman who was jailed for videotaping cops from her front yard, when they realized cops were outside issuing tickets for having parked more than 12 inches from the curb."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ytk_FpvHquw&feature=player_embedded#at=116
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqPZxRWxxm4
willie pete
26th June 2011, 08:43 PM
yea, that's it....build good relations with the citizens & community...lol ...actually these tactics remind me of the HOA board here → → sending a tow-truck to cruise through the place several times a week....trying to snag violators
BrewTech
26th June 2011, 08:50 PM
LOL. Protect and Serve.
OTB.
joboo
26th June 2011, 08:59 PM
Someone got the dirt on the officer...
http://www.pixiq.com/article/rochester-police-arrest-woman-for-videotaping-them
Seems police think they can arrest you for not doing whatever they feel like telling you to do.
Hmm, not breaking any laws except for "do what I say or else law."
The "do what I say or else".....yeap...seems perfectly normal.
Awoke
27th June 2011, 08:44 AM
I have zero use the the pigs. Zero.
Dogman
27th June 2011, 08:51 AM
CNN has been running the story about the cops arresting the woman, for the last couple of days. And their tone is the woman was in the right, and the cops wrong. It will be interesting to see if these new retalitary vids make it into their story.
This bunch of shit the cops are doing, is just digging them selfs deeper in showing and confirming what kind of slime ball bastards they really are.
gunDriller
27th June 2011, 09:12 AM
I have zero use the the pigs. Zero.
we already have anarchy where it matters - in the White House, in corporate boardrooms, wherever the Talmud-worshippers gathers.
what's wrong with having anarchy on the outside ?
it would be a worthwhile trade, if it would help us get rid of the parasites on the 'inside'.
Ares
27th June 2011, 09:26 AM
People should use this bumper stickers:
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
Awoke
28th June 2011, 03:44 AM
People should use this bumper stickers:
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
Nice. Worth repeating a third time.
Awoke
28th June 2011, 06:48 AM
She should get reparations for the bullshit they put her through.
Santa
28th June 2011, 07:45 AM
A clear case of intimidation and harassment by the police force. They totally deserve the title of goons and pigs.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.