PDA

View Full Version : Bayer agrees to pay Missouri rice farmers, others $750 million to settle suit Read m



osoab
1st July 2011, 07:59 PM
Bayer agrees to pay Missuri rice farmers, others $750 million to settle suit (http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_b102d218-a42b-11e0-97bc-0019bb30f31a.html#ixzz1QufLV3Ls)


Bayer CropScience agreed to pay up to $750 million to farmers in Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi Friday to settle lawsuits over an accidental release of genetically modified rice LibertyLink contaminated the rice supply in 2006.

The settlement had not yet been filed in federal court in St. Louis Friday, but plaintiff's lawyers announced the deal.
A Bayer statement read, in part, "Although Bayer CropScience believes it acted responsibly in the handling of its biotech rice, the company considers it important to resolve the litigation so that it can move forward focused on its fundamental mission of providing innovative solutions to modern agriculture."


When it was discovered in the rice supply, LibertyLink had not yet been approved for sale for human consumption. Rice futures plunged and Japan and European countries banned the import of U.S. rice.


The first lawsuits were filed days later.


The rice price recovered and LibertyLink has since been approved. It has not been commercially marketed.


Friday's settlement comes after a series of so-called "bellwether" trials set up to allow representative cases to proceed to trial and to give all sides a hint of what could come in pending cases.


In December 2009, a federal jury in St. Louis awarded $2 million to farmers. A different jury awarded $1.5 in February 2010. Neither jury awarded punitive damages.


Last July, a federal jury in St. Louis awarded a Louisiana farmer, Denny Deshotels, $500,000 in one suit. Jurors were not given the option of punitive damages because of Louisiana law.


In two state trials in Arkansas, jurors also found in favor of farmers, awarding $1 million in the first trial and $6 million in actual damages and $42 million in punitive damages in the second.


Company lawyers argued that farmers who waited out the brief price hit suffered no losses and that Bayer was not negligent.

Dogman
1st July 2011, 08:05 PM
Kinda hard to grow your own rice! Dam it!

osoab
1st July 2011, 08:17 PM
Wasn't starlink stopped by china or other east asia countries. Maybe I am thinking of the corn side of starlink. I know it wasn't just rice.




StarLink corn controversy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize)

StarLink is a variety of Bt corn patented by Aventis Crop Sciences (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aventis_Crop_Sciences&action=edit&redlink=1) (a subdivision of Aventis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aventis), acquired by Bayer AG (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer) in 2002), intended for use in animal feed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_feed).
U.S. regulatory authorities permitted the commercial sale of StarLink seed with the stipulation that crops produced must not be used for human consumption. This restriction was based on the possibility that a small number of people might develop an allergic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allergy) reaction to the Bt protein used in StarLink that is less rapidly digested than the version used in other Bt varieties.
StarLink corn was subsequently found in food destined for consumption by humans. An episode involving Taco Bell (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco_Bell) taco (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco) shells was particularly well publicized.[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize#cite_note-7) This led to a public relations disaster for Aventis and the biotechnology industry as a whole. Sales of StarLink seed were discontinued. The registration for Starlink varieties was voluntarily withdrawn by Aventis in October 2000.[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize#cite_note-8)
28 people reported apparent allergic reactions related to eating corn products that may have contained the Starlink protein. However, the US Centers for Disease Control studied the blood of these individuals and concluded there was no evidence the reactions these people experienced were associated with hypersensitivity to the Starlink Bt protein.[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize#cite_note-9)
A subsequent review of these tests by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel points out that while "the negative results decrease the probability that the Cry9C protein is the cause of allergic symptoms in the individuals examined ... in the absence of a positive control and questions regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, it is not possible to assign a negative predictive value to this" [11] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize#cite_note-10)
Aid sent by the UN and the US to Central African nations also contained some StarLink corn. The nations involved refused to accept the aid.
The southern portion of the U.S. corn belt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_belt) planted the greatest amount of StarLink corn. It is this portion of the U.S. where corn borer damage creates the greatest economic loss to farmers.
The US corn supply has been monitored for the presence of the Starlink Bt proteins since 2001. No positive samples have been found since 2004, showing that, most probably, it was possible to withdraw this GM crop without leaving traces in the environment once it has been used in the field [12] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenic_maize#cite_note-11)

Santa
1st July 2011, 09:04 PM
There's something about the modified genetic food topic that's just plain scary creepy no matter how you disperse it.