PDA

View Full Version : New 9/11 video missile strike pentagon



Serpo
4th July 2011, 10:50 AM
Ive never seen this angle before and it does seem to be a cruise missile,this is in the disclosure tv link below.


http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/44286/NEW_9_11_VIDEO_MISSILE_STRIKE_PENTAGON/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWj-dUOWNzI

http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=1067&pid=1198#pid1198

Ponce
4th July 2011, 11:11 AM
Is hard to hide what you can clearly see........

willie pete
4th July 2011, 11:11 AM
I saw those some time ago, the video looks fabricated to me, and in reading at one of the links that report a "thermonuclear" missile hit, looking at the "punched-out" hole in the inner rings, it's too symmetrical, to me it looks more like a "kinetic" impact, I'm thinking a thermonuclear device would not have made such a "clean" hole ...my 2¢..lol

Serpo
4th July 2011, 11:30 AM
It is taken from a strange angle and why wasnt it around earlier

Horn
4th July 2011, 12:01 PM
Just remember, In a state of National Emergency the citizenry is more important than Military Leaders.

Dick Cheney set the precedence there.

willie pete
4th July 2011, 12:08 PM
It is taken from a strange angle and why wasnt it around earlier

it's been on YT for over a year....and it would've HAD to have been recorded from a plane or helicopter flying around the impact area....it looks to me like some "3-D Shop-Job"

gunDriller
4th July 2011, 12:16 PM
it's been on YT for over a year....and it would've HAD to have been recorded from a plane or helicopter flying around the impact area....it looks to me like some "3-D Shop-Job"

in 2004 Maxim magazine had a centerfold that was 3D.

and the industry has spent the 7 years since then working on more photo-realism.

e.g. the movie Avatar.

the US gov. hires a LOT of computer graphics people. all part of their 'perception management'.

willie pete
4th July 2011, 12:28 PM
in 2004 Maxim magazine had a centerfold that was 3D.

and the industry has spent the 7 years since then working on more photo-realism.

e.g. the movie Avatar.

the US gov. hires a LOT of computer graphics people. all part of their 'perception management'.


I don't doubt that....I'm just saying it reminds me of an old Flight Simulator program I use to have....and someone just shopped-in an object flying in and impacting the P-gon

Down1
4th July 2011, 12:37 PM
The fact is there was/is video available of the attack on the Pentagon.
A "free" nation would have shown it to their people on 9/12.

willie pete
4th July 2011, 12:48 PM
The fact is there was/is video available of the attack on the Pentagon.
A "free" nation would have shown it to their people on 9/12.

I'm not disagreeing with that.....what about the next question though? ...I'm thinking most would say it's bogus

keehah
4th July 2011, 01:01 PM
I recommend most of this site for quickly understanding the larger issues in all of this.
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html

Lots of military people saw the plane and wreckage, and making the conspiracy dependent on the no plane hoax gets Bush and Cheney off the hook. The issue is not what the peons (us) think about these issues -- the real issue is what the military and civilian leadership in DC think about these issues. No plane speculations and hoaxes steer people away from real evidence of complicity such as how the plane was steered into the nearly empty part of the Pentagon and the role of the wargames in paralyzing the defense of Washington. Cui bono - who benefits? How long would Cheney and Bush be in office if the rest of the military thought that the PNAC gang allowed 9/11 to happen -- or deliberately flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon via some form of remote control?

The fact that "No Plane" is the cudgel being used against the 9/11 truth movement proves it is a counterproductive strategy for exposing real evidence of complicity. Whether these hoaxes are coming from deliberate disinformation agents, the aggressively naive, the gullible or the sloppy is not relevant, since the ONLY evidence for "no plane" is altered and misleading perspective photos.

Hatha Sunahara
4th July 2011, 07:05 PM
I have to admit that I am very much influenced by the investigation of 911 done by Dimitri Khalezov http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/Download.htm who thinks the pentagon was hit with a soviet Granit submarine borne cruise missile. He thinks the missile came from the submarine Kursk.

Is there any evidence that the Pentagon was hit by a missile? Is this evidence fake? This is the whole problem with 911 evidence. There is no end to argument about whether any piece of evidence is real or not. And whatever you believe about it, there is someone out there to ridicule you. I think for this reason, and a few others, we will all die believing bullshit about 911. It won't matter to future generations. The perpetrators will have gotten away with it.

Hatha

Glass
4th July 2011, 07:21 PM
interesting stuff but I wondered about the camera angles as well. The imagery would have had to have come from an aircraft over the area. So what aircraft was it that was flying over the pentagon at the time?

There are clearly 2 aerial views of the pentagon. They appear to be on the left and the right of the area that was hit. So two aircraft over the pentagon at the time.

keehah
4th July 2011, 08:53 PM
The video image I saw showed a smeared cigar shaped thing move towards the pentagon. So obviously whatever hit the pentagon was not normal matter, it was a UFO!

Seriously, the average Joe I hear in real life talking about 9/11 generally talks of the disinfo and the most foolish crap. Perhaps I need to realize its just sheep bahing about novelty, rather than properly comprehending crimes against our society, but it makes me sad, in the way that seeing someone choose a $20.00 fiat bill over a silver dollar does.