Oh the irony! 18 y.o. dog dies of old age, owner to be charged with a felony

[midnight rambler]

Cops allow their K-9 'officers' to die in hot patrol cars, yet when someone cannot afford to pay a vet to treat a EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD dog cops bust down his door and arrest him to show him what for.

Witness: "I didn't know there were such consequences for a dog."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nTykyjGxsY

[Serpo]

I thought I had seen it all but no.............Im typeless..........

[Awoke]

tag

adfkl;mhasdflkj

[mick silver]

there two sets of laws one for us and one for them . the faster we all understand this the better off we all will be ...........

[LastResort]

If loving a family pet enough to let them pass in a comfortable surrounding is a crime then I know a few people who should be locked up.

P.S. we need better emoticons. The crazy eyes one depicting loosing my mind would work well in this instance...LOL

[Hatha Sunahara]

Unwittingly disturbing the cash flow of an operation that gets money from the state has dire consequences.

I had a cat that wasn't eating. My son took the cat to the vet who diagnosed it as thyroid disease, and proceded to clean the cat's teeth. He 'had' to anesthetize the cat to do it. The cat came home and did not recover from the anesthesia properly, so my son took her to another vet, who correctly diagnosed the problem as chronic renal failure that was turned into acute renal failure from the anesthetic administered by the first vet. The cat could not recover from this, so she had to be euthenized.

I have a new cat now, and this fellow is not going to go to any vet, not gonna get any 'license', not gonna be any victim of this corrupt system. In the above example, the owner of the dog is the victim of a corrupt system. There is no accountability for the actions of the 'officials'. It's like Obama claiming that he is doing 'humanitarian bombing' in Libya. The road to hell is paved with phony 'good intentions' contrived by evil people.

Hatha

[joboo]

I'm split on this mentality. This one seems a bit over the top, but then you have demented fucks that starve their animals to death, and treat them in some of the sickest ways imaginable. I'm siding with the humane society overall as they are only looking out for the animal's best interests....yes sometimes at the displeasure and/or inconvenience of their owners, but then again owning an animal is a big responsibility. I would rather the humane society get some funding over a lot of other bullshit ripoff situations out there.

[willie pete]

apparently the owner had the dog for 18 years....that doesn't seem like it would've been neglected, it was taken care of.....sending a SWAT team in to "rescue" someone's pet in a situation like this is absolutely ridiculous, I think the police use their Storm-Teams to justify more $$$'s from the fed....they'll hold up a number: "see, last year we had to use our Storm Team 200 times, so we really Need another $5mill and that new helicopter"

[Serpo]

Unwittingly disturbing the cash flow of an operation that gets money from the state has dire consequences.
It's like Obama claiming that he is doing 'humanitarian bombing' in Libya. The road to hell is paved with phony 'good intentions' contrived by evil people.

Hatha


Bombing for peace.............

[Serpo]

Watch out for bugs on the windscreen ......it may become an offense.......poor little critters

[madfranks]

So let me get this straight - if a cop leaves a healthy dog in the back of a car until it dies of heat stroke, well that's just an honest mistake because the cop was a little too busy that day to remember. But if a man who owns a dog for 18 years can't afford to have it euthanized so instead takes it home to die and buries it in the back yard, the cops invade your home, breaking your property in the process, arrest you, and dig up the dead dog in the back yard to inspect it.

I just can't figure this out, they didn't have any evidence whatsoever that any wrongdoing occurred, so how did they legitimize this? Is "he might have hurt the dog" enough to break a man's door down, subdue him and dig the corpse up? WTF?

[midnight rambler]

buries it in the back yard

Noting that the dog's owner went to the trouble of burying his beloved pet in his own backyard and not simply discarding the body into the nearest dumpster, what do ya wanna bet that the state actors discarded the dog's remains in the landfill or handed it over to the local rendering company for disposal??

[iOWNme]

I'm split on this mentality. This one seems a bit over the top, but then you have demented fucks that starve their animals to death, and treat them in some of the sickest ways imaginable. I'm siding with the humane society overall as they are only looking out for the animal's best interests....yes sometimes at the displeasure and/or inconvenience of their owners, but then again owning an animal is a big responsibility. I would rather the humane society get some funding over a lot of other bullshit ripoff situations out there.

Do you know how many animals the Humane Society kills every year? This is like saying CPS has the best intentions for your child. INSANITY.

So you think there are times someone should be locked up for animal abuse? Who is going to pay for them to sit in jail? Not me.

If you see someone mistreating an animal, it might be your moral position to stop them. (I know I would) And that is YOUR choice. But you DO NOT have the right to go to the Government to solve this problem. You DO NOT have the right to use 'Government Sanctioned Violence' to achieve your goal.

The Humane Society is part of Agenda 21. Giving animals rights over humans. Dont fool yourself.

[Dogman]

Has anyone followed up on what happened to the man? This video was uploaded two years ago.

This is the most I could find, he got a ticket.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Did Nebraska man deserve a ticket for his dead dog?

An Omaha man is accused of animal cruelty by neglect after his dog, Sable, died (http://omaha.com/article/20090923/NEWS01/709239907). Jacob Palmer had visited the vet, who recommended euthanization for the pit bull. Palmer said he didn't have enough money and left -- so the vet later reported him to the Humane Society, fearing Palmer would kill the dog himself, the World-Herald reports.
The police visited his residence three times, but got no answer. (They did, however, notice the freshly dug grave in the back yard.) On the fourth attempt, they used a battering ram to knock down his door (http://omaha.com/article/20090923/NEWS01/709239907) and go to the back yard, where they dug up Sable.
The dog had died from a uterine infection that could have been treated. Palmer's mom says he didn't have money for tests, but the Humane Society says he could have sent the dog to them and they would've gotten Sable treated, which Palmer didn't know, his mother says.




Read more: http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/2009/09/did-nebraska-man-deserve-a-ticket-for-his-dead-dog.html#ixzz1RMIGbVHt

[osoab]

I wonder what a vet would do if they saw you beating hogs with a pick axe handle to get to go into a shoot.

Is the vet still in business?

[joboo]

Do you know how many animals the Humane Society kills every year? This is like saying CPS has the best intentions for your child. INSANITY.

So you think there are times someone should be locked up for animal abuse? Who is going to pay for them to sit in jail? Not me.

If you see someone mistreating an animal, it might be your moral position to stop them. (I know I would) And that is YOUR choice. But you DO NOT have the right to go to the Government to solve this problem. You DO NOT have the right to use 'Government Sanctioned Violence' to achieve your goal.

The Humane Society is part of Agenda 21. Giving animals rights over humans. Dont fool yourself.


They don't have infinite funds to house and feed every animal they take from abusive owners forever. The options are to end the abusive situation, temporarily house the animal for as long as funds allow, hoping it will get adopted, and as a last resort humanely put the animal down at some point. The alternative is do nothing, and let the animal suffer, or remove it, and let it roam wild.

You consider it insanity, but what would you do?

[iOWNme]

They don't have infinite funds to house and feed every animal they take from abusive owners forever. The options are to end the abusive situation, temporarily house the animal for as long as funds allow, hoping it will get adopted, and as a last resort humanely put the animal down at some point. The alternative is do nothing, and let the animal suffer, or remove it, and let it roam wild.

You consider it insanity, but what would you do?

I agree the situation is bad. But i see through the lies. The Humane Society is a Monster. Like all organizations, it started out with good intentions, but has been slowly changed into a animal STASI. They will break every single Common Law on the books, to uphold a MINOR policy. Subverting the Law; Which is there to protect the individual and his property; In order to enforce revenue generating/asset plundering policies of the Communist STATE. Their own stated stated main focus is 'Animal Welfare & Animal Rights'. I hope you understand what that truly means.

Check out a book called Animal Liberation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Liberation_%28book%29) (1975) by Peter Singer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer). "Singer’s book sought to recast concern for animals as a justice-based cause like the movements for civil rights and women’s rights.".

The HSUS has also been connected to the Animal Liberation Front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Liberation_Front).

There current CEO Wayne Pacelle is the former lobbyist for the HSUS, for over the past 10 years. He graduated Yale, (wink wink) and shortly after becoming CEO was quoted in an interview with Animal People Newspaper that his goal was "to build a National Rifle Association of the animal rights movement." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humane_Society_of_the_United_States#Criticism)

Not to mention their connection to PETA. One of the biggest criminal organizations on the planet.

So a human should suffer over an animal? Or should an animal suffer before a human?

Of course there are real animal abusers. And like i said I would make the moral choice to stop them with my own actions, because i am RESPONSIBLE. What i dont have the right to do, is gather the masses, and vote my opinion into Policy. Regardless of how honorable and righteous my opinion seems to be to me.

These people and organizations are EUGENICIST. Their stated goals are along the lines of Agenda 21, Animal Rights and 100% of control over every single facet of human activity. All in the guise of 'Mother Gaia'.

[praetorian]

I'm split on this mentality. This one seems a bit over the top, but then you have demented fucks that starve their animals to death, and treat them in some of the sickest ways imaginable. I'm siding with the humane society overall as they are only looking out for the animal's best interests....yes sometimes at the displeasure and/or inconvenience of their owners, but then again owning an animal is a big responsibility. I would rather the humane society get some funding over a lot of other bullshit ripoff situations out there.

I cannot agree, an animals death is not worth a humans life, no matter how short the sentence is. A proper sentence of animal "Abuse" would be to liberate the critter if alive, and ban the owner from keeping pets under penalty of a stiff fine. I love animals,so dont get me wrong, but its still an animal.

[joboo]

If you make it a rule that no man can be trespassed on, you will see all kinds of people running dog fighting groups or whatever sadist mentality they come up with.

So it's a question of trespass or no trespass. This example is the extreme, and there's probably more to the story is my guess. It's always a case of the few idiots ruining it for the many, and where to draw the line.

Look at the animal situation in greece. It's a nightmare to be an animal over there, and the humane societies wish they could do more, but are limited by funds and laws. The end result is people poisoning, hanging, and torturing stray animals all over the place like vermin. It's bad enough to the point people are calling to boycott the country. Where to draw the line, and how?

[midnight rambler]

If you make it a rule that no man can be trespassed on, you will see all kinds of people running dog fighting groups or whatever sadist mentality they come up with.

So it's a question of trespass or no trespass. This example is the extreme, and there's probably more to the story is my guess. It's always a case of the few idiots ruining it for the many, and where to draw the line.

Look at the animal situation in greece. It's a nightmare to be an animal over there, and the humane societies wish they could do more, but are limited by funds and laws. The end result is people poisoning, hanging, and torturing stray animals all over the place like vermin. It's bad enough to the point people are calling to boycott the country. Where to draw the line, and how?

There's a lot of dogs out there that need rescuing. I suggest you quit posting on here and get busy doing so.

http://org-observers.france24.com/files/images/100216%20Dogs%2014.jpg