PDA

View Full Version : Interesting stuff



vacuum
16th July 2011, 01:38 AM
I'm just trying to put the pieces together a little bit. Just organizing some thoughts in my mind, this post is as much for me as for anyone reading. Not looking for anyone's opinions here on the validity of these sources. I'm just clustering things that seem independent but supporting of each other.

Cluster 1
Atomic hydrogen and water effects.

Exhibit A)
Stumbled upon Keshe's work while listening to the Progressive Technology Hour archives. His claims are super far out there (unlimited free energy, anti gravity, universal medicine), and he says he's working with many governments on slowly bringing this technology to humanity (but only the Iranian government is working with him currently). He says he's behind the odd announcement by Iran a little while ago about having a flying saucer. Keshe claims to have new understandings of energy and matter, basing it all on interacting plasmas. I haven't read his books, but he appears to be using atomic hydrogen in a special way involving scalar waves.
http://www.keshefoundation.com/home.html
http://www.vortexnetworknews.com/Progressive_Tech_2011.html (scroll down to april 3 and april 9 for the interviews. There are also other interviews Keshe has done, including for red ice radio, blog talk radio, its rain making time, and the sterling alan show - check keshe's forums for the links)

Exhibit B)
A few years ago I remember seeing a free energy claim blurb about atomic hydrogen having strange effects and someone claiming free energy from it. It was an experimenter who experimented with an atomic hydrogen welder when atomic hydrogen welding was more used, apparently. Here's the story I was able to dig up from the web, some guy in 1926:
http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/AtomicH/atomicH.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5410-atomic-hydrogen-fuel.html
Interesting, now we've got two weird claims involving atomic hydrogen plasmas - Keshe and this hydrogen beam welder (which is a plasma).

Exhibit C)
Found this weird guy on the web, while looking for more info. Here's something he wrote about hydrogen plasma:
http://jonsthings.blogspot.com/2011/05/hydrogen-plasma.html
He claims nuclear fusion is happening all around us, in biological systems and especially in turbulent water. What's very interesting is this statement (http://www.keshefoundation.com/keshe_introduction.html) on Keshe's website: "We have proven that, the strength of the magnetic field and gravity of planets is more dependent on the composition of the material(s) and the speed of motion in the center core of the planet, rather than being dependant on the size, or heat or any other factors in the structure of the planet or star." Kind of a strange statement....he's basically saying this effect is dependent on the speed of motion of a certain material (we presume it's atomic hydrogen), rather than great temperatures and pressures of fusion energy today.

Its interesting how Jon also says it's the turbulent motion of water that creates fusion.

Exhibit D)
These things bring to mind something I remember from a few years ago. At face value, it seems completely ridiculous and off the wall:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh_-DUKQ4Uw
Basically, some guy discovered that a vibrating boiler pipe seemed to make a boiler super efficient. So he started making these rotating drums with holes drilled in them. Water goes through the holes, which presumably create extreme turbulence, and you get 70% more heat out than you put in. We see the same effect of turbulent water (which is pretty darn close to hydrogen atoms for anyone who understands the extreme polarity of H2O).

Exhibit E)
All of this obviously brings to mind Viktor Schauberger. You can read about him here:
http://www.newphys.se/fnysik/2_1/schauberger/index.html
Basically, he demonstrated very interesting effects with water in a vortex. Aligns with keshe's comment on speed of motion...the only way to move very fast in the center of a planet would be a vortex.

Exhibit F)
Another interesting thing is that Mr. Keshe claims his systems operate exactly like planets and stars do. What's interesting with the abiotic oil theory is that hydrocarbons are supposedly created within the earth. Well, what if there is a hydrogen plasma within the core of the earth? What if neutrinos from the sun (or some other effect) creates atomic hydrogen within the center of the earth, which then via nuclear reactions also creates carbon and other elements. This would align with the evidence that oil is replenished and isn't from dead dinosaurs.

Exhibit G)
Cold fusion seems to generally involve hydrogen at some point. I believe the palladium used in many cold fusion devices is porous in such a way as to allow hydrogen atoms into it but not anything larger. Interesting coincidence.

Here's the latest cold fusion device...Rossi's Ecat. It uses nickel powder and hydrogen gas: http://pesn.com/2011/07/21/9501874_Rossis_Self_Sustaining_One_Megawatt_Reacto r/

Exhibit H)
There are many watergas claims out there - super efficient electrolysis, things running on water.

Exhibit I)
Anyone reading esoteric literature usually seems to find some common ideas. One of the big ones is that everything is motion and vibrations. We hear about frequencies all the time referring to almost everything in new age stuff. Another common thing is that more subtle energies, more intelligence, etc, is associated with the lightest and fastest material. Hydrogen is the lightest and fastest atom. The ether itself is so light and fast it cannot be observed. Interesting that we're talking about fast moving hydrogen here involved in these strange effects.

Exhibit J)
The universe is known to be composed of mostly hydrogen. According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_the_chemical_elements), the universe is 74% hydrogen by mass (much greater by volume I'm sure). Plasma is also the most common state of matter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29) in the universe, according to wikipedia. So it's interesting that the universe is mostly made of hydrogen plasma, and at the same time our physicists are at a complete loss to explain the universe. According to physicists, our universe is made of of like 73% "dark energy" which we can't observe (hehe, that percentage is interesting), and 22% dark matter. So they can't explain it's behavior at all.

As a side note, helium, oxygen, and carbon are the next three most abundant elements. So there is a ton of H2O out there.

In conclusion, any one of these claims or exhibits seem completely absurd in and of themselves. However, they are surprisingly coherent.

The search continues...

keehah
16th July 2011, 03:50 AM
I'll share some links on the vacuum topic ....

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-u-free.asp

From the previous section, we can conclude that if a method is found to tap this 'free energy' or better 'energy of free space', then we have got a possible solution for the ultimate clean energy source - the vacuum. So, will dissipating this energy also change the universal constants with catastrophic results? The answer is definitely NO, as energy is never dissipated but just converted from one form to another. The easiest way to tap energy out from free space is by a simple resonant circuit tuned to the vacuum oscillations of this energy and matched to its impedance. This frequency can also be worked out as follows:

Free space frequency fo = 1/T = 7.4E42 Hz

Surely this tuned circuit will not consist of a lumped inductor and capacitor as we know them, but the concept should be the same. The tuned circuit could easily be formed out of an atomic structure such as a mass with special characteristics. A perfect example would be radioactive isotopes which are tapping in this energy and convert some of it into lower frequency radiation and heat. The perfect material should be very dense with its structure dimensions as small as possible. This explains why most dense (heavy) metals having atomic numbers over 80, start exhibiting radioactivity. Probably the most efficient vacuum energy resonant cicuit in our solar system is the sun
http://blazelabs.com/n-perpetual.asp

So, here are the answers which by now you should be able to answer yourself:

Is overunity possible? - Absolutely NOT.

Is perpetual motion possible? - NO. If you think otherwise, it shows lack of understanding of your energy source.
Are free energy machines a reality? -YES, of course! examples: Solar panels, wind turbines and others [radio wave gains and the like IMO -k] in which the energy source is free.
Is it theoretically possible to tap vacuum energy? -YES. examples: stars and atoms, but no man made devices yet!
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=428

"It is a casualty of ignoring the Aether that gives modern physicists no other explanation for energy coming from an atomic reaction than to invent a particle for it. But by recognizing the Aether, which shows up in several places mathematically, we can get a precise understanding of how we can tap the Aether for producing free energy.

And I know this can be done. The Federal government already invented a free energy device a long time ago, tested it, and verified that it works. It's called a Breeder Reactor. The Breeder Reactor gets its name because while its producing energy, it's also producing more fuel so that it can be used again, and again, and again, without ever being depleted.

Free Energy from Atoms (http://www.16pi2.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=69&Itemid=89)
Written by David Thomson 16pi2

All known atomic isotopes have been tested for their actual energy by physicists over the years. A complete list of actual "binding energies" for isotopes is available at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).

As a side note, atoms are not bound by energy, they are bound by the strong nuclear force, or electromagnetic charge. The "binding energy" is the actual amount of energy that would be required to pull the atom apart, if such a thing would be done.

The odd thing about atoms is that the actual "binding energy" never agrees with the calculated "binding energy". For example, the actual binding energy of Helium 4 is 28.293MeV. The calculated binding energy for Helium 4 is 23.79MeV. ..

There is no conversion of mass into energy. The extra energy came from the Aether. The process of assembling and disassembling matter to get free energy is similar to a pumping action.

But not all atoms have a COE greater than 1. Of all the stable atomic isotopes, only Lithium 7 has a COE of less than 1. What does this mean? It means Lithium does not take free energy from the Aether when it is disassembled, it takes the free energy while it is assembled. In other words, as the atoms of Lithium are formed, they draw extra energy from the Aether and store it in the atom.

It stands to reason that if Lithium can be either combined with another element or made to disassemble and reassemble through a high powered oscillation, then it will pump energy from the Aether directly into the atom, and from the atom into a circuit connected to the atom. Tapping the energy of the Aether through Lithium may be as simple as bombarding Lithium with X-rays or microwaves. Judging from a spectrum analysis of Lithium, perhaps the ideal frequency will be around 4.469 x 104GHz.

It has already been reported that Lithium batteries explode. In the reports I have heard and read, Lithium batteries tend to explode near X-ray machines, such as medical equipment or airport security systems.

Lithium is not the only isotope that would appear to draw energy from the Aether. Below is a table of all the isotopes with a COE of less than 1. EL = element abbreviation, A = atomic number. From the table it can be seen that deuterium (H2) and tritium (H3) are also excellent candidates for drawing energy from the Aether. Although there are other otherwise excellent candidate isotopes, the quantities of the isotopes occurring in nature are limited.
This link has all the images and equations: http://www.scribd.com/doc/33595527/Free-Energy-from-Atomic-Isotopes

BTW, oil from dinosaurs is false strawman.

vacuum
17th July 2011, 12:08 AM
Geez:

Re: What happened Keshe

Postby MTKeshe » Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:54 am
There are no conspiracy about this accident as I hear in different places.

I had a fall and broken eight ribs on one side of the body and puncher the lung and liver and fractured the skull and was in critical condition for some days, it will take some times to recover fully, but the life threatening part is hopefully over.

We have used our medical systems, which has allowed the recovery to less than 10 days from such horrendous accident,but bone production will take time

I have started to give the weekly Friday talks in Brussels again, but I can not work with the right side of the body or write too much at the moment , so the practical research is on hold for some six weeks we hope, but I hope the brain can still work.

Thank you for all goodwill wishes which we have received.

Yours faithfully
M T Keshe

http://keshefoundation.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=505&sid=e14f40bfeabc40f5a9f89012c0e92d9b