View Full Version : Total Bond Market Chaos!
Ares
21st July 2011, 10:33 AM
If someone is hell bent on breaking the bond market, they are doing a bang up job.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/draghi/30%20Year%20ver%202_0.jpg
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/unbelievable-bond-market-chaos
mamboni
21st July 2011, 10:35 AM
If someone is hell bent on breaking the bond market, they are doing a bang up job.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/draghi/30%20Year%20ver%202_0.jpg
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/unbelievable-bond-market-chaos
Holy shit! Is that the 5 yr bond being bid to 8.7%? Holy shit.
Son-of-Liberty
21st July 2011, 10:37 AM
WTF!
hmmm...
Ares
21st July 2011, 10:41 AM
Probably anticipating a debt down grade. My best guess
Son-of-Liberty
21st July 2011, 02:23 PM
OK what's the deal here, am I missing something? I thought this would be bigger news.
gunDriller
21st July 2011, 02:44 PM
OK what's the deal here, am I missing something? I thought this would be bigger news.
it might be HUGE news - but i need someone to explain it.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 02:46 PM
It means the cost of borrowing for the gov is going up up up!
Son-of-Liberty
21st July 2011, 02:58 PM
That is what I thought too if the cost of borrowing really went up that much you would think that this would be a hot topic here and elsewhere but it isn't getting much attention. This is like SHTF for the feds no?
Joe King
21st July 2011, 03:00 PM
If they stay up and keep going up, then possibly it is.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 03:01 PM
But this could be what the politicians need to "scare" them into making a dealio.
Ares
21st July 2011, 03:12 PM
But this could be what the politicians need to "scare" them into making a dealio.
Very likely in my opinion.
Book
21st July 2011, 03:42 PM
Some former Treasury Secretary said on Fox News today that they would FIRST pay the bond obligations next month then prioritize Social Security and all other payments after.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 03:46 PM
Why would they pay SS claims first, if there is no actual requirement to do so?
If you were on hard times, what would you pay first?
The obligations that keep your house from being re-possessed, or discretionary spending that has no true requirement of being paid at all?
Book
21st July 2011, 03:53 PM
Why would they pay SS claims first, if there is no actual requirement to do so? If you were on hard times, what would you pay first? The obligations that keep your house from being re-possessed, or discretionary spending that has no true requirement of being paid at all?
Yeah...pay the international jew bond investors before grandma.
::)
Joe King
21st July 2011, 03:58 PM
The fact is SS has no true obligation to be paid, but rather is paid by the grace of Congress.
Per the Supreme Court, anyways.
...and that's who Congress will listen to.
I'm not saying it's right, but rather what the facts are.
Book
21st July 2011, 04:00 PM
...and that's who Congress will listen to.
Monthly foreign aid check to Israel going out on time next month?
::)
Joe King
21st July 2011, 04:01 PM
Dunno about that. Is there an iron-clad obligation to pay them?
mick silver
21st July 2011, 04:05 PM
joe should i sell my gold an silver ?
Joe King
21st July 2011, 04:08 PM
Couldn't tell you yet....but gimme a minute and I'll take a ride in my time machine and out and go find out for you, ok? lol
Joe King
21st July 2011, 04:09 PM
Ok...just got back and it seems that the Morlocks have....oh wait, seems I went too far again. Doh!
Son-of-Liberty
21st July 2011, 04:22 PM
If they aren't going to be paying social security then what obligation does the taxpayer have to pay SS deductions? If they break their side of the contract you're under no obligation to continue to hold up your end of the bargain.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 04:32 PM
If they aren't going to be paying social security then what obligation does the taxpayer have to pay SS deductions? If they break their side of the contract you're under no obligation to continue to hold up your end of the bargain.
Ummm, because little peoples end of the stick says they gots to?...and they accepted the agreement?
If you read it, {SSA} I'd imagine the iron-clad-guarentee to pay into it, is in there.
Besides, they haven't said they're not going to pay at all, just that they won't be paid first.
Glass
21st July 2011, 05:02 PM
Holy shit! Is that the 5 yr bond being bid to 8.7%? Holy shit.
Wait until it gets to 20% like Greece etc
Joe King
21st July 2011, 05:06 PM
Oh happy day!
Horn
21st July 2011, 05:35 PM
Some former Treasury Secretary said on Fox News today that they would FIRST pay the bond obligations next month then prioritize Social Security and all other payments after.
They need the entire planet to falter at once to engineer their solution.
Here in Costa Rica, all the Social Security money mysteriously vanished overnight.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 07:18 PM
Holy shit! Is that the 5 yr bond being bid to 8.7%? Holy shit.Exactly whose Bonds do these yields represent? Just wondering.
po boy
21st July 2011, 07:31 PM
Ummm, because little peoples end of the stick says they gots to?...and they accepted the agreement?
If you read it, {SSA} I'd imagine the iron-clad-guarentee to pay into it, is in there.
Besides, they haven't said they're not going to pay at all, just that they won't be paid first.
I believe it's out lined in USC title 42 sections 301 -335.
Sparky
21st July 2011, 08:07 PM
That chart looks bogus. It has the 2-, 5-, and 10-year starting in negative territory.
Joe King
21st July 2011, 08:08 PM
It is bogus. That's why I asked whose Bonds is it?
A friend of mine is a Bonds guy. Asked him about it and he just laughed.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.