Ron Paul: what is a dollar? [Archive]

palani

31st July 2011, 08:12 AM

"Dollar" is a word. It's use causes the brain to visualize something round, heavy and made of gold or silver. But then that is a phantasm only, an image, not a part of reality, a fiction only.

po boy

31st July 2011, 08:25 AM

"Dollar" is a word. It's use causes the brain to visualize something round, heavy and made of gold or silver. But then that is a phantasm only, an image, not a part of reality, a fiction only.

Is that what you told the waitress when she came with the bill for your breakfast. Perhaps you gave her due process and countered her offer billed her 10million fictions for trying to drag you into her reality.

Joe King

31st July 2011, 08:46 AM

My dictionary says...

Main Entry: dol·lar http://www.wordcentral.com/images/audio.gif (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?dollar01.wav=dollar'))

Pronunciation: http://www.wordcentral.com/images/primarystress.gifdäl-http://www.wordcentral.com/images/schwa.gifr
Function: noun
Etymology: from Dutch daler "silver coin formerly used in Germany," from German Taler (same meaning), shortened from Joachimstaler "a coin made in Sankt Joachimsthal (Saint Joachim's Valley) in Bohemia (a former kingdom in Europe)"
1 : a coin (as a Spanish peso) similar to an earlier German silver coin
2 a : a basic unit of money (as of the U.S. and Canada) b : a coin or bill representing one dollar
3 : word in dictionary between "doll" and "dollhouse"

mick silver

31st July 2011, 09:58 AM

just paper ..........................................

palani

31st July 2011, 11:13 AM

Is that what you told the waitress when she came with the bill for your breakfast. Perhaps you gave her due process and countered her offer billed her 10million fictions for trying to drag you into her reality. A corporation bought the breakfast from another corporation. I had no part in the transaction.

JohnQPublic

31st July 2011, 11:29 AM

A corporation bought the breakfast from another corporation. I had no part in the transaction.

But you were a consumer [of said breakfast].

po boy

31st July 2011, 11:30 AM

A corporation bought the breakfast from another corporation. I had no part in the transaction.

Where is the annual report, proof of liability insurance business license and who are the agents president/director. Surely not you as you have said that you are responsible thus you have no insurance and responsible people don't hide behind corporations.

palani

31st July 2011, 11:45 AM

But you were a consumer [of said breakfast].

Would consumption be considered a use or a usufruct?

USE, civil law. A right of receiving so much of the natural profits of a thing as is necessary to daily sustenance; it differs from usufruct, which is a right not only to use but to enjoy.

I admit to the use but not the enjoyment.

palani

31st July 2011, 11:46 AM

Where is the annual report, proof of liability insurance business license and who are the agents president/director. Surely not you as you have said that you are responsible thus you have no insurance and responsible people don't hide behind corporations.

Responsible people can still engage in contracts.

po boy

31st July 2011, 12:23 PM

What corporation bought the food you ate?

palani

31st July 2011, 12:57 PM

What corporation bought the food you ate?

I expect there were several layers involved but ultimately it comes down to the Federal Reserve doesn't it? Especially when considering that the currency establishes the lawform.

po boy

31st July 2011, 02:59 PM

I expect there were several layers involved but ultimately it comes down to the Federal Reserve doesn't it? Especially when considering that the currency establishes the lawform.

Again what 2 corporations were involved, since you had no part in the purchase?

What law form is the FRN under?

Joe King

31st July 2011, 03:24 PM

I admit to the use but not the enjoyment.

Since you admit having used it, how did you aquire it from the corporation that ordered it?

palani

31st July 2011, 03:35 PM

Again what 2 corporations were involved, since you had no part in the purchase? Rhythm City and Federal Reserve.

What law form is the FRN under? Law merchant.

palani

31st July 2011, 03:38 PM

Since you admit having used it, how did you aquire it from the corporation that ordered it?

Contract.

po boy

31st July 2011, 04:02 PM

Rhythm City and Federal Reserve.

Law merchant.

The Fed is a corporation? Okay and in their charter you Palani are listed as an agent for them, allowed to make purchases on their behalf.

Law merchant? Sure that law form isn't not the civil law.

Joe King

31st July 2011, 04:24 PM

Contract.

Do you control both parties to the contract?

palani

31st July 2011, 05:17 PM

The Fed is a corporation? Okay and in their charter you Palani are listed as an agent for them, allowed to make purchases on their behalf.
That is the sum and substance of 12 USC 411 ... unless you can come up with a definition of "FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE".

Law merchant? Sure that law form isn't not the civil law. London was never ceded to William the Conqueror. He thought it expedient to negotiate with them rather than sustain a costly seige. The merchants of London got what they wanted, their own lawform. It is called the law merchant. You might know it better as the UCC in its' latest rendition.

palani

31st July 2011, 05:24 PM

Do you control both parties to the contract? I prefer arms length agreements.

Joe King

31st July 2011, 05:29 PM

You're more slippery than a greased watermelon. lol

palani

31st July 2011, 05:32 PM

You're more slippery than a greased watermelon. lol

Did your question get answered or not?

Joe King

31st July 2011, 05:34 PM

Were one of the arms at length, yours?

palani

31st July 2011, 05:42 PM

Were one of the arms at length, yours? I was a principal.

http://adask.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/alfred-adask-aka-alfred-n-adask-acting-at-arms-length/

po boy

31st July 2011, 07:15 PM

That is the sum and substance of 12 USC 411 ... unless you can come up with a definition of "FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE".

London was never ceded to William the Conqueror. He thought it expedient to negotiate with them rather than sustain a costly seige. The merchants of London got what they wanted, their own lawform. It is called the law merchant. You might know it better as the UCC in its' latest rendition.

So what part off title 12 sec.411 says palani is an agent of the fed?

ximmy

31st July 2011, 07:28 PM

Contract.

Contract hat justifies use...
http://mydisguises.com/wp-content/gallery/watermelon-helmets/watermelon-helmet32.jpg

palani

1st August 2011, 05:06 AM

So what part off title 12 sec.411 says palani is an agent of the fed? palani an agent of the fed? I don't believe so. Possibly an agent of an agent of an agent ;i.e., several layers removed. See if you can figure out how one might become an agent according to congress in the process of transferring these FRNs between federal reserve banks:

1. Issuance of Federal Reserve Notes; Nature of Obligation; Where Redeemable
Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are hereby authorized.

palani

1st August 2011, 05:13 AM

Contract hat justifies use...

Seems only the feds want the power to impair the obligation of contracts. After all, that is where the bankruptcy laws are located rather than the state level. Personally I prefer not to engage in any contract with irresponsible persons.

=u.s. constitution] Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter...pass any... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts