PDA

View Full Version : Roseanne to run for U.S. president--WTF?? lol



freespirit
6th August 2011, 06:18 PM
http://tvguide.ca/TVNews/Articles/110805_roseanne_run_president_MH.htm

Roseanne Barr’s off-key national anthem incident in 1990? I’d like to think that’s simply a precursor to this. The 58-year-old comedian announced that she’s running for president of the United States during a taping of Thursday’s The Tonight Show.

It’s not a joke. "I am running for president of the United States," she said as the audience cheered and host Jay Leno grinned. “I’m totally serious. ‘Cause I want to be part of the debates, because I want to represent the tax payer. In fact, I’m choosing the tax payers as my vice-president.”

What kind of platform would she run on? There may be clues in the lead-up to her announcement. According to Huffington Post, she endorsed medicinal marijuana and said macadamia nuts’ nutrition value would cure global warming and world hunger.

She also stated that she grows all her own food, stores water and uses solar power in her home, and claimed that legalizing marijuana would end drug wars.

As for which party she’d run for, she pooh-poohed both the Democrats (which she supported in the last election) and Republicans. "I'm not for either party because they both suck and they're both a bunch of criminals," she said. "So I made up my own party. It's the Green Tea Party."

...more at link...

willie pete
6th August 2011, 07:00 PM
now why in the hell would that......want to run for elected office?

http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/1255/roseanne1.jpg

Buddha
6th August 2011, 07:05 PM
now why in the hell would that......want to run for elected office?

http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/1255/roseanne1.jpg

That doesn't look like a malignant cunt to me. ;D

In all seriousness this shows that the presidency is a popularity contest akin to american idol, and not to be taken seriously.

solid
6th August 2011, 07:16 PM
In all seriousness this shows that the presidency is a popularity contest akin to american idol, and not to be taken seriously.

Bingo. Whatever puppet we stuff into the white house, it really doesn't matter. Might as well make it a reality show for the masses. Any hope for a guy like Ron Paul who may at least try...

It still doesn't matter. Getting Curious George out as soon as possible should at least be a start.

keehah
6th August 2011, 08:04 PM
Do you want to listen to your fellow man first before you crucify him you GSUS divideababies?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSZYGyOK_yY

Ponce
6th August 2011, 08:27 PM
Could she be any worse than Bush Jr?............I don't think so..........and Palin? may God help us all.

horseshoe3
6th August 2011, 08:27 PM
If I didn't know who it was, I might be interested in a candidate who grows her own food, stores water and want's to end the war on drugs. But something tells me she's not sincere.

freespirit
6th August 2011, 08:54 PM
If I didn't know who it was, I might be interested in a candidate who grows her own food, stores water and want's to end the war on drugs. But something tells me she's not sincere.

that's the part that raised my eyebrows...and her sincerity is indeed highly suspect.

midnight rambler
6th August 2011, 09:01 PM
Say what you want, but really - how many people do you know who grow their own food, stores water, wants to end the war on drugs, and uses solar power in their home?? Seriously...

freespirit
6th August 2011, 10:19 PM
i just got the impression that she was trying to get on the band wagon so to speak...mentioning these things because they are gaining popularity in the mainstream, as if it was trendy to be a "prepper" of sorts

Buddha
6th August 2011, 10:19 PM
Didn't Obama want to end us military intervention? Lies are manifest.

midnight rambler
6th August 2011, 10:23 PM
mentioning these things because they are gaining popularity in the mainstreamGrowing your own food, storing water, powering your home with solar energy, ending the war on drugs, etc. are gaining popularity in the 'mainstream'?!?!? WTH did you get this impression??

BrewTech
6th August 2011, 10:35 PM
Who cares?

keehah
6th August 2011, 11:07 PM
Roseanne Barr Presidential campaign announcement part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFsGruDpM3E

Roseanne's a general GIMer. The less Christian, more Progessive type mind you.

Check out her comments on truth starting at 3:00 for a highlight:
Roseanne Barr speaks at mind control event in Los Angeles 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVGXDmP59yQ

keehah
7th August 2011, 12:00 AM
http://www.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_16879585

Roseanne was working in Denver as a cocktail waitress at Bennigan's. And she was thin, she writes, so she made big tips and didn't give anybody change once they got drunk...

Roseanne went on to work at the Woman to Woman Book Center on East Colfax. ...She got funny and angry at the same time and helped start Denver's feminist newspaper Big Mama Rag.

1981 EO CPE Text
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1072811

D. IMPLICATIONS OF THE DECISION IN BIG MAMA RAG, INC.

Under IRC 7428, BMR sought a declaratory judgment from the United
States District Court (District of Columbia) that it qualified for IRC 501(c)(3)
exempt status and IRC 170(c)(2) deductibility of contributions. 79-1 USTC
Paragraph 9362. The facts in the case (as set out earlier in this paper) were agreed and stipulated, and both BMR and the government moved for summary judgment on the merits.

The District Court addressed the commerciality issue first. It cited the
nonprofit, volunteer structure of the newspaper and the fact that it distributed most of its papers free. The court was persuaded that the Big Mama Rag did operate in a manner distinguishable from commercial newspapers, and it found in favor of
BMR on the commerciality issue.

_______________

*
Here, BMR raised the crucial issue that reached the U.S. Court of Appeals.
BMR argued that the educational regulations under IRC 501(c)(3) should not be
harsher than the charitable regulations. BMR asserted that, if the educational
regulations could be used by the Service to impose a higher standard on
organizations presenting their views to the public, the educational regulations
unconstitutionally penalized such organizations by withholding IRC 501(c)(3)
exemption because of their views. BMR argued that this violated the First
Amendment right to free speech.

The court then addressed the main issue, i.e., whether BMR and its
newspaper are "educational". The issue turned on the "full and fair" exposition
standard of Reg. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3)(i)(b). The government argued that BMR could not meet the "full and fair" standard because its editorial policy amounts to censorship. The policy was presented in many issues of the newspaper, but was quoted by the court (79-1 USTC Paragraph 9362) from a September 1976 issue:

We retain the right to censor all copy (including
advertisements) submitted to the paper. As feminists in
the process of developing a political analysis, we must
adopt certain values and reject others. By "censorship"
we mean that we will not print any material which, by
our judgment, does not affirm our struggle. We will not
act to prevent the dissemination of such material via
means other than Big Mama Rag.

The government further contended that, in addition to the policy of censorship,
BMR publishes many articles which present unsupported opinion, innuendo, and
use inflammatory and disparaging language. The government categorized many articles as blatant attacks on persons, organizations, and institutions that did not agree with BMR.*

Roseanne Barr-Media Reform Debate Brava Theatre San Francisc (2008)
"There is no Liberty Without Truth"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0Ima2h9A6M

mightymanx
7th August 2011, 12:28 AM
Do you want to listen to your fellow man first before you crucify him you GSUS divideababies?


Umm....No

It is not the new norm here.

Just tow the party line, and don't make any waves will you.

osoab
7th August 2011, 03:51 AM
Didn't Obama want to end us military intervention? Lies are manifest.


You can't really use Obummer as an example. His whole life is a lie. Him lieing is status quo.

osoab
7th August 2011, 03:53 AM
Do you want to listen to your fellow man first before you crucify him you GSUS divideababies?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSZYGyOK_yY


Is she joking about being PM o Izzy? @ the 2:52 mark? "It's a twofer"

freespirit
7th August 2011, 06:25 AM
Say what you want, but really - how many people do you know who grow their own food, stores water, wants to end the war on drugs, and uses solar power in their home?? Seriously...

actually, i know many, many people who do just that.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 06:42 AM
Growing your own food, storing water, powering your home with solar energy, ending the war on drugs, etc. are gaining popularity in the 'mainstream'?!?!? WTH did you get this impression??

that may not have been the best turn of phrase to use, but there is no denying that more people are doing these things, i simply thought that she was using that to try and gain some popularity or support.

and for what its worth, you can drop the argumentative tone any time...i don't know what your problem is with me, but you post like a pretentious asshole more often than not (in my threads, anyways). if you have a valid point to make, make it. if you are just tryin to pick a fight, then piss off, i have no time for you...

midnight rambler
7th August 2011, 06:49 AM
that may not have been the best turn of phrase to use, but there is no denying that more people are doing these things, i simply thought that she was using that to try and gain some popularity or support.

and for what its worth, you can drop the argumentative tone any time...i don't know what your problem is with me, but you post like a pretentious asshole more often than not (in my threads, anyways). if you have a valid point to make, make it. if you are just tryin to pick a fight, then piss off, i have no time for you...

You're the one who asserted that growing one's own food, storing water, wanting to end the war on drugs, using solar power, etc. was now 'mainstream' and something gaining in popularity, at least to the extent that Rosanne Barr is capitalizing on all of it.

While you may personally know "many, many people" doing that, doing so is the exception, NOT the rule. If only all those concepts were "gaining in popularity".

And although I don't at all care for that feminazi sow I'm glad to see that she's giving these unconventional and rarely used memes some exposure.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 07:01 AM
If only all those concepts were "gaining in popularity".

And although I don't at all care for that feminazi sow I'm glad to see that she's giving these unconventional and rarely used memes some exposure.

there is no denying that there are more people doing these things than there were in the past...that indicates a gain in popularity.

and i said these things were "gaining popularity in the mainstream", not that these things were mainstream...

don't twist my words.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 07:11 AM
While you may personally know "many, many people" doing that, doing so is the exception, NOT the rule. If only all those concepts were "gaining in popularity".



they are...all you have to do to see it is pull your head out of your ass and look around...huge increase in survival blogs, preppers sites, heritage seeds, etc., solar power systems are selling more than ever...what does it take for you to recognize that as an increase in popularity?

Dogman
7th August 2011, 07:19 AM
Why not? Just another clown, to add to the big top we call Washington.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 08:55 AM
Do you want to listen to your fellow man first before you crucify him you GSUS divideababies?



i'll admit she makes some interesting points, and i chuckled @ the "outlawing bullshit" part. but, regardless of her intended context, the phrase "re-education camps" sent a shiver down my spine...lol

keehah
7th August 2011, 09:16 AM
Is she joking about being PM o Izzy? @ the 2:52 mark? "It's a twofer"

No sense being president of the US if your still being controlled by Israel. ;)

midnight rambler
7th August 2011, 11:54 AM
there is no denying that there are more people doing these things than there were in the past...that indicates a gain in popularity.

and i said these things were "gaining popularity in the mainstream", not that these things were mainstream...

don't twist my words.

I don't care HOW you spin it, these concepts regarding self-sufficiency are *NOT* "gaining popularity in the mainstream"...not even close. These concepts of self-sufficiency are strictly 'fringe' at the present, and will likely remain that way until the calamity goes to full blown and impossible to ignore any longer. IF these concepts of self-sufficiency WERE gaining ground, then you'd see a building to critical mass, if not outright critical mass, e.g. EVERYONE planting gardens, building greenhouses, getting into aquaponics, etc. As one real life example, the leader of our aquaponics meetup group has tried to get people on his suburban block interested in aquaponics and NOT A SINGLE ONE has taken up his offer to help them get their set-up established. Hell's Belles, barely a HANDFUL of our aquaponics meetup group of roughly 250 people has an up and running aquaponics set-up (everyone has an excuse of some sort). The growth of fringe websites does NOT equal 'mainstream popularity', only that the 'fringe' is growing. Those with the monopoly on management perception (of the 'mainstream') will keep up the illusion for as long as they possibly can. 'Gaining popularity' yes, 'in the mainstream', definitely not.

midnight rambler
7th August 2011, 12:04 PM
they are...all you have to do to see it is pull your head out of your ass and look around...huge increase in survival blogs, preppers sites, heritage seeds, etc., solar power systems are selling more than ever...what does it take for you to recognize that as an increase in popularity?

You have no idea how a little increase in volume would totally wipe out the limited amount of 'preppers' goods' and heirloom seeds available. You must not have been paying attention in '98 and '99 during the ramp-up to Y2K. lol Walden Feed was doing fulfillment for the 'preppers' sites' and by late '99 Walden Feed had an 18 month backlog. Was Y2K 'mainstream'?? Not even close.

Dogman
7th August 2011, 12:10 PM
You have no idea how a little increase in volume would totally wipe out the limited amount of 'preppers' goods' and heirloom seeds available. You must not have been paying attention in '98 and '99 during the ramp-up to Y2K. lol Walden Feed was doing fulfillment for the 'preppers' sites' and by late '99 Walden Feed had an 18 month backlog. Was Y2K 'mainstream'?? Not even close.


Truth +++

If only 1 % of the ones that are not prepping now , started to do so now. All of the suppliers now would be immediately backlogged. My figure of 1% is pulled out of the air, but I will hold that it is close to being right.

The markets for supply's would dry up more than a creek in west Texas in a nanosecond and the already high prices would shoot past Pluto.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 12:32 PM
The growth of fringe websites does NOT equal 'mainstream popularity', only that the 'fringe' is growing. Those with the monopoly on management perception (of the 'mainstream') will keep up the illusion for as long as they possibly can. 'Gaining popularity' yes, 'in the mainstream', definitely not.

i never said that fringe site growth equalled anything, it is merely an indicator...amongst others.
as to the fringe numbers growing, where do you think the new members of the fringe are coming from? they are coming from the mainstream. they aren't just appearing out of thin air...imo.

midnight rambler
7th August 2011, 12:40 PM
i never said that fringe site growth equalled anything, it is merely an indicator...amongst others.
as to the fringe numbers growing, where do you think the new members of the fringe are coming from? they are coming from the mainstream. they aren't just appearing out of thin air...imo.

No, I assert these 'new members' are NOT 'mainstream' at all, rather they are 'shadow fringe' who have become more motivated, at least enough to support a few 'survivalist' type websites.

Historically, the slightest little 'boo' makes the suppliers of storage foods go into a backlog status of MONTHS. There is just not enough capacity for the storage food companies to provide storage food when the masses even begin to give indications of waking from their slumber, let alone dealing with any sort of sizable increase in demand. The storage food companies are already operating at capacity. The best indicator I can offer is to contact a MH or AA distributor and inquire as to what their delivery backlog is - THAT is a reliable indicator.

freespirit
7th August 2011, 02:09 PM
i would agree that the delivery backlog would also be a good indicator, but i'm not entirely convinced on the 'shadow fringe' idea...not to say that you are wrong, just that i don't feel the shadow fringe as you call it allots for the increase in numbers exclusively....

Joe King
7th August 2011, 02:35 PM
The storage food companies are already operating at capacity.

Have they always been so?

Have they increased capacity over the years?

If so, there's obviously more people using their services today than there were a few years ago.
Also, not everyone who "preps" get their stuff at the survivalists stores/storage food companies.
Some people just stock-up on all the normal stuff they usually buy at the grocery store.

Serpo
7th August 2011, 03:38 PM
What kind of platform would she run on?............a reinforced one....hahaha

freespirit
7th August 2011, 03:48 PM
... not everyone who "preps" get their stuff at the survivalists stores/storage food companies.
Some people just stock-up on all the normal stuff they usually buy at the grocery store.

my father for example has enough food stores to last him almost a year...and he's been rotating his way through his supplies for the last 30 years. when he sees items come on sale, or case lots, he stocks up. and he grows his own veggies too.


ETA...oh i forgot, he also collects his rainwater too, as well as composts...he's been doing this since before i was born.

Tumbleweed
7th August 2011, 07:48 PM
One thing we don't need is anymore Jews running this country.

This is from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr

The granddaughter of European and Russian immigrants, Barr was the oldest of four children in a working-class Jewish Salt Lake City (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Lake_City) family who were also active in the LDS Church (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDS_Church)

keehah
7th August 2011, 11:20 PM
If she is a Jew, then I'm a Catholic. (I'm not a Catholic, but I still have some scars)

I recall her saying basically what I write in one of those clips. The Abrahamics are the wrong kind of mind control. They get used to benefit others at the expense of things like the spirit of truth.

osoab
8th August 2011, 03:20 AM
If she is a Jew, then I'm a Catholic. (I'm not a Catholic, but I still have some scars)

I recall her saying basically what I write in one of those clips. The Abrahamics are the wrong kind of mind control. They get used to benefit others at the expense of things like the spirit of truth.



At 16, Barr was hit by a car that left her with a traumatic brain injury.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr#cite_note-jjournal-3) Her behavior changed so radically that she was institutionalized for eight months at Utah State Hospital (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_State_Hospital).[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr#cite_note-PhiladelphiaDailyNews-5) In 1970 at age 18, Barr left home by telling her parents she was going to visit a friend in Colorado for two weeks, but never returned.[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr#cite_note-PhiladelphiaDailyNews-5)

From the wiki link above. I don't think we need anymore head cases in D.C.

mick silver
8th August 2011, 05:42 AM
mick silver for U.S. president . would everyone please sent me a silver round that would help get me into the office . once there i will find jobs for all here . we can loot and steal

Awoke
8th August 2011, 06:10 AM
If she is a Jew, then I'm a Catholic. (I'm not a Catholic, but I still have some scars)


She was married to Tom Arnold.
I saw him do a standup comedy routine and all he did was trumpet Israel, jews and zionism. That wouldn't be a bad thing, if today's "zionism" wasn't actually babylonian satanism in disguise.

BTW, grows her own food? There isn't a piece of private property big enough...

DMac
8th August 2011, 07:15 AM
She was married to Tom Arnold.
I saw him do a standup comedy routine and all he did was trumpet Israel, jews and zionism. That wouldn't be a bad thing, if today's "zionism" wasn't actually babylonian satanism in disguise.

BTW, grows her own food? There isn't a piece of private property big enough...

A quick search shows they divorced about 15 years ago. IIRC, she was the one that was heavy in cash at the time, not Arnold.



"Israel is a NAZI state,"


She has been portrayed as crazy by the MSM for many years. What she says is highly in line with the membership of this forum.

Dogman
8th August 2011, 07:22 AM
A quick search shows they divorced about 15 years ago. IIRC, she was the one that was heavy in cash at the time, not Arnold.



She has been portrayed as crazy by the MSM for many years. What she says is highly in line with the membership of this forum.


Truth!

587

sirgonzo420
8th August 2011, 09:20 AM
http://www.poppowwow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tom-arnold-roseanne-tattoo.jpg

sirgonzo420
8th August 2011, 09:25 AM
Here's the other side for shits and giggles! ;D

http://www.dirt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Tom-Arnold.jpg?1312820351944