PDA

View Full Version : Judge rules inmate has no right to matzoh



freespirit
14th August 2011, 09:50 AM
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge has ruled that a Jewish inmate in a New York jail does not have a constitutionally protected right to matzoh and grape juice.

Christopher Henry, who was charged with first-degree sodomy, claimed permanent trauma and malnourishment and requested nearly $10 billion in damages for what he called a violation of his First Amendment right to religious freedom.

Henry didn't request matzoh for Passover, the Jewish holiday during which it is traditionally eaten. Instead, Henry claimed he had a right to have the unleavened bread served daily and grape juice every Friday.

But on August 2, U.S. Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin held that the Rikers Island jail could deny Henry his request in the interests of maintaining order and keeping costs reasonable.

"Providing individualized meals to a single inmate might well foster an impression of favoritism, which could lead to jealousy and resentment among the inmate population, which in turn could cause tension and threaten prison security," she wrote.

"Similarly, providing individualized meals to one or several inmates would involve a substantial increase in administrative costs."

Scheindlin noted that Henry already receives Kosher meals and is allowed to meet with a rabbi.

Henry, who represented himself, has filed a number of lawsuits against the department of corrections, including claims based on the permitted length of phone calls and lack of conjugal visits.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Noeleen Walder)

Corrects second paragraph to say Henry was charged, not convicted.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
14th August 2011, 10:36 AM
I was aware that sodomy was listed as illegal in some states, but not that you could be put in jail for just sodomy. Am I to assume it was non-consensual? That would make much more sense.


It's hard to believe he is claiming "$10 Billion worth of damages" resulting in not being able to eat Matzoh everyday.

nunaem
14th August 2011, 11:55 AM
First degree sodomy? He must have done something really heinous, like ass to mouth.

Santa
14th August 2011, 02:00 PM
"Providing individualized meals to a single inmate might well foster an impression of favoritism, which could lead to jealousy and resentment among the inmate population, which in turn could cause tension and threaten prison security," she wrote.

"Similarly, providing individualized meals to one or several inmates would involve a substantial increase in administrative costs."

Scheindlin noted that Henry already receives Kosher meals and is allowed to meet with a rabbi.WTF? The State is already buying kosher food for special Jewish inmates at added expense? Isn't that what the judge was quoted as saying?

Maybe all the Gentiles should file a $100 billion class action lawsuit for prejudicial behavior. Lol