steyr_m
19th August 2011, 08:15 AM
I know there's tonnes of articles/posts about preps for ammo, food, etc. What about being terminally ill during SHTF? I do not have a history of cancer in my family; but I won't rule it out.
I've read about B17, high dose Vitamin C, removing all sugar from the diet, and now Calcium I found this here [http://www.henrymakow.com/my_cancer_cure_by_al.html]. What do you think is the best? Or a multi-pronged approach [using all that I mentioned]. Would someone prefer the conventional approach if available, like surgery, chemo?
Prepare a Cancer Survival Plan Now
August 17, 2011
42% of British Will Get cancer
Don't wait until you are diagnosed to take action!
by Andrew Lanyard
(henrymakow.com)
Reading the article by Geraldine Philips on the self-serving cancer industry made me think of my Uncle Frank and Aunt Eunice.
When I was a kid, my uncle and aunt were outspoken defenders of Dr. Andrew Ivy, a respected medical researcher who claimed that a substance named Krebiozen had cured many cancer cases.
Dr. Ivy's claim created a firestorm of controversy, and he was soon stripped of his membership in leading medical organizations. (He had been a director of the American Cancer Society.)
Despite the fact that it did not conduct proper medical trials on Krebiozen, the AMA declared it to be worthless, and suggested that Dr. Ivy was senile. In short, despite the high standing he had enjoyed, he was professionally destroyed.
I don't know whether Krebiozen had merit or not. The main reason I remember this is that about 15 years later my uncle developed cancer. By this time I was aware of many alternative treatments. For example, the protocol developed by Dr. Max Gerson (which is primarily a dietary and detoxification program) and a protocol using laetrile or vitamin B17.
My uncle's condition was grave (stage 4 cancer, meaning that it had "spread" to a number of areas of his body.) Though he had been a supporter of Dr. Ivy, to my surprise, he submitted meekly to intense radiological treatment.
I remember my aunt describing how he would be strapped into a chair and then lowered mechanically into the center of a huge machine which would bombard his body with radiation from all sides. This was "state of the art" treatment at the time.
It was a protracted, debilitating, and costly ordeal -- and in the end, futile. He died as a passive victim, both of cancer and of the cancer establishment.
Most cancer patients actually die from the cancer treatment rather than the cancer itself.
BE PREPARED
My uncle's convictions were not enough. When the crisis struck, he did not have an alternative plan of action, or was unable to defy the pressures that doctors will apply. Doctors possess great authority and they will proceed on the basis that you are going to do as they say.
If you balk, they will tell you that you must act immediately, that any delay may be fatal. They will let you know that you're ignorant, that you're a fool.
If they can, they'll get your spouse or family to pressure you. Many doctors will say you will be on your own, cut off from organized medicine.
Not all doctors are like this, but this is what you should be prepared for.
It's not enough to know about alternatives. These days many people have heard of treatments for cancer other than orthodox medicine's famous trio of cut, poison, and burn.
They may have read about Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, who has built upon the pioneering work of Dr. William Kelley who treated cancer with pancreatic enzymes, or about Drs. Stanislaw and Gregory Burzynski, who use antineoplastons (peptides that act as genetic switches) to treat cancer on a genetic level.
They may have heard about Essiac tea. They may be familiar with programs similar to Dr. Gerson's, such as the "Incurables" program of Dr. Richard Schulze. In a sense, they may have heard and read too much. The result may be confusion and indecision.
There are dozens of programs. Some are good (some are not.) But even a good program will not be appropriate for everyone, and no program has a 100 percent success rate.
The key is to do your homework ahead of time. Find one or more that seems to fit you. Some people will want a medically oriented program or one that works in tandem with orthodox medicine; others will want a naturopathic approach.
Learn what each program involves in terms of treatment, cost, accessibility, and personal responsibility. All alternative treatments require that the patient take a good deal of responsibility, something that many people do not want (or are not able) to do.
Dr. Schulze says there are no incurable diseases, only incurable patients, which is a variation on what his teacher, Dr. Bernard Jensen, inscribed above the door of his clinic: "The world is looking for great doctors; I'm looking for great patients."
So assess your own capabilities and temperament realistically. And assess your family situation realistically; know what kind of support (or opposition) you can expect.
And since you will have to deal with the organized medical profession -- at least initially -- learn what you need to do to navigate this environment. A good book for this is Survive Your Cancer: The Essential Who, What, When, Why & How Guide for Cancer Patients and Their Families by Barbara Brandon. You can get a copy for less than $5 (including shipping) on www.abebooks.com.
A PERSONAL EXAMPLE
All this came home to me last year, when my sister called and told me that she had breast cancer.
She was told that it was stage 3 and needed to be operated on right away. She needed to have a mastectomy asap.
My sister is intelligent and able to make decisions, but she is also married to a highly successful medical doctor, whose view of medical treatment is down-the-line orthodox. He sincerely believes orthodox medical dogma and is a forceful personality
In addition, my sister lives in the South, a thousand miles from me. In fact, she has no family at all in the state where she lives.
In such a situation, it was not really possible to make a complete break with medical protocol. Fortunately, I knew of an excellent resource which I would recommend to anyone, whatever their situation. That resource is Ralph Moss, Ph.D., and his Web site, www.cancerdecisions.com.
Dr. Moss is an expert in the field of complementary medicine. He is knowledgeable about both orthodox and alternative modalities, and assists people in learning about their specific kind of cancer and their treatment choices. He makes it possible for a person to combine both approaches in a complementary way.
This worked out well in my sister's case, and I believe it would work well for anyone, including those who would prefer to follow an alternative approach exclusively. With Dr. Moss, you can get a wealth of information giving you the "big picture" regarding your kind of cancer, the options available, and what works and what doesn't.
CONCLUSION
The article by Geraldine Philips on the cancer industry was a good look at the medical/pharmaceutical complex, and how it perpetuates sickness even as it pretends to combat it. Behind its facade of caring for the patient, at bottom, it is self-serving.
A well-known neurosurgeon, Dr. Jack Kruse, has said, "The system wants to keep you sick because everyone makes money from your being sick."
But this kind of self-serving is true of most institutions and organizations. And most people who work in these institutions have convinced themselves that they are doing the right thing. Like my brother-in-law, they are sincere. It's hard to change someone's mind when their living depends on accepting the system as it is.
But there is an even more serious and sinister reality than simple venality and hypocrisy. Those who organized the modern medical profession in the past century (notably the Rockefellers) did so not primarily to make money (though they have made a great deal of money from the pharmaceutical industry.)
For the Rockefellers (and their fellow Illuminati) the real motive is not money but control. One of the surest ways to control a population is to control the institutions that determine life and death. And another sure way is to make the population sickly and to keep it so.
The health of the American people has degenerated alarmingly over the past several generations, thanks largely to corporate agribusiness and mass food processing, as well as "public health" programs such as vaccination and fluoridation.
A few years ago, after not having watched television for many years, I started watching again and was astonished at the prevalence of drug advertising. It's as if Americans have been turned into a nation of cripples and invalids.
In this light, the cancer industry is just one more prominent example of the Illuminati's subversion of Americans' independence. Every individual needs to take control of his own life and health.
In preparing to act independently in case of sickness, one is not only increasing one's chances for health and survival, one is stepping outside of Illuminati control and striking a small but real blow for freedom.
http://www.henrymakow.com/surviving_cancer_surviving_ill.html
I've read about B17, high dose Vitamin C, removing all sugar from the diet, and now Calcium I found this here [http://www.henrymakow.com/my_cancer_cure_by_al.html]. What do you think is the best? Or a multi-pronged approach [using all that I mentioned]. Would someone prefer the conventional approach if available, like surgery, chemo?
Prepare a Cancer Survival Plan Now
August 17, 2011
42% of British Will Get cancer
Don't wait until you are diagnosed to take action!
by Andrew Lanyard
(henrymakow.com)
Reading the article by Geraldine Philips on the self-serving cancer industry made me think of my Uncle Frank and Aunt Eunice.
When I was a kid, my uncle and aunt were outspoken defenders of Dr. Andrew Ivy, a respected medical researcher who claimed that a substance named Krebiozen had cured many cancer cases.
Dr. Ivy's claim created a firestorm of controversy, and he was soon stripped of his membership in leading medical organizations. (He had been a director of the American Cancer Society.)
Despite the fact that it did not conduct proper medical trials on Krebiozen, the AMA declared it to be worthless, and suggested that Dr. Ivy was senile. In short, despite the high standing he had enjoyed, he was professionally destroyed.
I don't know whether Krebiozen had merit or not. The main reason I remember this is that about 15 years later my uncle developed cancer. By this time I was aware of many alternative treatments. For example, the protocol developed by Dr. Max Gerson (which is primarily a dietary and detoxification program) and a protocol using laetrile or vitamin B17.
My uncle's condition was grave (stage 4 cancer, meaning that it had "spread" to a number of areas of his body.) Though he had been a supporter of Dr. Ivy, to my surprise, he submitted meekly to intense radiological treatment.
I remember my aunt describing how he would be strapped into a chair and then lowered mechanically into the center of a huge machine which would bombard his body with radiation from all sides. This was "state of the art" treatment at the time.
It was a protracted, debilitating, and costly ordeal -- and in the end, futile. He died as a passive victim, both of cancer and of the cancer establishment.
Most cancer patients actually die from the cancer treatment rather than the cancer itself.
BE PREPARED
My uncle's convictions were not enough. When the crisis struck, he did not have an alternative plan of action, or was unable to defy the pressures that doctors will apply. Doctors possess great authority and they will proceed on the basis that you are going to do as they say.
If you balk, they will tell you that you must act immediately, that any delay may be fatal. They will let you know that you're ignorant, that you're a fool.
If they can, they'll get your spouse or family to pressure you. Many doctors will say you will be on your own, cut off from organized medicine.
Not all doctors are like this, but this is what you should be prepared for.
It's not enough to know about alternatives. These days many people have heard of treatments for cancer other than orthodox medicine's famous trio of cut, poison, and burn.
They may have read about Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, who has built upon the pioneering work of Dr. William Kelley who treated cancer with pancreatic enzymes, or about Drs. Stanislaw and Gregory Burzynski, who use antineoplastons (peptides that act as genetic switches) to treat cancer on a genetic level.
They may have heard about Essiac tea. They may be familiar with programs similar to Dr. Gerson's, such as the "Incurables" program of Dr. Richard Schulze. In a sense, they may have heard and read too much. The result may be confusion and indecision.
There are dozens of programs. Some are good (some are not.) But even a good program will not be appropriate for everyone, and no program has a 100 percent success rate.
The key is to do your homework ahead of time. Find one or more that seems to fit you. Some people will want a medically oriented program or one that works in tandem with orthodox medicine; others will want a naturopathic approach.
Learn what each program involves in terms of treatment, cost, accessibility, and personal responsibility. All alternative treatments require that the patient take a good deal of responsibility, something that many people do not want (or are not able) to do.
Dr. Schulze says there are no incurable diseases, only incurable patients, which is a variation on what his teacher, Dr. Bernard Jensen, inscribed above the door of his clinic: "The world is looking for great doctors; I'm looking for great patients."
So assess your own capabilities and temperament realistically. And assess your family situation realistically; know what kind of support (or opposition) you can expect.
And since you will have to deal with the organized medical profession -- at least initially -- learn what you need to do to navigate this environment. A good book for this is Survive Your Cancer: The Essential Who, What, When, Why & How Guide for Cancer Patients and Their Families by Barbara Brandon. You can get a copy for less than $5 (including shipping) on www.abebooks.com.
A PERSONAL EXAMPLE
All this came home to me last year, when my sister called and told me that she had breast cancer.
She was told that it was stage 3 and needed to be operated on right away. She needed to have a mastectomy asap.
My sister is intelligent and able to make decisions, but she is also married to a highly successful medical doctor, whose view of medical treatment is down-the-line orthodox. He sincerely believes orthodox medical dogma and is a forceful personality
In addition, my sister lives in the South, a thousand miles from me. In fact, she has no family at all in the state where she lives.
In such a situation, it was not really possible to make a complete break with medical protocol. Fortunately, I knew of an excellent resource which I would recommend to anyone, whatever their situation. That resource is Ralph Moss, Ph.D., and his Web site, www.cancerdecisions.com.
Dr. Moss is an expert in the field of complementary medicine. He is knowledgeable about both orthodox and alternative modalities, and assists people in learning about their specific kind of cancer and their treatment choices. He makes it possible for a person to combine both approaches in a complementary way.
This worked out well in my sister's case, and I believe it would work well for anyone, including those who would prefer to follow an alternative approach exclusively. With Dr. Moss, you can get a wealth of information giving you the "big picture" regarding your kind of cancer, the options available, and what works and what doesn't.
CONCLUSION
The article by Geraldine Philips on the cancer industry was a good look at the medical/pharmaceutical complex, and how it perpetuates sickness even as it pretends to combat it. Behind its facade of caring for the patient, at bottom, it is self-serving.
A well-known neurosurgeon, Dr. Jack Kruse, has said, "The system wants to keep you sick because everyone makes money from your being sick."
But this kind of self-serving is true of most institutions and organizations. And most people who work in these institutions have convinced themselves that they are doing the right thing. Like my brother-in-law, they are sincere. It's hard to change someone's mind when their living depends on accepting the system as it is.
But there is an even more serious and sinister reality than simple venality and hypocrisy. Those who organized the modern medical profession in the past century (notably the Rockefellers) did so not primarily to make money (though they have made a great deal of money from the pharmaceutical industry.)
For the Rockefellers (and their fellow Illuminati) the real motive is not money but control. One of the surest ways to control a population is to control the institutions that determine life and death. And another sure way is to make the population sickly and to keep it so.
The health of the American people has degenerated alarmingly over the past several generations, thanks largely to corporate agribusiness and mass food processing, as well as "public health" programs such as vaccination and fluoridation.
A few years ago, after not having watched television for many years, I started watching again and was astonished at the prevalence of drug advertising. It's as if Americans have been turned into a nation of cripples and invalids.
In this light, the cancer industry is just one more prominent example of the Illuminati's subversion of Americans' independence. Every individual needs to take control of his own life and health.
In preparing to act independently in case of sickness, one is not only increasing one's chances for health and survival, one is stepping outside of Illuminati control and striking a small but real blow for freedom.
http://www.henrymakow.com/surviving_cancer_surviving_ill.html