Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of Building 7

[DMac]

New video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nWRVqPYs-E

[VX1]

Damn, that was good! Congrats to Ed Asner. Hope he's on the list of good Jews. That's huge having him involved, as a former president of SAG.

[jaybone]

Mind-blowing video,
if you have a mind.

I will send this around to F&F like I have done for years, with poor results.
I liked the part where the gentleman said that he had to raise his consciousness before looking at this.
That really is the problem, the mind is repelled because the implication of truth is too ugly to comprehend.

I have been the nut job for almost a decade now, just like I was the nut job that bought all that gold back in 2006.

[Glass]

Excellent vid. I like Ed Asner. Seems like a real nice guy. Thanks for posting. This is one to share for sure.

[Large Sarge]

Ed has been antiwar for a long time....

Great Video!

[Hatha Sunahara]

I'm pretty sure the Architects and Engineers know a lot about building things, but I don't know how much they know about demolition. They seem to have an irrational exuberance about thermite as a demolition tool for steel buildings. But thermite has a limited amount of energy, and may be good for cutting steel beams, but not for melting them in huge quantities. That would require an extraordinary amount of energy, much more than would be contained in thermite.

What would contain a sufficient amount of energy to not only pulverize the steel and other materials in WTC 7, but to melt all the steel in the building would be a nuclear bomb. I do not disparage the Architects and engineers for wanting to not go there (to a nuclear bomb theory for 911) but they cannot rule out a nuclear demolition of all the WTC towers.

I didn't want to go there either--thinking that no one would be crazy enough to set off nuclear bombs in Manhattan, but I took a look at the videos of the Sedan Storax nuclear test, and it became obvious to me what brought down all three WTC towers. Once I accepted nuclear bombs as a likely demolition device, I found a very plausible explanation of the WTC nuclear demolition in the work of Dimitri Khalezov. I haven't found any better or more likely explanation than what Khalezov offers. He may not have everything correct, but I am sure he has at least 90% of it correct.

What keeps everyone from buying the nuclear demolition is their belief that nuclear explosions are all atmospheric--with a powerful blast and a shock wave that blows down everything in a large radius. Few people can switch gears and contemplate the effects of an underground nuclera blast on tall steel buildings.


Hatha

[Neuro]

I'm pretty sure the Architects and Engineers know a lot about building things, but I don't know how much they know about demolition. They seem to have an irrational exuberance about thermite as a demolition tool for steel buildings. But thermite has a limited amount of energy, and may be good for cutting steel beams, but not for melting them in huge quantities. That would require an extraordinary amount of energy, much more than would be contained in thermite.

What would contain a sufficient amount of energy to not only pulverize the steel and other materials in WTC 7, but to melt all the steel in the building would be a nuclear bomb. I do not disparage the Architects and engineers for wanting to not go there (to a nuclear bomb theory for 911) but they cannot rule out a nuclear demolition of all the WTC towers.

I didn't want to go there either--thinking that no one would be crazy enough to set off nuclear bombs in Manhattan, but I took a look at the videos of the Sedan Storax nuclear test, and it became obvious to me what brought down all three WTC towers. Once I accepted nuclear bombs as a likely demolition device, I found a very plausible explanation of the WTC nuclear demolition in the work of Dimitri Khalezov. I haven't found any better or more likely explanation than what Khalezov offers. He may not have everything correct, but I am sure he has at least 90% of it correct.

What keeps everyone from buying the nuclear demolition is their belief that nuclear explosions are all atmospheric--with a powerful blast and a shock wave that blows down everything in a large radius. Few people can switch gears and contemplate the effects of an underground nuclera blast on tall steel buildings.


Hatha
The steel beams of the WTC buildings could be melted with an inch of thermite coating. That was exactly what was applied in the name of fire coating. Frequently fire coating may contain Iron oxide and aluminum oxide. You only need to change the aluminum oxide to pure aluminum powder, and then you have thermite, which you only need to ignite with igniters. That is why you had the Israeli 'art students' residing in the towers prior to the demolition. The workers who applied the thermite thought they applied fire coating. The interesting thing is that the floors were they applied the coating corresponds perfectly with the initial collapse floors...

[PatColo]

Terrific video from AE911Truth.org (http://AE911Truth.org). ;)

I notice the folks at RememberBuilding7.org (http://RememberBuilding7.org) have a new 10th Anniversary spot, 37 seconds:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XXEMwhizCE

[k-os]

But they already had an investigation?

Amount of money allocated for the 1986 Challenger disaster investigation: $75 million
Amount of money allocated for the 2004 Columbia disaster investigation: $50 million
Amount of money allocated for Clinton-Lewinsky investigation: $40 million
Amount of money allocated for the 9/11 Commission: $14 million

www.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49d_1190054204

That is disturbing.

[Horn]

And as if it really matters.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcbAibPA2yY

[PatColo]

Remember Building 7: 10th Anniversary Ad Campaign Launches Today! (http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/546-remember-building-7-10th-anniversary-ad-campaign-launches-today-.html)
Written by AE911Truth Wednesday, 24 August 2011 00:00


Editorial: Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC7 has reached a new milestone for AE911Truth, garnering over 100,000 Youtube views in less than a week. The popularity of this groundbreaking mini-documentary has far outpaced every other video produced by AE911Truth, including the seminal film, 9/11: Blueprint for Truth. Congratulations to the Video Team and everyone else who helped make this success possible!

Remember Building 7:
10th Anniversary Ad Campaign Launches Today!
with our new Mini-Documentary:
“Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7”

Dear AE911Truth Supporters,

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is pleased to announce the launch of the Remember Building 7 10th Anniversary Campaign – the most aggressive ad campaign yet. This season we are accelerating our strategic partnership with RememberBuilding7.org in order to make this 10th Anniversary a vital turning point in the pursuit of a new 9/11 investigation.

In conjunction with the Remember Building 7 Campaign, we are very proud today to also release our powerful new 15-minute mini-documentary “Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 (http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/#aevideo)” as the essential educational component of the new campaign and an exceptional tool for all people who want to effectively expose the fraudulent official story of WTC 7’s destruction and the explosive evidence omitted from the NIST Report. It is compellingly narrated by actor Ed Asner and features a stellar lineup of AE911Truth experts including structural engineers, chemical engineers, physicists and others.

See it in context at RememberBuilding7.org (http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/) and get inspired to do your part in the campaign by forwarding this Action Alert to everyone you know! And be sure to make your pledge (http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/) to the 10th Anniversary Ad Campaign today. See below for the exciting campaign details.

As always, thank you for your tremendous support!

Sincerely,

Richard Gage, AIA
and the AE911Truth Volunteer Team

[madfranks]

I'm pretty sure the Architects and Engineers know a lot about building things, but I don't know how much they know about demolition. They seem to have an irrational exuberance about thermite as a demolition tool for steel buildings. But thermite has a limited amount of energy, and may be good for cutting steel beams, but not for melting them in huge quantities. That would require an extraordinary amount of energy, much more than would be contained in thermite.

For what it's worth, I am a licensed architect and one of the 1500+ petitioners on the AE911truth site, and I think thermite is the best explanation. There's plenty of energy in thermite to melt steel in huge quantities. Have you seen any number of youtube videos where they show thermite literally melting steel and shooting sprays of molten iron? Like this one:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JCfZo3wF00

For those who don't know, immediately prior to and up to the date of 9/11, the twin towers were undergoing a "modernization of the vertical transportation equipment" (http://www.elevator-world.com/magazine/archive01/0111-005.html-ssi), and it's not a long shot to believe that part of that maintenance would be in or around key supports of the building. Any number of spray applied materials (fireproofing, insulation, paint, etc), could have actually been thermite or a thermitic compound, others could have included spray explosive like nitrocellulose and none of the maintenance team would have known the difference. The whole maintenance team would have applied the thermite and detonating materials without even knowing it, and only a few key people at the top would be necessary to manage it. That certainly would explain the explosions, the Molten steel and tiny iron droplets found all over ground zero after the towers fell.

What bugs me most about it all, however, is NISTs refusal to explore the possibility of explosives or demolition at all, even though the fire codes and simple standard of care demand it. For example, (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3737/is_200505/ai_n13642027/) "NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, is generally recognized as a standard of care for conducting fire and explosion investigations." Private parties have tested and found evidence of explosives, but it's all ignored and covered up under the "official story".