So obvious even a cave man can see it

[DMac]

When the hardcore Neocon/Zionists @ Stratfor call your story bullshit....well, you get the point:

Stratfor disputes OBL killing in Abbottabad (http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/19-Aug-2011/Stratfor-disputes-OBL-killing-in-Abbottabad)

snip
ISLAMABAD - Globally recognised intelligence and forecast STRATFOR has rejected the US Central Intelligence Agency claim that the man killed in Abbottabad’s compound by US Naval SEALs was al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden. This was one of the reasons the CIA kept Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in dark.

[mick silver]

they were just feeding people what they wanted .

[Large Sarge]

When the hardcore Neocon/Zionists @ Stratfor call your story bullshit....well, you get the point:
Stratfor disputes OBL killing in Abbottabad (http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/19-Aug-2011/Stratfor-disputes-OBL-killing-in-Abbottabad)

snip
ISLAMABAD - Globally recognised intelligence and forecast STRATFOR has rejected the US Central Intelligence Agency claim that the man killed in Abbottabad’s compound by US Naval SEALs was al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden. This was one of the reasons the CIA kept Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in dark.

thats a classic highlighted above (I would double thank you for the comments, if I could!)

[k-os]

thats a classic highlighted above (I would double thank you for the comments, if I could!)

I gave him one for you. :-)

[osoab]

Reading the rest of the article from the Nation. Just about every other lie was held to form about OBL. Even how he was wanted for 911. No mention of him never being on the FBI list for that dastardly deed.

[osoab]

I can't find an article headline from http://www.stratfor.com/ talking anything about OBL and the raid. Especially that quote.

I find it odd that there are also no hyperlinks to the article. What the fuck is up with that. There are always hyperlinks.

[DMac]

Reading the rest of the article from the Nation. Just about every other lie was held to form about OBL. Even how he was wanted for 911. No mention of him never being on the FBI list for that dastardly deed.

I didn't call them neocon zionists for nothing!

[DMac]

I can't find an article headline from http://www.stratfor.com/ talking anything about OBL and the raid. Especially that quote.

I find it odd that there are also no hyperlinks to the article. What the fuck is up with that. There are always hyperlinks.


Maybe it was a subscription only article?

The headline has been carried by a number of websites.

______________


Posting another Paki source claiming OBL died of natural causes a while ago:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH8WUHjo1ms

[osoab]

Maybe it was a subscription only article?

The headline has been carried by a number of websites.




I can only find the article linked back to the original article at the nation nothing seems original.

From what I have seen on Stratfor, the headlines are always there and when you click on them, then the request your account info to view. Every once in a while stratfor gives out report that is visible to all.

[DMac]

I can only find the article linked back to the original article at the nation nothing seems original.

From what I have seen on Stratfor, the headlines are always there and when you click on them, then the request your account info to view. Every once in a while stratfor gives out report that is visible to all.


I think we have some sort of Paki psyop going on here c/o "The Nation" website.

Related:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH8WUHjo1ms

The Nation seems to be using this quote from this article, and running with it:
"STRATFOR long considered the possibility that bin Laden was already dead, and in terms of his impact on terrorist operations he effectively was."

This is from the subscriber article:


The Tactical Irrelevance of Osama bin Laden's Death (http://www.stratfor.com/memberships/193267/analysis/20110502-tactical-irrelevance-osama-bin-ladens-death)
May 2, 2011 1450 GMT

There is also this older STRATFOR article, I have not been able to read it yet:

Is Bin Laden Dead? (http://www.stratfor.com/memberships/55700/bin_laden_dead)
September 28, 2005 0330 GMT


Here is a screen shot of the first article that I found online: