PDA

View Full Version : Babysitting bill in Calif. Legislature



Canadian-guerilla
31st August 2011, 10:07 AM
Babysitting bill in Calif. Legislature

How will parents react when they find out they will be expected to provide workers' compensation benefits, rest and meal breaks and paid vacation time for…babysitters? Dinner and a movie night may soon become much more complicated.

Assembly Bill 889 (authored by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, will require these protections for all “domestic employees,” including nannies, housekeepers and caregivers.

The bill has already passed the Assembly and is quickly moving through the Senate with blanket support from the Democrat members that control both houses of the Legislature – and without the support of a single Republican member. Assuming the bill will easily clear its last couple of legislative hurdles, AB 889 will soon be on its way to the Governor's desk.

Under AB 889, household “employers” (aka “parents”) who hire a babysitter on a Friday night will be legally obligated to pay at least minimum wage to any sitter over the age of 18 (unless it is a family member), provide a substitute caregiver every two hours to cover rest and meal breaks, in addition to workers' compensation coverage, overtime pay, and a meticulously calculated timecard/paycheck.

more . . .

http://www.theunion.com/ARTICLE/20110830/BREAKINGNEWS/110839991/-1/RSS

chad
31st August 2011, 10:12 AM
everytime i think california can't outdo the stupid, they outdo the stupid.

Dogman
31st August 2011, 10:19 AM
They have truly stepped off a cliff, when it comes too common sense. This is another grab for money! How many baby sitters report wages?
None that I know of, usually done with cash and in the pocket it goes. The state is looking to expand revenue collection.

The nanny state is getting desperate, and someday the shit will hit the fan in a big way.

chad
31st August 2011, 10:20 AM
actually, this is probably about getting hispanic votes, as a majority of nannies are illegal aliens.

Dogman
31st August 2011, 10:22 AM
actually, this is probably about getting hispanic votes, as a majority of nannies are illegal aliens. Still if one complys with this , you are reporting income, and that = taxes!

Shami-Amourae
31st August 2011, 10:30 AM
actually, this is probably about getting hispanic votes, as a majority of nannies are illegal aliens.

That's true. When I was younger and my parents were together we had an illegal alien nanny. Fucking horrible. She stole shit from us so I lit some of her stuff on fire. We stopped having nannies after that.

k-os
31st August 2011, 10:33 AM
That's true. When I was younger and my parents were together we had an illegal alien nanny. Fucking horrible. She stole shit from us so I lit some of her stuff on fire. We stopped having nannies after that.

Ha!

TheNocturnalEgyptian
31st August 2011, 12:03 PM
The verbage in the OP suggests to me that the Californian government does not believe in the right to private contract between two individuals.

Joe King
31st August 2011, 12:26 PM
The verbage in the OP suggests to me that the Californian government does not believe in the right to private contract between two individuals.When operating as an entity within and defined by the regulated system, ones Right to private contract only extends as far as the regulations and Court decisions permit.
ie the people covered by that Bill have no such thing as an open-ended Right to private contract.

midnight rambler
31st August 2011, 12:43 PM
This is exactly what you get when you allow lawyers to run amok.