moon walk tracks seen in photo's from satelite 13 miles above moon surface.

[7th trump]

Just thought I would stir up the moon thingy!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44411123/?GT1=43001

[chad]

well, they show me pictures of a moon with nothing on it as well, so i don't believe it.

[platinumdude]

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

[Santa]

This proves that there are aliens living on the moon. Or,

Nasa is getting better at Photoshop techniques. Or,

the nazi's really did build a secret base on the moon. Or,

____________________________ fill in the blank.

[ximmy]

This proves that there are aliens living on the moon. Or,

Nasa is getting better at Photoshop techniques. Or,

the nazi's really did build a secret base on the moon. Or,

The aliens told us not to come back fill in the blank.

[osoab]

fill in the blank.

Jackie did it! :D

[keehah]

I remember we had a theard on the more blurry pictures that came out two years ago. They showed nothing although they claimed they saw the tracks then too.

The story says "astrounaut's paths" and "bootprints". So its not even dune buggy tracks then? Why don't we see the dune buggy tracks then? Those were the days, sent dune buggies to the moon in the 60's, unable to stock toiletries to low earth orbit 45 years later.

"What we're seeing is a trail," said Arizona State University geology professor Mark Robinson, the orbiter's chief scientist. "It's totally awesome."
However, the photos were not close enough to see individual bootprints, Robinson said.

The trails left by the astronauts are clear, but the places where backpacks were discarded, Apollo 17's moon buggy, and the bottom parts of the three lunar landers are blurry.

Seems basically once again NASA shows nothing.

Perhaps if one wants to sell a fake photoshop of an historic event, releasing beta versions in several steps with pauses for feedback each step, can prevent releasing it all at once, and risk making large obvious mistakes. :)

______________
Sept.6, 2011: NASA Has 2 Months to Decide on Abandoning International Space Station (http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/209489/20110906/nasa-abandoning-international-space-station.htm)

But the astronauts on board may need to temporarily abandon the research facility this fall after the Soyuz rocket recently failed to send a supply ship into space.

The unmanned Russian cargo ship Progress 44 malfunctioned shortly after its Aug. 24 launch, and the ship crashed in Siberia. It was supposed to carry 2.9 tons of supplies to the orbiting lab.

Russian space vehicles are the only means of transporting crews and supplies to the station

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/206711main_image_979_946-710.jpg
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_979.html
In this image, Schmitt, Evans and Cernan, pose in the moon rover during the rollout of the Apollo 17 rocket. This, the last of the Apollo/Saturn missions launched Dec. 7, 1972.

[ximmy]

why aren't there more dunebuggy tracks... didn't they drive that thing around until it broke?

[keehah]

Here they are making the tracks:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2fVLN6Jnmk
This next video has been speed up 2 times, when it should only be sped up 1.67 times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkLjVw-a9w0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU4usxsR7dM

[Neuro]

http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/j/ap/apollo%20moon%20photos-1033716704_v2.standard.jpg

What are the chances that the tracks are clear, but the backpacks, buggy and lunarpods are blurry. This does nothing to quell suspicion of conspiracy. I don't think Apollo 18 is any more fictional, than the previous Apollo moon landings...

Hell they can hardly get into near space a few kilometers above earth nowadays because of technical failures, and computer power is billions of times what it was in late 60's...

[Serpo]

There is a video of this somewhere but I cannot find it now


hang on........http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

So they went to the MOON.......such a great conspiracy ,in tatters:'(


Do we get pics of the first moon landing:confused:

[keehah]

Here is a video of the Apollo landing.

If you go to the one minute mark, one can see two large craters on the left side of the window. The ship lands at 11:00 on the rim of the lower crater.

Tracks do seem to conflate with video of the wired guys jumping around.

I thought the descent did not seem as far as verbalized. Field of view hardly changes at all when the ship is supposed to have decsended 110 feet. Note the crater at the top of the window the last 20 seconds or so that is about the size of a landing pad it seems at touchdown that seemed almost the same size at touchdown as it did when 110 feet higher.

At 1:52, the terrain between the landing ship and the large crator does look a lot like the terrain between what may be the same crator at 10:00 (the darkest crator at the edge of the image) in Neuro's post.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok1Vz_c-388

In this video they are very proud of their path. Camera even scans back over it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzGcWDZZpvo

[Awoke]

This proves that there are aliens living on the moon. Or,

Nasa is getting better at Photoshop techniques. Or,

the nazi's really did build a secret base on the moon. Or,

DAVID ICKE WAS RIGHT!!! fill in the blank.


Hahaha. Just kidding.

[Horn]

I don't you'd see boot prints from that far up, I assumed they were all dune buggy tracks.