View Full Version : FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
PatColo
8th September 2011, 10:37 PM
I've posted about this fundamental "fake elections" issue in several disparate threads now, at the risk of derailing or being "off topic" in said threads, and it's worthwhile to collect these marginal posts into one dedicated, aptly titled thread...
Ron Paul's message is naturally appealing at a messageboard like GSUS, where there is "uncommon awareness" that our fraudulent/uber-usurious monetary system is the root of so many political/economic/social ills we endure; and we're similarly aware of the Orwellian/Huxley-esque NWO "technocratic police state (http://policestateplanning.com/id19.htm)" future, already halfway here, which the zio-banksters (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23047-The-Zionist-Elephant-In-The-Room) have planned for us and our progeny. Are we not already the targets of willful economic, social, psychological, environmental, chemical & biological warfare, with the ultimate perpetrators hiding behind a synthetic wall of secrecy & deception?
http://solari.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/giant_squid.jpg
We're rightfully pissed off. So when a "reformer" like Ron Paul comes along, we're naturally inclined to support him and do whatever we can to help him "win the election". Hell, recall how "no ads, no spam GIM1" became a virtual cheerleading squad for RP leading up to the '08 "election"? And here ~14 months before the Nov '12 "election", GSUS is already shaping up with the same pattern, with threads discussing each of RP's latest campaign ads, blinks, burps, & farts; and our righteous indignation over the ZioStream Media's [ZSM] reaction/distortion/omission.
In the interest of not reinventing the wheel, following is that collection of posts I made across disparate threads, related to why Ron Paul is leading his parade of true-believing fans, down a dead-end alley. I added the bold/red here to allow for a quick scan "executive summary". To open the original posts to see them in the context of their respective threads, click the little blue "http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png" buttons inside the quote boxes:
it always pushes my skeptic buttons when an otherwise truthy piece like this bakes into their fine cake, something enshrining the hoax that "elections" are what tptb fear, that they're where the people might force change yada yada. Blathering on about how worried politicians are about their "sagging approval ratings" just builds on the myth that elections pose a threat to their jobs.
The final nail was driven into any former integrity in elections with the post-2000 passage of HAVA - Help America Vote Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_America_Vote_Act). Since then they've been rigged from the paperless blackboxes through the counting, with full ZioStream Media complicity in puffing up the hoax of integrity & legitimacy.
The only political activism I'd put a dime of donation towards or a shred of shoe leather, is election reform... that's the fraudulent foundation which the rest of the dog & pony show is built upon. So many "patriots" (workin' hard for Ron Paul etc) seem to miss this. And where's RP on using his "voice" to address the fraudulent election process, which would snuff out any chance of his "winning" no matter how many votes he really got? He's playing along with the establishment, pretending elections have integrity... in effect being nothing but a complicit steam release valve... again...
http://blackboxvoting.org/
http://verifiedvoting.org/
http://www.topplebush.com/humor/BlackBoxVoting.jpg
When presidential approval ratings are at all time lows (total admin approval I guess) the likelihood of a new attack rises dramatically.
the "approval polls" don't get a pass either- they're conducted and publicized by the same ZSM which is integral to the legit elections hoax.
Word of mouth doesn't match official election outcome? Exit polls are at odds with official election outcome? The truth-observers have no voice, and the ZSM will just ridicule & marginalize the "whiners" and spin tales about how what happened is legit etc.
CIA (proxy for their zio-bankster bosses) & Co have been rigging "elections" abroad for decades, where the populations are much less trusting of gummit/institutions than Americans (historically) are; and they know that even blatantly rigged elections don't have any real consequences beyond a few days of complaining by an informed minority of the population with no media voice.
Nothing matters in "electoral politics" until the integrity of the foundation- the election process itself, is fixed- returned to having full transparency & indisputable, auditable integrity.
Low-tech is best: paper ballots, hand counted, precinct by precinct under the watch of many citizen eyes; results made public immediately and passed up to add to the larger count.
The biggest hurtle is the jew media.
The biggest hurdle is ultimately the sham election process - after which the zio-decreed "winner" gets placed in the white house & wears the zio-meatshield outfit for 4 years.
As we've seen demonstrated in numerous "the ZSM is ignoring RP!!" threads here @ GSUS, and as we'll presumably continue to see for the next ~14 months: the ZSM's role will be to "manage perceptions" [read: systematically deceive] so that come Nov-12, the "outcome" of the fake election is not perceived by "most of the public" to be fraudulent.
worrying about how RP's running his campaign is like worrying about the deck chair arrangement on the titanic.... a diversion of precious energy from the core "problem" which must be remedied (reform the sham 'HAVA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_America_Vote_Act)' election process) before getting giddy over any "reformer candidate" (who ISN'T talking about the very election reform which would enable their actually winning...)
"Ron Paul cannot win if this persists" ;)
http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=901&d=1314889241
Why isn't RP talking about the fake election process which will ensure he doesn't "win"?? Isn't he just enshrining the myth that US "elections" have integrity?
Until he makes the fake elections a central talking point of his campaign, raising public awareness & thereby inciting election reform; he'll remain, willfully, controlled opposition - a steam release valve.
"Sobering question" for those readers tempted to "expend your activist energies" following RP's every (fraudulent election omitting) word/ad/speech/debate; getting out the vote for RP; convincing your acquaintances of the virtues of RP, donating your MONEY to RP's campaign, etc:
Isn't that a tragic misallocation of your finite activist energies/resources, given that the very mechanics of the electoral voting/counting process which would allow RP to actually WIN & become president, are hopelessly non-transparent, demonstrably rigged/fraudulent, and therefore a completely illegitimate sham?
RP talks about many exciting reforms, and attracting strong supporters of his message accordingly; but he's not talking about how he CAN'T WIN DUE TO THE SHAM MECHANICS OF OUR "ELECTIONS".
Instead, by "running for president", campaigning, debating, running ads on the ZSM etc-- all the while OMITTING discussion of the sham election process; he's enshrining the zio-establishment myth our "elections" have any sort of integrity such that he can actually win.
So it's "bitter medicine" to realize that by getting caught up in the virtues of RP's (spoken...) message; and by expending your activist energies/resources accordingly... all full of HOPE and VISIONS that he can actually "win", YOU TOO are playing a (diversionary) "audience clapping for Tinkerbell" role in the tragic deception which is our "democratic republic"... successfully distracted & deceived into thinking we're somehow governed "Of, By, And For The People"...
http://pinoleplayers.org/images/Drama%20Masks%20w-curtain.jpg
Wouldn't the highest & best expenditure of your activist energies/resources, be directed towards restoring transparency/auditability/integrity to our elections, such that the populace's "voice at the polls" could actually bring about real reform/change?
I only "pick on Ron Paul" in this thread because his campaign will inevitably be the focus of many bits & bytes exchanged at this messageboard. Realize of course, our sham "election" process, de facto [SPAWN OF THE] ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23047-The-Zionist-Elephant-In-The-Room) that it is-- affects EVERY candidate, initiative, referendum, etc which appears on "the ballot".
If you're unconvinced that our "elections" are "...hopelessly non-transparent, demonstrably rigged/fraudulent, and therefore a completely illegitimate sham" (a reality which is NO ACCIDENT, BTW...), I'll reserve for later posts in this thread evidence demonstrating that that is exactly the situation... and I invite others to do the same. Here's a start for now:
google: blackbox election fraud (http://www.google.com/search?q=blackbox+election+fraud)
Nomoss
8th September 2011, 11:39 PM
Dr Paul WILL NOT win for THEY will not let happen.
Now who are THEY? If you look back in time you
will see it all.. thanks for this post pat.
B safe all
Shami-Amourae
9th September 2011, 04:35 AM
I like Ron Paul, but I don't want him to win. If he did theoretically they'd just kill him, or collapse the economy and blame it on him/libertarianism. I'm just happy that he's out there educating people, since really that's what matters at the end of the day. He's waking a lot of people up (I was one of them back in his last presidential run.) One man cannot fix the problems we face, the people must suffer and experience completely collapse till they finally get it.
JJ.G0ldD0t
9th September 2011, 05:38 AM
Thanks PC for that post! BRAVO! I can't add anything to that and I believe true seekers of truth will be hard pressed to take anything away from it.
Very well said.
mrnhtbr2232
9th September 2011, 05:57 AM
PatColo:
You do the forum a tremendous service in presenting this reality check. This is why GSUS is important because no matter who believes what, we respect the truth above all. For the sake of disclosure I admit to being a Ron Paul supporter. I have donated three times to the 2012 campaign, and regardless of what I'm about to say I agree you are near-ultimately right in the end.
Ron Paul appears to be a genuinely honest and good person - that alone is water to thirsty horses. In a way he is our messenger to the system that we refuse to roll over and will defend our ideals in our own way. He is the proverbial stick in the eye we've all been desperate to find, and the euphoria of his arrival on the cusp of absolute corruption is a powerful rallying cry.
Yet in the midst of these positives exists the totality of evil that dwarfs any manifestation of change. Ron Paul is a Porterhouse in front of a hungry lion. We know it's almost hopeless, but at the same time we support it because in America you can still make a stink with enough financial firepower. And that is why, ultimately, the Ron Paul campaign is important because it vitalizes those places we need to prevail as decent human beings with legitimate rage.
From a clinical point of view that sounds like his campaign is a drug, and let's face it there are drug-like qualities to the whole thing. But down deep, in my core, is a kicking and screaming individual demanding participation. That *does* want to try. That *does* want to see Ron Paul elected President. We can maintain the pressure with continued support instead of being marginalized as an early casualty. We CAN force the system to at least pay attention.
Some would ask what's the point? The point is this: the movement is growing. As the numbers of people that get it increases it creates a larger buffer for resisting. It becomes the agar that grows the bacteria of awareness into bigger colonies. This momentum of course hits headwinds like Bruce Fein and metered media exposure. And who knows - perhaps RP himself is ultimately corruptible as a mortal man.
But to say Ron Paul is unelectable remains a metric even you cannot prove. Most manipulations in the vote depend on believably slim margins. The reality appears to be his support is a good 10-15% percentage points beyond their formula. Television and radio remain potent reality shapers but the Internet remains a frontier to energize and coordinate. Regardless of a Paul win or lose, his supporters know the stakes and he is our conduit to put the system on notice that we are at the breaking point and ready to kick ass.
Ron Paul 2012
palani
9th September 2011, 06:34 AM
The federal body politic has chosen their path already and shows no signs of recanting. The chosen path is communism, abortion, fake money, torture, invading sovereign countries to name a few. Attempting to force these people to abandon these bad habits results in joinder with them in committing the same acts. In other words anyone who attempts change is going to be changed themselves.
Paul's message is equivalent to one going into the Blue Moon Oyster bar and attempting to change THEIR politics.
po boy
9th September 2011, 09:10 AM
In a way Paul has already won as the so called top tier are parroting Paul's positions on economics. People especially Repubs have had it with Obama's thin veneer of bullshit and whoever is elected is either going to stay the course and let Rome burn or bend the other way even slightly.
The .gov is broke and this will come to light no matter and expose the realities of the current Fascist/communist state.This election the sides are drawn and for the Repubs they are going to have to realize that's just as last time trying to convince a Paul supporter to vote for their man rather than Paul will not happen. They will be left with a choice if they want rid of Obama join Paul supporters or have 4 more years because without Paul supporters Barry got it in the bag.
Veni, vidi...evigilavi!
10th September 2011, 12:39 AM
Even if he doesn't win he is helping many understand the true meaning of what a "republic" should be and what a true republican is even if he is considered a Libertarian. More so hopefully the youth take note of his ideas, unfortunately numbskulls like my 23yr old brother still don't believe he's genuine and believes is just like other politicians.
PatColo
10th October 2011, 07:27 AM
I noticed Ed Griffin has put up a series of "Project City Hall" recordings (http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=project_cityhall&refpage=activities), including these re election fraud, I haven't listened yet.They're .WAV files, I didn't know anyone used those anymore!
25. Vote Fraud. (2011-06-01) (http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/audio/PCH%2825%29.wav)
31. Counting Ballots (2011-06-21) (http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/audio/PCH%2831%29.wav)
Joe King
10th October 2011, 09:51 AM
Even if he doesn't win he is helping many understand the true meaning of what a "republic" should be and what a true republican is even if he is considered a Libertarian.Based upon my observations of the OWS protest, I sure wish they'd get a clue as to what a Republic is. All I see there is mostly democracy this, democracy that,...etc etc etc.
More so hopefully the youth take note of his ideas, unfortunately numbskulls like my 23yr old brother still don't believe he's genuine and believes is just like other politicians.Unfortunately most politicians have jaded many people to all politicians.....or Statesman as the case may be.
JohnQPublic
10th October 2011, 10:05 AM
I mentioned Ron Paul at a dinner with a group of fairly conservative republican types (related to a school event). One was a banker. The most positive response I got was that Ron Paul was a "nice man". When I mentioned abolishing the Fed, I got no comments (and just a stare form the banker). no one had any better candidate, though a couple said they may go with Romney as the least bad choice. I mentioned that more of the same is not going to get us anywhere. Another mentioned that [that crazy] Ron Paul was proposing a [shock] gold standard (and that can't work). I didn't take the time to explain that it could. I did mention that we did not necessarily have to have a gold standard, but that we needed at least US govt. issued currency.
Joe King
10th October 2011, 10:20 AM
I mentioned Ron Paul at a dinner with a group of fairly conservative republican types (related to a school event). One was a banker. The most positive response I got was that Ron Paul was a "nice man". When I mentioned abolishing the Fed, I got no comments (and just a stare form the banker). no one had any better candidate, though a couple said they may go with Romney as the least bad choice. I mentioned that more of the same is not going to get us anywhere. Another mentioned that [that crazy] Ron Paul was proposing a [shock] gold standard (and that can't work). I didn't take the time to explain that it could. I did mention that we did not necessarily have to have a gold standard, but that we needed at least US govt. issued currency.The reason you get responses like that is due to the fact that most of Rons proposals are completely foreign ideas to them as they have no working knowledge of anything other than the current system they've been immersed within for their entire lives and have built everything they have upon its foundation.
To think of altering that foundation is scary-as-hell to people like that.
Cebu_4_2
10th October 2011, 10:24 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcdUvKr8sDE&feature=related
Hatha Sunahara
10th October 2011, 03:26 PM
The Status Quo Is The Devil You Know.
Vote for the Devil!
Hatha
DMac
19th January 2012, 11:30 AM
Cross posting Golden Snake's excellent post on the upcoming election fraud here:
Just How Corrupt Will The United States Voting System Be In 2012 - VIRALIZE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRNORxmmVSc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRNORxmmVSc
Uploaded by Thyalwaysseek on Jan 17, 2012
PLEASE COPY & MAKE VIRAL; LINKS BELOW
** SCYTL (In Spain) **
http://www.scytl.com
http://scytl.com/en/news-events-c-3.html
SCYTL Acquires SOE Software, Becoming the Leading Election Software Provider
http://www.balderton.com/news/scytl-acquires-soe-software-becoming-the-leadin...
http://www.soesoftware.com (Tampa, hub for 900 locations before reporting)
http://scytl.com/en/remote-e-voting-s-5.html
http://www.elusivetruth.com/
BALDERTON CAPITOL (U.K.) - *** Only Investor In SCYTL!!! ***
http://www.balderton.com/portfolio/scytl
http://www.balderton.com/team (Leadership)
http://www.balderton.com/team/tim-bunting (Prior Goldman Sachs)
http://www.balderton.com/team/mark-evans (Prior Goldman Sachs)
http://www.balderton.com/team/charlotte-anne-swerling (Prior taskforce for Tony Blair)
Alex Jones (Jan 16 2012): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0LcpfmgPs8
You have to start somewhere. I'm taking a stand, spreading the message and voting for Ron Paul.
Glass
19th January 2012, 12:17 PM
The only solution to this seem to be to have public counting of ballots. It would be good for a lot of diehard believers in democracy to see how it really goes down. I think this election will be very blatant.
EE_
19th January 2012, 12:35 PM
Ron Paul Hot Air Balloon Taken Down After SCHP Request
Balloon Causes Traffic Slowdown On SC Interstate
POSTED: 8:40 am EST January 19, 2012
UPDATED: 11:48 am EST January 19, 2012
GREENVILLE COUNTY, S.C. -- It's deflated now, but a Ron Paul hot air balloon along the side of Interstate 85 caused traffic to slow down Thursday morning.
The balloon could be seen from a South Carolina Department Of Transportation camera.
DOT officials say the balloon had Ron Paul's name on it.
People looking at the balloon slowed down around Pelham Road in Greenville County causing a four-mile backup at one point.
SC Department of Public Safety spokesman Sid Gaulden told News 4 that the South Carolina Highway Patrol asked the operator of the hot air balloon, Remus Toppeta of Greer, to take it down because it was causing a hazard.
Gaudlin said SCHP gave Toppeta a written warning for improper lane use because the balloon was set up in the middle of the frontage road.
Video @ this link
Read more: http://www.wyff4.com/news/30248920/detail.html#ixzz1jwEgt9AJ
JDRock
19th January 2012, 12:40 PM
either;
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess (in which case there is no hope) OR
B. The people are too stupid and decadent to do basic research into who is good for this country ( in which case there is no hope)
JohnQPublic
19th January 2012, 12:46 PM
either;
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess (in which case there is no hope) OR
B. The people are too stupid and decadent to do basic research into who is good for this country ( in which case there is no hope)
C. War starts in Iran, peolpe in US pissed; Europe collapse, people in US shafted; Ron Paul suddenly appears sane.
But then:
1. Circumstances caused it;
2. It was planned all along;
JDRock
19th January 2012, 12:50 PM
@ john q .......they wont pull the trigger till AFTER RP is essentially eliminated imo...
gunDriller
19th January 2012, 01:33 PM
about the countless threats of war on Iran - i wonder if this is done to 'vaccinate' world markets so that they factor in such an invasion.
with Perry & Huntsman dropping out, we're left with close to a Romney vs. Paul situation. (Super-Sputum & Melonhead not withstanding).
Romney has some real weakness because of his Bain Capital background. keeping his wealth offshore in countries that are normally used for tax evasion. offshoring American jobs in his time in the private sector. being a chicken hawk.
Ron Paul is so much stronger in these key areas, including in pro-military states like South Carolina. I think he's done a good job in the debates of highlighting his strengths.
What's left is a VICIOUS (but well-thought-out) no-holds-barred attack on Romney. including dovetailing Ron Paul's attacks with other candidates attacks on Romney - if Gingrich & Super-Sputum are hammering on Romney about tax evasion, it creates a chance for Ron Paul to emphasize his military service and opposition to abortion - things that resonate with prototypical conservative voters.
I would not be surprised to wake up some morning to find out that Romney has fvcked up big-time-enough to leave Ron Paul as Last Man Standing. Of course this is the nightmare of Dick Morris and the other Jews.
EE_
19th January 2012, 02:28 PM
Santorum has been on saying that Ron Paul in his own words doesn't believe he will be president, has no intention of becoming president, and that he only wants to change the party.
Does Ron Paul want to be president? Has he ever made statements saying "If I'm president" or "when I'm president"...I don't recall him doing so?
PatColo
21st January 2012, 11:59 PM
either;
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess (in which case there is no hope) OR
This is where I hold RP personally responsible for his glaring OMISSION, given the bully-pulpit he momentarily enjoys in debates and running his campaign- WE (GSUS conspiracist nut jobs) talk about the obvious vote fraud happening in the state primaries, HE DOESN'T, and he needs to! From the OP:
RP talks about many exciting reforms, and attracting strong supporters of his message accordingly; but he's not talking about how he CAN'T WIN DUE TO THE SHAM MECHANICS OF OUR "ELECTIONS".
Instead, by "running for president", campaigning, debating, running ads on the ZSM etc-- all the while OMITTING discussion of the sham election process; he's enshrining the zio-establishment myth our "elections" have any sort of integrity such that he can actually win.
Why doesn't RP use his 5 mins of fame during this election cycle to raise public awareness/scrutiny/demand-for-reform WRT the sham election process- a necessary first step to getting himself or any future "reformer" actually, legitimately elected? ???
PatColo
22nd January 2012, 12:15 AM
When I started this thread, I was planning to add to it with info demonstrating what a sham the whole election process has become.
If you're unconvinced that our "elections" are "...hopelessly non-transparent, demonstrably rigged/fraudulent, and therefore a completely illegitimate sham" (a reality which is NO ACCIDENT, BTW...), I'll reserve for later posts in this thread evidence demonstrating that that is exactly the situation... and I invite others to do the same. Here's a start for now:
google: blackbox election fraud (http://www.google.com/search?q=blackbox+election+fraud)as yet I haven't personally added much so far. Most of us saw "America, Freedom to Fascism" - here's the clip dealing with the hackability built into the sham voting blackboxes (oops, surely just an oversight! ;)) The key election portion in the clip is 3:50 - 6:20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFoQVARKNUY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFoQVARKNUY
mick silver
22nd January 2012, 07:27 AM
there only one way paul can win .. he would need to come out and scare the hell out of the people in this country . just maybe that would wake alot of folks up . there nothing for him to lose if he was to do this . start ratting out all the people in this country that in the leader ship that done things that the people dont know about
BrewTech
22nd January 2012, 07:43 AM
C. War starts in Iran, peolpe in US pissed; Europe collapse, people in US shafted; Ron Paul suddenly appears sane.
But then:
1. Circumstances caused it;
2. It was planned all along;
People won't be pissed, because the media will just put up the results of a bunch of fake opinion polls that show there is massive public support for whatever action the president has taken, and that will get the masses in line, as it always does.
Book
22nd January 2012, 09:12 AM
Why doesn't RP use his 5 mins of fame during this election cycle to raise public awareness...
Ron ain't ever gonna mention the Jews.
::)
Tumbleweed
22nd January 2012, 11:08 AM
Ron ain't ever gonna mention the Jews.
::)
It's to bad there's not some multi billionair goyim to finance David Duke to run like the Jew Newt found to finance him.
It'd be kind of fun to see David Duke run with Brother Nathanael as his running mate. Ha!Ha!
JDRock
22nd January 2012, 12:23 PM
either;
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess (in which case there is no hope) OR
B. The people are too stupid and decadent to do basic research into who is good for this country ( in which case there is no hope)
i still stand by this.
BrewTech
22nd January 2012, 01:13 PM
i still stand by this.
And I stand by you as well... I said almost the exact same thing in another thread.
millwright
22nd January 2012, 01:45 PM
Santorum has been on saying that Ron Paul in his own words doesn't believe he will be president, has no intention of becoming president, and that he only wants to change the party.
Does Ron Paul want to be president? Has he ever made statements saying "If I'm president" or "when I'm president"...I don't recall him doing so?
EE, i just made this comment in another thread,and I think it touches on your question so I am repeating it here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"After many many years of deep thought on the subject, i have come to this conclusion.
RON PAUL IS HARRY SELDON ! ! ! ! THE BEST WE CAN HOPE FOR, IS THAT WE CAN RETURN TO SOME SENSE OF LIBERTY BY THE TIME OUR CHILDRENS CHILDREN ARE COMING OF AGE.
The Galactic Empire is in decline, the only question is, how long will it take to die ? "
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the answer to your question is this. Ron Paul knows that it does not matter if he wins or not. The Republic cannot be saved, and if he were to find himself in a position of power, THE PTB WOULD USE HIM AS AN EXCUSE FOR THE INEVITABLE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC.
The only thing that matters now, is how long it takes us to form a new Republic. It will take much less time if Ron can plant the seeds of liberty in as many minds as possible before the dark ages come.
Horn
22nd January 2012, 08:57 PM
They don't call it the establishment for nothing.
The MSM needs a new channel with major backing to get anywhere against the establishment.
PatColo
22nd January 2012, 09:59 PM
either;
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess and RP himself is remaining mum about this robbery, pretending all is legit with the voting/counting process (in which case there is no hope) OR
B. The people are too stupid and decadent to do basic research into who is good for this country ( in which case there is no hope)
I'd stand by that ^ ;)
Shami-Amourae
24th January 2012, 04:21 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRPldELzZXA
PatColo
24th January 2012, 06:04 AM
^ wow thanks Shami-A, excellent mini-docu.
Here's the "Eric Blair" article he cites:
Sunday, January 22, 2012
There's something very odd about GOP primary pre-polling and vote (http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/theres-something-very-odd-about-gop.html)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eRFprerMxFE/Txt9yszIkrI/AAAAAAAAOF8/3KhGYHp802w/s320/dees+ron+paul+debate.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eRFprerMxFE/Txt9yszIkrI/AAAAAAAAOF8/3KhGYHp802w/s1600/dees+ron+paul+debate.jpg)
Dees Illustration (http://ddees.com/)
Eric Blair
Activist Post (http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/theres-something-very-odd-about-gop.html)
Okay. It's time somebody says it. Something seems very strange about the GOP primary pre-polling and vote thus far.
As a Ron Paul fan, I didn't want to seem like a sore loser after the odd Iowa result where the failed no-name Senator, Rick Santorum, was catapulted to victory with very little tangible support.
But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
The Associated Press reported (http://www.mercurynews.com/presidentelect/ci_19782823):
Newt Gingrich has cancelled a campaign appearance in South Carolina because of poor attendance.
The Republican presidential candidate was scheduled to speak to the Southern Republican Leadership on Friday. But a campaign spokesman told reporters that he would no longer be appearing due to poor attendance.
There were just a few dozen people in the audience at the College of Charleston's arena, where the event was taking place.Meanwhile, on the same day Ron Paul boasted (http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/01/19/over-1000-supporters-greet-ron-paul-in-south-carolina/) over 1000 attendees at his campaign event in Charleston:
2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul attracted more than 1,000 supporters in Charleston today, demonstrating his strong support among younger voters and his overall popularity.
The crowd gathered expressly for the 12-term Congressman from Texas as he participated in “The Bully Pulpit Series” at 11:00 a.m. EST at the College of Charleston, located at 7 College Way, Charleston. The candidate had been in Washington the day prior for a key House vote against President Obama raising the debt ceiling, but upon his return there was apparently no loss of enthusiasm.http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lJBPDnFYEnE/Txt33zZMTVI/AAAAAAAAOF0/iCLOiBZ_A7c/s400/ron+paul+sc+rally.jpg (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lJBPDnFYEnE/Txt33zZMTVI/AAAAAAAAOF0/iCLOiBZ_A7c/s1600/ron+paul+sc+rally.jpg)
Ron Paul speaking to enthusiastic crowd in Charleston, S.C.
Primary elections are traditionally driven by enthusiasm. In other words, the average voter does not turn out for primaries unless they are motivated by a certain candidate. So, could someone please explain to me how Newt Gingrich, who has virtually no ground game, no money, and no fervent supporters, just won the South Carolina primary?
Could the conspiracy to keep Ron Paul out of the Oval Office be this coordinated, this pervasive?
PatColo
24th January 2012, 06:13 AM
Fourteen Defining
Characteristics Of Fascism (http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm)
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.
6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives (http://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat.html). Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
DMac
24th January 2012, 06:56 AM
ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus (http://www.bollyn.com/elron-voxeo-the-israeli-defense-firm-that-tallies-the-iowa-caucus)
By Christopher Bollyn
31 December 2007
The Iowa caucus is only a few days away and the nation's attention will be directed to the results, which signify the beginning of the U.S. presidential race. But does anyone watch who tallies the results of the Iowa caucus?
The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company that is headed by a man whose company was bought by Elron Electronics, the Israeli defense firm. I suspect that it will be the same this year. Don't expect to see any grassroots political activists doing the tally in Iowa. The Israeli defense establishment takes care of that part of the American "democratic" election process.
VOXEO
In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology tallied the Iowa caucus results.
The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided by a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based in Orlando, Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind of those familiar with Orlando and electronic vote fraud history. See Bollyn article on Yang below.)
The calls from the nearly 2,000 caucus centers in Iowa went to a Voxeo call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
On January 31, 2005, I wrote to Michelle Bauer, Iowa's Secretary of State with some questions about the use of Voxeo, a foreign company located in Florida, to tally the results of the Iowa caucus:
Subject: How was the Iowa Caucus Tallied?
Dear Sirs,
When I visited the headquarters of the Democratic Party in Des Moines last summer, I learned that the tally of the Iowa caucus had been "out-sourced" to a company in Atlanta, Georgia.
What this means is that the tallying of the Iowa caucus results was done over the telephone, using the touch-tone buttons, to enter the results from each caucus location…
I am interested in how this was done, and why. Why did the Democratic Party allow the crucial tally of the caucus results to be done by a company in Atlanta? Don't they trust their own math skills?
Can any of you provide any information about this matter?
Kind regards,
Christopher Bollyn
A person named Mike Milligan wrote back on behalf of Secretary of State Bauer:
Mike Milligan <milliganconsulting@mchsi.com> wrote:
Dear Christopher:
The Secretary of State forwarded me the email you sent to then on Monday, January 31, 2004 [sic] regarding the Iowa Caucuses.
Unfortunately you either received some incorrect information in your travels or are confused. The Iowa Democratic Party completed all of the caucus night tabulations in Iowa, in the Des Moines/Polk County Convention Center, which was the Caucus night HQ. In fact, our tech staff wrote the software that tabulated the results.
To answer your second to last question, we feel we have a comfortable grasp of mathematics.
Sincerely,
MWM
Mike Milligan, Executive Director
Iowa Democratic Party
(515) 244-7292 ex. 676
I wrote this note back to Mr. Milligan:
Dear Mr. Milligan,
I am responding to you about how the caucus results for the Iowa Democratic Party were tallied on the night of the nation's first caucus. After checking my sources, I can assure you that it is correct that an out-of-state telephone/computer system tallied the Iowa precinct results.
The system used was provided by Voxeo Corporation based in Orlando, Florida. The calls went from Iowa to a call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
See: http://www.voxeo.com/
This information was first provided to me last August by John McCormally, Communications Director for the Iowa Democratic Party in Des Moines, Iowa.
Today I called Voxeo (800) 305-5771 in Orlando and although I didn't go into detail, the receptionist confirmed that Voxeo had conducted the telephone tally of the Iowa Democratic Caucus results.
How is it that you don't know that?
McCormally told me that chairmen were selected in all 1,993 precincts and these chairmen called in on touch-tone phones and after giving their PIN number, were able to enter the results from their precinct using the touch-tone number pad.
I'm not going to go into great detail at this point, but this procedure of using an out-of-state computer company to tally the precinct results for the Iowa Democratic Caucus lacks the transparency and openness that one might expect in this exercise in grass-roots poll.
Clearly, if someone wanted to adjust the results, it would be the easiest thing to do to do it through this computer system in Orlando, Florida. The Democrats in Iowa would never be aware of it, regardless of their math skills, unless the paper results were carefully audited in an open and honest manner.
Christopher Bollyn
THE ISRAELIS & VOXEO
Now, who really is Voxeo, and why are the Iowa caucus results tallied by them? I don't know if the 2008 Iowa results will be tallied in the same way, but I wouldn't doubt it.
Voxeo is headed by Jonathan Taylor, who is the company's President and CEO. This is what his Voxeo webpage says about him:
Jonathan combined his experience in both business operations and technology innovation to found Voxeo in 1999. Under his guidance, Voxeo has seen triple-digit revenue growth for four consecutive years and has been profitable since January, 2004. Prior to Voxeo, Jonathan founded and helped bring three additional software and infrastructure service companies to profitability.
From 1995 to 1997, Jonathan was the founder and President of InterResearch and Development Group (IRdg), Inc. IRdg created and licensed iPost - the first internet powered OEM unified messaging solution - to leading telecommunications providers including Ericsson, Motorola and Unisys. IRdg was acquired by Elron Electronic Industries (Nasdq: ELRN) subsidiary MediaGate in 1997.
There you have it. Jonathan Taylor's company, which he founded, was taken over by Elron Electronic Industries, the Israeli defense high tech company:
In its early days, Elron focused on defense, particularly electronics and avionics, as well as the emerging medical and technology sectors. In 1966, Elron founded Elbit, which combined the expertise of the Ministry of Defense-Research Institute in special computer design with Elron's experience in electronic product design, manufacture and management.
Source: http://www.elron.net/default.asp?PageID=203
This is important information that Americans need to know and which they will not find in the Zionist-controlled media in the United States. It needs to be understood that the entire election process in the United States is a fraud. More than that, it is a fraud that is being perpetrated by the Israeli defense establishment on the naïve and gullible American public.
The sine qua non of an honest and transparent election process is the open counting of the votes by the voters themselves in each polling station in front of the open eyes of other citizens and members of the media. Any compromise in this most fundamental and essential process which acts to remove the citizenry from the vote-counting process simply cannot be accepted.
This is what Americans MUST get back to, in every polling station in the nation: paper ballots that are hand counted in front of the public.
Nothing else will do to protect their democratic franchise in the United States - NOTHING.
DMac
24th January 2012, 07:00 AM
Ron Paul is being given his limited face time to maintain the status quo - the cooky old codger the young people like. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, the fascists in power finish their election rigging work started in 2000 with this latest form of electronic warfare against the American people:
SCYTL Acquires SOE Software, Becoming the Leading Election Software Provider (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/scytl-acquires-soe-software-becoming-the-leading-election-software-provider-2012-01-11)
SCYTL is based in Barcelona. Why are the Spaniards managing the US presidential election? No Americans want that job either, amirite??
:mad:
PatColo
26th January 2012, 06:24 AM
should cross link this here for posterity, Magnes' thread:
Thread: Bollyn, The Zionist Plot to Stop Ron Paul , INCREDIBLE ! (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58446-Bollyn-The-Zionist-Plot-to-Stop-Ron-Paul-INCREDIBLE-%21)
Points to this Bollyn article -
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13410
can discuss it more specifically @ Magnes' thread ^
Today, Bollyn has posted this new one- perfectly on topic here:
The Reality of Electronic Vote Fraud in America (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13436)
January 26, 2012
As this system is the only form and principle of government by which liberty can be preserved, and the only one that can embrace all the varieties of a great extent of country, it necessarily follows, that to have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also. Like will always produce like.
- Thomas Paine to the Citizens of the United States, 29 January 1803
"WHERE THE ELECTION IS A FICTION"
While most Americans will vote on electronic voting machines in 2012, the public is generally unaware of how easy it is for an election to be stolen by the people who control these machines. This is the fundamental problem that has disenfranchised the American voter and has turned our elections into fiction. As Thomas Paine wrote in 1803, "where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also."
The following three short video clips explain why a free people should not allow elections to be conducted using such machines. The simple and sure way to restore our democratic franchise is to return to hand-counted paper ballots which are openly counted in front of the public in each polling place. This is the absolutely essential element, the sine qua non, of open and transparent elections. This is what we must return to in every county in every state across the nation.
Two of the biggest voting machine companies, ES&S and Diebold, were set up by two brothers from Ohama, Robert and Todd Urosevich. The 2011 obituary of their mother, Helen Catherine Varda Urosevich, has been added at the end of this piece to help identify the Urosevich brothers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TdzlnwWsAAU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TdzlnwWsAAU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FPuLNjvAc&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FPuLNjvAc&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rMpQKqZhM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rMpQKqZhM
Endnote on Urosevich family of Omaha:
Helen Catherine Varda Urosevich
Urosevich, Helen Catherine Varda, Oct 24, 1923 – Mar 15, 2011
Age 87, born in Omaha. Preceded in death by parents, Louie and Thelma Varda, and grandson, Nicholas Varda Urosevich. Survived by husband, Steve Urosevich, Omaha; sons: Steve L. Urosevich and Donna Lawton, Omaha, Robert and Julie Urosevich of McKinney TX, Todd and Mary Urosevich; daughter, Sueann and Mike Devereaux, all of Omaha; sister, Dorothy Soland of Tucson, AZ. Helen was loved by 12 grandchildren and 21 great-grandchildren. Helen was an active member in the St. Nicholas Serbian Orthodox Church.
VISITATION with the family Thursday, 5pm-7pm, followed by a PRAYER SERVICE at the West Center Chapel. Private family interment, Evergreen Memorial Park. Memorials to St. Nicholas Serbian Orthodox Church or charity of your choice. HEAFEY-HEAFEY-HOFFMANN
DWORAK-CUTLER
WEST CENTER CHAPEL
78th & West Center 402-391-3900
Published in Omaha World-Herald from March 16 to March 17, 2011
Shami-Amourae
31st January 2012, 08:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP2BjpIYJLw
JJ.G0ldD0t
31st January 2012, 10:11 AM
Screw SNL
ONN FTW AGAIN
PatColo
4th February 2012, 03:35 AM
Kevin Barrett's radio show 1/31. The only way to listen is go to the link, the live stream auto-plays as the page loads, need to hit PAUSE on that (console near upper right of page), then hit PLAY on the other player console below the show title. 1 hour: http://noliesradio.org/archives/41783
Meet election integrity expert John Washburn! _ on The Kevin Barrett Show (http://noliesradio.org/archives/41783)
This show was broadcast January 31, 2012.
It is now archived here — Use Player Coming up Tuesday at 9am Pacific – 12 Noon Eastern – 16:00 GMT
Will be archived here after the broadcast by Tuesday evening.
http://noliesradio.org/images/VotingFraud.gifhttp://noliesradio.org/images/kevinbarretttv.jpg
“THE KEVIN BARRETT SHOW”
EXCLUSIVE –Tuesday on KB Show:
Meet election integrity expert John Washburn!
Email your questions or comments now. (kbarrett@merrr.com)
Guest: John Washburn, Wisconsin-based software engineer and election integrity activist. (Check out his blog (http://washburnsworld.blogspot.com/) and website (http://www.washburnresearch.org/).)
Is it just a coincidence that Wisconsin is about to “upgrade” to “new, improved” voting machines just in time for the nationally-important Scott Walker recall election? (http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/29/wisconsin-recall-election-integrity-in-doubt-suspicious-free-upgrades-from-paper-to-electronic-voting-booths-occurring-statewide/) Why are those machines – and just about all voting machines – “black box” systems with proprietary software, so that only the people who program the machines know how they work (and how to hack them)?
The 1% needs Walker to win so it can keep pushing the 99% into poverty. You can bet they’ll be pulling out all the stops. If the recall-Walker people allow the election to proceed on black-box machines, the result (like the results of so many stolen elections, including the Bush coups of 2000 and 2004) is easily predictable.
For more information, click on the following links to the Wisconsin election integrity groups: Fair Elections Wisconsin (http://www.fairelectionswi.com/) and Wisconsin Citizens for Election Protection (http://electionprotectionwisconsin.com/).
PatColo
7th February 2012, 06:12 AM
there are existing GSUS threads on this and the embedded links within, but good stuff, putting here for posterity. He makes the point succinctly where I highlighted red:
Monday, February 6, 2012
VOTER FRAUD IN NEVADA!! (http://www.truthinourtime.com/2012/02/voter-fraud-in-nevada.html)
I realize that people claim vote fraud at every turn, some don't trust electronic voting, others don't trust paper ballots. I do not doubt that voter fraud goes on, but this instance is on a mass scale and very very blatant. I have already posted several stories (here (http://www.truthinourtime.com/2012/02/nevadas-trouble-box.html), here (http://www.truthinourtime.com/2012/02/nytimes-morning-workers-ron-paul-voters.html) and here (http://www.truthinourtime.com/2012/02/paul-camp-cries-fraud-over-nevada.html)) and this further cements my position.
Action must be taken, this is not acceptable and if it is accepted than all of our other work is for naught. We can read, write and inform others about the issues of liberty, but if voting is rigged than absolutely no "non violent revolution" can ever take place.
Like JFK said, "those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolutions inevitable" remember these words.
This is the link to the most recent story Ron Paul's Last Stand (http://news.yahoo.com/ron-pauls-last-stand-153602227.html)
The key paragraphs are posted here.
"We have more IDs than Romney had votes in '08," said Paul's state chairman, Carl Bunce, meaning identified supporters who have committed to attend Saturday's caucuses across the state. He wouldn't give a precise number, but Romney's 2008 vote total in his big Nevada win was 22,649."
"The town clerk, she said, has reported being stunned by the number of former Democrats and independents the Paulites have gotten to register as Republicans in order to caucus for Paul. The volunteers have netted 800 new registrations, according to Bunce.
It is absolutely crucial to note that Ron Paul got 6089 votes in 2008 and 6175 in 2012. Let this sink in. In the first 4 states of 2012 Ron Paul got anywhere from 2 to 5 times as many votes as he did in 2008 and you mean to tell me that all the hard work that the Paul supporters did in Nevada only netted 86 votes in an entire state? Give me a break, this is voter fraud of the highest degree. I demand a recount, and possibly a revote, whatever is necessary.
Do not just sit on this information! Demand justice! Explain this to everyone that you know.
PatColo
7th February 2012, 06:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP2BjpIYJLw
this onion spoof is an updated version of the one they did before the '08 elections- they just re-did the intro, and voice-over'd a couple current candidate names in the rest of it. The current "Gingrich" press conference used to be "Hillary"...notice on the front of the podium, sign still says "Hillary"
still a good spoof!
jimswift
7th February 2012, 08:16 AM
2207
Com'on now, really. voter fraud?
PatColo
8th February 2012, 09:57 PM
cross posting here for posterity again- See Magnes' thread:
Thread: Ron Paul Super PAC to fight election fraud (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58787-Ron-Paul-Super-PAC-to-fight-election-fraud)
^ for full discussion. I posted:
The whole "election" is a fraud... and they say they will be investigating "irregularities"?
Sounds like a game changer.If I'm reading you right, I share your skepticism.
But I basically won't be happy until RP himself uses his platform to raise national awareness/activism demanding return to paper ballot elections, hand counted at every precinct at poll closing time.
As a practical matter, as many precincts are burdened by "long ballots" IE ~50 votable selections from federal down through state & local, I'd say some MIX of hand-count portion mixed with machine count for everything below say, federal or maybe state- might be a workable solution.
KEY is that ballots are ALL PAPER, auditable in all cases by hand-recount as necessary.
My concern with this latest RP development, or WRT this PAC (not even clear on what the relationship is between RP's official campaign & this PAC)- is that it ends up being the predictable formula where the RP voters upset over this most recent daytime robbery, get pacified feeling "good, they're doing something about this!", then a little time goes by, yada yada & in the end nothing whatsoever changes.
RP needs to prove himself through PERSONALLY stumping on this fake election issue. Without that, all his latest "campaign messages" about The Way Things Oughta Be, are for naught. RP's having once uttered the Stalin/elections/counting quote some years ago, is wholly inadequate today where the rubber is meeting the road.
PatColo
4th March 2012, 08:02 AM
Bollyn, updated 2/24:
The Criminal Plot to Stop Ron Paul (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13410)
Updated February 24, 2012
Added video from Maine about how votes were stolen from Ron Paul.
monty
10th March 2012, 09:53 PM
Some good news for the Paul Campaign!
Paul supporters seize control of Clark County GOP party
By Laura Myers
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
http://www.lvrj.com/news/heller-unites-clark-county-gop-convention-with-shots-at-berkley-obama-142194615.html
Copyright © Stephen Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction or distribution (except for personal, non-commercial purposes), in any form or by any means, without the express written consent of Stephens Media, LLC, is strictly prohibited.
Awoke
15th March 2012, 04:56 AM
http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0905/vote-obama-vote-economy-demotivational-poster-1243132508.jpg
PatColo
9th April 2012, 11:18 PM
I just noticed this "Ponce Returns" thread, "Why Ron Paul will loose......paper vote, our only hope (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?60073-Why-Ron-Paul-will-loose......paper-vote-our-only-hope.)", adding the OP vid to this thread for posterity,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtHiA7TJUV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtHiA7TJUV0
Uploaded by YodadogProductions (http://www.youtube.com/user/YodadogProductions) on Mar 27, 2012
VIDEO PROOF THAT ELECTIONS ARE AND CAN BE RIGGED WITHOUT DETECTION...
PatColo
27th April 2012, 11:38 PM
Just Say No to GOP and their Election Fraud (http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/just-say-no-to-gop-and-their-election-fraud/14206)
Saturday, 28 April 2012 04:48
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/April201293/390293_303510343028129_100001074970735_872190_8721 71103_n.jpg
'The Republican Party has released its first commercial piece for Mitt Romney vs. Barack Obama for the national election in an attempt to ram this fraud down the American people’s throats while at the same time it is not being reported in the mainstream that Ron Paul is winning state after state as the delegates gather to make their intentions known. These criminals that make up the establishment Republican Party should be arrested.
Mitt Romney has not secured the GOP nomination and what we are seeing is an attempt to bypass the established process and disenfranchise we the American voters, not just as individuals voting in the beauty contests, but also as delegates with an absolute constitutional right to decide who will be the GOP candidate for president in 2012.'
Read more: Just Say No to GOP and their Election Fraud (http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/just-say-no-to-gop-and-their-election-fraud/14206)
PatColo
29th April 2012, 09:28 PM
I just rolled by Bollyn's site, and see he posted this article Apr 12,
The Media Blackout of the Ron Paul Revolution (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13487)
April 12, 2012
There is a political revolution underway in the United States but you certainly wouldn't know about it from the "mainstream" media, which is truly anything but mainstream. Ron Paul has millions of supporters across the nation and has activated college students and young people like no other candidate in history. This photo collage shows some of the huge crowds that have turned out recently to hear Ron Paul in towns and college campuses.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Ron_Paul_crowds.jpg
Source: http://www.dailypaul.com/226084/where-is-the-media-amazing-collage-photo (http://www.dailypaul.com/226084/where-is-the-media-amazing-collage-photo)
A blackout is defined as "a suppression, as of news, by censorship," which is exactly what the controlled media is doing in its handling of the Ron Paul revolution. Ron Paul represents the hopes and dreams of millions of Americans for honest government and a return to true American values, as defined by the U.S. Constitution. The Zionist-controlled media wants to contain the Ron Paul wildfire by suppressing all news about the huge and growing popular support for his presidential candidacy. Reading the controlled press one would think that it's a two-man race between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, which is what they want us to think. Romney and Obama are both Zionist-controlled candidates, a subject I have written about extensively in my article "The Criminal Plot to Stop Ron Paul" (http://www.bollyn.com/the-iowa-caucus-and-iran/).
In this article I explain the Zionist agenda to stop Ron Paul, which involves running several Zionist-controlled and funded candidates to confuse the voters and hide the fact that electronic vote fraud is being used to steal votes - and elections - from Paul across America. This is a criminal plot to steal yet another presidential election.
The supposed Republican front-runner Mitt Romney is strongly supported by his old colleague Benjamin Netanyahu and other supporters from the extreme right-wing Likud party of Israel. This is the radical Zionist faction that is striving to take the United States to war against Iran, a conflict that could easily evolve into a World War.
Barack Obama, on the other hand, is supported by the same people (e.g. the Crown family of Chicago). The blatant Zionist meddling in the primaries and bankrolling of marginal candidates like Newt Gingrich is a good example of how the Zionist establishment seeks to control U.S. politics by controlling both candidates in a two-man race. Except for Ron Paul, all of the presidential candidates are Zionist lackeys. The media censorship of the Ron Paul revolution clearly reveals the anti-American character of the controlled media. This is the same controlled media that has imposed a 10-year blackout of the truth of 9/11. It's time to shut down the controlled media. It's time for the truth.
PatColo
23rd November 2012, 04:06 PM
22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham (http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012111617392/us/politics-and-economics/22-signs-that-voter-fraud-is-wildly-out-of-control-and-the-election-was-a-sham.html)
Friday, 16 November 2012 00:00 American Dream
http://www.rightsidenews.com/templates/ja_teline_iii/images/emailButton.png (http://www.rightsidenews.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,d10a1fd8d7fde3956b6822e93410fddb0e301c08/tmpl,component/) http://www.rightsidenews.com/templates/ja_teline_iii/images/printButton.png (http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012111617392/us/politics-and-economics/22-signs-that-voter-fraud-is-wildly-out-of-control-and-the-election-was-a-sham/print.html)
6751 readings Tweet (http://twitter.com/share)
After what we have seen this November, how is any American ever supposed to trust the integrity of our elections ever again? There were over 70,000 reports of voting problems on election day, and there are numerous eyewitnesses that claim that they saw voting machines change votes for one candidate to another candidate right in front of their eyes. In several of the swing states there were counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population by a very wide margin. How in the world does that happen? Some of the vote totals that were reported in some of the most important swing states were completely and totally absurd, and yet we are just supposed to accept them on blind faith without ever being able to ask any questions.
http://www.rightsidenews.com/images/stories/October_2012/US/Politics_and_Economics/voter_fraud.jpgOf course the Romney campaign has already totally given up, so it isn’t as if there is any chance that the results of the presidential election could be overturned anyhow. But if massive election fraud did take place and nobody is held accountable, what kind of message will that send for the future? Will we ever be able to have faith in the integrity of our elections ever again?
The following are 22 signs that voter fraud is wildly out of control and the election was a sham…
#1 According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters across the United States reported more than 70,000 voting problems (http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2012/11/thousands-report-voting-problems/) by 5 PM Eastern time on election day.
#2 There were 59 voting divisions (http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-12/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-sasha-issenberg) in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. In those voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.
#3 The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent (http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-09/news/34995157_1_voter-turnout-president-obama-gop-voters). But in the areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed (http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012111617392/us/politics-and-economics/22-signs-that-voter-fraud-is-wildly-out-of-control-and-the-election-was-a-sham.html#.UKLSqYa7lAz), the voter turnout rate was over 90% (http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/fraud-in-pa-obama-got-over-99-of-vote.html) and Obama received over 99% (http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/fraud-in-pa-obama-got-over-99-of-vote.html) of the vote. Officials in Philadelphia have already ruled out (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/12/pa-officials-plan-no-probe-despite-extraordinary-turnout-totals-for-obama-in/) an investigation.
#4 According to WND (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/poll-watcher-sees-romney-ballots-changed/), one poll watcher in Pennsylvania actually claims that he witnessed voting machine software repeatedly switch votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama…
It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.” He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes. He said the changes appeared to have been made by a software program. Ashcroft said the format for computer programming has a default status, and in this case it appeared to be designating a vote for Obama each time it went to default.
#5 Somehow Mitt Romney won 55 out of the 67 counties in the state of Pennsylvania (http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012111617392/us/politics-and-economics/22-signs-that-voter-fraud-is-wildly-out-of-control-and-the-election-was-a-sham.html#.UKEjA_8mBAM.facebook) and still managed to lose the entire state by a wide margin because of the absurd vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.
#6 Barack Obama received more than 98 percent of the vote (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/12/pa-officials-plan-no-probe-despite-extraordinary-turnout-totals-for-obama-in/) in 10 out of the 50 wards in the city of Chicago.
#7 Prior to the election, voters in the states of Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Ohio (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/02/claims-increasing-switched-votes-in-ohio/) all reported that voting machines were switching their votes for Romney over to Obama.
#8 There were more than 50 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Mitt Romney received 2 votes or less (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/election-fraud-obama-won-more-than-99-percent-of-the-vote-in-more-than-100-ohio-precincts).
#9 There were more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Barack Obama received more than 99 times the votes (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/election-fraud-obama-won-more-than-99-percent-of-the-vote-in-more-than-100-ohio-precincts) that Mitt Romney did.
#10 Barack Obama also received more than 99% of the vote (http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/in-florida-obama-got-over-99-in-broward.html) in a number of very important precincts down in Broward County, Florida.
#11 Wood County, Ohio (which Obama won) has a voting age population of 98,213 (http://www.cleveland.com/datacentral/index.ssf/2012/09/ohio_voter_registration_list_i.html), but somehow 106,258 (http://www.cleveland.com/datacentral/index.ssf/2012/09/ohio_voter_registration_list_i.html) voters were registered to vote on election day.
#12 Ten counties in the swing state of Colorado have a voter registration rate of more than 100% (http://www.redstate.com/2012/09/04/colorado-counties-have-more-voters-than-people/).
#13 Barack Obama did not win in a single state (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/did-this-dirty-trick-get-obama-elected/) that absolutely requires a photo I.D. in order to vote.
#14 In Ohio, two election judges were caught (http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/11/07/voter-fraud-watch-two-election-judges-replaced-after-illegal-activity-in-ohio/) allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots.
#15 Many Ohio voters that showed up at the polls on election day were surprised when they were informed that they had already voted (http://godfatherpolitics.com/7942/ohio-residents-told-they-already-voted-when-they-showed-up-at-the-polls-tuesday/).
#16 In fact, there were reports all over the nation (http://twitchy.com/2012/11/06/voter-fraud-people-go-to-vote-ballots-already-cast-in-their-names-others-vote-more-than-once/) of people being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted.
#17 According to U.S. Representative Allen West, there were numerous “voting irregularities (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/allen-west-unconscionable-vote-shenanigans/?cat_orig=politics)” in St. Lucie County, Florida on election day…
“The thing that spurred our curiosity in our race was the fact that at 1 o’clock in the morning on Election Night, all of a sudden there was a 4,000-vote swing that took me from being ahead to put the lead into my opponent’s hands.”
#18 In Wisconsin, there were allegations that Obama voters were actually being bussed in from out of state (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387389068009997&set=a.362561847159386.84375.361783440570560&type=1&theater)…
The Democrats stationed a self described “BIG Chicago pro bono attorney” as one of their two observers at this small polling place. He remained at the polling place from 7:00 a.m. until well after 8:p.m. …..A high priced CHICAGO attorney, sitting in a Sheboygan WISCONSIN polling place, observing wards comprised of 1500 voters? …. WHY???
Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD?
This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned.
Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting.
One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails!
She complained because registering was taking too long and she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago.
We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
#19 Prior to election day, an Obama for America staffer was caught on video (http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/10/undercover-video-obama-workers-enable-double-voting-across-state-lines/) trying to help someone register to vote in more than one state.
#20 It is being alleged that unions in Nevada have been registering illegal immigrants (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMGd50sZG4g&feature=share) and pressuring them to vote.
#21 According to townhall.com (http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2012/11/11/obama_likely_won_reelection_through_election_fraud/page/2), there was a systematic effort by the Obama campaign to suppress the military vote because they knew that most military votes would go against Obama…
Aiding Obama’s win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/01/military-ballot-requests-down-in-key-battleground-states/) drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
#22 According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, it appears that thousands of military votes from this election will never be counted at all (http://www.nera.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=191:military-ballots-not-counted&catid=81:blog1&Itemid=148).
So what do you think about all of this?
Do you still believe that elections in America are fair and honest?
Please feel free to post an article with your thoughts below…
SOURCE: American Dream (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/22-signs-that-voter-fraud-is-wildly-out-of-control-and-the-election-was-a-sham)
PatColo
23rd November 2012, 04:56 PM
yall remember this,
Thread: anyone see the story on drudge about the tv station in cleveland calling the election (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?64458-anyone-see-the-story-on-drudge-about-the-tv-station-in-cleveland-calling-the-election)
'nother good one from Bollyn Nov 8:
Stealing the Election - Again (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13780)
November 8, 2012
The CBS television station in Phoenix, KPHO, announced the results of the November 6 presidential election on October 19, more than two weeks before the election! These are the weird things that happen when elections are run by the media and private voting machine companies. Elections in the United States are not in the hands of the citizenry. The fundamental problem with elections in the United States is that the votes are not counted by the citizens in each polling station as they should be. We do not have transparent and open elections. We have lost our democratic franchise.
Video Link - http://youtu.be/CgYTw06Te1Q
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Elections_France12.JPG
In a proper democratic election, like this one in France, the citizens count the votes openly in front of the public in each polling station. Without this most essential aspect, an election is neither transparent nor authentic. My article "Restoring Democracy in America" (http://www.bollyn.com/restoring-democracy-in-america-2/) describes how proper democratic elections are conducted using the French presidential election of 2002, which I monitored, as an example.
“…to have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also. Like will always produce like.”
- Thomas Paine to the Citizens of the United States, 29 January 1803
The U.S. presidential election on November 6 will be stolen, just like every election since 2000 has been, using electronic voting machines that are designed to steal elections. Even The Christian Science Monitor has caught on to the systemic vote fraud in U.S. elections with its recent article titled, “Could e-voting machines in Election 2012 be hacked? Yes.”
The evil character in the new James Bond film says he can throw an election to the highest bidder using computers, but he oddly uses Uganda as his example target - not the United States. Perhaps they don't want to be too obvious for the naive American voters who still believe their vote really counts. Why is it so easy to accept that massive vote fraud happens in places like Uganda, but not the United States? When was the last time you saw the votes being tallied by the citizens in a polling station in America?
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Atlantic_Oct12.jpg
YOU CALL THIS AN ELECTION? - The battered and chained eagle on the cover of Atlantic magazine represents the sad state of our elections - and our republic.
By now, it should be obvious that electronic voting machines are actually designed to steal elections. There is no valid reason why citizens in a free republic should allow a machine to control the most crucial aspect of their elections: the counting of the votes. In an authentic democratic election the votes should be openly counted in front of the press and the public in every polling station across the nation. It is very simple, inexpensive, and precise.
Most importantly, the open and public counting of the votes is the sine qua non, the absolutely indispensable aspect of a democratic election because the citizens’ tally of the votes in every polling station is what authenticates a proper democratic election. With the possible exception of a few rural counties, the vote counting and authentication process is no longer done by the citizens. This is to say that the elections in the United States are neither transparent nor democratic. In our American republic the representation is a fiction, as Thomas Paine said. The election has been stolen before we even cast our votes.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Elections_France21.JPG
The counting of the votes in each polling station in front of the public is what makes the tally authentic. This is the most simple and transparent way to conduct a democratic election. It is time for Americans to return to this simple and fool-proof method of voting.
I wrote my first article about the subject of electronic vote fraud, “The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win,” the week before the 2000 election. I soon realized that the criminal network behind the electronic voting systems was stealing our elections in order to control our nation. The installment of the un-elected Bush administration in the White House in 2001 and its subsequent failure to investigate the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 confirmed the criminal nature of the regime that had been put in power through vote fraud.
Now it has been reported that there are connections between Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital and Hart InterCivic, one of the companies that manufactures the electronic voting machines used in Ohio. Ohio is a “swing state” and the Hart voting machines are used in Hamilton County, the metropolitan area of Cincinnati. If Hamilton County swings for Romney there will certainly be questions raised about these connections, but by then the election will be over and even the most blatant cases of vote fraud are seldom news for more than a day or two.
Ohio’s Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner commissioned the Project Everest Report in 2007. The study was a “Risk Assessment Study of Ohio Voting Systems” to examine and evaluate the electronic voting systems used in Ohio. About the Hart machines, the report found a list of failures:
• Failure to effectively protect election data integrity
• Failure to eliminate or document unsafe functionality
• Failure to protect election from “Malicious Insiders”
• Failure to provide trustworthy auditing
The final evaluation for the Hart voting machines indicates that these machines were evidently designed to allow tampering with the results: “The researchers concluded that virtually every ballot, vote, election result, and audit log is ‘forgeable or otherwise manipulatable by an attacker with even brief access to the voting systems.’”
The report also evaluated the iVotronic voting machine manufactured by ES&S of Omaha. Again the study found that the machine was designed to facilitate tampering with the tally: The researchers found that access to administrative and voter functions are protected with “ineffective security mechanisms.”
The Ohio report concluded that the central server, software, and the precinct-based components for both DRE and optical scan voting machines “lack the fundamental technical controls necessary to guarantee a trustworthy election under operational conditions.” This is intentional, of course.
The ES&S machines also received a failing grade in security with vulnerabilities that were described as “pervasive, critical failures.”
• Failure to protect election data and software
• Failure to effectively control access to election operations
• Failure to correctly implement security mechanisms
• Failure to follow standard software and security engineering practices
About the ES&S machines, which are used in many states across America, “the researchers concluded that many of the most serious vulnerabilities in the ES&S system arise from the incorrect use of security technologies such as cryptography. This effectively neutralizes several basic security features, exposing the system and its data to misuse or manipulation.”
The report found that the ES&S voting machines were wide open to tampering: “The researchers discovered ‘exploitable vulnerabilities’ that allowed even persons with limited access – such as voters or poll workers – to compromise voting machines and election results, or to inject and spread software viruses into the central election management system."
Why is Ohio still using these seriously flawed voting machines in 2012? Why are the citizens of Ohio, or any other state, still voting on machines in which “every ballot, vote, election result, and audit log is ‘forgeable or otherwise manipulatable by an attacker with even brief access to the voting systems?” It just doesn’t make any sense unless one realizes that the system is designed for cheating on a massive scale.
Which raises the question, who is supposed to be overseeing the use of these machines at the federal level?
As Ohio’s Project EVEREST (i.e. Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing) study says:
In 2002, the United States Congress adopted the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), which aimed to improve the administration of elections in the United States. With the enactment of HAVA, new voting system requirements were established, and a national program was implemented to provide states with the funds necessary to replace punch card and lever voting systems with new, qualifying systems.
HAVA also created the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and transferred the responsibility of developing voting system standards from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to the EAC. Through HAVA, the EAC was also tasked with establishing the federal government’s first voting system certification program.
Well then, who is running the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, which is responsible for voting system standards and certifying the voting machines we vote on?
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (vacant)
It is a sign of the times that during the year leading up to the 2012 election there has been no Executive Director of the EAC. Thomas R. Wilkey submitted his resignation as executive director effective November 30, 2011. As the EAC website (http://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/staff.aspx) says: “HAVA states that if the executive director position becomes vacant, the general counsel of the commission serves as acting executive director until the commission appoints a replacement.
GENERAL COUNSEL (vacant)
“EAC’s general counsel, in accordance with HAVA, is appointed to a four-year term and may serve additional terms by a vote of the Commission. The general counsel serves under the executive director and is responsible for reviewing all guidance, guidelines, best practices as well as overseeing compliance.”
But there is no general counsel either at the EAC. Mark A. Robbins submitted his resignation as general counsel effective May 15, 2012.
How odd. The federal commission responsible for voting systems has had no executive director or general counsel during the six months before a general election! This is an agency that is clearly not working. So, who are the political appointees on “the commission” responsible for this utter failure to regulate the voting systems in the United States?
The EAC Commissioners’ webpage is blank except for this one paragraph:
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) specifies that four commissioners are nominated by the President on recommendations from the majority and minority leadership in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate. No more than two commissioners may belong to the same political party. Once confirmed by the full Senate, commissioners may serve two consecutive terms. HAVA states that members of the commission shall continue to serve past their expired term until a successor takes office. There are four vacancies on the commission.
THE FRAUDSTER IN CHIEF
It seems that Alice P. Miller, the chief operating officer (COO), has assumed the executive responsibilities of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, including the most critical task of testing and certifying the voting systems being used. When Miller was appointed to the COO position at the EAC in May 2008 there was a chorus of protest concerning her record of involvement in fraud (http://www.zoominfo.com/CachedPage/?archive_id=0&page_id=-1655788183&page_url=//www.countedascast.com/usa/alicemiller_boee.php&page_last_updated=2012-04-29T03:40:26&firstName=Alice&lastName=Miller) at the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics (BOEE), where she was Executive Director.
The evidence indicates that Miller was involved in a criminal scheme to obtain $12,000 pay raises for herself and a colleague, and to collect $22,000 in back pay, each. In order to do this, she drafted two memorandums that falsely claimed that the pay raises were authorized and legal - the day after the changes in their job classification and pay had been improperly entered into a computerized payroll system. In 2003, the same year she was investigated for criminal fraud, Miller became the first African-American president (http://votingmachines.procon.org/view.source.php?sourceID=001307) of the National Association of State Election Directors.
In May 2008, when Miller was appointed as COO, an EAC press release (http://www.eac.gov/eac_selects_d.c._elections_director_for_chief_oper ating_officer_post_/) said:
"Ms. Miller will oversee the day-to-day operations at the EAC in six program areas: Voting Systems Testing and Certification, HAVA Funding, Election Administration Improvement Programs, Research, Administration and Human Resources."
Instead of being prosecuted for her crimes, Miller was promoted to a higher federal position. This is, of course, the way a crimocracy works and this is exactly the kind of regimes we are fostering in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the former republics of the Soviet Union.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Miller_Alice_P.jpg
ALICE P. MILLER - Without an executive director, general counsel, or any commissioners, the crucial responsibilities at the U.S. Election Assistance Commission have all devolved upon the chief operating officer, Alice Miller, who is currently running the agency that oversees U.S. elections. Miller has a documented history of unprosecuted criminal fraud (http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/ig030522.htm). She seems to have found the perfect federal job for herself certifying the fraudulent voting systems being used to steal our elections.
So we have a federal election agency, run by a known fraudster, certifying the fraudulent voting systems Americans vote on. No wonder voting machines that are so easily tampered with are still being used across the nation. The whole system is clearly designed to steal our elections, which is the real purpose of the voting machines in the first place. It’s time to go back to hand-counted paper ballots counted in every polling station in America. It’s time to take our republic back.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Alice P. Miller, Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission
http://democrats.cha.house.gov/sites/democrats.cha.house.gov/files/styles/detail_main_image/public/2011%20BIOS%20-%20Miller.pdf
"Could e-voting machines in Election 2012 be hacked? Yes." by Mark Clayton, Christian Science Monitor, October 26, 2012
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/2012/1026/Could-e-voting-machines-in-Election-2012-be-hacked-Yes
"Death of Democracy Or May the Best Hacker Win," by Christopher Bollyn, October 27, 2000
http://www.bollyn.com/death-of-democracy-or-may-the-best-hacker-win
"EAC Selects D.C. Elections Director for Chief Operating Officer Post,” www.eac.gov (http://www.eac.gov), May 9, 2008
http://www.eac.gov/eac_selects_d.c._elections_director_for_chief_oper ating_officer_post_/
“Inspector General Report of Investigation Concerning Inadequate Oversight and Misconduct at the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics and the Office of Campaign Finance,” OIG No. 2002-0252, May 22, 2003, DCWatch.com
http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/ig030522.htm
Project EVEREST, Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing, Executive Report, Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, December 14, 2007
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/upload/everest/00-SecretarysEVERESTExecutiveReport.pdf
“Restoring Democracy in America,” by Christopher Bollyn, March 19, 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/restoring-democracy-in-america-2/
“The Dubious Integrity of Alice P. Miller and the Elections Assistance Commission,” CountedAsCast.com (cached), October 7, 2008
http://www.zoominfo.com/CachedPage/?archive_id=0&page_id=-1655788183&page_url=//www.countedascast.com/usa/alicemiller_boee.php&page_last_updated=2012-04-29T03:40:26&firstName=Alice&lastName=Miller
“The Reality of Electronic Vote Fraud in America,” by Christopher Bollyn, January 26, 2012
http://www.bollyn.com/13598/
U.S. Elections Assistance Commission website, November 4, 2012
http://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/staff.aspx
http://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/commissioners.aspx
PatColo
16th June 2013, 03:21 AM
Jim Stone posts this (http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/)- I wasn't aware that NH is all hand count paper ballot now?
Elections in Iran underway
Unlike what you have been told, Ahmadenijad is not getting ousted. Iran has term limits that are exactly the same as America's, and Ahmadenijad has served his 8 years. Most likely he would win in a landslide absent term limits. Contrary to what you have been told, Iranian elections are not rigged. They all take place with public counts of anonymously cast hand counted paper ballots, the exact same way New Hampshire does it in America. Furthermore, if I remember right, the ballots in Iran have two parts that separate and you get to keep your ballot number, and can then check that number against public record to ensure your vote was counted correctly while remaining completely anonymous.
It is America with the rigged elections, where except in a few jurisdictions, your vote goes into a black hole with no way to know how it got counted. The zionist media in America can STUFF IT with their lies about elections. The Israeli made electronic voting machines in America keep everything secret and can be tweaked at will, and if you are smart enough to find this site, I don't need to tell you that. There is a reason why Iran has a non Rothchild central bank, and a reason why the zionists want Iran destroyed, and a big part of that reason is FULLY ACCOUNTABLE YET ANONYMOUS TRUTHFULLY ACCURATE ELECTIONS, and a well educated population. But since the Iranian election, as a result of it being impossible to manipulate will most certainly NOT produce the results Israel wants, watch for all sorts of screams in the ziopress about how rigged it all is.
Cebu_4_2
16th June 2013, 05:25 AM
Jim Stone posts this (http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/)- I wasn't aware that NH is all hand count paper ballot now?
What was the results in NH?
PatColo
31st December 2013, 06:02 PM
1 hr comm free show. The first 1/2 with Lundgren, they only talk election fraud in the first few mins. Second 1/2 with Curtis is nearly all election fraud talk.
Must listen via the player console at: http://noliesradio.org/archives/74435
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Rolf Lindgren on black box voting & NSA spying; Cint Curtis on Dr. Bob Bowman (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2013/12/rolf-lindgren-on-black-box-voting-nsa.html)
Broadcast Mon., Dec. 30th 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on NoLiesRadio.org (http://noliesradio.org/), archived here (http://noliesradio.org/archives/category/archived-shows/kevin-barrett-show). [,,,]
First half-hour: Libertarian activist Rolf Lindgren and I argue about whether or not black-box voting machines are stealing elections (including Bob Bowman (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/11/11/bowman-tribute/)'s congressional seat in 2006). Later in the show, we agree that NSA spying blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment, and discuss the legal wrangling around this issue that is heading for the Supreme Court.
Second half hour: Clint Curtis (http://www.clintcurtis.com/), an attorney and computer programmer, ran for Congress in Florida as a whistleblower in 2006 and 2008 against "vote fraud Congressman" Tom Feeney. During his 2006 campaign he got to know another whistleblower candidate: Dr. Bob Bowman. In 2010, he won the Democratic nomination and ran against Tom McClintock in California.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BMumAXxCMAIKofC.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&docid=1MkYzb7R_tCNBM&tbnid=VcRiXp0BlBg_gM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ronpaulforums.com%2Fshowthrea d.php%3F417929-Massie-We-Must-Never-As-Americans-Accept-The-Premise-That-Government-Can-Lie-To-Us%21&ei=YY7BUsWIPOjgyQG0oYDICw&bvm=bv.58187178,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFmAWYLOCYPyMkv_549Nichmnrdzg&ust=1388465392970481)
Posted by Kevin Barrett (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227) at 8:50 PM No comments: (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2013/12/rolf-lindgren-on-black-box-voting-nsa.html#comment-form)
Labels: black box voting (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/black%20box%20voting), bob bowman (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/bob%20bowman), clint curtis (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/clint%20curtis), election fraud (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/election%20fraud), election theft (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/election%20theft), fourth amendment (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/fourth%20amendment), karl rove (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/karl%20rove), nsa spying (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/nsa%20spying), rolf lindgren (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/rolf%20lindgren), supreme court (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/supreme%20court), tom feeney (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/tom%20feeney), tom mcclintock (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/tom%20mcclintock)
Re: (including Bob Bowman (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/11/11/bowman-tribute/)'s congressional seat in 2006), it seems the fake election blackboxes said the result was 45-55% against Bowman; meanwhile the exit polls gave the opposite result, giving Bowman 55%.
Does anyone believe CA & WA voters actually voted AGAINST having GMO foods merely LABELED?
Washington's GMO food label initiative reportedly fails to pass 55-45% (http://www.naturalblaze.com/2013/11/washingtons-gmo-food-label-initiative.html)
How to Rig an Election | Harper's Magazine (http://harpers.org/print/?pid=225772)
new illuminati: There Is No US President: Voter Fraud Inevitable ... (http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2012/11/there-is-no-us-president-voter-fraud.html)
Hypertiger
31st December 2013, 06:45 PM
The Universe is perfectly fair, All an everything is supplied with what all and everything deserves, and there is no hope.
A. Ron paul is getting scamed in the voting proccess (in which case there is no hope) OR
B. The people are too stupid and decadent to do basic research into who is good for this country ( in which case there is no hope)
Both.
Then there is
C. His policies if attempted to be implemented would cause the premature collapse of the USA and world and kill you all in mass numbers...You all would be dead or dying if he was elected...the only reason you have the benefit of lamenting what you all are moaning about is because the system is still inflating enough to sustain the fantasy you exist within.
D. He took on Greenspan in front of cameras many times and was not able to lift the veil...It was a joke...Ludicrous
In a mass media broadcast debate between any poor unfortunate deluded soul sent up against me...I would lift the veil on the apocalypse and the world would end.
E. Sophistry...A.K.A. Or Democracy.
The essential claim of sophistry is that the actual logical validity of an argument is irrelevant (if not non-existent); it is only the ruling of the audience which ultimately determines whether a conclusion is considered "true" or not. By appealing to the prejudices and emotions of the judges, one can garner favorable treatment for one's side of the argument and cause a factually false position to be ruled true."--Sophistry A.K.A Democracy or Truth by Popular delusion/consensus
"We must win the war of democracy"--Vladimir Lenin
"A lie told often enough becomes the truth."--Vladimir Lenin
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”--Adolf Hitler
“Presidents are selected, not elected.”--Franklin Delano Roosevelt
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."--Joseph Stalin
"A lie which is finite and fragile is designed to masquerade as Truth and since Truth is infinite and indestructible and never changes must mimic truth by Not changing."--Me
Cebu_4_2
31st December 2013, 06:49 PM
The reason the Demorats can cheat:
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/
The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud.http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/election-2012/
Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud Posted on November 15, 2012 (http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/) by Dr. Eowyn (http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/author/eowyn2/) | 290 Comments (http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/#comments)
Friends and Patriots,
It’s major duct tape time ’cause you’ll need it to keep your head from exploding.
Are you ready for this?
Here we go….
There is now compelling and undeniable evidence that MAJOR vote fraud had been perpetrated in the November 2012 Election. See FOTM’s posts chronicling the extensive pervasive fraud by going to our “2012 Election” page (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/election-2012/) below our FOTM masthead, and click on those post links colored dark green.
But our screaming and hollering are to no avail. No one is listening to us. Not even the Republican Party.
Here’s why….
The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud. Yes. You read it correctly.
In fact, legally the GOP cannot ensure voting integrity, nor can it prevent vote fraud.
Here’s the astounding reason, which is kept from the American people.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/suicidal-gop.jpg?w=500 (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/suicidal-gop.jpg)
PolitiJim writes for Gulag Bound (http://gulagbound.com/36046/no-joke-the-gop-can-not-legally-help-stop-vote-fraud/#.UKPfJWd4CSq), November 13, 2012, that during the weekly True the Vote webcast, Catherine Engelbrecht (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/01/The-Left-s-War-on-True-the-Vote-and-Catherine-Engelbrecht-Where-It-All-Began) (see her photo below) related a meeting she had with Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), asking what the GOP would do about voter integrity. The answer?
Nothing. They aren’t legally able to.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/catherine-englebrecht.jpg?w=500 (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/catherine-englebrecht.jpg)True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht (read more about her, here (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/01/The-Left-s-War-on-True-the-Vote-and-Catherine-Engelbrecht-Where-It-All-Began)) This all goes back to a lawsuit 31 years ago, in 1981. The following is compiled from an account on The Judicial View (http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975), a legal website specializing in court decision research and alerts, and from “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/rnc-v-dnc.pdf),” Case No. 09-4615.
In 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the RNC, the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The following is what the RNC and RSC, in the Consent Decree, agreed they would do:
[I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:
(a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;
(b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;
(c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;
(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;
(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;
(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.
The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”
As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”
Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickinson_Richards_Debevoise), now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back (http://gulagbound.com/36046/no-joke-the-gop-can-not-legally-help-stop-vote-fraud/#.UKPfJWd4CSq) yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/debevoise.jpg?w=225&h=300 (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/debevoise.jpg)U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise
In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). (I paid The Judicial Review $10 for the PDF of Case No. 09-4615 and uploaded the 59-page document to FOTM’s media library. To read Case No. 09-4615, click here (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/rnc-v-dnc.pdf)!)
This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling (http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975), filed on March 8, 2012:
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee (http://www.afj.org/judicial-selection/nominees/joseph-a-greenway.html), Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/greenaway.jpg?w=500 (http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/greenaway.jpg)Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
Guy Benson of Townhall.com (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/11/12/the_400000_votes_that_tipped_the_election) points out that in last Tuesday’s election, Obama only won by 406,348 votes in 4 states:
Florida: 73,858
Ohio: 103,481
Virginia: 115,910
Colorado: 113,099
Those four states, with a collective margin of 406,348 votes for Obama, add up to 69 electoral votes. Had Romney won 407,000 or so additional votes in the right proportion in those states, he would have 275 electoral votes.
All four states showed Romney ahead in the days leading up to the election. But on November 6, Romney lost all four states by a substantial margin, all of which have precincts that inexplicably went 99% for Obama, had voter registrations that exceeded their population, and had experienced problems with voting machines.
This election was stolen by the Democrats via vote fraud. Despite all the evidence of fraud, the Republican Party has been strangely silent about it.
Now you know why.
I’ll leave you with one last, even more disturbing thought: The RNC and DNC made their Consent Decree 30 years ago, in 1982. The agreement in effect gives a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.
The Democrat Party knew this 30 years ago, more than enough time to put a plan in place to identify and groom their “perfect candidate” — in the words of Sen. Harry Reid (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/01/harry-reid-barack-obama.html) (D-NV) in 2008, a “light-skinned” black Democrat who has “no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one.”
Being a black Democrat, this perfect candidate would get the support of almost all black Americans (96% in 2008 (http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/06/5-voting-demographics-where-barack-obama-made-headlines)!) and other racial minorities (two-thirds of Hispanics in 2008).
Being a “light-skinned” black with “no Negro dialect”, this perfect candidate would get the support of white Americans perpetually guilt-ridden about America’s original sin of slavery.
It doesn’t matter if this “perfect candidate” has dubious Constitutional eligibility to be president. They would see to it that his original birth certificate (if there is one) would never see the light of day. The same with his other documents — his passports, school and college records, draft registration, and medical records (so we’ll never know why Obama has that very long scar running from one side of his head, over the crown, to the other side (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/what-are-those-scars-on-obamas-head/)).
Now, we understand the significance of the account Tom Fife (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/05/24/obama-a-sleeper-agent-for-world-communism/) wrote during the 2008 presidential campaign. Fife, a U.S. government contractor, claims that in 1992 while he was visiting Moscow, a woman with undying allegiance to Soviet Communism (the Soviet Union had recently collapsed, on December 31, 1991) told him that a black man named Barack, born of a white American woman and an African male, was being groomed by communists to be, and would be elected, President of the United States.
Now, we finally understand the cryptic remark made in May 2010, by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: “Obama was selected before he was elected.” (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/05/19/louis-farrakhan-obama-was-selected-before-he-was-elected/)
In 2008, this “perfect candidate” won the presidential election. And despite his many failures in his first term, he would be reelected in 2012 for a second term via massive vote fraud. But nothing would be done about the vote fraud, because of that Consent Decree signed by the RNC 30 years ago.
The Republican Party is dead — and with it, the U.S. two-party system as well — and the sooner we voters recognize that the better.
The question that remains is whether the American Republic is also dead.
UPDATE (Nov. 16, 2012): Since I published this post yesterday, we’ve been asking each other: “What can I/we do about this?” Here are my suggestions:
1. If you are a registered Republican, QUIT! Switch your voter registration ID to non-partisan Independent.
2. Stop donating money, not even one penny, to the GOP. Tell them why.
3. Spread the word. Please send the URL of this post (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/) to:
EVERYONE on your email list.
Media people for whom you have email addresses.
Tea Party groups you know.
Post the link on your Facebook page.
Post the link as your comment on websites and blogs you visit.
4. Write your state’s attorney general and ask him/her to investigate vote fraud in your state. Click here (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/17/what-you-can-do-about-vote-fraud/)!
UPDATE (Nov. 21, 2012): 5 days after I’d published this and 7 days after PolitiJim of GulagBound published his acount, someone in the conservative establishment media is writing about this — WND’s Bob Unruh. Click here (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/)for his article, “GOP Legally Barred From Fighting Vote Fraud”. But it’s still the sound of crickets from conservative talk radio, even though I’ve sent my post to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, and a reader had also sent it to Mark Levin.
Just so you know: It makes no monetary difference to us how many people read this post. Fellowship of the Minds (FOTM) is an ad-free blog. We don’t make even a penny in revenue because we deliberately don’t have ads. In fact, I paid WordPress a $99 annual fee so WordPress can’t insert ads on FOTM either. All of our writers work our butts off, for no pay, as a labor of love for our country.
Hypertiger
31st December 2013, 07:00 PM
The regime In Iran was installed by the invisible order...The revolution and the ayatollah and the hostage crisis was all planned...
Iran under sanctions is helping all the security council members...
The economy is deflating...the easiest way to support prices so they do not deflate...Is to cut supply in relation to demand.
All the lines on the map are barriers that all the chattel nationalists are confined within.
Who do you think invented nation states?...They are just absolute capitalist hierarchical food powered make work enterprises...economic zones or sub hierarchies all connected to the global hierarchical system.
It's like a farm where all the animals are in separate pens...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-endorsed-iranian-plans-to-build-massive-nuclear-energy-industry/2067
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/archive/Rumsfeld_was_on_ABB_board_during_deal_with_North_K orea.html?cid=3176922
Hypertiger
31st December 2013, 07:07 PM
The USA is DOA...It took you all over 70 years to vote your way to where you are....You are not going to vote your way out.
The first stage is denial.
The second stage is anger.
The third stage is bargaining.
The fourth stage is depression.
The fifth and final stage is acceptance.
PatColo
31st December 2013, 09:08 PM
Jim Stone posts this (http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/)- I wasn't aware that NH is all hand count paper ballot now? What was the results in NH?
He was cheated in both '08 & '12. Here's a piece from '08,
Ron Paul - Vote Fraud Victim (http://www.rense.com/general79/cct.htm)
By J. Bruce Campbell
1-9-8
The numbers don't add up, obviously. Ron Paul wins straw poll after straw poll, he wins hack-proof online polls such as AOL's and he gets unprecedented donations and still he gets wiped out by the Diebold machines, which was expected. Blackboxvoting.org has shown us how it is done. The exact same Diebold machines that were exposed in "Hacking Democracy" two years ago were used in New Hampshire yesterday to manage 81% of the primary ballots. Then we learned that the 2004 Iowa Caucus voting was handled by an Israeli-owned company, Elron. Were things different this year? Who is behind John Silvestro and his LHS company that counted the New Hampshire vote?
We should stop hoping that we can beat the house and its rigged roulette wheel, its programmed slot machines and its marked decks and loaded dice.
The Ron Paul campaign was given millions of dollars to clean out the corruption in the federal government. This will be impossible if vote fraud prevents Ron Paul from winning, despite his wild and growing popularity. Vote fraud is at the center of official corruption and will always prevent investigation and prosecution of those involved in criminal behavior.
The campaign should now shift gears and announce that vote fraud has clearly destroyed the American political process, as proven by the Collier brothers, by Jim Condit, Bev Harris, Harri Hursti and the Public Broadcasting System and by many others.
Vote fraud must now be the target of the Ron Paul Revolution. Ron Paul can make a calm announcement that calls for an audit of the vote-counting machine from one end to the other. The audit can be made by the Ron Paul campaign, which can now afford to do it. He should recommend that the General Accounting Office and Federal Election Commission assist the campaign's audit. He can invite the GOP and Democratic Party to participate. If they refuse for any reason, their refusal will prove that they know about the vote fraud and are willing participants.
Ron Paul should announce that fair elections cannot be held until it is proven that the vote counting process is honest and trustworthy. The best weapon his campaign has in the 2006 PBS program, "Hacking Democracy." Bev Harris' ongoing work at Blackboxvoting.org can be revealed to millions of Americans now, with the millions of dollars entrusted to the Ron Paul Revolution. The two Ohio election officials recently sentenced to prison for the 2004 vote fraud were exposed by Blackboxvoting's great work, which can be seen in the PBS program.
Ron Paul should file suit to order a suspension of the primary process until a comprehensive audit of the vote counting process has been completed and all doubts as to its honesty are removed. Computers must be outlawed in the vote-counting process. The only way to ensure honest elections is with paper ballots and receipts, as the Collier brothers proved in their groundbreaking book, Votescam. They showed that there are dozens of ways to steal the vote as long as machines are used to count it. The question we must all ask is, "Who programs the computers that count the votes?"
Ron Paul should demand that paper ballots be counted by hand in the open and measured against paper receipts in the event of a disputed result. But first, there must be an audit of the process we have been under for decades, to show how we have been cheated and defrauded.
for the '12 "election" theft from RP, I'd Startpage search Ron Paul New Hampshire Primary voter fraud (https://startpage.com/do/search?cmd=process_search&cat=web&query=Ron+Paul+New+Hampshire+Primary+voter+fraud&language=english&no_sugg=1&ff=&abp=-1)
Cebu_4_2
31st December 2013, 09:12 PM
Cant win by voting obviously. The Dems are evil cheaters for the votes, The Rebugs are evil and the same breed. This is just a game they play to make the dweebs think they matter. The only voting that may count is local. Local has much more power than 90% of the nation to elect the next dweeb.
PatColo
31st December 2013, 09:45 PM
ah the old plane crash trick!
Democracy Now! coverage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_s97iE8J40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_s97iE8J40
USA - Michael Connell's Convenient Plane Crash (I)
https://i1.ytimg.com/i/6C6qKdctOvwg7yfXYPkgCA/1.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/user/gfde08?feature=watch)gfde08 (https://www.youtube.com/user/gfde08?feature=watch)·145 videos (https://www.youtube.com/user/gfde08/videos)
609
2,126
https://s.ytimg.com/yts/img/pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif 19 https://s.ytimg.com/yts/img/pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif 0
Uploaded on Dec 26, 2008
Republican IT Specialist Dies in Plane Crash
-
A top Republican internet strategist who was set to testify in a case alleging election tampering in 2004 in Ohio has died in a plane crash. Michael Connell was the chief IT consultant to Karl Rove and created websites for the Bush and McCain electoral campaigns. Michael Connell was deposed one day before the election this year by attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis about his actions during the 2004 vote count in Ohio and his access to Karl Roves email files and how they went missing.
Mark Crispin Miller:
professor of media culture and communication at New York University. He is the author of several books, including Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008 and Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why Theyll Steal the Next One Too.
December (19)22, 2008
A top Republican internet strategist who was set to testify in a case alleging election tampering in 2004 in Ohio has died in a plane crash. Mike Connell was the chief IT consultant to Karl Rove and created websites for the Bush and McCain electoral campaigns. He also set up the official Ohio state election website reporting the 2004 presidential election returns.
Connell was reportedly an experienced pilot. He died instantly Friday night when his private plane crashed in a residential neighborhood near Akron, Ohio.
Michael Connell was deposed one day before the election this year by attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis about his actions during the 2004 vote count and his access to Karl Roves email files and how they went missing.
Velvet Revolution, a non-profit investigating Connells activities, revealed this weekend that Connell had recently said he was afraid George Bush and Dick Cheney would throw [him] under the bus. Cliff Arnebeck had also previously alerted Attorney General Michael Mukasey to alleged threats from Karl Rove to Connell if he refused to take the fall.
ziopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Connell
Cebu_4_2
31st December 2013, 09:52 PM
Spamming the truth Pat...
Other than I have no Idea why you want to bury the truth.
PatColo
10th October 2014, 04:42 PM
Bigjon posted this thread in May but I missed it at that time. I'll repost his OP here for posterity, but check there for 36 replies,
Thread: Ohio Sec of State Husted Admits Election Officials Agree Not to See Election Software (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?77243-Ohio-Sec-of-State-Husted-Admits-Election-Officials-Agree-Not-to-See-Election-Software)
April 29, 2014 NA (Network America) e-wire
http://www.letfreedomring2014.com/
***** (To Subscribe to the Network America Ewire, go to LetFreedomRing2014.com -- go to top of left hand column, click and follow simple instructions -- punch in your email, -- wait for confirmation email and respond to it -- then you are subscribed) *****
* * * * * www.youtube.com/jimconditjr (http://www.youtube.com/jimconditjr) www.twitter.com/jimconditjr (http://www.twitter.com/jimconditjr)
* * * * *
Ohio Sec of State Husted Admits Election Officials Agree Not to See Election Software
Now we get back to what the Network America Ewire usually does – bring you hard to find (often “incredible”) facts and news. And this ewire contains such information. But first –
* * * * * * Network America Ewire is not just info and entertainment, -- we are essentially action oriented.
With the daily push to put on the Radio Ads campaign, and the two hour radio show with former Congressman Traficant this Sunday evening – we have had about 12 “unsubscribes” and about 5 “subscribes.” – That’s OK, if the 12 aren’t interested in an effective action program, then they probably will be annoyed as we go. (Total Network America Ewire list, circa 1700.)
But also, thanks to the 17 generous people who have funded the Radio Ads project to the tune of $1530 so far – with only $470 to go by this weekend to complete this project in a first class manner.
We will reach somewhere between 300,000 and 500,000 people this weekend via major Talk Radio stations with the one minute ads, and probably 5000 locally with the two hour radio show, with many more listening online worldwide. I’ve received emails from the Philippines, Sweden, and Canada supporting this effort..
So, if you are able to help $$ wise, and have been meaning to do so, please go to www.LetFreedomRing2014.com (http://www.LetFreedomRing2014.com) right now, and use the online donation link. About 19 supporters donating $25 would complete the goal. And if you’re one of those financially blessed right now who can contribute $100 to $2500, we will put it to great use between now and November. If that’s not possible for you now (again, I understand) -- might everyone consider saying a prayer that we reach the right people to complete this project effectively. I would greatly appreciate it.
* * * * *
So, in the fall of 2012, a month or so before the Presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State John Husted was the speaker at a Tea Party meeting held at a reception hall in Delhi, a community on the extreme west side of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio.
About 150 people were in attendance. John Husted is a well groomed, all American looking man in his early 40s. He was clearly doing everything he could to minimize the retail vote fraud that a disturbing number of Democratic oriented groups on the left seem to specialize in.
Husted has clearly inherited the rotten secret, computerized system we “vote” under, and his answer to my question showed that he would like to do something about it.
The whole evening was professionally audio-taped, and soon our exchange will be up on YouTube so you can hear it for yourself.
After complimenting him for the efforts he was making, I asked a somewhat complicated question that lasted about 90 seconds to 2 minutes. For the purpose of this Ewire, I will focus on one aspect of the question, and Ohio Secretary of State Husted’s answer.
My question culminated with asking the Ohio Secretary of State if it was true that the Election Officials in each of the 88 counties of Ohio signed a contract with the private vendor that they (the election officials) could NOT look at the computerized election software that was telling the computers what to do on election night.
Mr. Husted agreed in his answer that this was the case, and stated that if someone would file suit maybe they could do something about it.
(I appreciated Mr. Husted’s candor. If he had called me a “conspiracy theorist”, or ridiculed me in front of the crowd, he could have easily dismissed me and avoided the question. But he did not do that – he gave a straight answer.)
Now, understand, this incredible state of affairs prevails not only in Ohio, but in all 49 states, with the only exception I’m aware of in 20% of the state of New Hampshire, where neighborhood citizens still count the paper ballots by hand, in the polling place BEFORE the ballots are taken from public sight. (This would be easily possible in the entire country, which is explained in an article linked on the home page at votefraud.org )
Furthermore, there are only FOUR major vendors, which service about 96% of the counties in the USA. These were ES & S (Election Systems and Software), Hart Civic, Sequoia, and Diebold.
ES & S was trying to buy Diebold a few years ago, and I’m not sure where that stands.
TAKE NOTE: ES & S “counts” 60% of the ballots in the country every election day, primary and general. (All this and much more can be found in veteran reporter Ronnie Dugger’s article, “How They Could Steal the Election This Time”, linked on the right hand column of the home page at votefraud.org ).
Computerized voting began to be used circa 1973, but was consolidated in 49 states and half of New Hampshire by the Presidential Election of 1988.
How did this happen? The crooks behind the National Democratic Committee and the National Republican Party have urged, cajoled, and who-knows-what-elsed the state and local Party leaders to adopt one of these four mega-election vendors in their respective counties. It’s easy! And the private vendors will take care of everything!
And, the 5 major TV networks, AP wire, Clear Channel, the New York Times, and the Washington Post – protect the whole sordid situation by never mentioning. (We’ll go into the roll of the 5 Big TV Networks and AP wire, in a coming Network America e-wire.)
All of the four mega-vendors demand that the local election officials sign a contract which says that they can NOT look at the software which tells the local election computers what to do on election night. And all the election systems for 3131 out of our 3141 counties in the USA --
also demand that the citizens, the candidates, and the local press people are NOT allowed to examine or count any actual ballots on election day, or for about 21 days thereafter (plenty of time for someone to switch, or “doctor”, some or all of the ballots).
Finally, these secretly counted elections are unconstitutional and illegal.
* computer counts violate at least two standing US Supreme Court decisions, namely, US v Mosely, 1915, and Reynolds v Sims, 1964 . . . * In both cases, the US Supreme Court said that our right to vote consists of two parts: a) the right to cast a ballot; b) the right to KNOW that our vote has been counted accurately. When the “count” is conducted in secret (within a computer) powered by secretly programmed software (with source code usually programmed by persons unknown to even the local election officials) – then the second part of our right to vote is being violated and nullified.
You and I, as the voter, are still allowed to cast a ballot, but we have NO WAY to know whether our vote is counted accurately. (Once the ballots are snatched from the people and judges in the local, neighborhood polling places – the chain of evidence is broken, and can never be restored.
* Another US Supreme Court decision, Westbury v. Sanders, 1964, stated that all other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined.
Several sources for those who want to see that I’m only scratching the surface here: www.votefraud.org (http://www.votefraud.org) (important short articles linked on the right hand side of the home page -- www.thelandesreport.com (http://www.thelandesreport.com) – www.blackboxvoting.org (http://www.blackboxvoting.org) – which has the book, Black Box Voting, free online – and the original book, “Votescam: The Stealing of America”, by James & Kenneth Collier (1993); -- the HBO documentary, “Hacking Democracy”, starring Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org – and “Hacked! High Tech Election Theft in America” by Vickie Karp – the video documentary, “The Right to Count.” And there’s many, many more sources.
I’ve been doggedly trodding this road since 1979. The incredible thing is that so many otherwise intelligent people have allowed the USA to be reduced to, in effect, a tin horn dictatorship, or a Communist-style country with regard to elections – where our votes are “counted” in secret, on secret computer programs, by a relative handful of the Ruling Elite. This negligence includes not only the election officials themselves, but all the groups and leaders who participate, or comment on, elections, --- such as the NRA, Right to Life, the Campaign for Liberty, and all of the national Tea Party organizations, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Meet the Press, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Does anyone wonder why I say that the Guardians for Liberty program and the Constitution Party are the only major groups which have a COMPREHENSIVE Action Program? Both are linked at www.LetFreedomRing2014.com (http://www.LetFreedomRing2014.com) --
Communist Dictator Joseph Stalin said, “Those who CAST the votes decide nothing; those who COUNT the votes decide everything.”
END OF THIS NETWORK AMERICA EWIRE.
Jim Condit Jr.
LetFreedomRing2014.com
votefraud@fuse.net
513-741-2095
PO Box 11555
Cincinnati, Ohio 45211
Network America
PO Box 11339
Cincinnati, Ohio
45211
US
PatColo
23rd December 2014, 01:55 AM
Jim Fetzer belives WI's recent election had the blackbox vote counts flipped for governer. Here's JF on Rense radio last night discussing, 45 mins:
Listen (http://www.talkshoe.com/resources/talkshoe/images/swf/lastEpisodePlayer.swf?fileUrl=http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/l47fw51n6u/Rense.20141222.2of3.mp3) Download (http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/l47fw51n6u/Rense.20141222.2of3.mp3) Hour 2 - James Fetzer (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/) - The WI Scott Waller 'Re-Election' (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/20/voter-fraud-vs-election-theft-the-wisconsin-scott-walker-re-election/)
and an article JF posted at VT:
Voter Fraud vs. Election Theft: The Wisconsin Scott Walker re-election (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/20/voter-fraud-vs-election-theft-the-wisconsin-scott-walker-re-election/)
By Jim Fetzer (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/fetzer/) on December 20, 2014 election theft (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/election-theft/), GAB (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/gab/), Government Accountability Board (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/government-accountability-board/), Marquette poll (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/marquette-poll/), Mary Burke (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/mary-burke/), Ohio (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/ohio/), Richard Charnin (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/richard-charnin/), Scott Walker (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/scott-walker/), The Capital Times (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/the-capital-times/), The Devil's Advocates (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/the-devils-advocates/), The New Mitch Henke Show (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/the-new-mitch-henke-show/), voter fraud (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/voter-fraud/), Wisconsin (http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/wisconsin/) Politics (http://www.veteranstoday.com/category/government-and-politics/)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/themes/_stylebook/timthumb.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.veteranstoday.co m%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2FScott-Walker-meets-with-members-of-his-cabinet.jpg&q=90&w=795&h=470&zc=1
We have uncovered the template for Election Theft, not just in Wisconsin but across the United States.
mick silver
23rd December 2014, 08:47 AM
back up for pat
General of Darkness
23rd December 2014, 09:33 AM
Tagged thanks pat.
PatColo
24th March 2015, 04:38 AM
Obama Says He Wants To Make Voting Mandatory (http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/obama-says-he-wants-to-make-voting-mandatory/)
PatColo
31st December 2015, 11:20 PM
PPjg adio show, haven't listened yet
TS Radio: Dave Frank discusses the way we vote (http://ppjg.me/2015/12/04/ts-radio-dave-frank-discusses-the-way-we-vote/)
December 4, 2015
ppjg (http://ppjg.wordpress.com) Marti Oakley (http://ppjg.me/category/marti-oakley/), TS Radio (http://ppjg.me/category/radio/ts-radio/) Dave Frank (http://ppjg.me/tag/dave-frank/), Marti Oakley (http://ppjg.me/tag/marti-oakley/), the way we vote (http://ppjg.me/tag/the-way-we-vote/), TS Radio (http://ppjg.me/tag/ts-radio/), voting (http://ppjg.me/tag/voting/), voting alternatives (http://ppjg.me/tag/voting-alternatives/), voting machines (http://ppjg.me/tag/voting-machines/) Leave a comment
(http://ppjg.me/2015/12/04/ts-radio-dave-frank-discusses-the-way-we-vote/#respond)
https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/ts-radio.png?w=500&h=79 (https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/ts-radio.png)
Join us Friday December 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. CST!
https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/ebcfaa2a-a7ec-11e3-a68f-12313b090d61-medium.jpg?w=191&h=191 (https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/ebcfaa2a-a7ec-11e3-a68f-12313b090d61-medium.jpg)
8:00 a.m PST … 9:00 a.m. MST … 10:00 a.m. CST … 11:00 a.m. EST
Listen Live HERE! (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley/2015/12/04/ts-radio-dave-frank-discusses-an-alternative-to-the-way-we-vote)
Call in # 917-388-4520
____________________________________
Hosted by Marti Oakley-
Dave Frank joins the show today to discuss a new and innovative way to vote that would bypass the rigged Sequoia and Diebold machines.
We all remember the 2000 election, and the massive vote fraud that took place in nearly every state. None of the results could be examined in the states that used those two machines. All the machines were programmed to do was repeat their earlier numbers.
But what if there was a simpler, more verifiable way to cast your vote? One that wouldn’t require you to use those rigged ballot machines? Join us for the next hour while Dave explains his plan.
mick silver
1st January 2016, 07:04 AM
http://www.tomdispatch.com/images/managed/bankersprins.jpg (http://www.amazon.com/dp/1568584792/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20)
PatColo
5th February 2016, 04:30 AM
Jim Condit Jr. by way of JFriend's, don't miss: http://OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com
27 mins:
Trump Must Challenge Secret Computer Counts in NH & SC (http://therealistreport.com/trump-must-challenge-secret-computer-counts-in-nh-sc/)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TObruTAzimg
Trump Must Challenge Secret Computer Counts in NH & SC
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-3ANLTZ3HAOc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Px5CawKSBlU/s88-c-k-no/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMjlIyYXlZZPB8gzOqxSdCQ) Jim Condit Jr (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMjlIyYXlZZPB8gzOqxSdCQ)
2
37 views
Published on Feb 4, 2016
http://OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com -- see menu tab on "Election Nite Gatekeepers" --
The USA and the World are being Stolen by Easily-Rigged, Secret Computer Programs. These secret computer programs are controlled by mega-Companies ES &S, Hart, and Dominion (formerly Diebold) on election night. These handful of private mega-companies are hired by 99% of our counties because the RNC and the DNC encourages their Board of Elections officials to hire these mega companies.
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, and AP are equal gatekeepers on Election night in that they protect this set up AND they announce whatever results they are given by National Election Pool (NEP), a company ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, and AP JOINTLY OWNS. There are no checks and balances on election day except in 20% of NH, where paper ballots are still counted by the local citizens by hand, in public, BEFORE THE BALLOTS LEAVE THE SIGHT OF THE JUDGES AND PUBLIC.
PatColo
5th February 2016, 05:03 AM
Jim Condit Jr. by way of JFriend's, don't miss: http://OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com
27 mins:
Trump Must Challenge Secret Computer Counts in NH & SC (http://therealistreport.com/trump-must-challenge-secret-computer-counts-in-nh-sc/)
at around 21 mins, Condit is talking about this Gary Forbes tweet: https://twitter.com/gqforbes
(https://twitter.com/gqforbes)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/620591365362216960/9jhCWc6h_bigger.jpg Gary Forbes @gqforbes (https://twitter.com/gqforbes) Feb 3 (https://twitter.com/gqforbes/status/694927928484880385)
Gary Forbes Calls 4 IMMEDIATE & PERMANENT BAN on ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES—Due 2 FRAUD! @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) #dtmag (https://twitter.com/hashtag/dtmag?src=hash)
Gary Forbes (https://twitter.com/gqforbes), Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump), Ann Coulter (https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter) and 6 others
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CaThRK3W0AEhnsu.jpg
237 retweets 199 likes
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/620591365362216960/9jhCWc6h_bigger.jpg Gary Forbes @gqforbes (https://twitter.com/gqforbes) Feb 3 (https://twitter.com/gqforbes/status/694899066782793733)
AND I CHALLENGE THE GOPe To Re-Do The New IOWA Election—WITHOUT ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES! -gf #dtmag (https://twitter.com/hashtag/dtmag?src=hash) @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) @MichaelCohen212 (https://twitter.com/MichaelCohen212)
View conversation (https://twitter.com/gqforbes/status/694899066782793733) 107 retweets 107 likes
also find this new one there:
Pinned Tweet https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/620591365362216960/9jhCWc6h_bigger.jpg Gary Forbes @gqforbes (https://twitter.com/gqforbes) 7m7 minutes ago (https://twitter.com/gqforbes/status/695589523380695040)
WILL GATES' MICROSOFT STEAL GOP NOM from TRUMP?—#dtmag (https://twitter.com/hashtag/dtmag?src=hash) http://goo.gl/cTEFYR (https://t.co/FWQdaRzUDL) @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) @MichaelCohen212 (https://twitter.com/MichaelCohen212)
Ann Coulter (https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter), Gary Forbes (https://twitter.com/gqforbes), Corey Lewandowski (https://twitter.com/CLewandowski_) and 5 others
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cac6_EZWEAEp29N.jpg
3 retweets 4 likes
PatColo
5th February 2016, 10:07 PM
I believe in the past I had trouble finding the full version of this Emmy Award nominated HBO documentary, "Hacking Democracy", featuring Bev Harris:
82 mins;
Hacking Democracy - Full Length (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVTXbARGXso)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVTXbARGXso
more info:
Hacking Democracy (2006) - IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808532/)
Hacking Democracy - Official Website and DVD (http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/)
Watch "Hacking Democracy" Full Movie Online Free | Snagfilms (http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/hacking_democracy)
Hacking Democracy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacking_Democracy)
PatColo
5th February 2016, 10:17 PM
The most recent Harris interview I’m aware of is: “Another Presidential Election Year Featuring Unverified and/or Unverifiable E-Voting Begins: ‘BradCast’ 1/7/2016” (1 hour): Download MP3 (http://bradblog.com/audio/BradCast_BradFriedman_BevHarris_EVotingBegins2016_ 010716.mp3)
Another Presidential Election Year Featuring Unverified and/or Unverifiable E-Voting Begins: ‘BradCast’ 1/7/2016 (http://http://www.revereradionetwork.com/another-presidential-election-year-featuring-unverified-andor-unverifiable-e-voting-begins-bradcast-172016)
Posted on
January 8, 2016
by News Feeder (http://www.revereradionetwork.com/author/news-feeder/) — No Comments ↓ (http://www.revereradionetwork.com/another-presidential-election-year-featuring-unverified-andor-unverifiable-e-voting-begins-bradcast-172016/#respond)
By Brad Friedman
(http://bradblog.com/?p=11498)
Last year ended with a number of voter database breaches — from the Sanders/Clinton/DNC database kerfuffle (http://bradblog.com/?p=11480) to the discovery of the still-mysterious posting of some 191 million voter records (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/voter-registration-data-exposed-217172) online shortly thereafter.
But those concerns may pale in comparison to the fact that the nation is about to begin voting in Presidential primaries and caucuses using electronic voting systems and tabulators that have failed time and again, that remain vulnerable to both malfunction and malfeasance, and that are often impossible for the public to oversee in any meaningful way.
On today’s BradCast (http://bradblog.com/BradCast): Welcome to Presidential Election 2016! Good luck! (We’re gonna need it.)
Joining us to discuss the voter database breaches as well as concerns about election integrity and oversight in early caucus and primary states such as Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada and beyond is Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org (http://blackboxvoting.org/).
Harris, the election integrity watchdog featured in HBO’s Emmy-nominated 2006 documentary Hacking Democracy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacking_Democracy), has been investigating and writing about (http://blackboxvoting.org/voter-data-breaches/) those voter database breaches lately, including a new one that has just been discovered concerning tens of millions of additional voter records.
While voter registration databases actually contain public information, she explains, there are restrictions on their use, and they are not supposed to simply be posted publicly for download. “This stuff is not secure. It’ll probably never be secure,” she warns. “One of the things I did was really research how many of the breaches have occurred over time, and it’s a shocking number. You can’t secure this stuff.” As we discuss on today’s program, that point is something to keep in mind when you hear advocates of Internet Voting systems (the next nightmare that some hope to force upon American democracy) claim otherwise.
We then step through the differing voting processes used in each of the early voting states, with Harris explaining that completely unverified and/or unverifiable e-voting and tabulation systems — most of them hacked many times in the past — will once again be in use in every state in the union. Yes, even where hand-marked paper ballots are used, almost all of those ballots are tabulated by unverified computer systems.
“I’m not at war with a machine,” she explains. “I’m at war with no transparency. We have to be able to have some way to see and authenticate that count, before the ballots travel anywhere.”
Harris tells me: “The key here is not that there will never be a mistake, or never be fraud. The key is that the public has a right to accountability. If you can catch it, and do something about it — if you’re vigilant enough and doing a patriotic duty of vigilance — then that’s the whole point. When you start saying, ‘No, you can never see, you can never account for it,’ then you have a problem.”
We discuss how it was, in fact, public oversight of hand-counted paper ballots at GOP caucus sites (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9023) in Iowa in 2012 which resulted in the correct results actually becoming known (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9078) weeks later, long after the Republican Party misreported them on the night of the caucuses.
Transparency, however, is not quite as easy in other early voting states like New Hampshire (remember the unbelievably unverified mess (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5538) there in 2008, when Hillary Clinton’s victory defied even Exit Polls (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5535) taken on the day of the Primary?) and, especially, South Carolina (remember the unknown Alvin Greene’s (http://www.bradblog.com/?page_id=8954) 100% unverifiable and inexplicable victory in their 2010 Democratic U.S. Senate primary?)
“There’s not just one magic wand you can wave, but there are things to at least force some accountability into it,” Harris tells me, describing some of the ways election integrity advocates can try to force the issue a bit. Among her suggestions: “You can go [to the polling place at closing time] and snap a picture of what those [computer tabulated] results are with your cell phone and compare it with, at least, what they report” later on.
We cover a lot of ground in the conversation and I suspect we’ll be discussing this issue with her, and others, a lot more as the election year moves forward. But today’s show is a good place to begin.
Finally, speaking of warnings we keep trying to give you, Desi Doyen joins us for the very first Green News Report (http://greennewsreport.bradblog.com/) of the new year as El Niño — turbo-charged by climate change — ravaged the globe over the holidays and beyond…
Download MP3 (http://bradblog.com/audio/BradCast_BradFriedman_BevHarris_EVotingBegins2016_ 010716.mp3) or listen to complete show online below…
[See post to listen to audio]
(http://www.revereradionetwork.com/another-presidential-election-year-featuring-unverified-andor-unverifiable-e-voting-begins-bradcast-172016)
PatColo
7th February 2016, 12:16 AM
Jim Fetzer's 1st hour guest in this 2 hour show, is (@ amazon):
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll (https://www.amazon.com/Proving-Election-Fraud-Uncounted-National/dp/144908527X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8)
Mar 31, 2010
by Richard Charnin
I have no idea what the "James DiEugenio attacks..." shite is about; I may give it a couple mins to find out... :(??...oh, I see it's JFK-related, 52+ years on now... whatever, next case plz! [P]
The Real Deal Ep # 160 Election Theft / James DiEugenio attacks Jim Fetzer (Part 1) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuqDnPzDNIg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuqDnPzDNIg
also see this Fetzer/Charnin collaborative article:
JAMES FETZER: Voter Fraud vs. Election Theft: Scott Walker's Wisconsin ReElection (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/07/voter-fraud-vs-election-theft-scott.html)
PatColo
19th February 2016, 10:46 PM
2 hours; I just started listening, see show links below & open RR page for developing reader comments:
The Realist Report – Jim Condit, Jr. (http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-jim-condit-jr/) February 19, 2016 (http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-jim-condit-jr/) Realist Report (http://therealistreport.com/author/realist/) Leave a comment
(http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-jim-condit-jr/#respond)http://therealistreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Condit-Friend-2.jpg
Jim Condit, Jr. and John Friend at the Jim Traficant Memorial Tribute (http://therealistreport.com/jim-traficant-memorial-tribute/) in Washington, D.C.
On this edition of The Realist Report broadcast live on Renegade Broadcasting (http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/), we’re joined by Jim Condit, Jr. Jim and I discussed a number of topics, including the 2016 presidential campaign, Jim’s website OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com (http://openlettertodonaldtrump.com/) and WatchTheVoteUSA.com (http://www.watchthevoteusa.com/), Donald Trump, the reality of vote fraud in the United States, and what we can do to fix our election process.
Below are relevant links for this program:
Scourge of US elections: Electoral College, hackable voting machines & obscure rules – Cynthia McKinney (https://www.rt.com/op-edge/332494-scourge-us-elections-electoral/)
Trump Headed for Votescam in Iowa and NH? – American Free Press (http://americanfreepress.net/trump-headed-for-votescam-in-iowa-and-nh/) (Subscribe to America’s last real newspaper today! (http://americanfreepress.net/subscribe/))
Trump: I’ll be ‘neutral’ on Israel and Palestine – The Hill (http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/269806-trump-ill-be-neutral-on-israel-and-palestine)
Michael Glassner – Trump’s National Political Director (https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glassner-81417313)
Download (http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-128766/TS-1056326.mp3)
mick silver
20th February 2016, 04:06 AM
back up .............. the game is rigged
PatColo
21st March 2016, 10:05 AM
as posted by OptionT, 12 mins:
Thread: Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath He Coded Computers To Rig Elections (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?88670-Computer-Programmer-Testifies-Under-Oath-He-Coded-Computers-To-Rig-Elections)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr04qLSqS3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr04qLSqS3s
and now this from Corbett, 1 hr:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBpSejHAI5U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBpSejHAI5U
Crashes of Convenience: Michael Connell
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-ldW19U4GzlY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Jb900M4JewU/s88-c-k-no/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM6EbmEFrTbrQ_31bUx5h3w) Corbett Report Extras (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM6EbmEFrTbrQ_31bUx5h3w)
3,956
4,265
Published on Mar 9, 2016
SHOW NOTES and mp3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=4488
In late 2008, the GOP’s theft of the 2004 presidential election via vote machine rigging in Ohio was on the verge of being exposed. An insider had been identified and deposed, and he was ready to be sworn in as a star witness in a major trial…but on December 19, 2008, the small Piper airplane he was piloting crashed on approach to the Akron-Canton Regional Airport. Join us today on The Corbett Report as we start connecting the pieces of the Michael Connell puzzle.
mick silver
22nd March 2016, 06:13 AM
I will say it one more time ............................ the game is rigged
PatColo
5th April 2016, 04:40 AM
Jim Fetzer's 1st hour guest in this 2 hour show, is (@ amazon):
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll (https://www.amazon.com/Proving-Election-Fraud-Uncounted-National/dp/144908527X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8)
Mar 31, 2010
by Richard Charnin
I have no idea what the "James DiEugenio attacks..." shite is about; I may give it a couple mins to find out... :(??...oh, I see it's JFK-related, 52+ years on now... whatever, next case plz! [P]
The Real Deal Ep # 160 Election Theft / James DiEugenio attacks Jim Fetzer (Part 1) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuqDnPzDNIg)
also see this Fetzer/Charnin collaborative article:
JAMES FETZER: Voter Fraud vs. Election Theft: Scott Walker's Wisconsin ReElection (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/07/voter-fraud-vs-election-theft-scott.html)
Another Fetzer/Charmin show, 2 hrs;
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7mTvgfsEnZg/mqdefault.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mTvgfsEnZg)
1:58:43
The Real Deal Ep # 183 Richard Charnin on Stealing Elections / Loose Ends from the DiEugenio Shows (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mTvgfsEnZg)
1,346 views
5 days ago
mick silver
5th April 2016, 02:08 PM
back up...I will say it again ............................ the game is rigged
PatColo
6th April 2016, 04:10 AM
from part 2 of the 4 part:
Thread: "Everything is Fake" - Top 40 Pieces of Fakery in Our World (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?88917-quot-Everything-is-Fake-quot-Top-40-Pieces-of-Fakery-in-Our-World)
18. Fake Republic
The US was set up to be a Republic, not a Democracy. What’s the difference? The difference is that a republic contains protections of individual and minority rights, so that no matter who is in power, these basic rights can never be infringed, while a democracy runs on majority opinion, so that if a majority (whose emotions can easily be swayed by controllers who own the media and understand psychology) votes to impose its rule on the minority, that’s how it goes.
The US has been deliberately turned from a constitutional republic into a corporate democracy. It is a fake republic now.
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/fake-democracy.png (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/fake-democracy.png)
19. Fake Democracy
The above points about republics and democracies was talking about the technical or legal definition of those terms. In the broader sense, however, people use the word “democracy” to mean a system where the common people have a fair say in public affairs. The US loves to boast how it is delivering democracy to the world, but most invaded countries see – and it’s a long list of aggression (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/usa-history-of-aggression/) from the end of World War 2 until today, from Iran to Guatemala to Cuba to Chile to Panama to Kuwait to Libya to Iraq and many more – is not democracy but rather tanks, fighter jets, missiles and bombs. True democracy has nothing to do with invading other sovereign nations and stealing their resources to please corporate puppeteers.
20. Fake Elections
Elections in many societies have become a farce with the introduction of rigged electronic voting machines that leave no paper trail. If you can’t trust that your vote will be counted properly, how can you possibly think an average person could have any say at all in public affairs? Stalin is rumored to have said that “the people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” The situation has become so absurd that in the 2012 US presidential race, it was candidate Mitt Romney’s company who actually purchased voting machines (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/romney-vote-rigging-now-possible/)! The film Uncounted did a great job exposing how rigged and dysfunctional the Diebold voting machines are.
In addition to rigged voting machines, consider how the fake debates we get shown on MSM TV, where elite-favored candidates are fed softball questions while anyone challenging the establishment is sidelined, given less air time and hit with personal attacks, unfounded accusations or hard questions.
Re the ref above to a docu called "Uncounted", I wasn't even aware of it! :o
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GXLEjTmQTQg/mqdefault.jpg
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXLEjTmQTQg)
Uncounted Trailer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXLEjTmQTQg)
EarnhardtFilms (https://www.youtube.com/user/EarnhardtFilms)
4 years ago
150 views
http://www.UncountedTheMovie.com UNCOUNTED: The New Math
of American Elections, a documentary by Emmy ...
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pisBdNLmo-A/mqdefault.jpg
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pisBdNLmo-A)
Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections (Full Length) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pisBdNLmo-A)
Justin Wallis (https://www.youtube.com/user/djscrumpit)
5 years ago
44,924 views
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Uncounted-The-New-Math-of-A... (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Uncounted-The-New-Math-of-American-Elections/11321231225) UNCOUNTED is an explosive ...
PatColo
6th April 2016, 08:58 AM
UK based Richie Allen show; 38 mins:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tn53_E0Z_rs/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=PNTnElKK0mz2FbzILPKiLQSe3b0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn53_E0Z_rs)
Richie Debates Canary Editor Kerry-Anne Mendoza On The Futility (Or Not) Of Elections (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn53_E0Z_rs)
70 views
1 hour ago
PatColo
25th April 2016, 06:31 PM
Another JFriend with guest Jim condit show w all the latest fake election news.
http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-jim-condit-jr-2
On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Jim Condit, Jr. In this podcast, Jim provides some updates on the 2016 election and the very real threat of vote fraud. Donald Trump is now openly calling the nomination process “rigged” and “crooked,” which it most certainly is. Trump is dominating the overall vote count and has over 200 more delegates than his nearest rival, yet he still does not have the nomination locked up. The GOP establishment appear intent on preventing the populist businessman turned Republican front-runner from obtaining the nomination before the party convention in Cleveland this summer. Will they be successful? Doubtful!
Below are relevant links for this program:
The Realist Report – Jim Condit, Jr.: Vote Fraud
RealClearPolitics – Republican Delegate Count & Popular Vote results
Trump nearly sweeps NY delegates – The Hill
White Voter Rebellion Crushes Cruz – The New Observer
Let Me Ask America a Question by Donald Trump – Wall Street Journal
Donald Trump rails against ‘rigged system’ before New York primary
PatColo
25th April 2016, 11:39 PM
Looks like Fetzer nabbed Jim C Jr as guest too; 2 hrs, haven't listened
The Real Deal Ep # 192 VOTESCAM with Jim Condit, Jr.
Media Broadcasting Center Official Channel 983 views
Subscribe
5,524
41
3
Published on Apr 22, 2016
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WE7GGxqs1vg
PatColo
8th May 2016, 08:48 PM
Electronic Vote Fraud is Alive and Well in Chicago (and beyond)
http://www.bollyn.com/home/#article_15513
May 2, 2016
To have the representation real, the election must be real;
and that where the election is a fiction,
the representation is a fiction also.
Like will always produce like.
- Thomas Paine to the Citizens of the United States, January 29, 1803
HOW VOTES SHOULD BE COUNTED IN A DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
I monitored the French presidential election in Avignon in May 2002 and observed how a proper and transparent vote count is done, using paper ballots, in each polling place across France, in full view of the public. It's really very simple, but such proper elections would put the crimocracy out of business, so they force us to use riggable voting systems.
It was in the run-up to the election of 2000 that I wrote my first article about electronic vote fraud in Chicago. In doing the research for that article, "The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win" I found that the voting machines being used in Cook County were wide open to vote fraud on a massive scale. I also found that organized crime was behind the production and use of these rigged voting machines. This is when I concluded that the United States had become a crimocracy, a government of criminals, by criminals, for criminals.
What was very discouraging to see was that nobody really cared that the voting machines used in Cook County were not secure and that there was no way to be sure that the tally produced by the machines accurately reflected how the voters had voted. The fact that the vote count could not be authenticated did not seem to bother anyone. As I wrote then:
NOBODY CARES
Tests of computer vote-counting systems used in Illinois from 1983-1987, which tested tens of thousands of ballots, revealed significant errors in the computer counting in more than twenty percent of the tests. Fulle said that in Illinois today there is “a 16 percent error rate” with ballot-counting machines. He expected numerous problems on election night saying “equipment will fail across the state.”
“I don’t understand why nobody cares,” Michael L. Harty, former Illinois director of voting systems and standards said, “At one point, we had tabulation errors in twenty-eight percent of the systems tested, and nobody cared.”
The indifference of election officials, the people ultimately responsible for the integrity of the elections, proves a point made by a former president of the University of Chicago, Robert M. Hutchins, who said, “The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment."
OUR SHAM ELECTIONS
Today, 16 years later, electronic vote fraud is still the name of the game in Chicago, Cook County, and across the nation. The following 7-minute video shows that when it comes to vote fraud in Chicago - nothing has changed. This is, of course, not a problem limited to Chicago - it is a national problem. We want to believe that we have democratic and transparent elections when it is crystal clear that we don't.
It is, of course, very simple to have proper elections, but in our corrupt system there is no political will to have open and transparent elections, like those I have observed in France and other countries. If we had proper and transparent elections we could restore the integrity of our democratic republic.
To explain how simple it is to have democratic and transparent elections, I wrote an article with photos from my experience monitoring the French presidential election. The article is entitled "Restoring Democracy in America"
It is, after all, exactly as Thomas Paine said to Americans in 1803: "To have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also."
VIDEO EVIDENCE The Voting Machines Are WRONG!
(and It’s Being Covered Up)
Video URL youtu.be/O_mJ5KutY8s (http://youtu.be/O_mJ5KutY8s)
https://youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=O_mJ5KutY8s
Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to bollyn@bollynbooks.com
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Christopher Bollyn, 21 articles in the section on U.S. Elections & Computer Vote Fraud
www.bollyn.com/electronic-voting/
mick silver
9th May 2016, 09:51 AM
I will say it one more time ............................ the game is rigged
PatColo
9th May 2016, 09:29 PM
Haven't listened yet. Listen at
https://ppjg.me/2016/04/28/the-plan-to-restore-americas-voice-with-david-frank/
TS Radio: The Plan to Restore America’s Voice with David Frank
April 28, 2016
ppjg Marti Oakley, TS Radio David Frank, honest elections, Marcel Reid, Marti Oakley, TS Radio, vote fraud, voting, whistleblowers, Whistlerblowers summit 1 Comment
TS RAdioJoin us live Friday April 29th, at 8:00 am CST!
WB16:00 am PST … 7:00 am MST … 8:00 am CST … 9:00 am EST
Listen Live HERE!
Call in # 917-388-4520
Hosted by Marti Oakley
__________________________________________________ ___
marcelWhistleblowers! Is presented in coordination with Marcel Reid and the Whistleblowers Summit July 27-29 in Washington DC.
David Frank joins us this morning to discuss the fatal flaws in our system of voting. What exactly has gone wrong? Who did it? How did they do it? Does your vote matter?
David will cover the “whodunit” plaguing our voting system then give us a plan that could radically alter not only the way we vote, but how to ensure a fair and honest vote.
david.frank.77920@facebook.com
www.onevoicenow.org/video
PatColo
17th October 2016, 02:04 PM
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr. – Election Fraud & The Jewish Shadow Government (10-10-16)
Author and election fraud whistleblower Jim Condit Jr. will join chris on The Militia Intelligence Report. The two cover 100% rigged elections and controversial topics; International Banking, Adolf Hitler and much more. Calls taken in the second hour! Music list
With 43 comments http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/militia-intelligence-report-jim-condit-jr-election-fraud-jewish-shadow-government-10-10-16/
PatColo
26th October 2016, 10:06 PM
Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election
October 26, 2016 MHB Administrator 6 Comments
Dallas elections officials say allegations “likely false or instances of user error”
Over the past few weeks corporate news media have interpreted Donald Trump’s repeated claims of a “rigged” election as exaggerated. The Republican presidential candidate’s response in the third presidential debate of perhaps not accepting the election result was met with similar bluster by the major punditocracy.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Rb592tRwcYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb592tRwcYY
The experience of voters in Texas and other states may be bearing out Trump’s warning as multiple reports are surfacing of electronic voting machines changing virtual ballots from Republican to Democratic presidential candidates. Because Texas law prohibits videos and photos in polling places many voters in that state explain the apparent polling shenanigans on social media.
As The Economic Collapse Blog observes,
[A] number of voters in Texas are reporting that the voting machines switched their votes from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton. The odd thing is that none of the other choices were affected when these individuals attempted to vote for a straight Republican ticket. If Hillary Clinton is declared the winner of the state of Texas on election night, a full investigation of these voting machines should be conducted, because there is no way that Donald Trump should lose that state. I have said that it will be the greatest miracle in U.S. political history if Donald Trump wins this election, but without the state of Texas Donald Trump has exactly zero chance of winning. So those living down in Texas need to keep reporting anything unusual that they see or hear when they go to vote.
Here are several social media posts from the Dallas Morning News article at the I Am A Texan blog.
Continue reading Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election → https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/26/reports-of-potential-voting-trickery-in-2016-presidential-election/
PatColo
1st November 2016, 08:20 AM
From bev harris; short & longer versions about the (((GEMS vote counting software))).
9m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
25m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44
Fraction Magic - Detail Version
Bev Harris 100,545 views
Subscribe
785
1K
20
Published on Oct 31, 2016
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions. Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors. It's a product. It's scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.
PatColo
1st November 2016, 08:42 AM
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr. – Election Fraud & The Jewish Shadow Government (10-10-16)
Author and election fraud whistleblower Jim Condit Jr. will join chris on The Militia Intelligence Report. The two cover 100% rigged elections and controversial topics; International Banking, Adolf Hitler and much more. Calls taken in the second hour! Music list
With 43 comments http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/militia-intelligence-report-jim-condit-jr-election-fraud-jewish-shadow-government-10-10-16/
Another Condit visit with host Chris Dorsey-- a fairly new renegade host who i've never warmed up to; too knowitall/dogmatic, abrasive, & boastful about how harassed & poisecuted he's been by the jesuits lol :D IOW, extra high odds of being an agitprop/dis-direction spook himself. :rolleyes:
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr – Vote Fixing, Catholicism & Hitler (10-31-16)
Jim Condit Jr is back by popular demad to the MIR. chris and Jim take calls on Catholicism and Christianity in general, Hitler, the international Jewish Military Media Banking Complex and The Fixing of elections.
http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/militia-intelligence-report-jim-condit-jr-vote-fixing-catholicism-hitler-10-31-16/
PatColo
8th November 2016, 01:06 PM
25:19 mins
Biggest Election Fraud In History Discovered In The United States: Breaking Now
The Alex Jones Channel
188,627 views
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
PatColo
9th November 2016, 07:50 AM
Trying to reconcile DT'S official 47.5/47.7% win, with my overall paradigm which asssumes the spooks, as servants of (((TPTB))), have total control over "election results".
After the JSM spent months pimping utterly fake polls giving killery the lead to prep the public for the fake results, now with DTs win by 0.2% of the popular vote, they're babbling on about DTs "stunning upset", and wondering aloud what could have gone so wrong with their polls?
When in reality it was obvious all along that DT led by somewhere in the double digits, and I expect the same was true in the REAL pop vote numbers from last night... IE we're looking at fraudulent vote numbers making it appear as some kind of photo finish when it was actually a DT landslide.
I speculate something changed in the recent month behind the scenes in killery's preordained installation as potus. Deals were made-- guessing something about DTs forgetting about his killery prosecution, & his installing a cabal of dinjooz for his cabinet & key appointments, in exchange for allowing him to become prez.
Point was not blowing up the whole poker game-- the secret societies, pedo rings, satanism, JWO, etc.
Plus with neocon pence as veep, they can always just whack DT & have their boy be prez.
Any thoughts?
PatColo
10th November 2016, 04:15 AM
Guest Posts
Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud
November 9, 2016 MHB Administrator 9 Comments
[Democratic Party operatives clearly believed they could steal the 2016 Presidential Election for Hillary Clinton, just as they had done for her in the Democratic Primary. This is suggested, for example, in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s November 8 remarks on PBS’s NewsHour, where she exhibited strong confidence in a Clinton victory. This no doubt is the type of hubris that drove much of the electorate to vote against the incumbent party. Further, Dems chose an embodiment of establishment incompetence, insincerity and corruption who remarkably failed to even inspire her own purported base to turn out the vote, CNN observes. Still, as this brief article below suggests, the public will likely never know the Republican candidate’s true margin of victory, -Ed.]
Doug Steil
Aletho News
As luck would have it Hillary Clinton’s landslide loss was so big that massive election fraud by Democratic Party operatives in various cities could not overcome her deficit.
The “shock” by insiders of having lost obviously reflects their earlier certainty of prevailing, which hints at the extent of their vote rigging schemes. The unverifiable system of voting in America is so flawed that foreign observers are now being blocked from monitoring US elections. The topic of fraud can no longer be swept under the rug.
Surely Clinton and the media will try to make a big deal of having “received more votes” than Trump in the popular vote total, which according to the current tabulation has already occurred, with an even higher differential to come once West Coast state results are all counted.
Those inside the DC Beltway and within elite campuses will claim that this is “unfair” and that Hillary really “should have won”.
However, this assertion should be vociferously challenged. Surely this surplus is artificial. Is it really possible that so many Americans would have ignored the prospect of going to war with Russia?
The question needs to be raised publicly: How many hundreds of thousand votes were switched from Trump to Clinton altogether and how many invalid (illegal) votes were registered for her?
Aside from that — assuming all the votes were legitimate — the electoral college system is intended to prevent, say, a concentration of votes in urban centers to the detriment of rural voters across the country. As is the case in Maine and Nebraska, voters in individual states can decide how to allocate their electoral votes, so it doesn’t have to be a winner-take-all system.
It is a tribute to the designers of the US Constitution that the Electoral College mechanism still exists. It’s almost as if though they might also have already suspected long ago that there could be illicit efforts in the future to change an election outcome simply by stuffing the ballots in a few locations. The indirect US electoral system has saved the country from a big crisis brought on by election fraud. Instead of changing the Constitution future election reforms should focus on making vote fraud impossible or extremely difficult to carry out.
With growing reader comments,
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/09/trumps-victory-should-not-obfuscate-election-fraud/
PatColo
10th November 2016, 01:53 PM
I commented at memoryholeblog.com
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/09/trumps-victory-should-not-obfuscate-election-fraud/#comment-119547
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM
I’m all for the overall vote fraud issue of this article; but where it (and a couple reader comments) go off track IMHO, is pinning the mainly electronic voter fraud on “Clintons/the DemRats”.
AFAIC the whole fake “election” system introduced with 2001’s mockingly named “Help America Vote Act” (HAVA) was a product of the alphabet spook agencies, in service to their real bosses: the NWO banksters. TPTB/NWO obviously have a problem with a fullly honest/transparent/auditable election process, given that their global tyranny agenda isn’t in the lower 99.x percent’s best interests.
I was active in the “verifiable voting” movement circa ’04 when the blackbox/fake “election” nightmare was coming into focus. I recall the question of why the software running these blackboxes was allowed to be closed-source/secret/proprietary rather than open-source & inspectable by anyone? The official answer as smugly disseminated by the NWO-propaganda-MSM was how the blackbox supplying corp’s (then Diebold & others) had a legitimate need to protect their investments in the software they developed, and the NWO media dismissed any further questions/discussion of it. Imagine, software tasked with a simple 1+1=2 job which any beginner programmer could write; software depended on at the core of our (pretend) democracy, yet allowed to be ‘secret’. I also recall a bill in Congress to prohibit all wireless tech capabilities in the blackboxes, which was quietly, bipartisanly dismissed.
The above only makes sense when accepting that the current HAVA pretend-“election” process is fully, ‘invisibly’ corrupt/manipulable from its inception BY DESIGN by TPTB/NWO. I recall watching the propaganda-MSM’s post ’04 “election” coverage, where WRT voter’s impressions of the new HAVA blackboxes, they paraded out exiting voter after voter who gushed about how they loved it; so simple & easy, oh such an improvement!! No dissenting opinions to be heard.
Point is, the HAVA pretend voting system is a product of, and under the full control of the NWO banksters through their spook agency proxies, aided by their propaganda-MSM in pretending it’s all so legit… not “the clintons/DemRats.”
Reply
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 4:13 PM
I’ll add, given my belief above re our HAVA/fake “election outcomes” being under full NWO bankster control– following is what I believe happened wrt Trump’s recent “upset victory” (as the MSM has labored to discharacterize it…). I read this 2-part blog which makes the case for DT’s being a de facto mossad controlled sexual deviate/pedo:
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/08/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-ii/
Some of the reader comments there, dated ~1 week before the 11/8 fake “election”, speculate that the NWO may have switched horses from HRC to DT; but with a ‘photo-finish’ pretend vote outcome, perhaps with the popular vote vs electoral college disparity which we’ve since seen the official fake election outcome reflect– no ‘mandate’ for DT. I’d personally guess DT’s real lead over HRC, both through the couple months preceding 11/8, and in the TRUE 11/8 vote outcome, was in the double digits somewhere… in spite of the NWO-Propaganda-MSM’s incessant pre-election pushing of fake latest poll numbers indicating HRC leading… psyop’ing the electorate in preparation for her seemingly inevitable installment as POTUS. You’ve all seen Newsweek’s now infamous “Madame President” edition, on sale before the fake election, yes?!
Well it did appear the NWO/backroom machinations were furiously in play in the 1-2 weeks prior to 11/8… Comey’s re-opening then re-closing of FBI’s HRC investigation; the ongoing Wikileaks disclosures including some tips of TPTB’s ritual satanic abuse/pedo iceberg, team-HRC’s purchasing a NYC fireworks show 1-2 weeks before the fake election then cancelling it the day before, etc. This all after months of blatant MSM pro-HRC anti-Trump psyop’ing of the public. So it does appear to me that TPTB/NWO did in fact switch horses around the last minute; and their MSM was/is still in disarray as to how they should spin things come 11/8.
The Soros/MoveOn orchestrated “protests” last night are a whole ‘nother tar baby to discuss! I did notice how, at least CNN, went wall to wall on that synthetic “story” for a few hours last night… that’s always a psyop ‘tell’…
crimethink
10th November 2016, 01:58 PM
Tuesday proves one of two things:
1) the elections are not fake;
2) Trump is fake.
PatColo
10th November 2016, 02:43 PM
I can't easily copy over formatting, embedded links nor pics from this 'device' so reco reading this at the source; plus there's growing reader comments there.
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/10/president-donald-trump-the-art-of-the-deal
Just posting this here for a bit of internet redundancy; as i'd noticed MHB blog was offline this past Monday.
Guest Posts
President Donald Trump: The Art of the Deal
November 10, 2016 MHB Administrator 10 Comments
By Vivian Lee
I don’t do it for the money. I’ve got enough, much more than I’ll ever need. I do it to do it. Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That’s how I get my kicks.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
The stunning win by Donald J. Trump in the November 8th U.S. presidential election took many by surprise, since Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate. Everyone seemed to think that Clinton would win – either legitimately or in a rigged election. News coverage favored Clinton by a wide margin, and the only major network to give Trump a break was Fox News.[1] Most polls predicted that Clinton would win the presidency, with her odds of winning put as high as 85% and Trump’s as low as 35%.[2] The pundits are now asking how they all got it wrong.[3]
trump-art-of-the-deal
Donald Trump with his book, The Art of the Deal. Image: The Guardian.
Blame is being placed on “the e-mail scandal,” with James Comey’s letter of October 28 to the U.S. Congress refocusing attention on Clinton’s private e-mails just 11 days before the election.[4] FBI Director Comey reopened the investigation after another 650,000 e-mails were found, this time on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The laptop was confiscated by the New York Police Department (NYPD) and turned over to the FBI. On November 6, Comey caved to pressure, announcing that no charges were warranted, but some said the damage had been done.[5]
Election night was a long, drawn-out affair, with final results not in until 2:40 am on Wednesday. The television networks “called” the electoral vote in the states, a notoriously undemocratic way of deciding U.S. elections before all the votes have actually been counted. Fox News ran consistently high vote counts for Trump, as opposed to the lower numbers predicted at CNN. Dramatic coverage continued into the wee hours, with a number of states said to be “too close to call” – including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, all of which eventually went to Trump, who won by a landslide.[6]
megyn-kelly-screenshot-11-8-16Megyn Kelly going to find out why Fox can’t call any more states for Trump. Image Fox News.
Although many states were “called” earlier in the evening based on partial results and exit polls, the last few states were agonized over by the networks, with Fox anchor Megyn Kelly walking back to the desk of experts twice to ask them why they could not call these key states – and when they might be able to do so. According to Kelly, she thought Fox would be able to call the election around 11 pm. She said she expected Clinton to win, until there was an abrupt shift, when “the real vote” started to come in. She ascribed the dramatic turnaround to
“a hidden Trump vote…It was a resounding victory. I have never seen anything like this. You will never have a result this shocking where people got it shockingly this wrong.”[7]
A return to Anthony Weiner’s laptop may provide an explanation.
weiner-washington-times
Anthony Weiner. Image Washington Times.
Unnamed but highly-placed sources, including NYPD detectives and prosecutors, revealed that the laptop contained “enough evidence to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life.” Also reportedly involved were Huma Abedin, Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein – convicted pedophile, as well as members of the U.S. Congress, the Saudis, and other interests in the Middle East. Epstein and his “Lolita Express” have been associated with numerous well-known people, such as Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton.[8] The NYPD reportedly said that if the FBI and Department of Justice did not issue indictments against “Clinton and co-conspirators,” they would go public with the e-mails. According to an NYPD chief:
What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach…There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to WikiLeaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that…People are going to prison.[9]
This being the case, what better way to stanch the blood than to give Trump the presidency?
Although Comey let Clinton off the hook, it seems clear that forces within the government had decided she was a liability. Should she be elected, the emails would come out, and she would be indicted along with many others. And Trump had vowed to investigate “crooked Hillary” with chants from supporters to “lock her up.”[10] Inconveniently, as it now turned out, the election had been fixed in favor of Clinton.[11] Clearly it was time to make a deal with Trump.
trump-1985-la-times
Donald Trump in 1985, shortly before the publication of The Art of the Deal. Image Los Angeles Times.
The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have. Leverage is having something the other guy wants. Or better yet, needs. Or best of all, simply can’t do without.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Let’s say that Trump was approached by government insiders and told he could be president – if he agreed to certain terms. Let’s say that the deal was this: Trump gets a win on November 8th and becomes the nation’s 45th president; he lets all allegations against Clinton and her foundation drop; he respects Obama’s “legacy”; and he agrees to partner with Israel.[12] This deal was struck after Comey’s letter of October 28. Clinton was given notice as Election Day approached (although she may have held out hope that she could win). And the news teams were informed during the course of the election.
When the counter-fix went live, the networks experienced the turnaround – the “hidden Trump vote” referred to by Megyn Kelly. Around 10 or 11 pm, the anchors began to refer to Trump as the winner, frequently correcting themselves or qualifying their statements: “I mean, IF he wins,” or “that is, presuming he is elected.” This included Anderson Cooper and his cronies at CNN, who suddenly turned conciliatory toward Trump after months of abuse and slander. The consolation prize went to Clinton: winning the popular vote. Even this was predicted by the networks, with no surprise or consternation.
It’s strange how things can turn around.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Was this the deal of a lifetime? Or did Trump really win the election?
Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.
Notes:
[1] “Open Season on Donald Trump: Corporate Press Propaganda at Behest of Clinton Campaign.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/29/open-season-on-donald-trump-corporate-press-propaganda-at-behest-of-clinton-campaign/
[2] “Why Did Many Polls Seem To Miss a Trump Victory?” CBS News, 11/9/16. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-did-many-polls-seem-to-miss-a-trump-victory/.
[3] “News Outlets Wonder Where the Predictions Went Wrong.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/business/media/news-outlets-wonder-where-the-predictions-went-wrong.html
[4] “FBI Investigating New Emails for Classified Information.” New York Times, 10/28/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/28/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-clinton-email.html. “Oct. 28 FBI Letter to Congressional Leaders on Clinton Email Investigation.” Washington Post, 10/28/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/
[5] “FBI Chief: No Charges for Clinton after New Emails Reviewed.” New York Times, 11/6/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/06/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-clinton-emails.html. “Read the Full Text of James Comey’s Letter on the New Clinton Emails.” USA Today, 11/6/16. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/06/read-full-text-comeys-letter-new-clinton-emails/93398304/
[6] “Donald Trump Wins the Presidency in Stunning Upset over Clinton.” Washington Post, 11/9/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/election-day-an-acrimonious-race-reaches-its-end-point/2016/11/08/32b96c72-a557-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html. “Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump Wins.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president. “Key President Election Results by State.” http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
[7] “Megyn Kelly Admits She Was Expecting Different Election Result.” Western Journalism, 11/9/16. http://www.westernjournalism.com/megyn-kelly-admits-she-was-expecting-different-election-result/
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein. “Alan Dershowitz on the Defense (His Own).” New York Times, 12/12/15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/business/alan-dershowitz-on-the-defense-his-own.html. “Prince Andrew Faces Court Appearance in ‘Sex Slave’ Case against Jeffrey Epstein.” Mirror, 9/22/15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-faces-court-appearance-6495024. “Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender’s Jet Much More than Previously Known.” Foxnews.com, 5/13/16. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html
[9] “Breaking Bombshell: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury.” Infowars, 11/3/16. http://www.infowars.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
[10] “At Florida Rally, Trump Resumes Attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton.’” Washington Post, 9/27/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/27/at-florida-rally-trump-resumes-attacking-crooked-hillary-clinton/
[11] “Predetermined Vote Counts Show Nov. 8 Presidential Election Is Rigged in Favor of Hillary Clinton.” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/11/03/predetermined-vote-counts-show-nov-8-presidential-election-is-rigged-in-favor-of-hillary-clinton/ “Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/09/trumps-victory-should-not-obfuscate-election-fraud/
[12] “Biden: Trump Administration Will Stand with Israel.” cnn.com, 11-9-16. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-israel/index.html
PatColo
18th November 2016, 04:42 AM
I just started listening to this, recorded 11/6 aka 2 days before the fake election. Bev comes on after 11 min mark.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Battle Of New Orleans Bev Harris/Rhonda Sheer
Mp3 https://gwking.podbean.com/mf/web/vf5afa/Battle_Of_New_Orleans_11_3.mp3
My take on this recent election is basically it WAS rigged, for TRUMP-- in a relatively last minute change of horses by (((tptb))). Again see
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/10/president-donald-trump-the-art-of-the-deal
for the likely back story.
PatColo
18th November 2016, 04:50 AM
At http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/
Actions: The Brakey Method
Put the brakes on “mystery elections” once and for all. A simple 3-step method places public elections back under public control.
THE BRAKEY METHOD
http://blackboxvoting.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/GEMS-view-ballot-image.png
Preserve and make public the “ballot images” — Modern voting systems take a picture of every ballot, called a “ballot image.”
Peg the ballot image to the actual ballot using a unique ID number (not connected to any voter identifier in any way).
Make sure ballots are a public record so that any person can arrange to inspect the actual ballots at any time.
Ballot images can be released electronically, either upon request or — better — by placing them on the Web, allowing any person to examine pictures of any or all ballots. These electronic images can be authenticated by any person by checking any ballot, which must contain same unique ID number.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q. Do all voting systems make ballot images?
A. Most of them do. The best ballot images are actual photographic images of voter-marked paper ballots, but even the paperless DRE machines are capable of, and usually do, automatically make ballot images.
Q, Where do I go to ask to see ballot images?
A. Public records and freedom of information laws direct persons to the “custodian of the records.” For most locations, the custodian of the records for ballot images is the county elections office. In some locations, primarily in New England, the custodian of the records is a municipality.
Q. How do I ask for the ballot images?
A. You can go to the elections office with a USB stick in hand and ask for a copy as a public records request.
Q. What if they tell me the ballot images don’t exist?
A. There are two possible reasons this could be the case: (1) They destroyed the ballot images, which violates records retention requirements and destroys a crucial audit record, and, in some states, constitutes a felony. (Note that one case, in Alameda County Calif, required an election official to re-run an election after she destroyed audit records.) Or (2) They are using old, out of date voting machines, some of which do not produce a ballot image. If they destroyed the ballot images, seek out a qualified attorney to take appropriate legal action, or focus on obtaining legislation to require preservation of ballot images and making them public. If they are using machines which do not produce the images, focus on public pressure to purchase the right kind of voting machines next time, and/or on getting legislation requiring the use of machines that produce ballot images, plus public release of the images.
Q. What if they won’t let me see anything at all?
A. Some states, like Kansas, Utah, and Nevada, have passed exceptionally undemocratic laws which prohibit any inspection of key election audit documents. If this is the case, litigation or change of legislation will be the appropriate action.
Q. How does the Brakey Method address issues like voter purges or voter ID?
A. It doesn’t. The Brakey Method solves transparency problems with the counting of the vote. There is no magic wand that solves all types of election integrity issues in one swoop. It helps to parse election integrity into four components:
– Who can vote (voter lists)
– Who did vote (participating voter lists)
– Counting of the vote (The Brakey Method produces transparency and auditability of the count).
– Chain of custody (Are the ballots and images the real ballots? Have any gone missing or been added?)
Q. Why is it called The Brakey Method?
A. Actually it has a lengthier pedigree. The first election integrity advocate to propose using ballot images to authenticate the count was Harri Hursti, in 2006. Hursti is the computer security expert who demonstrated hacking voting machines in the film Hacking Democracy. (See http://hackingdemocracy.com). Black Box Voting promoted this concept in 2006, working with Hursti to produce a prototype to allow public, open source, automated counting of ballot images if desired. A commercial fisherman named Kevin Collins, from Humboldt County California, together with Carolyn Crnich, a Humboldt County election official, met with Bev Harris to discuss actually implementing the use of ballot images to authenticate the count. Humboldt County purchased an off-the-shelf scanner and began making its ballot images available to the public in 2008. A Humboldt County citizen named Mitch Trachtenberg developed free open source software which improved on the original Hursti prototype. The first time Humboldt County allowed public authentication of the count using ballot images, it was discovered that the central tabulator had miscounted. A Colorado citizen named Marilyn Marks filed, and won, a succession of lawsuits establishing that both ballots and ballot images must be treated as public records in Colorado. But it was in 2016, under the relentless and strategic efforts of Arizona election integrity advocate John Brakey, that the ballot image concept really began to take off.
Brakey requested ballot images from Pima County, was told they were being destroyed. He sought and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to prohibit Arizona officials from destroying the images. His work mushroomed out into many other U.S. states, generating cooperation from some and obstruction from others. It is Brakey who boiled this important transparency measure down into a simple three-part method (images, connector ID, right to examine actual ballots). It is Brakey who has been most effective at propagating this excellent solution. We need a name for it. Bev Harris started calling it The Brakey Method to make it easy to say and easy to explain as a 1-2-3 process that:
a. Is already available with most voting systems
b. Is already pinned into Freedom of Information rights in most places
c. Costs little or nothing to implement
OBJECTIONS
“This might allow voters to sell their vote.” — No, it won’t, and if you are concerned about that you are against vote-by-mail right? Because it is far easier to sell a vote by just taking a picture of an absentee ballot than by trying to identify an anonymous ballot image.
“This might jeopardize secrecy of the ballot.” — No, it doesn’t, unless your election administration is permitting an identifier on the ballot which ties back to the voter. One state, Colorado, was caught doing this, embedding a QR code on each ballot which connected to vote ID number, permitting election officials and vendors to see how you voted. The solution is to prohibit printing identifying information on the ballot. There is no special class of persons such as election officials or vendors who have a right to see how you voted.
Using The Brakey Method, it doesn’t matter if Attila the Hun owns the voting machines, the public will once again own its elections.
Work on getting The Brakey Method going in your location. It is, at this time, the most important thing you can to do protect the counting of the vote.
http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/
Also see: Ballot Images – A new way to verify that results are true
http://blackboxvoting.org/ballot-images/
PatColo
20th December 2016, 08:50 AM
JFriend has up this article:
http://therealistreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russian-Hacker-story-420x240.jpg (http://therealistreport.com/owner-of-servers-implicated-in-dnc-hacks-says-no-one-is-interested-in-truth-behind-computer-crimes/)
Owner of Servers Implicated in DNC Hacks Says No One Is Interested in Truth Behind Computer Crimes (http://therealistreport.com/owner-of-servers-implicated-in-dnc-hacks-says-no-one-is-interested-in-truth-behind-computer-crimes/)
December 16, 2016 (http://therealistreport.com/owner-of-servers-implicated-in-dnc-hacks-says-no-one-is-interested-in-truth-behind-computer-crimes/) 4 comments (http://therealistreport.com/owner-of-servers-implicated-in-dnc-hacks-says-no-one-is-interested-in-truth-behind-computer-crimes/#comments)
The mainstream media argues with no real evidence that the Russian government has been behind computer hacking targeting top Democrats and U.S. elections systems. However, the man who runs the servers implicated in the crime said no U.S. law enforcement or intel agency is interested in speaking with him to gather evidence on the perpetrators.
to which I just commented:
PatColo (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?53978-FAKE-quot-ELECTIONS-quot-Why-Ron-Paul-Can-t-quot-Win-quot&p=868246&viewfull=1#post868246) December 20, 2016 8:08 am (http://therealistreport.com/owner-of-servers-implicated-in-dnc-hacks-says-no-one-is-interested-in-truth-behind-computer-crimes/#comment-4158)
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce2f23de9867d139d900052621887095?s=72&d=mm&r=g Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The (((Legacy Mockingbird Media’s))) orchestrated, synchronized rollout of their “Russia hacked the sacred US election, OH MY!!” psyop is also designed to enshrine the myth that the USA’s fake blackbox elections have any integrity in the first place, & that said US election “results” aren’t already completely fraudulent & (((CIA/MSM))) controllable. The same CIA who’s been neck deep in rigging elections worldwide since their WW2 inception, and whose expertise in election rigging was surely brought to bear in designing USA’s current “perfect fake election” system, in accordance with the mockingly named “Help America Vote Act.”
I maintain that (((TPTB))) were planning to rig the recent “election” to hand it to Killery, right up until late Oct, as surely as their weaponized (((MSM))) gaslighted the public all Fall about how a Killery “win” was virtually assured. But the Podesta emails, where the tip of the #Pizzagate iceberg appeared, threatening to illuminate the DC elite’s whole Ritual Satanic Child Abuse underbelly which binds them… had (((TPTB))) scrambling like cockroaches to keep the lid on that. They figured a Crooked/Sick-Killery “win”, and the vast scrutiny which would follow such a grand fraud against the public (guessing Trump’s real popular vote lead was 20+ percent), would be bad for their sudden new highest agenda: snuffing out their #Pizzagate Ritual Satanic Child Abuse uber-scandal.
So they rigged the election “results” to properly give it to “wildcard” Trump; but to erase his real 20+ percent popular vote advantage & likely 50 state electoral college sweep– and rather rigged it to appear like it was a thin “technical win”, with a pop vote loss, giving wildcard Trump “no mandate,” which would hopefully make him & the still-deceived public, more controllable.
And (((they))) also hoped to appease the 60+ percent of the public who actually voted Trump, and thus help turn the bloodhounds away from #Pizzagate. Post fake-election, we’ve also seen (((their weaponized MSM))) roll out their fake “Fake News Crisis” psyop against the alt-media, with (((goog/YT/FB/twit/reddit/etc))) instantly jumping on board… all in a further (futile!) effort to snuff out #Pizzagate.
So we rightfully got our Trump, albeit robbed of (the wide perception of) his “landslide mandate”; but the alt-media bloodhounds are STILL all over #Pizzagate, to (((TPTB’s))) obvious frustration. Oh look, look over here, “Ruskies tried to hack our sacred already fake election, OH MY!!!” lolz; interesting times. :D
Horn
20th December 2016, 09:31 AM
Diversity includes diversion...
PatColo
22nd October 2017, 12:45 AM
New Sofia Smallstorm interview;
Laura Pressley 10/6/17 (http://aboutthesky.com/podcasts)
http://aboutthesky.com/images/stories/inmedia/Laura_Pressley_crop.png
Dr. Laura Pressley ran for City Council in Austin, Texas in 2014, intent on cutting waste from the city budget and fixing problems. She was an extremely popular candidate whose grassroots campaign was boosted by scores of dedicated volunteers, and given her expertise with numbers and lifelong activism she was thought by nearly all to be perfect for the job. However, two weeks before the election-entry deadline, a 24-year-old ethnic Mexican (Gregorio Casar) (http://www.austintexas.gov/department/council-member-gregorio-casar-biography) moved into town, signed up to run and beat Laura Pressley 2 to 1. With her mathematical skills, Dr. Pressley began to analyze the election results, saw odd patterns, and decided to file a lawsuit to decertify her opponent's victory. Her case -- the first in the country to produce direct evidence of electronic vote fraud -- has reached the Texas Supreme Court, and if she prevails, EVF will be blown open in America as never before. Please hear this amazing woman's story and support her ($15K of donations are needed!!) at PressleyForAustin.com (http://www.pressleyforaustin.com). Read more here (http://blackboxvoting.org/the-case-of-dr-laura-pressley/)and here (http://mailchi.mp/startmail/x2mu0710mb-437285?e=bd0a03fa49).
Listen here (http://aboutthesky.com/images/stories/audio/Ssmallstorm_podcast_075_10-06-17.mp3)
To understand how EVF is done today, watch this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
PatColo
31st October 2017, 06:54 PM
another interview with Laura Pressley who was blatantly robbed of an Austin TX city counsel seat; Sean/SGT Report:
http://pressleyforaustin.com
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B7bJgugoZfw/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCNACELwBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLByM9vo3Pod4Bzs9cWKsewvW5tfkw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7bJgugoZfw) 41:07
This HEROIC PATRIOT Needs Our Support -- Dr Laura Pressley (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7bJgugoZfw)
903 views
55 minutes ago
PatColo
9th March 2018, 10:19 PM
Interesting little story today, what's going on? Esp CIA has been 'meddling' in foreign elections since their inception; and surely have a hand in the pretend 'outcomes' of US elections, esp post-HAVA. JAssange tweeted about it,
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/972190598219292672
______________
The CIA Democrats (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html)
Introduction
By Patrick Martin
7 March 2018
PART ONE (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html) | PART TWO (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/08/dems-m08.html) | PART THREE (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/09/dems-m09.html)
This is the first part of a three-part article.
An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.
If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress.
Both push and pull are at work here. Democratic Party leaders are actively recruiting candidates with a military or intelligence background for competitive seats where there is the best chance of ousting an incumbent Republican or filling a vacancy, frequently clearing the field for a favored “star” recruit.
A case in point is Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA operative with three tours in Iraq, who worked as Iraq director for the National Security Council in the Obama White House and as a top aide to John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence. After her deep involvement in US war crimes in Iraq, Slotkin moved to the Pentagon, where, as a principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, her areas of responsibility included drone warfare, “homeland defense” and cyber warfare.
https://www.wsws.org/asset/39fdc4e9-0637-4d80-8734-99f466ea106A/image.jpg?rendition=image480
Elissa Slotkin
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has designated Slotkin as one of its top candidates, part of the so-called “Red to Blue” program targeting the most vulnerable Republican-held seats—in this case, the Eighth Congressional District of Michigan, which includes Lansing and Brighton. The House seat for the district is now held by two-term Republican Representative Mike Bishop.
The Democratic leaders are promoting CIA agents and Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. At the same time, such people are choosing the Democratic Party as their preferred political vehicle. There are far more former spies and soldiers seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party. There are so many that there is a subset of Democratic primary campaigns that, with a nod to Mad magazine, one might call “spy vs. spy.”
The 23rd Congressional District in Texas, which includes a vast swathe of the US-Mexico border along the Rio Grande, features a contest for the Democratic nomination between Gina Ortiz Jones, an Air Force intelligence officer in Iraq, who subsequently served as an adviser for US interventions in South Sudan and Libya, and Jay Hulings. The latter’s website describes him as a former national security aide on Capitol Hill and federal prosecutor, whose father and mother were both career undercover CIA agents. The incumbent Republican congressman, Will Hurd, is himself a former CIA agent, so any voter in that district will have his or her choice of intelligence agency loyalists in both the Democratic primary and the general election.
CNN’s “State of the Union” program on March 4 included a profile of Jones as one of many female candidates seeking nomination as a Democrat in Tuesday’s primary in Texas. The network described her discreetly as a “career civil servant.” However, the Jones for Congress website positively shouts about her role as a spy, noting that after graduating from college, “Gina entered the US Air Force as an intelligence officer, where she deployed to Iraq and served under the US military’s ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy” (the last phrase signaling to those interested in such matters that Jones is gay).
According to her campaign biography, Ortiz Jones was subsequently detailed to a position as “senior advisor for trade enforcement,” a post President Obama created by executive order in 2012. She would later be invited to serve as a director for investment at the Office of the US Trade Representative, where she led the portfolio that reviewed foreign investments to ensure they did not pose national security risks. With that background, if she fails to win election, she can surely enlist in the trade war efforts of the Trump administration.
How this article was prepared
The House of Representatives is currently controlled by the Republicans, with a majority of 238 compared to 193 Democrats. There are four vacancies, one previously held by the Democrats. To reach a majority of 218 seats in the next Congress, the Democrats must have a net gain of 24 seats.
The DCCC has designated 102 seats as priority or competitive, including 22 seats where the incumbents are not running again (five Democrats and 17 Republicans), and 80 seats where Republican incumbents could be defeated for reelection in the event that polls predicting a sizeable swing to the Democrats in November prove accurate.
The World Socialist Web Site has reviewed Federal Election Commission reports filed by all the Democratic candidates in these 102 competitive districts, focusing on those candidates who reported by the latest filing date, December 31, 2017, that they had raised at least $100,000 for their campaigns, giving them a financial war chest sufficient to run in a competitive primary contest. In addition, there a few cases where a candidate had less than the $100,000 cutoff, but was unchallenged for the nomination, or where last-minute retirement or resignation has led to late entry of high-profile candidates without an FEC report on file. These have also been included.
The total of such candidates for the Democratic nomination in the 102 districts is 221. Each has a website that gives biographical details, which we have collected and reviewed for this report. It is notable that those candidates with a record in the military-intelligence apparatus, as well as civilian work for the State Department, Pentagon or National Security Council, do not hide their involvement, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They clearly regard working as a CIA agent in Baghdad, an Army special ops assassin in Afghanistan, or a planner for drone missile warfare in the White House or Pentagon as a star on their résumé, rather than something to conceal.
One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (57) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (35), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (19) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.
Of the 102 primary elections to choose the Democratic nominees in these competitive districts, 44 involve candidates with a military-intelligence or State Department background, with 11 districts having two such candidates, and one district having three. In the majority of contests, the military-intelligence candidates seem likely to win the Democratic nomination, and, if the Democrats win in the general election, would enter Congress as new members of the House of Representatives.
There are some regional differences. In the Northeast, 21 of the 31 seats targeted by the Democrats have military-intelligence candidates. This area, not the South or Midwest, has the highest proportion of military-intelligence candidates seeking Democratic nominations.
In the West, only 7 of the 23 targeted seats have military-intelligence candidates, while in a half dozen seats the leading candidates are self-funded millionaires, mainly from the IT industry. There has been a wave of Republican retirements in California and wealthy people are bidding for these seats.
The military-intelligence candidates are disproportionately favored by the party apparatus, encouraged to run in districts that are the most likely takeover targets. Military-intelligence candidates account for 10 of the 22 districts selected for the most high-profile attention as part of the “red-to-blue” program, or nearly half. In some cases, military-intelligence candidates have amassed huge campaign war chests that effectively shut out any potential rivals, an indication that the financial backers of the Democratic Party have lined up behind them.
To be continued
PART TWO (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/08/dems-m08.html) | PART THREE (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/09/dems-m09.html)
PatColo
25th May 2018, 08:50 PM
47 mins:
Election Rigging and Corruption? Bev Harris - May 24, 2018 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd0vJPeXaYM)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd0vJPeXaYM
PatColo
24th November 2018, 10:24 AM
MUST WATCH: Tim Canova - A Fight for FL District 23
12,080 views
1.2K 5 Share Save
https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AN66SAyq7DQl7q2hiqGoFJMe5rHMo9YxYwje-_TCFQ=s88-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no (https://www.youtube.com/user/tracybeanz)Tracy Beanz (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC98Zwfvjq12M1oi99Yqd78w)
Published on Nov 23, 2018
This interview will definitely go down as one of the most important pieces I have done. Tim Canova has been fighting corruption and election fraud in earnest against Brenda Snipes and the machines of BOTH parties for three years. PLEASE watch and share this interview to raise awareness about what this amazing man has been doing to ensure elections with integrity for ALL of us.
52m: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc
PatColo
6th January 2020, 04:33 PM
new Whitney Webb, who did an exhaustive series on Epstein last Summer/Fall:
Why a Shadowy Tech Firm With Ties to Israeli Intelligence Is Running Doomsday Election Simulations (https://www.mintpressnews.com/cybereason-israel-tech-firm-doomsday-election-simulations/263886/)
A shadowy tech firm with deep ties to Israeli intelligence and newly inked contracts to protect Pentagon computers is partnering with Lockheed Martin to gain unprecedented access to the heart of America’s democracy.
by Whitney Webb (https://www.mintpressnews.com/author/whitney-webb/)
PatColo
6th January 2020, 04:36 PM
new Whitney Webb, who did an exhaustive series on Epstein last Summer/Fall:
Why a Shadowy Tech Firm With Ties to Israeli Intelligence Is Running Doomsday Election Simulations (https://www.mintpressnews.com/cybereason-israel-tech-firm-doomsday-election-simulations/263886/)
A shadowy tech firm with deep ties to Israeli intelligence and newly inked contracts to protect Pentagon computers is partnering with Lockheed Martin to gain unprecedented access to the heart of America’s democracy.
by Whitney Webb (https://www.mintpressnews.com/author/whitney-webb/)
Adam Green analyzes ^
Operation BLACKOUT: Israel Hacking America 2020
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFg3ICq-cY)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFg3ICq-cY
PatColo
10th January 2020, 11:42 PM
TruNews w guest Whitney Webb, 43 mins
Doomsday Election 2020: Israeli Spies Run Drill Predicting Overthrow of America (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW3vnrixxJs)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW3vnrixxJs
PatColo
31st January 2020, 07:07 PM
recent Whitney Webb article re USA's joo election meddling prob,
https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/status/1222318758859067394
Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb (https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb)
The unnerving conclusion to my 3-part series on Cybereason and foreign (and domestic) intel agencies meddling in the 2020 election with the apparent goal of annulling or cancelling it is now online:
How Government and Media Are Prepping America for a Failed 2020 Election (https://www.mintpressnews.com/media-israel-intelligence-2020-elections-cyber-security/264361/)
Russia, China and Iran are already being blamed for using tech to undermine the 2020 election. Yet, the very technologies they are allegedly using were created by a web of companies with deep ties to Israeli intelligence.
by Whitney Webb (https://www.mintpressnews.com/author/whitney-webb/)
Dachsie
1st February 2020, 04:52 AM
recent Whitney Webb article re USA's joo election meddling prob,
https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/status/1222318758859067394
Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb (https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb)
The unnerving conclusion to my 3-part series on Cybereason and foreign (and domestic) intel agencies meddling in the 2020 election with the apparent goal of annulling or cancelling it is now online:
How Government and Media Are Prepping America for a Failed 2020 Election (https://www.mintpressnews.com/media-israel-intelligence-2020-elections-cyber-security/264361/)
Russia, China and Iran are already being blamed for using tech to undermine the 2020 election. Yet, the very technologies they are allegedly using were created by a web of companies with deep ties to Israeli intelligence.
by Whitney Webb (https://www.mintpressnews.com/author/whitney-webb/)
I feel Rick Wiles really had the help of the Holy Spirit when he confronted yesterday, January 31 2020, that Israeli reporter, Cohen, about the spying and software of the Israelis.
Rick Wiles just received a phone call the same day of the interviews requesting him to be the guest on an RT show, so he had no preparation time for what I thought was his excellent testimony. He said he gets many such requests but almost always turns them down but he did accept yesterday. Rick Wiles was perfectly clear and outspoken and told it like it is. He left no big bombshell truth about Israel and the Mossad unmentioned. He covered every thing in an articulate poised way. Such a refreshing change from MSM and Fox News talking heads. Mr. Cohen just kept making the weak assertions over and over again and just looked like a pitiful joke.
This was a major breakthrough for truth about Israel technology and spy operations.
Rick Wiles also gave his Christian testimony and prayed for the Kingdom of Christ to take over the world and for Christ to help all the people of the world right now.
The silence was deafening in response to that.
PatColo
10th February 2020, 01:13 PM
https://twitter.com/MintPressNews/status/1226947893241827328
MintPress News
@MintPressNews
1h
SPECIAL REPORT: Despite #IowaCaucuses2020 fiasco, #Nevada#Democrats plan to use a new #software application for reporting results during the #NevadaCaucus scheduled for #February 22. (https://mintpressnews.com/nevada-democrats-caucus-new-software-despite-iowa-app-problems/264777/)
By: @_whitneywebb
https://mintpressnews.com/nevada-democrats-caucus-new-software-despite-iowa-app-problems/264777/
PatColo
25th February 2020, 02:10 PM
https://twitter.com/DrREpstein/status/1232414889584390144
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein (https://twitter.com/DrREpstein)
Just out in @EpochTimes (https://twitter.com/EpochTimes):
My latest take on the obscene threat that #BigTech (https://twitter.com/hashtag/BigTech?src=hashtag_click) companies pose to the free-and-fair election:
"Why Republicans Can't Win in 2020 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/why-republicans-cant-win-in-2020_3247875.html)"
Forget the #Russians (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Russians?src=hashtag_click). They're not the problem. #election2020 (https://twitter.com/hashtag/election2020?src=hashtag_click)
February 24, 2020 Updated: February 24, 2020
Commentary
When it comes to election manipulation, left-leaning American technology companies make the Russians look like rank amateurs.
No matter which weak candidate the Democrats (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-democrats) ultimately nominate, and even with Russia’s help (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/20/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-2020/index.html), President Donald Trump can’t win the 2020 election. For that matter, in races nationwide in which the projected winning margins are small—say, under 5 percent or so—Republicans (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-republicans), in general, are likely to lose.
That’s because of new forces of influence that the internet has made possible in recent decades and that Big Tech (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-big-tech) companies—Google (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-google) more aggressively than any other—have been determined to perfect since Armageddon Day—oh, sorry, Election Day—in 2016.
For the record, I’m neither a conservative nor a Trump supporter. But I love democracy (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-democracy) and America more than I love any particular party or candidate, and rigorous research (https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_2018-Manipulating_minds-The-power_of_search_engines_to_influence_votes_and_opi nions-UNCORRECTED_PROOFS.pdf) that I have been conducting since 2013 shows that Big Tech companies now have unprecedented power to sway elections.
While I cheer the fact that 95 percent of donations from tech companies and their employees go to Democrats, I can’t stand by and watch these companies undermine democracy. As long as I’m still breathing, I will do everything I can to stop that from happening—and, for the record, I’m NOT suicidal.
The threat these companies pose is far from trivial. For one thing, they can shift opinions and votes in numerous ways (https://www.theepochtimes.com/10-ways-big-tech-can-shift-millions-of-votes-in-the-november-elections-without-anyone-knowing_2671195.html) that people can’t detect.
Remember the rumors about that movie theater in New Jersey that got people to buy more Coke and popcorn using subliminal messages embedded into a film? Well, those rumors were a bit exaggerated—those messages actually had a minimal effect—but Google-and-the-Gang are now controlling a wide variety of subliminal methods of persuasion that can, in minutes, shift the voting preferences of 20 percent or more of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they’ve been manipulated.
Worse still, they can use these techniques without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. In a leak of Google emails (https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-workers-discussed-tweaking-search-function-to-counter-travel-ban-1537488472) to the Wall Street Journal in 2018, one Googler asks his colleagues how the company can use “ephemeral experiences” to change people’s views about Trump’s travel ban.
Ephemeral experiences are those fleeting ones we have every day when we view online content that’s generated on-the-fly and isn’t stored anywhere: newsfeeds, search suggestions, search results, and so on. No authority can go back in time to see what search suggestions or search results you were shown, but dozens of randomized, controlled, double-blind experiments (https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_2018-Manipulating_minds-The-power_of_search_engines_to_influence_votes_and_opi nions-UNCORRECTED_PROOFS.pdf) I’ve conducted show that such content can dramatically shift opinions and voting preferences. See the problem?
Speaking of content, I’m getting sick of seeing headlines about Russian interference in our elections. Unless the Russians suddenly figure out how to massively hack our voting machines—and shame on us if we’re incompetent enough to let that happen—there’s no evidence that bad actors such as Russia or the now-defunct Cambridge Analytica can shift more than a few thousand votes here and there. Generally speaking, all they can do is throw some biased content onto the internet. But content isn’t the problem anymore.
All that matters now is who has the power to decide what content people will see or will not see (censorship), and what order that content is presented in. That power is almost entirely in the hands of the arrogant executives at two U.S. companies. Their algorithms decide which content gets suppressed, the order in which content is shown, and which content goes viral. You can counter a TV ad with another TV ad, but if the tech execs are supporting one candidate or party, you can’t counteract their manipulations.
Forget the Russians. As I said when I testified before Congress (https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4807816/congressionalhearing-16july2019-testimonybydrrobertepstein) last summer, if our own tech companies all favor the same presidential candidate this year—and that seems likely—I calculate that they can easily shift 15 million votes to that candidate without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail.
By the way, the more you know about someone, the easier it is to manipulate him or her. Google and Facebook (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-facebook) have millions of pieces of information about every American voter, and they will be targeting their manipulations at the individual level for every single voter in every swing state. No one in the world except Google and Facebook can do that.
In President Eisenhower’s famous 1961 farewell address, he warned not only about the rise of a military-industrial complex; he also warned about the rise of a “technological elite” who could someday control our country without us knowing.
That day has come, my friends, and it’s too late for any law or regulation to make a difference—at least in the upcoming election. There’s only one way at this point to get these companies to take their digits off the scale, and that’s to do to them what they do to us and our children every day: monitor them aggressively.
We need to look over the shoulders of a diverse group of thousands of American voters—with their permission, of course—to aggregate and measure the ephemeral content that Google-and-the-Gang are showing them every day. When bias is detected that has the potential to shift votes, it needs to be reported immediately to the media, the Federal Election Commission, members of Congress, and other authorities. That will force the tech execs to back off; if they don’t, they’ll be risking humiliation, fines, and, quite possibly, criminal prosecution.
I’m building such a system now—a greatly expanded version of the monitoring systems I deployed in 2016 (https://hackernoon.com/taming-big-tech-5fef0df0f00d) and 2018 (https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_&_WILLIAMS_2019-WPA-Evidence_of-search_engine_bias_related_to_2018_midterm_electio ns.pdf). If you value democracy, wish me luck, or, better yet, lend your support (https://mygoogleresearch.com/).
Robert Epstein, the former editor-in-chief of “Psychology Today,” is senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (https://aibrt.org/). He has published 15 books and more than 300 articles on AI and other topics. To read Dr. Epstein’s full congressional testimony, click here (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Epstein%20Testimony.pdf). To learn more about or to support his research on online influence, visit MyGoogleResearch.com (https://mygoogleresearch.com/). Follow him on Twitter @DrREpstein (https://twitter.com/drrepstein).
Dachsie
25th February 2020, 02:41 PM
https://twitter.com/DrREpstein/status/1232414889584390144
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein (https://twitter.com/DrREpstein)
Just out in @EpochTimes (https://twitter.com/EpochTimes):
My latest take on the obscene threat that #BigTech (https://twitter.com/hashtag/BigTech?src=hashtag_click) companies pose to the free-and-fair election:
"Why Republicans Can't Win in 2020 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/why-republicans-cant-win-in-2020_3247875.html)"
Forget the #Russians (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Russians?src=hashtag_click). They're not the problem. #election2020 (https://twitter.com/hashtag/election2020?src=hashtag_click)
PatColo, is this YOUR "latest take" "on the obscene threat that #BigTech companies pose to the free-and-fair election"
I and probably you and most on this forum are already well aware of the threat bigtech companies pose to free and fair elections. What do you find especially insightful about Dr. Epstein's insights? The harm they do goes far and beyond "free and fair elections" and the thing that is causing "obscene threat" is something that was in existence long before there was something called "bigtech". I am more concerned about the harm done to the abstract concepts of "free and fair".
Jewboo
25th February 2020, 05:06 PM
free-and-fair election
Any GSUS member who posts this phrase with a straight face should be permabanned.
:rolleyes:
PatColo
11th March 2020, 12:05 AM
Angelo John Gage interviews Whitney Webb, 69m:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWAgv3Bs4w&feature=emb_title
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWAgv3Bs4w
Cyber Treason with Whitney Webb
Today we are joined by writer, researcher, and former Mint Press contributor, Whitney Webb to discuss the cyber treason that is going on in our own big tech industries; specifically focusing on the company Cyber Reason and what their role is in all this, along other special interests undermining our country.
*** Whitney's Links ***
Twitter: https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/whitneywebbmpn
Her work: https://t.co/ISQlIao54R
monty
25th March 2021, 08:02 AM
Dr. Cynthia McKinney and Dr. Edwin Vieira on Dr. Vieira’s proposal for election integrity. About 40 minutes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EX6MZcSWJiNk/
monty
7th June 2021, 06:46 PM
The fake elections are much worse than I imagined. The Gateway Pundit has forwarded an urgent message to the citizens of Windham, New Hampshire. “Your Forensic Audit is Being Secretly Sabotaged.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/urgent-message-american-patriots-people-windham-forensic-audit-windham-secretly-sabotaged/
URGENT MESSAGE From American Patriots to People of Windham: Your Forensic Audit in Windham is being Secretly Sabotaged
Jim Hoft
Urgent Message From American Patriots to New Hampshire Patriots Under Siege in Windham — Your forensic audit in Windham New Hampshire is being secretly sabotaged.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/F1E545D1-1096-4AAD-A699-20FFD075018A.jpeg
We wanted to be sure you knew.
Windham’s choice of Verified Voting (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/hey-new-hampshire-look-entities-verified-voting-firm-selected-audit-windham-associating/) for the forensic audit must be fought by patriots and defeated.
Given this choice, all other choices made by this Board of Selectman must be rigorously investigated, before your meeting on Monday night, fought and, if need be, defeated.
TRENDING: Biden Gives 2-Minute Generic Graduation Speech to Class of 2021 - He Gasps, Squints at his Teleprompter, Looks Lost and Slurs Words - WTH? (VIDEO) (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/biden-gives-2-minute-generic-graduation-speech-class-2021-gasps-squints-teleprompter-looks-lost-slurs-words-horrible-video/)
The Selectmen have chosen Mark Lindeman, the co-director of the nonprofit Verified Voting as part of the audit team. VV fought for paper ballots years ago, when the country was being told to go with paperless electronic voting machines. VV fought that and made sure we bought machines with a paper ballot.
It used to be the trusted and factual voice of computer scientists fighting on the side of election honesty and integrity.
Not any more.
First we found out two respected computer scientist board members (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/shocking-indictment-company-chosen-windham-nh-audit-accused-2019-downplaying-voting-machine-security-risks-providing-cover-untrustworthy-companies/) of VV resigned, Phil Stark, Ph.D., and Richard DeMillo, Ph.D.
Mr. Stark said in his Nov. 21, 2019 letter:
“I believe that Verified Voting has lost its way.
It has been providing cover for inherently untrustworthy voting systems–and the officials who bought them, the companies that make them, and any officials who might contemplate buying them in the future–by conducting “risk-limiting audits” of untrustworthy paper records, creating the false and misleading impression that relying on untrustworthy paper for a RLA can confirm election outcomes (and debasing the meaning of “RLA” in the process).”
“Our message to jurisdictions that buy poorly designed, insecure, universal-use BMD systems should be, ‘We tried to warn you. You need a better voting system.’ Instead, we’re saying, ‘Don’t worry: VV will teach you to sprinkle magic RLA dust and fantasies about parallel testing on your untrustworthy election. All will be fine; you can use our authority and reputation to silence your critics.’”
Mr. DeMillo said in his Dec. 1, 2019 letter:
“Although my concerns have been growing for some time now, Verified Voting’s involvement in a “pilot RLA” in Georgia following the recent election makes it impossible to continue as a member of the advisory board. VV issued and supported misleading public statements that those pilots confirm outcomes and even prove the security of new election systems. Verified Voting’s seal of approval for the security theatrics in Bartow County undermines efforts to make elections more accountable. This exercise conducted behind closed doors and billed as a practice run—even if flawlessly conducted—could only confirm the correctness of the tally of the unverified (and therefore possibly corrupted) ballots, not that the ballots tallied were correctly marked. No audit based on an untrustworthy audit trail can confirm the correctness of the outcome.”
“I can no longer lend my name to Verified Voting … If they are successful at confusing the public about the correctness of election outcomes in Georgia and elsewhere, I fear it will be in some measure due to the absence of values once embraced by Verified Voting.”
Then, Tracy Beanz who does awesome investigative journalism at UncoverDC, published a story on this NH audit. In her April 28 article, Windham, NH Officials Choose Auditor Opposed to Audit in Maricopa County, AZ, reporter Michelle Edward said:
“Mark Lindeman is the Co-Director of Verified Voting, a non-profit with a history of working with left-leaning organizations, including the Brennan Center for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Leadership Conference for Civil and Human Rights, and Common Cause. Also worth noting, Verified Voting board chair Barbara Simons also sits on the board of the Democracy Alliance, an influential Soros-funded donor collective.“
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/04/28/windham-nh-officials-choose-auditor-opposed-to-audit-in-maricopa-county-az/
Mark Lindeman of VV is the same exact guy who sent a very threatening letter on April 13, along with the Carter Center, the Brennan Center, and some unknown, private for-profit company, RSM Election Technologies, to the Arizona Senate President, Karen Fann!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/paige-alexander-letter-az.jpg
This letter denouncing the New Hampshire audit WAS SIGNED by Mark Lindeman from Verified Voting!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/lindeman-signed-.jpg
We checked. Barbara Simons is on the board of George Soros’s Democracy Alliance just as UncoverDC uncovered.
We don’t know how many years she has been there. She was still a board member in January 2021. After that, the Democracy Alliance deleted its board list from the internet.
The Democracy Alliance was founded by George Soros and a handful of secretive progressive Democrat billionaires in 2005 so that they could secretly fund and control U.S. nonprofits and develop a progressive, U.S. infrastructure. Its only purpose is to infiltrate, fund, control, and form new nonprofits, to push its progressive agendas.
The DA also targeted election integrity nonprofits, which now only appear to be nonpartisan: the Brennan Center, Demos, USPIRGs, the LWV, the ACLU, and Common Cause are just six examples. VV is another.
With the DA, you don’t get to be a board member on that powerful of a board unless you are in all the way on Soros’s agendas.
This is how they’re tearing apart our election system.
One county at a time!
One state at a time!
One presidential election at a time!
Right under our noses.
They are trying to secretly replace our Constitutional Republic with socialism.
They’ve weaponized our charities.
Now the computer scientists, supposed to be trusted experts in elections and computer security, software, machines, and these “Risk Limiting Audits,” are also suspect and now you’re fighting them off in NH.
The fact that the co-director of this nonprofit, Mark Lindeman, is being hired by your Board to do the audit work in NH means he’s under the thumb of his board president, Barbara Simons, and she’s under the thumb of George Soros and his secretive club of progressive billionaires at the Democracy Alliance.
The fact that this nonprofit is being hired for this Windham forensic audit, while Barbara Simons, the president of Verified Voting, is also on George Soros’s Democracy Alliance board IS ALARMING.
Gather a team, get the pots of coffee and tea, do your research and be prepared to fight this Monday night:
1. DA Board: try this: https://democracyalliance.org/about/board/ (https://web.archive.org/web/20210124122603/https://democracyalliance.org/about/board/)
or
https://web.archive.org/web/20210124122603/https://democracyalliance.org/about/board/
2. Research the entire VV board.
Call them and find out why they quit VV.
4. Read Phil Stark’s 2020 affidavits in GA against “Risk Limiting Audits”:
https://gaverifiedvoting.org/pdf-litigation/20200824-809_2-Exhibit-1-Decl-Philip-Stark.pdf
5. Search for and read about Stark and DeMillo’s strong opposition to “Risk Limiting Audits.”
6. Joseph Lorenzo Hall, Ph.D., was and still is affiliated with VV. He now does “Risk Limiting Audits” all across the country. Be aware.
7. Contact J. Christian Adams on Monday at the Pubic Interest Legal Foundation, the country’s most ethical, seasoned election integrity organization. Get his advice on what to do regarding your Monday night forensic audit meeting. Tell him it is urgent you speak with him.
https://publicinterestlegal.org/
8. FOR LATER: Did NH get any nonprofit Zuckerbucks? Check with the Amistad Project, the Capital Research Center, and the FGA to rule this out:
9. Review the nonprofits the DA specifically highlights on its own website under Investments: Portfolio, The Resistance and State Funds. There are thousands more nonprofits the DA supports, these are the really special ones.
https://democracyalliance.org/
10. FOR LATER: It is through corrupted nonprofits that your red state has been secretly and gradually turned purple/blue. Colorado was the first, red to blue plan. Set up a committee, research this, and keep out the corrupted nonprofits and their power-mad philanthropists. Do you have a secret NH Democracy Alliance Chapter like CO does?
11. In 2017, Soros donated $18 billion of his own wealth to his Open Society Foundations. It was one of if not the largest charitable transfer of wealth in world history. How much of that money has shown up in NH? How blue has NH gone since 2017?
12. In this Nov. 16, 2020 letter there is a list of 59 American computer scientists to be very, very suspicious of given they all found nothing wrong with the 2020 election!
Scientists say no credible evidence of computer fraud in the 2020 election outcome, but policymakers must work with experts to improve confidence:
“We are specialists in election security, having studied the security of voting machines, voting systems, and technology used for government elections for decades.”
“Anyone asserting that a US election was “rigged” is making an extraordinary claim.”
“We are aware of alarming assertions being made that the 2020 election was “rigged” by exploiting technical vulnerabilities. However, in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent. To our collective knowledge, no credible evidence has been put forth that supports a conclusion that the 2020 election outcome in any state has been altered through technical compromise.”
Barbara Simons, Ph.D., signed this letter.
So did David L. Dill, Ph.D., David Jefferson, Ph.D., Ron Rivest, Ph.D., and Poorvi L. Vora, Ph.D., who are currently on the Verified Voting board of directors.
So did these members of the current Verified Voting board of advisors:
Andrew W. Appel, Professor of Computer Science, Princeton University
Steven M. Bellovin, Percy K. and Vida L.W. Hudson Professor of Computer Science; affiliate faculty, Columbia Law, Columbia University
Matt Blaze, McDevitt Chair of Computer Science and Law, Georgetown University
Edward W. Felten, Robert E. Kahn Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs,Princeton University
J. Alex Halderman, Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan
Joseph Lorenzo Hall, SVP Strong Internet, Internet Society
Harry Hursti, co-founder Nordic Innovation Labs and Election Integrity Foundation
Douglas W. Jones, Associate Professor of Computer Science, University of Iowa
Joseph Kiniry, Principal Scientist, Galois, CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair
Peter G. Neumann, Chief Scientist, SRI International Computer Science Lab
Aviel D. Ruben, Professor of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University
Bruce Schneier, Fellow and Lecturer, Harvard Kennedy School
Kevin Skoglund, Chief Technologist, Citizens for Better Elections
Dan S. Wallach, Professor, Departments of Computer Science and Electrical &Computer Engineering, Rice Scholar, Baker Institute of Public Policy, Rice University
Phil Stark and Richard DeMillo also signed this letter, despite having left the VV board. Why? Find out.
https://www.mattblaze.org/papers/election2020.pdf (https://www.mattblaze.org/papers/election2020.pdf)
13. Here is how to begin researching George Soros, corrupted nonprofits, foundations, their networks, and the people who fund them. DO NOT NEGLECT DOING THIS HARD WORK!.
Anything at the Capital Research Center: https://capitalresearch.org/
This is a Capital Research Center tool: https://www.influencewatch.org/?s=Democracy+Alliance
https://capitalresearch.org/?s=Democracy+Alliance
Anything by Matthew Vadum, the expert on the corrupt, criminal ACORN. (Also see his books):
Subversion, Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers
Anything at The Gateway Pundit
Anything by J. Christian Adams, the president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation. (Also see his books):
Injustice : Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department
Anything by Trevor Loudon
Anything in the Epoch Times
Steve Bannon’s The WarRoom Pandemic
Michael Savage Podcasts
READ THESE NOW: Anything by Joe Schaeffer at the World Tribune:
Develop your own list of awesome Conservative news sites and Talk Radio shows. We are blessed to have so many high-quality choices.
14. Research tools:
15. NH, please lead the way like you did in the 1700’s. This time, help our besieged country ditch these electronic voting machines, all of them. Clearly, we don’t need ’em.
New Hampshire friends, you will all be in our prayers tomorrow night.
Hold. the. line. patriots.
You are not alone.
Via Silence Dogood and friends
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.