Time Magazine Bin Laden cover

[joboo]

Just saw this...

I can't f-ing believe this cover Time puts out. I literally thought it was a joke by mad magazine when I first saw it...but it's real.

Surreal beyond belief that anyone, let alone Time magazine, would feature a dead persons face with a red bloody X over it.

Does this strike anyone else as exceptionally deranged?

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/2011/1101110520_400.jpg


It appears they have done three others (wow big surprise on the selections):

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/272998/TIME-RED-X.jpg

Was time always a Zionist porn trash mag, or did it get reorganized post 9/11?

[Neuro]

Interesting that they used pretty much the same cross also....

We can see a progression in the facial hair department too... Who's next? Santa Claus?

[keehah]

You missed one:
http://cdn.theatlanticwire.com/img/upload/2011/05/02/1101450820_400.jpg
August 20, 1945

[PatColo]

they also had Stalin in '39 & again in '42...

Hitler was voted Time Magazine’s man of the year in 1938 (http://www.didyouknowthat.net/hitler-was-voted-time-magazines-man-of-the-year-in-1938/2010/12/28/)


In 1938, Adolf Hitler was chosen as Time Magazine’s man of the year.
http://www.didyouknowthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/hitler-Time-man-of-the-year-227x300.jpg (http://www.didyouknowthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/hitler-Time-man-of-the-year.jpg)
The tradition of selecting a Man of the Year began in 1927, with Time editors contemplating newsworthy stories possible during a slow news week. The idea was also an attempt to remedy the editorial embarrassment earlier that year for not having aviator Charles Lindbergh on its cover following his historic trans-Atlantic flight. By the end of the year, it was decided that a cover story featuring Lindbergh as the Man of the Year would serve both purposes.

Since the list began, every serving President of the United States has been a Person of the Year at least once with the exceptions of Calvin Coolidge, in office at time of the first issue, Herbert Hoover, the next U.S. president, and Gerald Ford.

Despite the magazine’s frequent statements to the contrary, the designation is often regarded as an honor, and spoken of as an award or prize, simply based on many previous selections of admirable people. However Time magazine points out those such as Adolf Hitler in 1938, and Joseph Stalin in 1939 and again in 1942, and the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979, have also been granted the title.


Source: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year)

[Awoke]

Hahahaha. Time is as owned as popular mechanics and the Economist magazines. As if you didn't know that.

[Joe King]

Gerald Ford

To this day it still pisses me off that they didn't pick Gerald as man of the year. He was the best President no one ever voted for. lol

[StreetsOfGold]

For those that don't know X is the devil's letter.

http://www.whale.to/b/x_h.html

[DMac]

For those that don't know X is the devil's letter.

http://www.whale.to/b/x_h.html


I've always found it odd that "XMAS", an abbreviation for Christmas, was celebrated on December 25th. Nimrod's birthday. X as a symbol for Nimrod. I thought I had read that x = nimrod some time ago.

Thanks for the link, it confirms my suspicion!

[Son-of-Liberty]

then there is XXX

[palani]

To this day it still pisses me off that they didn't pick Gerald as man of the year. He was the best President no one ever voted for. lol

Lynch King? Is he a relative?

[joboo]

You missed one:
http://cdn.theatlanticwire.com/img/upload/2011/05/02/1101450820_400.jpg
August 20, 1945

What it supposed to mena I wonder? Anti Japanese?

[joboo]

Interesting that they used pretty much the same cross also....

We can see a progression in the facial hair department too... Who's next? Santa Claus?

lol, true. They have a hair fetish. Damn, Hitler looks really pissed off... he could eat a baby at any moment.


I've never really read Time mag that I can remember. I thought it was considered an iconish representation of mainstream values with some modicum of integrity.

Zoom....out the window with that idea.

[Serpo]

http://static.moviefanatic.com/files/x-filesgif.gif












http://www.wallpaperbase.com/wallpapers/movie/xmen/x_men_1.jpg


http://www.techdigest.tv/x%20factor%20logo.jpg

[Santa]

Interesting that they used pretty much the same cross also....

We can see a progression in the facial hair department too... Who's next? Santa Claus?

http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/junk/file-8.jpg

[Neuro]

Nice one Santa!

[Buddha]

http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2173/usac.jpg

[Santa]

Nice one Santa!

Although,I should mention I find the near identical bloody "X" that has been used over the past 60 or so years to be quite disturbing.

Repetition is powerful. It's also related to ritual. I'm beginning to see a pattern. There's a correlation between symbols and psychology.

[Serpo]

Why stop there ,may as well x the whole world..............

[Buddha]

Why stop there ,may as well x the whole world..............


http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/8604/l75pmzyk.jpg

[k-os]

Hahahaha. Time is as owned as popular mechanics and the Economist magazines. As if you didn't know that.

I agree, Time is owned. I used to have a subscription and would become furious reading it - nearly every article. I kept my subscription just to see how the other side thinks. I disagree somewhat about The Economist. I have been reading that magazine lately, and I am shocked at how fair they seem . . . but now that I think about it, I am coming off of reading Time magazine, so maybe I am just relieved that it's not making me furious.

[Mouse]

I agree, Time is owned. I used to have a subscription and would become furious reading it - nearly every article. I kept my subscription just to see how the other side thinks. I disagree somewhat about The Economist. I have been reading that magazine lately, and I am shocked at how fair they seem . . . but now that I think about it, I am coming off of reading Time magazine, so maybe I am just relieved that it's not making me furious.

The Economist IMHO is the globalist version of Time. I subscribed for a couple years and once I started "paying attention" found it to be propaganda for the "thinking man" (e.g. those that think they are smart). So, it's retard magazine for those that are narc enough to think they are above the fray.

Obviously no implications implied that you are reading any rag or another. It's a rag.

[k-os]

The Economist IMHO is the globalist version of Time. I subscribed for a couple years and once I started "paying attention" found it to be propaganda for the "thinking man" (e.g. those that think they are smart). So, it's retard magazine for those that are narc enough to think they are above the fray.

Obviously no implications implied that you are reading any rag or another. It's a rag.

Well, I think I am pretty smart, so you are partially, if not fully correct. (Because I don't know what "narc enough" means.) I still think it's way better than Time magazine.

[Joe King]

Well, I think I am pretty smart, so you are partially, if not fully correct. (Because I don't know what "narc enough" means.) I still think it's way better than Time magazine.I assumed it meant narcissistic, as it fits within the context he used.

Unless he's referring to the tattle-tale kind of "narc". lol

[k-os]

I assumed it meant narcissistic, as it fits within the context he used.

Unless he's referring to the tattle-tale kind of "narc". lol

Oh, yeah, probably. I thought it was drugged, or asleep (narcosis). You know, sheeple.

[Mouse]

As I stated in my OP, it's IMHO. What I meant was that I believe it to be a more refined propaganda. I enjoyed reading it and they have many good articles, but it's still MSM. I think most readers, myself included, are induced under the illusion that it's a smarty pants magazine for smarty pants people. I don't buy into that anymore. Nothing on you or anyone else K-OS.

Agent 99 signing out :0

Of course you could read my new sig line and get some idea. It's all fun and games until the band DROWNS. haha

[Serpo]

Yes its difficult to find a magazine that hasnt a secret agenda anymore as the globalists have brought them all because they have all the money.They have brought everything including education.You could say they have brought the world.