PDA

View Full Version : Anybody else wish they could be left the fuck alone?



General of Darkness
21st October 2011, 10:24 PM
Yeah I know, I can be real prick at times, but in all honest I just want to be left the fuck alone.

But what does that mean for me.

1 - I don't want to be obligated for anyone's bad decisions -i.e. kids
2 - I don't want to be obligated to the state so they can supplementing my tax dollars for those bad decisions.

I could go on and on and on, I'm just not interested in typing a mile long post. Bottom line, I'm fucking sick and tired of my tax dollars being used in ways that are not in my interests and these little boy fuckers and carpet munchers are looking for more money that again will be used in ways that are NOT BE IN MY INTERESTS.

Leave me the fuck alone.

solid
21st October 2011, 10:30 PM
Yeah! You can be a real prick at times GoD (kidding)...I agree with this post, I just want to be left the fuck alone too. Well said.

Cheers for freedom, those of us that still have it.

Joe King
21st October 2011, 10:36 PM
Are you saying you want "out"?

General of Darkness
21st October 2011, 10:54 PM
Are you saying you want "out"?

Honestly, if I could just make a post on gsus without you pulling on my nutz that would a fucking great start.

Joe King
21st October 2011, 10:59 PM
Honestly, if I could just make a post on gsus without you pulling on my nutz that would a fucking great start.

Who's pullin' on yer nutz? ???

All I asked was if you want out of the bs. When I posted that, I was thinkin' of the song. Why you always gotta read stuff into everything? I know you're a sensitive guy, but jheez louise. lol

solid
21st October 2011, 11:02 PM
Joe....maybe GoD wants to be left alone for a bit...

po boy
21st October 2011, 11:02 PM
Sounds like the General wants to opt out, it's a start.

mamboni
21st October 2011, 11:11 PM
Yeah I know, I can be real prick at times, but in all honest I just want to be left the fuck alone.

But what does that mean for me.

1 - I don't want to be obligated for anyone's bad decisions -i.e. kids
2 - I don't want to be obligated to the state so they can supplementing my tax dollars for those bad decisions.

I could go on and on and on, I'm just not interested in typing a mile long post. Bottom line, I'm fucking sick and tired of my tax dollars being used in ways that are not in my interests and these little boy fuckers and carpet munchers are looking for more money that again will be used in ways that are NOT BE IN MY INTERESTS.

Leave me the fuck alone.

Man oh man, you're singing my song.

There are millions of folk who feel the same exact way, believe it.

Joe King
22nd October 2011, 12:18 AM
Joe....maybe GoD wants to be left alone for a bit...

Ok, I suppose. Maybe he does, but I didn't think he meant left alone from us here, but all the bs stuff in the World that just wants a bite out of us.
...and I wasn't bustin' his nutz, Just tryin' to communicatethat I understand how he feels. After all, I want out, is like my theme song. lol

Spectrism
22nd October 2011, 07:31 AM
The liberal socialist mindset just pisses me off too. It irks me that there are self-righteous bastards out there (and many of them) who think they have the right to reach into my pocket with the power of government and deadly force, to take what I work for so that they can give to those who would not work or who make foolish choices. That is not charity and it is not noble to steal from one to "give" to another.

gunDriller
22nd October 2011, 08:14 AM
carpet munchers are looking for more money that again will be used in ways that are NOT BE IN MY INTERESTS.

maybe a little fulminating silver on the carpet would do the trick.

anybody who munches that will be needing dental work pronto.

palani
22nd October 2011, 08:16 AM
You create your own joinder with society. Learn to contract less and love living more.

freespirit
22nd October 2011, 08:22 AM
you might like this song GoD...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc9sQoxPxAg

freespirit
22nd October 2011, 08:27 AM
a little detour, but this one still rings true!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4kTnP5VJ1k

enjoy!

mrnhtbr2232
22nd October 2011, 08:39 AM
Yeah I know, I can be real prick at times, but in all honest I just want to be left the fuck alone.

But what does that mean for me.

1 - I don't want to be obligated for anyone's bad decisions -i.e. kids
2 - I don't want to be obligated to the state so they can supplementing my tax dollars for those bad decisions.

I could go on and on and on, I'm just not interested in typing a mile long post. Bottom line, I'm fucking sick and tired of my tax dollars being used in ways that are not in my interests and these little boy fuckers and carpet munchers are looking for more money that again will be used in ways that are NOT BE IN MY INTERESTS.

Leave me the fuck alone.

Actually I think this is an excellent post. Our lives today are under duress from a wide spectrum of political and business abuses. The fantasy of representative government is actually the reality of state tyranny. Since only a handful of us are left that still understand it, I sense we will not only experience *more* intrusive B.S. from officials but also punitive abuse as well - sort of like a sadistic gratification that they are teaching us a lesson. You can count me in the "leave me the fuck alone" camp General - freedom also means you can go about your affairs without every prick under the sun wanting a piece of the action at your expense.

po boy
22nd October 2011, 09:16 AM
General, you may not do anything with the information contained in this but might give a little relief.

http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/sovereignty/errant-sovereign-handbook.pdf

Santa
22nd October 2011, 10:13 AM
There is an enormous irony here.

Like fish in the ocean, we all wish to be left the fuck alone, yet we voluntarily pay for this gigantic social and business network that includes the entire world.

It's not called the Net for nothing.

In the beginning it chums our sense of independence and individuality, but nevertheless the Net is drawn in toward the vessel.

JJ.G0ldD0t
22nd October 2011, 10:18 AM
Honestly, if I could just make a post on gsus without you pulling on my nutz that would a fucking great start.

that made me ROFL

Libertarian_Guard
22nd October 2011, 10:23 AM
After Sept. 11, America’s intelligence, surveillance and counter-terrorism agencies basically got a blank check to fund their efforts. The CIA got a billion dollars right away. So did the National Security Agency (NSA). “What we found in the years immediately after Sept. 11 was that the existing agencies grew enormously,” observes Dana Priest, a reporter for The Washington Post. “They doubled in size, many of them, and new organizations were created as well, big ones.”

In 2002, for example, there were 34 new federal organizations created to work at the top-secret level. In 2003, government created 39 more; in 2004, 30 more; in 2005, another 35; and more each year since. “Every year [since 9/11],” Priest goes on, “more than two dozen, sometimes three dozen, entirely new federal organizations dedicated to counterterrorism [were] being created.”

Do we really need all these agencies? Will any of us really notice or care if we lose a few government acronyms along the way?

By funding this proliferation of intrusive government agencies — all in the name of national security — we taxpayers are paying to be groped by strangers, metaphorically speaking. Maybe we could do with a little less groping. And certainly, we could do with a lot less “protecting” and “rescuing.”

Less is more, as the saying goes.

Thus, the one solution to the euro crisis — and also to the economic malaise here at home — is the one solution that no one seems to be considering: Benign neglect.

Doing nothing at all may be the very best thing to do, as Jim Grant suggests in a recent issue of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer. “Constructive inaction” is the term Grant uses to describe the government’s response — or rather, non-response — to the economic contraction of 1920.

“90 years ago,” Grant explains, “in the teeth of a slump much deeper than our Great Recession, the government did what today would be unimaginable.”

It did nothing.

“The US government — the Wilson administration through March 1921, the Harding administration thereafter — met the emergency mainly by getting out of its way,” Grant relates. “To most of the policymakers of the day, it was, indeed no ‘emergency,’ but essays of the business cycle, unpleasant but inevitable.”

Importantly, the government of 1920-21 did not stand aside because it had no idea what to do; it stood aside because it had some idea what not to do. The administrations of Wilson and Harding stood aside because they trusted market forces to resolve the crisis more effectively that the government could.

“Market forces didn’t fail in 1920-21,” says Grant. “They were virtually the only forces in play… The Federal Reserve in 1919 was celebrating its fifth birthday, while the welfare state of finance — too big to fail, TARP, TALF, etc. — was not only unborn but also unimagined.”

Anticipating the deep recession of 1920-21, the Ben Bernanke of his day, Benjamin Strong, governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, had this to say in 1919:

[“There will be] a considerable degree of unemployment, but not for very long, and… after a year or two of discomfort, embarrassment, some losses, some disorders caused by unemployment, we will emerge with an almost invincible banking position, prices more nearly at competitive levels with other nations, and be able to exercise a wide and important influence in restoring the world to a normal and livable condition.”

Therefore, in anticipation of both an imminent deep recession and also at a rapid, vibrant recovery that would restore the world to a normal and livable condition, Strong proposed neither bailout plans nor “stimulus measures” to alter the economy’s natural course.

He simply watched. And as he watched, he saw his predictions fulfilled. The economy did contract, fiercely so. But shortly thereafter, the economy launched a powerful recovery. The whole thing lasted less than two years.

“The point cannot be overstated that the slump did end,” Grant points out, “and that the post-1921 labor market mounted a powerful recovery and that the incumbent Republicans remained in power until Herbert Hoover decided to meet the Great Depression, not through inaction but through an aggressive intervention.”

But constructive inaction is not even a topic of discussion among the G-20. Today’s discussion is all about destructive action. In the name of “stabilizing the system,” the G-20 wishes to amass hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into a kind of economic funeral pyre.

“The supposed lessons of the Great Depression, as interpreted by the former Princeton economics professor who now directs the nation’s destiny at the helm of the Federal Reserve Board, constitute the guiding light for today’s policymakers,” Grant explains. “Intervene early and often… print money, run up the federal debt, slash interest rates, extend jobless benefits and soften the sting of foreclosure…”

Accordingly, the leaders of the EU and IMF are planning to “save the system” by sending money to governments that overspent foolishly and banks that invested foolishly. Why bother saving that system?

The system that deserves saving is not the one that rewards incompetence and reckless risk-taking. The system that deserves saving is the one that rewards prudence. That’s the very same system that permits bankrupt investments to go bankrupt…that separates fools from their money.

The system that deserves saving is not the one that tries to slap green paint on every piece of dead wood and call it “healthy.” The system worth saving is the one that respects the power of market forces — that allows the dead wood to rot and decompose right where it sits, so that it may fertilize the next generation of productive enterprise.

“The bailout funds [in Europe] — no matter how large they grow — will merely slow the march toward inevitability,” we observed several weeks ago. “The destination is certain; the timetable is variable.”

Greece will default…eventually. Why not let it happen? And if the euro fails, the euro fails. Why not let that happen too?

The leading policymakers of the European Union would like to halt the crisis in its tracks. Not gonna happen. These guys and gals should probably stop practicing their speeches into a mirror. They are forgetting that the images before them are flip-flopped. Left is actually right. Right is actually left. Rescue plans are actually failure plans. Failure is actually the first part of any enduring rescue.


http://dailyreckoning.com/why-constructive-inaction-is-no-longer-in-the-feds-lexicon/

Libertytree
22nd October 2011, 12:08 PM
I dig how ya feel General but for me it's about damage long ago done and more currently perpetrated by TPTB.

The crime of destroying our monetary system.

The crime of subverting or ignoring our Constitution and the BOR.

The crime of enacting laws antithetical and abhorrent to freedom and what they do in the present and the future. Laws that make us all enemies of the state for believing in the tenets America was founded on.

Of course I could go on and on but what's the use? They've sucked any ambition I have for success and have left me with only a desire to live to see an end to their tyranny.

MAGNES
22nd October 2011, 02:29 PM
Honestly, if I could just make a post on gsus without you pulling on my nutz that would a fucking great start.

He is trolling you, no doubt about it, going back to the summer,
he is here to antagonize you in a subtle way, some times more
blatant, he reads like Juristic Person, I am not the first person
to mention this, others did, way back, I just elaborated, Ben Shockly
last summer had him pegged as Juristic Person. Ben was his number
one enemy, you are next in line, I am somewhere behind you, him
and Book knocked heads before you, so he is going down a list of
old enemies.

Don't get banned, that is what he wants. You have said a lot and
done a lot already, keep it cool , I am telling you this as a friend.

The little ankle biting muts sooner or later are going to piss you off.

In real life something else would happen after you are told to fuck off
and don't stop getting into peoples faces and space constantly.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2476/3975167029_cbc09eb2d3_o.jpg

po boy
22nd October 2011, 02:42 PM
Joe and JP are not on in the same and he has stated as such more than once.

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 11:00 AM
He is trolling you, no doubt about it, going back to the summer, he is here to antagonize you in a subtle way, some times more
blatant, he reads like Juristic Person, I am not the first person
to mention this, others did, way back, I just elaborated, Ben Shockly
last summer had him pegged as Juristic Person. Ben was his number
one enemy, you are next in line, I am somewhere behind you, him
and Book knocked heads before you, so he is going down a list of
old enemies.You know what Mags? You'd have been right at home in the Inquisition as they weren't concerned with what the truth was nor what ones intent was either. Same as you.

If you'd care to look, I explained my response on page one. If you don't like it, oh well. Get over it and get over your overly inflated head too. You try to come across as someone who knows everything while actually demonstrating that you know nothing. At all. You're as mis-guided as anyone I've ever met. Seriously. You make me sad.
....and who the heck is Ben? I don't know that one, but you keep goin' on about him. Is he your boyfriend, or what?



Don't get banned, that is what he wants.No, it's not what I want.
What I want is to have an open exchange of thoughts and ideas. If some can't do so in a relatively normal way, oh well, it's not my problem if they blow their top. How old are they again?

Besides, I made one little joke about Croatia and some of you act as though I'd told him to go have relations with his Mother. Get real....please.


You have said a lot and done a lot already, keep it cool , I am telling you this as a friend.That's actually good advice, Mags.
To General: Do try to keep your cool. You'll find life much more bearable if you do. Besides, blowin' up over every least little thing isn't good for you mentally or physically.
Remember, you're getting into age where people can literally "blow a gasket".......it happens.
Be safe, be cool, brother.



The little ankle biting muts sooner or later are going to piss you off.You think you piss off people. So I guess that makes you a little ankle bitting mutt too.



In real life something else would happen after you are told to fuck off
and don't stop getting into peoples faces and space constantly.How is GSUS supposedly "his" space? I say it isn't.
...and if you post something, anyone can respond, right? Or do you feel the rulz should be more equal for some?




Joe and JP are not on in the same and he has stated as such more than once.
It doesn't matter when saying it to people who only see their side and choose to follow thair own made-up theories.

If I were JP on gim1/2 I'd be JP on here too.
...but apparently some here need multiple names and just assume others do too.

freespirit
23rd October 2011, 11:24 AM
joe, i used to wonder why people here gave you such a hard time...now i'm starting to get it.

you say you just want an open dialogue/exchange of ideas, etc., but the manner in which you approach this exchange borders on antagonistic. you seem to be tip-toeing along the razor's edge, pushing just to the point that you can still say "what? i'm just playin', or expressing my opinion" or whatever, but the facts are the facts. you obviously realize you are getting under people's skin, and you then play innocent when they try to tell you to ease up. no body wants to have someone in their face all the time, (surely you know this), and yet you perpetrate the same types of behavior.


you wouldn't last long in my circle.

solid
23rd October 2011, 11:30 AM
I could be way off on 'gsus theory and history', but wasn't Ben poster Philobeddoe back in the day? That guy was the most negative miserable poster that I can remember. Nothing but insults to folks..




Of course I could go on and on but what's the use? They've sucked any ambition I have for success and have left me with only a desire to live to see an end to their tyranny.

LT, I understand completely where you are coming from. When I think about success and desire to live the way I want, I first think of all the obstacles that are in place limiting my freedoms. Then, I realize, my goals and dreams are far bigger than what they think they can take from me. Part of what makes America great, or at least originally, is that we all have the right to pursue the lives we want. If you want something, you can get it with hard work. We must not let them take that spirit from us, ever. Each goal you achieve towards your personal happiness, is basically telling them to fuck off.

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 11:38 AM
joe, i used to wonder why people here gave you such a hard time...now i'm starting to get it.

you say you just want an open dialogue/exchange of ideas, etc., but the manner in which you approach this exchange borders on antagonistic. you seem to be tip-toeing along the razor's edge, pushing just to the point that you can still say "what? i'm just playin', or expressing my opinion" or whatever, but the facts are the facts. you obviously realize you are getting under people's skin, and you then play innocent when they try to tell you to ease up. no body wants to have someone in their face all the time, (surely you know this), and yet you perpetrate the same types of behavior.


you wouldn't last long in my circle.I just get tired of Mags trying to read stuff into everything.

General posted something we can all relate to. I merely asked him if he want'd out. {of the bs} Don't we all?

Besides, I don't see anyone telling Mags, or General, or Boook, or anyone of those ones to not respond to me. They need to get over their self imposed sense of superiority to others.


As for you and i, I'm sure we'd get along just fine.

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 11:41 AM
I could be way off on 'gsus theory and history', but wasn't Ben poster Philobeddoe back in the day? That guy was the most negative miserable poster that I can remember. Nothing but insults to folks.Thanks. I was wondering who "Ben" was that Mags keeps goin' on about.
...and yes, you are spot-on in your assessment of him. He was in fact a miserable little man.

Golden
23rd October 2011, 11:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB-wmOYelnM

Horn
23rd October 2011, 03:28 PM
You've been promoted.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnx95KyQEAA

Book
23rd October 2011, 05:39 PM
You'd have been right at home in the Inquisition as they weren't concerned with what the truth was nor what ones intent was either. Same as you. If you'd care to look, If you don't like it, oh well. Get over it and get over your overly inflated head too. You try to come across as someone who knows everything while actually demonstrating that you know nothing. You're as mis-guided as anyone I've ever met. Seriously. You make me sad...You think you piss off people. So I guess that makes you a little ankle bitting mutt too......and if you post something, anyone can respond, right? Or do you feel the rulz should be more equal for some?



Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Defense_mechanism) where a person subconsciously denies (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Denial) his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, usually to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others originate those feelings.[1] (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Psychological_projection#cite_note-0)Projection reduces anxiety (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Anxiety) by allowing the expression of the unwanted unconscious impulses or desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them. An example of this behavior might be blaming another (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Blame#Blame_shifting) for self failure. The mind may avoid the discomfort of consciously admitting personal faults by keeping those feelings unconscious, and by redirecting libidinal satisfaction by attaching, or "projecting," those same faults onto another person or object.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Psychological_projection





::) is your anxiety reduced now Joe...lol.

JDRock
23rd October 2011, 06:15 PM
@ g-o-d its the same reason i moved to wyoming! im no longer surrounded by assholes, just millions and millions of acres of pristine mountains....

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 09:51 PM
Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Defense_mechanism) where a person subconsciously denies (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Denial) his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, usually to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others originate those feelings.[1] (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Psychological_projection#cite_note-0)Projection reduces anxiety (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Anxiety) by allowing the expression of the unwanted unconscious impulses or desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them. An example of this behavior might be blaming another (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Blame#Blame_shifting) for self failure. The mind may avoid the discomfort of consciously admitting personal faults by keeping those feelings unconscious, and by redirecting libidinal satisfaction by attaching, or "projecting," those same faults onto another person or object.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Psychological_projection





::) is your anxiety reduced now Joe...lol.I'm not projecting anyting. Just pointing out that with his attitude that only he can know why anyone ever does anything, he'd have made a good Judge at the inquisitions.
ie I explained why I posted asking if he wanted out.
...and then Mags has to declare it to be untrue based upon his own lack of thinking.


So what's your prob, picture Book?

Book
23rd October 2011, 10:31 PM
I'm not projecting anything.

Just pointing out that with his attitude that only he can know why anyone ever does anything, he'd have made a good Judge at the inquisitions. ie I explained why I posted asking if he wanted out...based upon his own lack of thinking.



http://images.puella-magi.net/thumb/b/b2/Deny_the_obvious.png/160px-Deny_the_obvious.png

::)

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 10:36 PM
http://images.puella-magi.net/thumb/b/b2/Deny_the_obvious.png/160px-Deny_the_obvious.png

::)
Think what you want Book, you always do anyways despite what the truth may be. I responded to general, Mags came attacking, so I answered him and now here you are.
Are you sure y'all aren't the same person? Sure seem to be a tight circle y'all got going. lol

Book
23rd October 2011, 10:43 PM
I responded to general, Mags came attacking, so I answered him and now here you are. Are you sure y'all aren't the same person? Sure seem to be a tight circle y'all got going.



http://www.sabinabecker.com/images/everyone-hates-paranoid.jpg

::)

Joe King
23rd October 2011, 10:51 PM
I'm not paranoid of anyone here. Certainly not you or Mags.
After all, you're the one who ran away when it got too hot for you. lol

You, like Mags, would make a good inquisition Judge too, Book.

ximmy
23rd October 2011, 11:08 PM
I'm not paranoid of anyone here. Certainly not you or Mags.
After all, you're the one who ran away when it got too hot for you. lol

You, like Mags, would make a good inquisition Judge too, Book.


What about me trolojoe... aren't you just... a little paranoid...
http://www.astrolabe.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/700x550x/e5c3f25dbe2a3021345b55270d5894a1/common-224000/Front_Cover.jpeg

Dogman
24th October 2011, 04:47 AM
@ g-o-d its the same reason i moved to wyoming! im no longer surrounded by assholes, just millions and millions of acres of pristine mountains....Plus about one or two zillion pronghorns.

Neuro
24th October 2011, 08:59 AM
I'm not paranoid of anyone here. Certainly not you or Mags.
After all, you're the one who ran away when it got too hot for you. lol

You, like Mags, would make a good inquisition Judge too, Book.
The inquisition is overrated, childs play compared to the Nürnberg trial. But some never forget...

Joe King
24th October 2011, 09:09 AM
The inquisition is overrated, childs play compared to the Nürnberg trial. But some never forget...Ok. That's an even better example Neuro, thanks.
Yea, Book and Mags could've been judges there, too. Only difference is that Mags and Book would have hung 'em all. ie no taking into account a persons true intent for them.

Joe King
24th October 2011, 09:17 AM
What about me
I apologize Ximmy, I wasn't meaning to forget you. ;)


http://evlogiaonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/flowers-for-you.jpg

Olmstein
24th October 2011, 09:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tym0MObFpTI

keehah
25th October 2011, 04:01 AM
AKA Ximénez?
I had no clue.

And that was one smart grandmother: "I do not understand."

Here is Part2, seems fresher than ever.
Half as much fun as the Oil Orgy Video.

'Call the next death GoatFart' was my first quess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m07ISfx_5b0