Huge Blowback from RP supporters about O'Rielly excluding RP in poll results

[slvrbugjim]

'Blowback Slammed' O'Reilly Shuts Down Facebook Page Amazon Ranking Dives CNBC to Follow?

http://libertypulse.com/article/-blowback-slammed-o-reilly-shuts-down-facebook-page-amazon-ranking-dives-cnbc-to-follow-/


He took down all of the postings of outside users as it became nothing but a support Ron Paul site, thousands of posts and videos were deleted. Now only Bill can post new messages on his wall page, but that is not stopping them, they are flooding every single post he is making with thousands of comments now as well.
Even going to his photo page and flooding the comment section as well.

Go here

https://www.facebook.com/billoreillyfnc?sk=wall&filter=1

Article about this here

http://libertypulse.com/article/-blowback-slammed-o-reilly-shuts-down-facebook-page-amazon-ranking-dives-cnbc-to-follow-/

By Kurt Wallace:

We reported that Blowback was occurring for Bill O'Reilly. On Monday Nov. 7 O'Reilly attacked Ron Paul and his supporters for voting and winning his one man show debate forum poll. Bill said that the Paul supporters 'Slammed' the poll therefore he was disqualified. After this exclusion Paul supporters began to fight back and 'slam' O'Reilly's facebook page. Here is Tuesday's article of the blowback that ensued
http://libertypulse.com/article/bill-o-reilly-s-attack-on-ron-paul-boycott-blowback-in-motion/

Paul supporters have been posting pro Ron Paul videos, news articles, polls and comments on Bill O'Reilly's Facebook page for the entire week. Almost every few minutes or so a Ron Paul supporter would put something on Bill's Facebook page and they have been very creative. If one didn't know what was happening they would think they're on Ron Paul's fan page. Some supporters called this Occupy Bill O'Reilly they are intent on showing O'Reilly the definition of 'Blowback' by 'Slamming'.

Bill O'Reilly's Facebook Page is no longer available for posting to 'Everyone' other than Bill.

Let's explain, on a normal facebook page such as Ron Paul's
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul
there is a separate section for everyone to comment
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul?sk=wall&filter=1

O'Reilly's 'everyone' can post portion is no longer available
https://www.facebook.com/billoreillyfnc?sk=wall&filter=1

Has this stopped the blowback? No, now Paul supporters are slamming the comments section of every post O'Reilly puts on his facebook page as well as the comment section of Bill's photos.

The Ron Paul supporters are also 'Blowback Slamming' O'Reilly's inbox one supporter posted this on Bill's facebook comments area'we're all emailing at the show too. Oreilly@foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com, name and town, name and town if you wish to opine and please when writing to the factor...support Dr. Paul'

Paul supporters created the 'money bomb' Paul supporters created the first modern day 'Tea Party' event and now Paul supporters have 'Blowback Slammed' in their arsenal.

'Blowback Slammed' has not been limited to just O'Reilly's Facebook page his Amazon book reviews have been hammered to the tune of 650 one star rated reviews for his new book Killing Lincoln giving his book an overall 2 star rating.

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Lincoln-Shocking-Assassination-Changed/product-reviews/0805093079/ref=cm_cr_dp_all_helpful?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

Bill O'Reilly has yet to make a comment on the facebook matter other than fixing it so only he can post.

CNBC has now attacked Ron Paul by removing the poll because his supporters voted and overwhelmingly won the post debate poll. Now, CNBC is the target of 'Blowback Slamming' on facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/cnbc?sk=wall&filter=12

Jerry Doyle National talk show host has been covering the exclusion of Ron Paul because he won the poll in both O'Reilly and CNBC post debate polls and his commentary is in the video below.

[Ponce]

The truth speaks for itself and doesn't need a witness......

[Cebu_4_2]

Hahaha, I checked the facebook and amazon page, there are much smarter people posting than me. I figured it would be simple but people really do understand Lincoln and that the book is wrong.

What they gonna do when it's romney vs Ron Paul? How can they hide that?

Remember to VOTE in the primary!

[Spectrism]

Glad to hear it. I am not sure if O'Reilly is just an ignorant fool or a clever traitor.

[Dogman]

Glad to hear it. I am not sure if O'Reilly is just an ignorant fool or a clever traitor. Think profit and loss, and throw a healthy dose of ratings.

And then you should know!

[Cebu_4_2]

Glad to hear it. I am not sure if O'Reilly is just an ignorant fool or a clever traitor.

Just another Zionist tool

[vacuum]

rofl, thanks for the update on Bill O

[Horn]

Some major news network should put together a IP address reader and make one those huge big screen interactive displays that they do these day with the info.

Then get everyone to log on and click to a page with their favorite candidate, and the results would show on the screen.

I guess that would be truth in poll reporting though?

Of course they would say it only reflects "interent savy" subsection of the public (Like anyone else alive deserves to be living)...:eek:

[Hermie]

Glad to hear it. I am not sure if O'Reilly is just an ignorant fool or a clever traitor.

He's an a**hole.
A major a**hole and a hypocrite.

When he got caught sex talking to a female associate, he at first indignantly denied it.
Then when she played a recording of his telephone come-on of him saying what he would like to do to her in a shower,
well then he just said he would not talk about it anymore.

He's an egotistical, narcissistic A**hole.

[slvrbugjim]

I went to the Amazon page and posted my review and when I got back there were another one hundred one star reviews, LOL now that is funny and this really is hitting him in his wallet, got to love that.

The CNBC facebook page wall looks like a Ron Paul site now LOL.

[JohnQPublic]

Maybe he and Rick Perry can do a talk show together and call it twiddle dee and twiddle dum (I'll let you decide who is dee and who is dum). They can talk about three things:

1. Politics
2. Culture
3. Umm..,,, I ..., Ummm. , well , Ummm...

[skidmark]

Glad to hear it. I am not sure if O'Reilly is just an ignorant fool or a clever traitor.

Zionist whore

[mightymanx]

I am still waiting for the "I'm just following orders" bit.

[gunDriller]

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bill-O-Reilly/106535016033311

don't see anywhere to post though.

[Cebu_4_2]

try this:

https://www.facebook.com/billoreillyfnc?sk=wall&filter=1

[slvrbugjim]

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bill-O-Reilly/106535016033311

don't see anywhere to post though.

You are correct, if you read the first post in this thread to understand that Bill was getting so many posting videos and things on his wall that it looked like a Ron Paul site, so he deleted all the pro Ron Paul postings and made himself the only one that could post on the wall, but he is posting every couple of hours and you can respond to each of his postings, I think I have counted over 10 thousand responses to his postings alone today only and 98% were about Ron Paul. There are up to a thousand or more in each of his postings that he makes only himself the only one that can post on the Facebook wall.

now that is a shutdown for sure.

Also there are almost 800 negative or one star reviews of his latest book on Amazon, this happened pretty much yesterday through today. Go there and give your review of his latest book about the "greatest president of all time Abe Lincoln.

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Lincoln-Shocking-Assassination-Changed/product-reviews/0805093079/ref=pr_all_summary_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

[gunDriller]

You are correct, if you read the first post in this thread to understand that Bill was getting so many posting videos and things on his wall that it looked like a Ron Paul site, so he deleted all the pro Ron Paul postings and made himself the only one that could post on the wall, but he is posting every couple of hours and you can respond to each of his postings, I think I have counted over 10 thousand responses to his postings alone today only and 98% were about Ron Paul. There are up to a thousand or more in each of his postings that he makes only himself the only one that can post on the Facebook wall.

now that is a shutdown for sure.


if we want media that tells the truth about Ron Paul & Zionism - we have to create it ourselves.

websites like G-S.us & the original GIM, for example.

[mightymanx]

You are correct, if you read the first post in this thread to understand that Bill was getting so many posting videos and things on his wall that it looked like a Ron Paul site, so he deleted all the pro Ron Paul postings and made himself the only one that could post on the wall, but he is posting every couple of hours and you can respond to each of his postings, I think I have counted over 10 thousand responses to his postings alone today only and 98% were about Ron Paul. There are up to a thousand or more in each of his postings that he makes only himself the only one that can post on the Facebook wall.

now that is a shutdown for sure.

Also there are almost 800 negative or one star reviews of his latest book on Amazon, this happened pretty much yesterday through today. Go there and give your review of his latest book about the "greatest president of all time Abe Lincoln.

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Lincoln-Shocking-Assassination-Changed/product-reviews/0805093079/ref=pr_all_summary_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

Add one more to the list.


Please do not give this sockpuppet that is incapable of independent thought Do not waste your your hard earned money on this tool or his propaganda.
Hopefully now you will wake up to this pied piper before he leads you off the cliff.

[sunshine05]

I just got kicked off his FB page. I posted about Ron Paul, nothing disrespectful toward O'Reilly or anything. I went back and checked and my post is gone and I can't post there anymore:).

[mightymanx]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html



Bill O’Reilly’s ‘Lincoln’ book banned from Ford’s Theatre because of ‘mistakes’


http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/sites/twpweb/img/icons/icon-minus.png (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html#)http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/sites/twpweb/img/icons/icon-plus.png (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html#)Text Size
Print (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_print.html)
E-mail (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_email.html)
Reprints (http://www.washingtonpostreprints.com/)




By Steven Levingston (http://www.washingtonpost.com/steven-levingston/2011/03/09/ABzdNoP_page.html), Saturday, November 12, 2:40 PM


Of all the places you’d expect to find Bill O’Reilly’s new history (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/book-reviews-killing-lincoln-and-jack-kennedy/2011/11/07/gIQAhC0BxM_story.html)“Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever,” Ford’s Theatre — the site of the dreadful act — should rank right at the top. But you’d do better to search for the bestseller on Amazon because it has been banned from the theater’s store.
The crime? O’Reilly and his co-author Martin Dugard have displayed a serial disregard for historical fact.

805 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_allComments.html#comments)
Comments (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_allComments.html#comments)

Weigh In (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html#weighIn)
Corrections? (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/interactivity/corrections/)



(Henry Holt & Co.) - \"Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination that Changed America Forever\" by Bill O'Reilly & Martin Dugard.


More on this Story

'Killing Lincoln' banned from Ford's Theatre (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html)
Read Ford's Theatre's historical review of the book (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fords-theatre-historical-review-of-bill-oreillys-lincoln-book/2011/11/12/gIQAC604FN_story.html)
Reviews: ‘Killing Lincoln’ and ‘Jack Kennedy’ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/book-reviews-killing-lincoln-and-jack-kennedy/2011/11/07/gIQAhC0BxM_story.html)
Stewart, O’Reilly talk more than Lincoln (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/bill-oreilly-and-jon-stewart-duke-it-out-over-taxes-class-warfare-video/2011/09/29/gIQAbBgC7K_blog.html)
View all Items in this Story (http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/bill-oreillys-lincoln-book-banned-from-fords-theatre-because-of-mistakes/2011/11/11/gIQAhJpyFN_story.html#)

O’Reilly-Perry: Instaclassic (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/oreilly-perry-instaclassic/2011/10/26/gIQAspqnIM_blog.html)




For a purported history of the assassination — an “unsanitized and uncompromising ... no spin American story,” as the authors put it, “Killing Lincoln” is sloppy with the facts and slim on documentation, according to a study conducted by Rae Emerson, the deputy superintendent of Ford’s Theatre National Historic Site (http://www.nps.gov/foth/index.htm), which is a unit of the National Park Service.
Other Lincoln experts also have sounded off. In a review published in the November issue of “North & South — The Official Magazine of the Civil War Society,” historian Edward Steers Jr. cites many instances where the book strays from documented history, then asks, “If the authors made mistakes in names, places, and events, what else did they get wrong? How can the reader rely on anything that appears in ‘Killing Lincoln’”?
By taking on Lincoln, O’Reilly and Dugard have set themselves up for avid scrutiny. Few presidents, indeed few subjects, are as voluminously researched and fought over as Lincoln, and have as many amateur and professional specialists eager to display their startling command of minutiae. Steers notes that more than 16,000 books and articles have been written about Lincoln, with more than 125 volumes on the assassination. Oddly, he adds, only eight of the assassination books have been written by professional historians, leaving the field, in his view, to be trampled on by amateurs like Reilly and Dugard.
Eric Foner, a history professor at Columbia who has written about the Civil War, Lincoln and the South for 40 years and whose latest book, “The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery” was showered with awards -- the Pulitzer Prize, Bancroft Prize, and Lincoln Prize -- said he had not read the book in question. But he noted in an e-mail, “I would not be surprised if there were historical errors as [O’Reilly] is better known as a TV polemicist than as a scholar. Of course many people outside the academy have written about Lincoln and the assassination, but all sorts of unproven theories about it abound and one would hope that any writer would make use of all the relevant sources (and avoid historical errors) in writing about the subject.”
“Killing Lincoln” has no footnotes. An afterword on sources lists “books, websites, and other archived information” the authors consulted. But to Steers, the list is inadequate, leaving out important primary documents. “The authors have chosen to write a story based . . . [on] a few dozen secondary books that range from excellent to positively dreadful . . . [with] no vetting . . . treating them as equal,” Steers writes. Among the criteria that earn a book a place in the Ford’s Theatre store are that it is “historically accurate . . . has relevant citations [and uses] primary resources with documentation,” Emerson notes in her report.


http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/09/Simpsons-Nelson-haha.jpg

[BabushkaLady]

Couldn't happen to a nicer goy.

New "Word of the day": Blowback! ;D

[slvrbugjim]

Wow, that just made my weekend thanks mightymanx (http://gold-silver.us/forum/member.php?3789-mightymanx) you are the best

[sunshine05]

Good find mightymanx!

[mightymanx]

http://www.shambhala.com/images/covers/large/0834804670.jpg



Bill O’Reilly: ‘Enemies’ trying to hurt my book

On Monday night Bill O'Reilly is set to further address the allegations against his book. | AP Photo Close




By MACKENZIE WEINGER (http://www.politico.com/reporters/MackenzieWeinger.html) | 11/14/11 4:03 PM EST Updated: 11/14/11 11:50 PM EST

Bill O’Reilly strongly defended his best-selling “Killing Lincoln” book on Monday after the Ford’s Theatre bookstore refused to sell it because of alleged historical inaccuracies.
The Fox News host told POLITICO that the attack on his book about President Abraham Lincoln’s assassination is “a concerted effort by people who don’t like me to diminish the book.”
Continue Reading (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68334.html#continue)Text Size


-
+
reset
http://www.politico.com/design/bg/gray.gif Listen (http://javascript<b></b>:showOdiogoReadNowFrame ('101651,101652,101653,101654,101655', 'oreilly enemies trying to hurt book', '0', 530, 80);)

Latest on POLITICO


Walker airs ad before recall kickoff (http://www.politico.com/blogs/davidcatanese/1111/Walker_airs_ad_on_eve_of_recall_kickoff_.html)
Health law to get broad SCOTUS look (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68360.html)
EU cutbacks could be red flag for U.S. (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68357.html)
Gingrich marriage attacks begin (http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1111/Gingrich_rises_and_the_marriage_attacks_begin.html )
Gloria Cain: He's not that person (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68369.html)
Huntsman veers to Brookings (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68366.html)
POLITICO 44




In a historical review of “Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever,” Ford’s Theatre National Historic Site deputy Superintendent Rae Emerson on Saturday slammed the book’s “lack of documentation and the factual errors within the publication.”
As a result, she recommended the National Park Service not stock “Killing Lincoln” on the shop’s shelves at Ford’s Theatre.
O’Reilly said he was speaking out about the controversy because “you ignore most of it, but we were getting a little bit tired.”
He also shot back at Emerson’s claims about the book’s mistakes, saying there are just four errors in his 325-page work — and two of those are typos.
The alleged mistakes by O’Reilly and co-author Martin Dugard start in the prologue and are found in other places in the book, according to Emerson’s analysis published in The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fords-theatre-historical-review-of-bill-oreillys-lincoln-book/2011/11/12/gIQAC604FN_print.html) on Saturday. O’Reilly claims Ford’s Theatre burned to the ground in 1863, but it actually happened on Dec. 30, 1862. He writes several times over that Lincoln held meetings or sat in the Oval Office — a nice image. It turns out, however, that the West Wing’s Oval Office wasn’t built until 1909, during President William Howard Taft’s administration, Emerson wrote.
On Monday night’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” the Fox personality is set to further address the allegations against his historical work.
“That’s a pretty good record even for nitpickers who want to hurt the book,” O’Reilly will say on the air, according to the script obtained by POLITICO.
“By the way, there are now more than 1 million copies of ‘Killing Lincoln’ in print, and the book continues to sell briskly,” O’Reilly will also say, calling the book “honest” and saying all students should read it. “We well understand our enemies are full of rage at our success.”
And as for Emerson, O’Reilly said he’s invited the NPS employee to make an appearance on his show. “I would love to talk with her,” O’Reilly says, according to the script.
For those trying to buy O’Reilly’s book at Ford’s Theatre, it’s a case of upstairs, downstairs.
While there had been initial reports (http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/11/14/bill_o_reilly_s_killing_lincoln_barred_from_ford_t heatre_s_bookstore_for_factual_errors_.html) that the theater where Lincoln was shot had banned the best-seller from being sold at the site because of claims of historical inaccuracies, the museum is still offering the book in one of its shops, Ford’s Theatre publicist Lauren Beyea said.
How that works, Beyea noted, stems from the fact that the National Park Service and the Ford’s Theatre Society operate the site in a joint public-private partnership — and that means what’s sold in the lobby shop is a different story from what’s available in the basement store.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68334.html#ixzz1dkQCB11L (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68334.html#ixzz1dkQCB11L)