PDA

View Full Version : U.S. banks should "undermine" Occupy protesters: memo



JohnQPublic
19th November 2011, 02:54 PM
U.S. banks should "undermine" Occupy protesters: memo (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/19/us-lobbying-banks-idUSTRE7AI0YA20111119?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=71)



(Reuters) - The Occupy Wall Street movement is a big enough problem for U.S. banks that they should pay for opposition research into the political motives of protesters, said a firm that lobbies for the industry.
Clark Lytle Geduldig & Cranford, a Washington-based firm, proposed the idea in a memo to the American Banking Association, an industry group which said on Saturday that it did not act on the idea.
The four-page memo outlined how the firm could analyze the source of protesters' money, as well as their rhetoric and the backgrounds of protest leaders.
"If we can show they have the same cynical motivation as a political opponent, it will undermine their credibility in a profound way," said the memo, according to a copy of it on the website of TV news channel MSNBC, which first reported on it. (See MSNBC's report here (http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/19/8896362-exclusive-lobbying-firms-memo-spells-out-plan-to-undermine-occupy-wall-street-video))
Clark Lytle Geduldig counts the banking association among its regular lobbying clients, U.S. Senate records showed.
Other clients include MasterCard Worldwide and a banking coalition concerned about interchange fees.
The firm did not respond to requests for comment.
Its memo said it could deliver research, survey data and plans to use the information in 60 days at a cost of $850,000.
Banking association spokesman Jeff Sigmund told Reuters the memo is authentic, but his group was not interested.
"Our government relations staff received the proposal - it was unsolicited and we chose not to act on it in any way," Sigmund said.
The memo is dated November 24, five days after it became public. Sigmund did not respond to a follow-up question about the date. November 24 is also the Thanksgiving holiday.
The memo said U.S. financial firms should be concerned about comments that Democratic campaign consultants have made in the news media about trying to harness the energy of the Occupy Wall Street protesters.
"This would mean more than just short-term political discomfort for Wall Street firms," it said.
"If vilifying the leading companies of this sector is allowed to become an unchallenged centerpiece of a coordinated Democratic campaign, it has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bull's-eye."
The memo is from Clark Lytle Geduldig's four name partners. Two of them, Sam Geduldig and Jay Cranford, are former aides to House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, a Republican.
Using shorthand for Occupy Wall Street, the memo said:
"It may be easy to dismiss OWS as a ragtag group of protesters but they have demonstrated that they should be treated more like an organized competitor who is very nimble and capable of working the media, coordinating third party support and engaging office holders to do their bidding. To counter that, we have to do the same."
(Reporting by David Ingram. Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh)

hoarder
19th November 2011, 04:53 PM
US banks DID undermine OWS. Did you see the OWS "demands" that the controlled opposition OWS leader submitted? They made OWS look like complete idiots.

MNeagle
19th November 2011, 05:22 PM
how the firm could analyze the source of protesters' money

...deliver research, survey data and plans to use the information in 60 days at a cost of $850,000

Didn't this board already solve this big, dark mystery weeks ago??

Horn
19th November 2011, 10:50 PM
Whether or not it was started from undermining force & as its original intent remains history.

OWS currently is being contained & controlled by the MSM and globalists, which is why it should only be supported until fruition.

Neuro
20th November 2011, 01:52 AM
The memo is dated November 24, five days after it became public. Sigmund did not respond to a follow-up question about the date. November 24 is also the Thanksgiving holiday.
They cracked the time dimension!

Santa
21st November 2011, 05:16 PM
http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/junk/file-24.jpg

PatColo
22nd November 2011, 02:22 AM
"Young Turks"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDiQb0K0TXk&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDiQb0K0TXk&feature=player_embedded

If I were to take a skeptical view of this memo itself, and it's "going public contrary to their desires" -- I'd consider that the ZSM has given it any coverage, and note that it seems to try to frame OWS as a left/right/demrat/repug conflict... "the other wingnut extreme from the tea partyers"... (who, what, "fully support banksters & wall street?!")

Young Turks piece above also frames it dem/pug - when IMHO, framing OWS & tea partyers- both groups disgruntled for reasons more same than different (regardless of whether most of them are NWO-aware), as anything resembling Left/Right/Dem/Pug/Divide/Rule benefits TPTB- making this whole "leaked memo" thing suspect.

po boy
22nd November 2011, 04:46 AM
So far all I have heard from the average Joe on the street about OWS is that it's a bunch of commy wanna be kids.

I've seen very little talk about this kid's rant.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0cp_DyfiRU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0cp_DyfiRU

dys
22nd November 2011, 09:36 AM
This is a very important post, thank you JQ. How can anyone doubt the veracity and pervasive of controlled op at this point? We are at the point where they are actually admitting that they do it.

dys

Horn
22nd November 2011, 10:39 AM
As to the whys, re-posting for posterity sake.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fnGmELSV8j8