Default New Iowa poll places Ron Paul firmly in first with 25%

[Libertytree]

http://www.revolutionpac.com/2011/11/new-iowa-poll-places-ron-paul-firmly-in-first-with-25/



Congressman Ron Paul is leading by a significant margin in Iowa, according to preliminary results of a new TeleResearch poll.


Revolution PAC, the Super PAC formed to support presidential candidate Ron Paul, has received early data from the commissioned Iowa poll. The TeleResearch survey is the first to incorporate disaffected Democrats and Independents who will not vote to reelect Obama and will instead crossover to participate in the Iowa Republican Caucus, as well as likely Republican caucus-goers.


Survey sample size is approximately 2,900, with almost 700 likely Republican caucus-goers. Indiana’s TeleResearch Corp., which has been polling voters for more than 18 years, reports that the margin of error is less than 3%.


Factoring in both Republican caucus-goers and disaffected Democrats and Independents who’ve indicated that they will participate in the Iowa Republican Caucus, Ron Paul leads at 25%, with an approximate 4-point advantage over Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain.


Factoring in only Republicans voters, Ron Paul is in a three-way dead heat for the lead, with Paul and Cain tied and Gingrich trailing by 1 point.


The poll also reveals that more than 25% of all respondents – Democrats, Republicans and Independents – stated that an interventionist foreign policy is the greatest threat to long-term peace and national security.
Full analysis of the results will be posted tomorrow at http://RevolutionPAC.com. (http://revolutionpac.com./)

[Horn]

Since when did they change all these debates to "National Security" debates?

Or am I out of the loop?

CNN still refuses to mention anything of him in the runup to their national security debate today.

[midnight rambler]

'National security' is a convenient cover for all manner of bad behavior, 'cause who dares to question 'national security'??

[Horn]

'National security' is a convenient cover for all manner of bad behavior, 'cause who dares to question 'national security'??

Well I guess the "Super" committee is not so unquestionable as whoever is the current presidential dictator is?

[Neuro]

It is a protection racket at a national level. Once it reaches critical mass National Security will grow exponentially in scope, violence, cost corruption and oppression.

[mrnhtbr2232]

...who dares to question 'national security'??

We, the People. That's who. Whether or not you believe it is possible to change anything, it does not remove the responsibility to keep reminding them they are criminals. Depending on the breaks, one of these days some of them will have to confront their deeds and face the music. "National Security" is a oxymoron of the first order - stirring up shit all over the world at the cost of others is hardly security. Just ask DHS - those fools think national security is about thawing Thanksgiving turkeys or they explode. That is the extent of our public servants protecting national security. Give every fool in government that believes our foreign policy is legitimate a DU enema and turn them into a night light.

[Libertytree]

Ooooops, the word Default was a mistake on my C&P, solly.