PDA

View Full Version : The Medical Miracle You'll Get Arrested for Using



Serpo
26th November 2011, 11:18 PM
Posted By Dr. Mercola (http://articles.mercola.com/members/Dr.-Mercola/default.aspx) | November 26 2011 | 137,573 views








http://media.mercola.com/assets/images/emailtoafriend-icon.png Email : 963


Previous

(http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/26/medical-journals-using-ghost-writers.aspx) Next

(http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/25/ways-on-buying-in-markets.aspx)

http://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2099/December/obama-war-on-weed.jpg
Story at-a-glance



Fifteen states plus the District of Columbia have laws permitting medical marijuana, but the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has raided medical marijuana suppliers and even arrested patients, because on a federal level, possessing or distributing marijuana is still considered a criminal offense
In 2009, the U.S. Justice Department told federal prosecutors to lay off Americans producing and using medical marijuana in accordance with state laws, but this year in a blatant about-face, the Obama administration declared that only seriously ill patients and caregivers would be spared from arrest
Recently, a series of attacks against the medical marijuana industry have occurred, including threats against banks and landlords that do business with those in the industry. Also, the IRS has denied medical cannabis facilities in California the right to file standard expense deductions. These strong-arm tactics put the medical marijuana industry in jeopardy, and may force those who depend on it for medical purposes to resort to the black market
Research shows medical marijuana holds promise in the treatment of over 100 health conditions, including cancer, autoimmune diseases, pain, glaucoma, asthma, psychiatric conditions and high blood pressure.
Fifty percent of Americans now support the legalization of marijuana




By Dr. Mercola

Marijuana was a popular botanical medicine in the 19th and 20th centuries, common in U.S. pharmacies of the time.
Yet, in 1970, the herb was declared a Schedule 1 controlled substance and labeled as a drug with a "high potential for abuse" and "no accepted medical use."
Three years later the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) was formed to enforce the newly created drug schedules, and the fight against marijuana use began.
The Huffington Post (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-bloom/legalization-or-bust-a-br_b_775684.html) has a concise history of marijuana prohibition, and the struggle for legalization, that is well worth reading -- but the most successful movement to date, and the one that is set to produce the first legal marijuana market in decades, is the medical marijuana movement.
Unfortunately, the feds have recently announced a blatant reversal on their previous pro-medical marijuana stance -- a move that is threatening to stop the industry cold.
Why are the Feds So Concerned About Medical Marijuana?


Fifteen states plus the District of Columbia have laws allowing medical marijuana.
In other words, in those states it is considered legal to consume, possess or distribute marijuana for medical use.
Up until 2009, the U.S. Justice Department essentially told federal prosecutors to lay off Americans producing and using medical marijuana (http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192) in accordance with state laws.
But despite marijuana's legal status at the state level, historically it was common for the DEA to raid medical marijuana suppliers and even arrest patients.
This is because federal law overrides state law, defining the possession or distribution of marijuana as a criminal offense.
According to The State of the Medical Marijuana Markets 2011 (http://medicalmarijuanamarkets.com/), the national market for medical marijuana is now worth $1.7 billion -- and could grow to close to $9 billion in the next five years -- if not for a stunning reversal by the Obama administration. In October 2011, the Obama administration released a letter to clarify their earlier position, which, as Seattle Weekly reports (http://www.seattleweekly.com/2011-10-26/news/obama-s-war-on-weed/), indicates, "The only people safe from arrest were the "seriously ill" patients and their caregivers... Everyone else? Be forewarned."
The Obama administration has long been supportive of the medical marijuana movement, even stating during the presidential campaign that (http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-federal-authorities-be-able-to-close-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california/obama-should-keep-promise-on-medical-marijuana), "The basic concept of using medical marijuana... entirely appropriate." However the Feds now appear to be launching a full-fledged attack against this legitimate industry, not only by threatening prosecution and arrest, but also by intimidating and coercing banks, land and store owners, as well as other business entities, that help keep the medical marijuana industry alive.
Feds Attempt to Force Medical Marijuana Industry Out of Business


In recent months there have been several blows to the various industries who support the medical marijuana market. Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, reported in U.S. News & World Report Opinion (http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-federal-authorities-be-able-to-close-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california/obama-should-keep-promise-on-medical-marijuana), these disturbing changes:


[I]"The Department of Justice sent letters this past spring to state lawmakers that were debating legislation to allow for the licensed distribution of medical cannabis, threatening prosecution of those involved with said efforts if the measures went forward;
The IRS has assessed crippling penalties on taxpaying medical cannabis facilities in California by denying these operations the right to file standard expense deductions;
The Department of Treasury has strong-armed local banks and other financial institutions into closing their accounts with medicinal cannabis operators;
The Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected a nine-year-old administrative petition that called for hearings regarding the federal rescheduling of cannabis for medical use, ignoring extensive scientific evidence of its medical efficacy;
The National Institute on Drug Abuse rejected an FDA-approved protocol to allow for clinical research assessing the use of cannabis to treat post-traumatic stress disorder, stating, "We generally do not fund research focused on the potential beneficial medical effects of marijuana."
Most recently, Deputy Attorney General James Cole, along with the four U.S. attorneys from California, announced plans for a coordinated effort against operations in California that provide above-ground access to cannabis for those patients qualified to use the substance in accordance with state law."

The war on marijuana is indeed a strange one, considering the legality of cigarettes and alcohol -- products that have vastly greater potential to harm public health, without any of the medicinal benefits. Not to mention that the FDA approves drugs, prescribed by doctors every day, that kill over 100,000 Americans a year (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/15/recreational-drugs-far-less-likely-to-kill-you-than-prescribed-drugs.aspx).
Moreover, by shutting down reputable marijuana dispensaries, it will only force those who legitimately depend upon it to alleviate their suffering to enter the (sometimes dangerous) black market.
As Seattle Weekly wrote (http://www.seattleweekly.com/2011-10-26/news/obama-s-war-on-weed/3/):

"Landlords, worried the feds will steal their property, will tell dispensaries to move out. Banks won't handle money for pot-themed businesses. Dispensaries will be taxed so heavily they won't be able to cover the payroll or pay the electric bill.
… An estimated one million people in California have obtained a doctor's recommendation to grow and use marijuana legally. Patient estimates in Washington are hazier, but the number is thought to be around 100,000.
If the feds shut down every dispensary in the country, all these people will still be able to legally possess marijuana—no matter where they bought it—under their state laws. The only difference is they'll be forced to go back to buying their weed from Mexican drug cartels, rather than from Americans who provide jobs and pay taxes."
What are the Medical Uses for Marijuana?


In order to really comprehend the movement behind medical marijuana, you must first understand that this herb truly does show outstanding promise as a medicinal plant. The studies conducted so far show significant potential for the use of cannabis in the prevention and treatment of a wide range of health conditions, including cancer.
For instance, in 2009 a study in the journal Cancer Prevention Research (http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/content/2/8/759.abstract) found that marijuana smokers have a lower risk of head and neck cancers than non-marijuana smokers.
Harvard researchers also found that THC in marijuana cuts tumor growth (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Preet%20A%202007) in lung cancer while significantly reducing its ability to spread. There is also a wealth of research linking marijuana with pain relief and improved sleep. In one recent study, just three puffs of marijuana a day for five days helped those with chronic nerve pain to relieve pain and sleep better (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20805210).
Americans for Safe Access also has links to research studies (http://americansforsafeaccess.org/article.php?id=4177) suggesting that cannabis may help in the treatment or prevention of Alzheimer's disease and cancer, while the International Association for Cannabis as Medicine (http://www.cannabis-med.org/index.php?tpl=page&id=21&lng=en) highlights the following medical uses:
Nausea Vomiting Anorexia Cachexia (Wasting Syndrome) Spasticity Movement Disorders Pain Glaucoma Epilepsy Asthma Dependency and Withdrawal Psychiatric Symptoms Autoimmune Diseases Inflammation High Blood Pressure Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Lastly, the research site GreenMedInfo.com lists over 126 (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/substance/cannabis) potential therapeutic applications for marijuana in disease prevention and treatment, further illustrating just how voluminous the scientific evidence really is in support of the medical marijuana movement.
Your Body is Hard-Wired to Respond to Cannabinoids in the Marijuana Plant


There are more than 60 chemical compounds known as cannabinoids in the marijuana plant. Cannabinoids interact with your body by way of naturally occurring cannabinoid receptors embedded in cell membranes throughout your body. There are cannabinoid receptors in your brain, lungs, liver, kidneys, immune system and more; both the therapeutic and psychoactive properties of marijuana occur when a cannabinoid (such as the THC produced by the cannabis plant) activates a cannabinoid receptor.
Your body also has naturally occurring endocannabinoids that stimulate your cannabinoid receptors and produce a variety of important physiologic processes, far beyond that of the traditional "highs" associated with THC.
What is amazing is that your body is actually hard-wired to respond to cannabinoids through this unique cannabinoid receptor system; research is still ongoing on just how extensive their impact is on our health, but to date it's known that cannabinoid receptors play an important role in many body processes (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16402900), including metabolic regulation, cravings, pain, anxiety, bone growth, and immune function.
A report by Dr. Manuel Guzman in the journal of Nature Reviews (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14570037?ordinalpos=18&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum) suggests that these active components of cannabis and their derivatives are potential anti-cancer agents:

" … these compounds [cannabinoids] have been shown to inhibit the growth of tumour cells in culture and animal models by modulating key cell-signaling pathways. Cannabinoids are usually well tolerated, and do not produce the generalized toxic effects of conventional chemotherapies."
A report by the American College of Physicians (ACP) (http://www.acponline.org/acp_news/medmarinews.htm) further notes that:

"Marijuana has been smoked for its medicinal properties for centuries. It was in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia until 1942 when it was removed because federal legislation made the drug illegal … Still, the overwhelming number of anecdotal reports on the therapeutic properties of marijuana sparks interest from scientists, health care providers, and patients.
Over the past 20 years, researchers have discovered cannabinoid receptors: CB1, which mediates the central nervous system (CNS), and CB2, which occurs outside the CNS and is believed to have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity.
These scientific developments have revealed much information supporting expansion of research into the potential therapeutic properties of marijuana and its cannabinoids."
Why Isn't Marijuana Being Studied?


This is the burning question, as even a quick review of the data (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4) suggests that cannabis deserves more than a passing glance (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/05/07/medical-marijuana-becoming-blockbuster-drug.aspx) as a potential treatment for various diseases. But in the United States – primarily for political reasons -- these studies are not being performed.
According to a report by Americans for Safe Access (http://safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Research_Obstruction_Report.pdf):

"In the past three decades, there has been an explosion of international studies designed to investigate the therapeutic value of cannabis (marijuana).
However, drastic restrictions on research in the U.S. have meant that few clinical trials are being conducted domestically and none are being conducted as part of a sponsor-funded drug development plan aimed at obtaining Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the prescription use of the botanical plant itself.
Meanwhile, research teams in Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Israel, and elsewhere have confirmed - through case studies, basic research, pre-clinical, and preliminary clinical investigations - the medical value of cannabis … "
Of course, in the United States marijuana is so heavily controlled that even if you wanted to conduct a clinical trial, you would have a hard time getting a supply for research purposes. As the Safe Access report (http://safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Research_Obstruction_Report.pdf) states:

" … the federal monopoly on the supply of cannabis has fundamentally limited FDA-approved clinical research to investigate its safety and efficacy in controlling symptoms of serious and chronic illnesses.
In the United States, research is stalled, and in some cases blocked, by a complicated federal approval process, restricted access to research-grade cannabis, and the refusal of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to license private production of cannabis for use exclusively in federally approved research."
The DEA appears to be behind many puzzling restrictions concerning the marijuana plant, including the fact that it is even illegal to grow hemp in the United States.
Contrary to popular opinion, hemp and marijuana are not the same. Both are members of the Cannabis sativa plant species, but they are two distinct varieties, with hemp generally being too low in THC (the compound responsible for the plant's notorious psychoactive effect) to create a "high." In fact, the THC is intentionally bred out of the plant in order to maximize its fiber, seeds and oil -- the constituents for which it is most commonly used.
Ironically, despite these differences, the DEA classifies all Cannabis sativa varieties as "marijuana." This is why the United States is the only industrialized nation in the world where growing industrial hemp is next to impossible. To do so requires a permit from the DEA -- and it is reportedly almost impossible to get one.
Could it be that the DEA has its own agenda for keeping marijuana a controlled substance?
Seattle Weekly speculates (http://www.seattleweekly.com/2011-10-26/news/obama-s-war-on-weed/2/):

"Ignorance, false propaganda, and rank political posturing tend to be the foundation of the anti-marijuana argument. (Throw in bureaucratic turf protection as well. The DEA, for example, would need fewer agents if pot was decriminalized nationwide.)"
Many Americans Have an Open Mind About Legalizing Marijuana


A new Gallup poll (http://www.gallup.com/poll/150149/Record-High-Americans-Favor-Legalizing-Marijuana.aspx) found that a record high number of Americans -- 50 percent -- favor legalizing marijuana use, which suggests that public pressure will continue to build for a (pun-intended) grassroots legislative overhaul of U.S marijuana laws...
Of course, there are certainly some downsides to marijuana use that need to be addressed, particularly if you are thinking of smoking it for recreational purposes.
Marijuana use can be addictive, and no doubt resources have been squandered, families have been broken up and jobs lost over its use. In the short-term, marijuana use can cause trouble with your ability to think clearly and may impair memory. Marijuana also leads to motor skill impairment and may adversely affect alertness, coordination and reaction time, which is why it should never be used prior to driving.
There is also some evidence that marijuana use can exacerbate psychotic symptoms (http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mental_Health_Letter/2010/April/medical-marijuana-and-the-mind) in those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, as well as serve as a "gateway" drug that eventually leads to the use of "harder" drugs like cocaine and heroine, although this is still a matter of debate (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17151165).
Marijuana use among children and teens can also have dire consequences, as drug use of any kind may encourage risky choices and irresponsible behaviors.
Furthermore, while the vast majority of marijuana use is through the act of smoking it, it is worth noting that anytime you heat materials and inhale them you run the risk of introducing toxic elements into your system. Because of this it is always best to use an organic version; any pesticides that are on the material that is burned and inhaled will dramatically increase its toxicity.
It is possible to avoid these risks entirely by either using cannabis in hemp oil form or, as many medical marijuana patients advocate, by using a vaporizer. The device allows for the ingestion of marijuana without any combustion byproducts, eliminating rightful concerns about the cumulative harms associated with smoking it. It is also possible to minimize harm by eating marijuana (along with some fat, as THC is fat-soluble and will not dissolve in water).
It is important to note that in the United States today using marijuana for any reason is still considered an illegal activity that can result in serious legal consequences, including imprisonment.
Sadly, it is not the scientific evidence -- but rather politics and an increasingly insatiable privatized industrial-prison complex in need of more drug-convicted "criminals" -- which maintains the stranglehold on our freedom to choose wild growing plants as our medicine rather than soley FDA-approved drugs.
I think Willie Nelson said it well in the following quote:

I think people need to be educated to the fact that marijuana is not a drug. Marijuana is an herb and a flower. God put it here. If He put it here and He wants it to grow, what gives the government the right to say that God is wrong?


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/26/obama-war-on-weed.aspx?e_cid=20111126_DNL_art_1

Ponce
26th November 2011, 11:39 PM
The only way that it will become "legal" is either by force, by the people, or if the government has total control of it.

To me liquor is worse than mary jane.....how many people have had an accident while driving and drinking? vs marijuana?

We got a lot of it around my Micky Mouse one mule of a town and the only reason that I don't used it is that, like drinking, I simply don't like it.

BabushkaLady
27th November 2011, 12:17 AM
One of the big problems with the medical marijuana field is their are far too many doctors who as long as they get their palm greased with a stack of FRN's they will write a script too anyone and that distracts from the legitimate users.

Every story the media does about it always starts with a picture of some long hair stoner dude coming out of a supply shop and during the interview he can't keep a straight face when he says he has medical issues and that is why he uses.

A lot more states would probably get on board but they keep showing images of stoner dude to get people to vote no


It doesn't matter who the buyers are IF they got the script. Besides, what part of this was voted Yes in the states that have it, don't the Feds understand?? They should keep their nose out of state business.

mrnhtbr2232
27th November 2011, 01:48 AM
Legalizing pot is like a giant asteroid impacting the bottom line of tobacco, liquor, and big pharma companies. Lawmakers and enforcers provide reverse thrust against wider adoption by the public. If they passed a law today making it illegal to breathe air there are some people who would obediently suffocate. In fact, it would be more scientific than any poll - just order everyone to stop where they are at noon tomorrow and if they haven't paid their per-aspiration tax they drop dead. The resulting flood of PayPal income would be tribute before swine and the true bottom of the gene pool would entertain us with reality TV - "tonight on I Can't Breathe Barbara loses her AirCard and has to suck an aquarium pump to stay alive." I mean, the absurdity of destroying people's lives for marijuana is a profit center as well as a threat. With so many competing forces it's no wonder it remains a cause dejour to villify.

midnight rambler
27th November 2011, 04:53 AM
that distracts from the legitimate users.Who the FUCK* is in a position to determine who is a 'legitimate user' of a flower which is merely part of God's green earth??

*anyone who thinks they should lord over anyone else is deserving of a lead enema (or one of the magnanimous punishments described in the Noahide laws such as burying them with only their head sticking out of the ground and pouring molten lead down their throat) - meanwhile that which is in direct contradiction to God's laws (e.g. abortion) is not only sanctioned by those who wish to lord over us, but is encouraged and cultivated

po boy
27th November 2011, 05:28 AM
If one looks at all the people who could employ themselves by the production of useful hemp products, it becomes only too clear who profits from it's illegal status.

Hatha Sunahara
27th November 2011, 09:53 AM
Big Pharma wants a monopoly on producing and selling Marijuana. That's what's driving the policy of the Federal government. If you talk about any issue other than money and power, you're farting in the wind.


Hatha

Dogman
27th November 2011, 10:09 AM
Big Pharma wants a monopoly on producing and selling Marijuana. That's what's driving the policy of the Federal government. If you talk about any issue other than money and power, you're farting in the wind.


Hatha

One needs to take it further, big pharmacy Co's know there is no way they can get a lock on marijuana at all and knows the benefits of the plant. We are talking about a plant that dam near anyone can grow for themselves, so who would buy from a pharmacy co ?

Now here is the big thing no one is talking about, the pharmacy co's stand to loose a ton of cash from sales that would be lost,if marijuana was legal. All of the physic mood altering drugs that the big pharmacy's and their front men, the doctors hand out and sell now would become dam near useless.

What marijuana does for the body and mind , can replace most if not all of the synthetic man made drugs that are on the market now.

And the big pharmacy's and their government lackeys can not have that!

It's all about the money!

gunDriller
27th November 2011, 02:40 PM
one thing good marijuana is good at treating - heartburn & ulcers.

i used to take Tagamet & Zantac. marijuana works SO MUCH better.

i forget who makes Tagamet & Zantac but that's just ONE medical condition - marijuana is useful in treating & curing many conditions, including cancer ... i put the URL's for those studies in another thread here ... key word "antineoplastic" - that thread should come up in a search.

so whoever makes Tagamet & Zantac - i imagine they don't like the competition.

multiply that x100 or x500, that's how much medical industry revenue marijuana threatens.


on the other hand - for sure a lot of medical marijuana patients over-consume, they don't seem to understand the concept of "diminishing returns".

once i sat at a dispensary on Divisadero in San Francisco, and watched a support group. maybe 4 of the 7 people in the group had terrible coughs, it was the winter. meanwhile they're passing doobies around, "God, I have such" - puff COUGH - "a bad cold" - puff COUGH - "I wish it would go away" - puff COUGH.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
27th November 2011, 05:16 PM
I get that there are people who will never try the flower, and that's fine. By the way, you can cure arthritis by soaking cannabis in alcohol and rubbing it into the painful area. You won't get a head change (i.e. will stay completely sober) but the pain will be completely gone. You're welcome, you can walk normally again. But whatever. Let's not use cannabis.

Is it too easy? Is it too easy to believe that a plant that grows in the ground yields a fat/alcohol soluble medicine? Tell me what it is? Why don't people like cannabis?

I have seen it cure a tumor IRL. (just a small sunspot near the eye, but the lady avoided surgery, it was a diagnosed tumor and it just disappeared after using the oil i made for her) I have seen it cure arthritis. My buddy has gout, but he's walking normally again after cannabis soaked in castor oil was rubbed into the affected area.





However, it is known that if you are genetically predisposed to schizophrenia, it can bring it out much faster. I have seen that happen, exactly one time, when I was 18-22. It's a sad story, lost a friend (as in I don't know where he is anymore.) Nobody else has ever had issues, and I have known hundreds of people who have smoked or otherwise ingested cannabis.

Nobody in society is truly honest about cannabis. This is because both sides have decided to polarize. Here is why...The government, for mainly economic reasons, has decided to make cannabis forbidden. They can only do this through propaganda, since cannabis has been used as a material by hundreds of cultures since the beginning of time, being made most famous by the American leadership, following their revolution.

Some people have unfortunately been tricked into believing false information regarding cannabis, which is then strongly supported/correlated via a few bad experiences. Usually someone in their lives. Someone really close to them used pot or something, and that person was not wise and could not handle it, had a bad trip or did something foolish, or used it and was lazy, boom suddenly this person is an expert on drugs. They will tell you everything you know, because now cannabis is bad for all people.

The opposite side of this is that everyday cannabis ingestion does have a few downsides, although it is possible to lead a healthy life while doing so. But because pro-cannabis individuals feel so attacked, they tend to downplay and ignore these downsides, in a sort of loyalty-display.

Neither side is honest about cannabis!

Let me just point out that at the federal level, studies regarding cannabis are completely blocked, as in not acceptable. Translation: If you scientifically prove that the government is wrong using double-blind peer reviewed studies, the government will throw the information out and over-ride you. These are the laws currently on the books. That is some bullshit I cannot support.

The truth is, responsibility starts and ends with YOU! Nobody has ever given me shit for my drug use because I have never flipped out and harmed anybody, or even come close, ever! Period! I always stand up for what is right if I can. I am way more responsible than 90% of the people I know and I use drugs in the same damn manner, responsibly. It's fucking possible, so please don't give me gruff about it! And I am telling you, since it is already out there, and you go and use the law to make me a criminal for a non-violent act, then by my definitions you are a criminal. Because you are fucking up peoples lives for no reason. You are an immoral person in my book. It's just how I see things.

I want to live in a nice, clean society, too. I don't want this in public but I don't want it in jail either.

So many countries have proven it can be done and it has nothing but good effects, the only danger is when the top swoops back in and puts their artificial constraints back on.


It is okay to disapprove of something in society, but to say that you are going to pay thugs to break through someone's front door and put a gun in their family's face, then you've got fucking problems.


Self-determination means that I get to pretend you are not here and do whatever I want as long as it does not infringe on your rights at all. At all.