PDA

View Full Version : Question to GSUS - Why are only WHITE countries being flooded with immigrants



General of Darkness
27th November 2011, 12:38 PM
From Amerikwa, Canada, Ireland, England Europe. Why is it only white countries that are having to accept the hordes of low iq, intolerant idiots, that have no interests in assimilation from around the globe?

I know the answer, but I'm interested in yours?

General of Darkness
27th November 2011, 12:40 PM
Just an FYI.

The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.
Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the"intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and
2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.
Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here (http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/index.htm#text))
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide. "
It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide. Punishable Acts The following are genocidal acts when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence:
Killing members of the group includes direct killing and actions causing death.
Causing serious bodily or mental harm includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation.
Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group’s physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.

Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation.

Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 18 years.

Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence.
The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.
A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.
An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.
A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.
A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.
Key Terms
The crime of genocide has two elements: intent and action. “Intentional” means purposeful. Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders. But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts.
Intent is different from motive. Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorrial integrity, etc.), if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide.
The phrase "in whole or in part" is important. Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group. Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide. Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members – mass murder. But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.
Other Information:
Kofi Annan's April 7, 2004 Action Plan to Prevent Genocide (http://www.preventgenocide.org/prevent/UNdocs/KofiAnnansActionPlantoPreventGenocide7Apr2004.htm) On the 10th anniversary of the 1994 Genocide In Rwanda, Annn announced his Action Plan and announced the future appointment of a Special Advisor on Genocide Prevention.
Kofi Annan's Stockholm Genocide Prevention Proposals, January 26, 2004 (http://www.preventgenocide.org/prevent/UNdocs/KofiAnnanStockholmGenocideProposals26Jan2004.htm) In Stockholm, Sweden on January 26, 2004 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan calls for parties to the Genocide Convention (http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/text.htm) to establish a Genocide Prevention Committee
Ratification Status: (http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/index.htm#ratifications) 135 Nations are parties to the Genocide Convention, but 52 Nations are NOT, including Indonesia, Japan, Nigeria.
Article II was included without change in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/icc/statute/languages.htm) as Article 6 (http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/icc/statute/part-a.htm#a6) and also in the the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and former Yugoslavia.
For a more detailed description of the crimes described in Article II (Rome Statute Article 6) see the Elements of the Crime of Genocide (http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/elements.htm) agreed upon by the International Criminal Court Preparatory Commission in June 2000.
Over 70 nations have made provisions for the punishment of genocide in domestic criminal law (http://preventgenocide.org/law/domestic/), sometimes modifying the legal definition. Prosecution of genocide in domestic courts (http://preventgenocide.org/punish/domestic/index.htm#russia) is becoming more frequent.
The legal definition of genocide can be compared to five alternative definitions of genocide (http://www.isg-iags.org/definitions/def_genocide.html) proposed by researchers and scholars Frank Chalk & Kurt Jonassohn, Israel Charny, Helen Fein, Barbara Harff & Ted Gurr and Steven Katz.
Prevent Genocide International info@preventgenocide.org
Please send us your comments on our website.

Horn
27th November 2011, 12:58 PM
http://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/zion_pyramid.png?w=512&h=512

osoab
27th November 2011, 12:59 PM
For their music and ethnic clothing? ;D

gunDriller
27th November 2011, 01:30 PM
Israel & the US make life unlive-able in the Mid-East.

many countries in Europe offer welfare for refugees from Israeli cruelty.


similar things happen in South America. that results in Hispanic emigrants to the US.


i know a family from Iraq that was scattered to Australia, Finland, Canada, and the US.

one of the brothers was able to get a medical license in Australia, he was a doctor in Iraq. one of the sisters got on welfare in Finland & then got a degree as a chef, works as a chef.

compared with sucking in Depleted Uranium dust in Iraq - a gift from the Talmud worshippers & the neocons - it's a no-brainer.

po boy
27th November 2011, 01:31 PM
When has a nation of primarily colored people sailed across oceans then back to sell whites as slaves?

Real question.

Book
27th November 2011, 01:35 PM
https://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/benjamin-netanyahu-ii.jpg
A JEWISH NATION ONLY FOR THE JEWISH PEOPLE

::) ...but our ACLU and ADL must promote open borders for Anglo-Saxon nations

Ponce
27th November 2011, 01:46 PM
mi Cubano refugi no peaki ingli........oi vey, oi vey, giv moni.

The more outsiders living from our assets the weaker that we will become.......and all that thanks to the Zionist in our government, and when the time comes, those to whom we gave a hand will return the hand.....while holding a pistol.

po boy
27th November 2011, 02:01 PM
https://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/benjamin-netanyahu-ii.jpg
A JEWISH NATION ONLY FOR THE JEWISH PEOPLE

::) ...but our ACLU and ADL must promote open borders for Anglo-Saxon nations


Well we have immigration laws that aren't enforced and some profit well from the cheap labor. Bacon comes from slaughter houses that are labored by cheap labor read immigrants, employers benefit the government benefits the consumer benefits the worker and taxpayers suffer.

Dogman
27th November 2011, 02:05 PM
Well we have immigration laws that aren't enforced and some profit well from the cheap labor. Bacon comes from slaughter houses that are labored by cheap labor read immigrants, employers benefit the government benefits the consumer benefits the worker and taxpayers suffer.

Also add, that the government gets the tax's that are withheld from the wages payed. And the workers will not see a penny of it. So it is a win , win thing for business and gov.

po boy
27th November 2011, 03:06 PM
Also add, that the government gets the tax's that are withheld from the wages payed. And the workers will not see a penny of it. So it is a win , win thing for business and gov.

Yep many of the fake SSN's used to obtain those jobs cannot collect the benefits paid in so all those funds are lost to those who labored, paid to those who collect today.

hoarder
27th November 2011, 05:06 PM
that have no interests in assimilation Would it be better if they wanted to assimilate?

k-os
27th November 2011, 05:16 PM
Would it be better if they wanted to assimilate?

I am not sure, but it seemed that when immigrants assimilated, everyone was able to get along a little better.

zap
27th November 2011, 07:36 PM
I agree K

mick silver
27th November 2011, 08:07 PM
what white person would want to live in a shit hole . just look at every thing they do it turn to a shit hole

po boy
28th November 2011, 04:43 AM
what white person would want to live in a shit hole . just look at every thing they do it turn to a shit hole

Tell that to the Iraqis.

Horn
28th November 2011, 05:46 AM
I am not sure, but it seemed that when immigrants assimilated, everyone was able to get along a little better.

Let me get one ting stroight here, whach yous guys mean by "ass-milate"?

http://sensationmusic.net/img/attach/20101003204216880363.jpg

Panoptimist
28th November 2011, 05:55 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCSeSOVCfkk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Xq9fJH0h34

hoarder
28th November 2011, 07:29 AM
I am not sure, but it seemed that when immigrants assimilated, everyone was able to get along a little better.Assimilate = race mixing, either directly or indirectly. They may get along better in the short term under the banner of "we're all the same", but they have positioned themselves to be more easily herded into world government....which is why "assimilation" is strongly encouraged by our rulers.

Awoke
28th November 2011, 08:11 AM
The correct answer is that the satanic babylonians are pushing immigration onto white countries with the intention of watering down the purity of the gene pool and completely destroying any sense of national identity.

The destruction of the white race is priority, in the case of immigration. (And the pro-homosexuality agenda, etc etc)

EDIT to add pic

learn2swim
28th November 2011, 09:03 AM
When has a nation of primarily colored people sailed across oceans then back to sell whites as slaves?

Real question.

WHEN EUROPEANS WERE SLAVES: RESEARCH SUGGESTS WHITE SLAVERY WAS MUCH MORE COMMON THAN PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED

COLUMBUS, Ohio – A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been estimated before.
Robert Davis

In a new book, Robert Davis, professor of history at Ohio State University, developed a unique methodology to calculate the number of white Christians who were enslaved along Africa’s Barbary Coast, arriving at much higher slave population estimates than any previous studies had found.

Most other accounts of slavery along the Barbary coast didn’t try to estimate the number of slaves, or only looked at the number of slaves in particular cities, Davis said. Most previously estimated slave counts have thus tended to be in the thousands, or at most in the tens of thousands. Davis, by contrast, has calculated that between 1 million and 1.25 million European Christians were captured and forced to work in North Africa from the 16th to 18th centuries.

Davis’s new estimates appear in the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 (Palgrave Macmillan).
“Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland.”

“Much of what has been written gives the impression that there were not many slaves and minimizes the impact that slavery had on Europe,” Davis said. “Most accounts only look at slavery in one place, or only for a short period of time. But when you take a broader, longer view, the massive scope of this slavery and its powerful impact become clear.”

Davis said it is useful to compare this Mediterranean slavery to the Atlantic slave trade that brought black Africans to the Americas. Over the course of four centuries, the Atlantic slave trade was much larger – about 10 to 12 million black Africans were brought to the Americas. But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis.

“One of the things that both the public and many scholars have tended to take as given is that slavery was always racial in nature – that only blacks have been slaves. But that is not true,” Davis said. “We cannot think of slavery as something that only white people did to black people.”

During the time period Davis studied, it was religion and ethnicity, as much as race, that determined who became slaves.

“Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland,” he said.

Pirates (called corsairs) from cities along the Barbary Coast in north Africa – cities such as Tunis and Algiers – would raid ships in the Mediterranean and Atlantic, as well as seaside villages to capture men, women and children. The impact of these attacks were devastating – France, England, and Spain each lost thousands of ships, and long stretches of the Spanish and Italian coasts were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants. At its peak, the destruction and depopulation of some areas probably exceeded what European slavers would later inflict on the African interior.

Although hundreds of thousands of Christian slaves were taken from Mediterranean countries, Davis noted, the effects of Muslim slave raids was felt much further away: it appears, for example, that through most of the 17th century the English lost at least 400 sailors a year to the slavers.

Even Americans were not immune. For example, one American slave reported that 130 other American seamen had been enslaved by the Algerians in the Mediterranean and Atlantic just between 1785 and 1793.

Davis said the vast scope of slavery in North Africa has been ignored and minimized, in large part because it is on no one’s agenda to discuss what happened.

The enslavement of Europeans doesn’t fit the general theme of European world conquest and colonialism that is central to scholarship on the early modern era, he said. Many of the countries that were victims of slavery, such as France and Spain, would later conquer and colonize the areas of North Africa where their citizens were once held as slaves. Maybe because of this history, Western scholars have thought of the Europeans primarily as “evil colonialists” and not as the victims they sometimes were, Davis said.

Davis said another reason that Mediterranean slavery has been ignored or minimized has been that there have not been good estimates of the total number of people enslaved. People of the time – both Europeans and the Barbary Coast slave owners – did not keep detailed, trustworthy records of the number of slaves. In contrast, there are extensive records that document the number of Africans brought to the Americas as slaves.

So Davis developed a new methodology to come up with reasonable estimates of the number of slaves along the Barbary Coast. Davis found the best records available indicating how many slaves were at a particular location at a single time. He then estimated how many new slaves it would take to replace slaves as they died, escaped or were ransomed.

“The only way I could come up with hard numbers is to turn the whole problem upside down – figure out how many slaves they would have to capture to maintain a certain level,” he said. “It is not the best way to make population estimates, but it is the only way with the limited records available.”

Putting together such sources of attrition as deaths, escapes, ransomings, and conversions, Davis calculated that about one-fourth of slaves had to be replaced each year to keep the slave population stable, as it apparently was between 1580 and 1680. That meant about 8,500 new slaves had to be captured each year. Overall, this suggests nearly a million slaves would have been taken captive during this period. Using the same methodology, Davis has estimated as many as 475,000 additional slaves were taken in the previous and following centuries.

The result is that between 1530 and 1780 there were almost certainly 1 million and quite possibly as many as 1.25 million white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.

Davis said his research into the treatment of these slaves suggests that, for most of them, their lives were every bit as difficult as that of slaves in America.

“As far as daily living conditions, the Mediterranean slaves certainly didn’t have it better,” he said.

While African slaves did grueling labor on sugar and cotton plantations in the Americas, European Christian slaves were often worked just as hard and as lethally – in quarries, in heavy construction, and above all rowing the corsair galleys themselves.

Davis said his findings suggest that this invisible slavery of European Christians deserves more attention from scholars.

“We have lost the sense of how large enslavement could loom for those who lived around the Mediterranean and the threat they were under,” he said. “Slaves were still slaves, whether they are black or white, and whether they suffered in America or North Africa.”

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.htm

JDRock
28th November 2011, 10:08 AM
Assimilate = race mixing, either directly or indirectly. They may get along better in the short term under the banner of "we're all the same", but they have positioned themselves to be more easily herded into world government....which is why "assimilation" is strongly encouraged by our rulers.
this is correct

StreetsOfGold
28th November 2011, 10:40 AM
White folk are easily guilt tripped into feeding and clothing those of a different racial black ground.

Fixed it for you, but seriously, the 3 major classification of people come from Ham, Shem and Japheth (Genesis 9)
If you look at the general traits that these 3 would carry on with as described by Noah in Genesis 9 you'll find that Ham which setteled in Africa is going to be the servants OF servants. Japheth which settled in Europe would be ENLARGED as in the ones doing the "city building and expanding" and shem would be the spiritual based ones. Settled in the East (from which the kings came LOOKING for Jesus) this included the decendants of Abraham (Jews and Arabs, etc) It is ordained by God that Both shem AND Japheth would end up taking CARE OF HAM but AS servant's they would reciprocate.

Ash_Williams
28th November 2011, 11:33 AM
The whites aren't breedling like rabbits so they don't need to flood out into other countries.

Also, whites not breedling like rabbits means the politicians don't see their wealth and power increasing thanks to new human batteries, so they open the borders to make sure even the white countries have that all-important "population growth".

Joe King
28th November 2011, 03:40 PM
Assimilate = race mixing, either directly or indirectly. They may get along better in the short term under the banner of "we're all the same", but they have positioned themselves to be more easily herded into world government....which is why "assimilation" is strongly encouraged by our rulers.No it doesn't.
Assimilation by immigrants simply means that they've become "Americanized".
...but 1st generation immigrants have typically not been fast to do that. It's their children and grandchildren who are. ie the ones who are raised here.

steyr_m
28th November 2011, 07:38 PM
No it doesn't.
Assimilation by immigrants simply means that they've become "Americanized".
...but 1st generation immigrants have typically not been fast to do that. It's their children and grandchildren who are. ie the ones who are raised here.

But they are not becoming "Americanized"

Joe King
28th November 2011, 07:52 PM
But they are not becoming "Americanized"
The current crop of actual immigrants may not be, but their kids will be. I've known some first generation immigrants from Central/South America, as well as those born/rasised here by immigrant parents and IMHO the 2nd generation always seems alot more Americanized. The ones I know who have kids in school, the kids act just like any other kid from here that I've seen.
I even know a guy from Cuba and he's livin' the American dream as much as anyone I know.

Horn
28th November 2011, 07:58 PM
I even know a guy from Cuba and he's livin' the American dream as much as anyone I know.

I guess, if you call living behind 30 yards of barbedwire a dream...

Joe King
28th November 2011, 08:27 PM
I guess, if you call living behind 30 yards of barbedwire a dream...Point taken. lol
...but I was talkin' about the proverbial American dream of home-ownership and being a productive member of society. ie he lives like a typical American.

steyr_m
29th November 2011, 05:23 AM
The current crop of actual immigrants may not be, but their kids will be. I've known some first generation immigrants from Central/South America, as well as those born/rasised here by immigrant parents and IMHO the 2nd generation always seems alot more Americanized. The ones I know who have kids in school, the kids act just like any other kid from here that I've seen.
I even know a guy from Cuba and he's livin' the American dream as much as anyone I know.

I'm not going to argue this point much with you because I know you are a very rigid person.

Yes, I know there are examples of some people being "Americanized" but when there are significant numbers, they do not. Go to S. Florida and parts will look like Haiti or the DR. Remember the soccer game in LA? It was in Spanish....

steyr_m
29th November 2011, 05:28 AM
But to answer the original post, it's because of years of social engineering and collective White-guilt. We were told [when the immigration bill of 65 came out] that the demographics of the country would not change. When people finally found out it was a ruse, it was too late.

People who opposed immigration were ruled "racist" and people lost jobs.

It will take a civil war to fix it, and I doubt if it ever will be.

Don't you love it when a plan comes together?

It's worse here in Canada. Where I work, if I do not officially support diversity, I could be branded a racist and could lose my job [or assimilate, and be the borg]

po boy
29th November 2011, 05:35 AM
I'm not going to argue this point much with you because I know you are a very rigid person.

Yes, I know there are examples of some people being "Americanized" but when there are significant numbers, they do not. Go to S. Florida and parts will look like Haiti or the DR. Remember the soccer game in LA? It was in Spanish....

I've watched the immigration in FL for the last 15-20 years and it was mostly fueled by contractors,homeowners,restraunts, landscaping,and roadbuilding companies wanting cheap labor.

steyr_m
29th November 2011, 05:43 PM
I've watched the immigration in FL for the last 15-20 years and it was mostly fueled by contractors,homeowners,restraunts, landscaping,and roadbuilding companies wanting cheap labor.

Oh, I know it's cheap labour that's driving it; but my point is that they are not assimilating. People seem to think that all peoples are the same. If they were, the 3rd world would be like us and not just move here.

ximmy
2nd December 2015, 03:49 PM
Bump.... nothing has changed... White countries even more flooded with immigrants... Other Nationalities spared.

singular_me
2nd December 2015, 03:52 PM
cant believe this thread is 5yo already... still worry for my son a lot as it is getting worse over there

Neuro
3rd December 2015, 12:29 AM
Bump.... nothing has changed... White countries even more flooded with immigrants... Other Nationalities spared.
Nice avatar ximmy!

Neuro
3rd December 2015, 12:32 AM
https://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/benjamin-netanyahu-ii.jpg
A JEWISH NATION ONLY FOR THE JEWISH PEOPLE

::) ...but our ACLU and ADL must promote open borders for Anglo-Saxon nations
What happened to book btw?

Shami-Amourae
3rd December 2015, 12:42 AM
cant believe this thread is 5yo already... still worry for my son a lot as it is getting worse over there
Everyone wants to live around us, but everyone wants to wag their finger at us when we stand up for ourselves and try to create a nice society.

:rolleyes:

Tumbleweed
3rd December 2015, 01:15 AM
What happened to book btw?

Gaillo perma banned him.

Shami-Amourae
3rd December 2015, 01:18 AM
What happened to book btw?

He's Jewboo.

Cebu_4_2
3rd December 2015, 01:25 AM
Book is banned. Boojew is not... yet.

Jewboo
3rd December 2015, 03:11 AM
Gaillo perma banned him.


I'm glad. He was a jerk! Where's Gaillo?

singular_me
3rd December 2015, 03:41 AM
Everyone wants to live around us, but everyone wants to wag their finger at us when we stand up for ourselves and try to create a nice society.
:rolleyes:

I can see that

although it is possible to get insight everywhere, to me america still means a place where I learned the most in my life after almost 16 years since my move from EU.

Horn
3rd December 2015, 07:50 AM
Bump.... nothing has changed... White countries even more flooded with immigrants... Other Nationalities spared.

Its like 1492 in reverse.

Did I say that before?

Tumbleweed
3rd December 2015, 08:00 AM
I'm glad. He was a jerk! Where's Gaillo?

I think Gaillo must have cracked under all the pressure Book and his friends put on him. I think he probably had to leave the forum and go off grid to save his sanity.

JohnQPublic
3rd December 2015, 08:59 AM
I'm glad. He was a jerk! Where's Gaillo?


http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?64746-About-Gaillo-Leaving&highlight=Gaillo

Cebu_4_2
3rd December 2015, 12:22 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?64746-About-Gaillo-Leaving&highlight=Gaillo


3 years! Wow...

mick silver
3rd December 2015, 01:35 PM
it look Gaillo was the only one that made the move to get off the grid , I know me an wifey have talked about this for some time now if every thing plays out right next year it will happen with us there only few things left for us too do an we will cut the tie and be able to live with out the stuff we have now . working now on the last home we will ever need right now this has been planned out for more then 5 years now making sure that we have all the dots just right on this place

Neuro
3rd December 2015, 10:43 PM
it look Gaillo was the only one that made the move to get off the grid , I know me an wifey have talked about this for some time now if every thing plays out right next year it will happen with us there only few things left for us too do an we will cut the tie and be able to live with out the stuff we have now . working now on the last home we will ever need right now this has been planned out for more then 5 years now making sure that we have all the dots just right on this place
Before you do that, you should become an indispensable part of the administration of this forum! :)