View Full Version : There's a Gulag in Your Future
Panoptimist
28th November 2011, 06:12 PM
Panop note: I "copped" this little essay by E.M. when I purchased a few books on Amazon awhile back. I didn't know if it was a small book, or what. Turns out, it was a little paper essay. It's kind of short and I haven't found it anywhere else on the net, so I figured I would write it up here. Written the bicentennial year. Seems timelier than ever.
There's A Gulag In Your Future
by Eustace Mullins
America in the Bicentennial year showed many of the characteristics of Russia in 1910. The white middle class is working hard, saving money, educating their children, and buying real estate and insurance from their earnings. On the surface, it seems a comfortable, predictable world, but terrible forces are at work. Like Russia in 1910, America in 1976 has well organised revolutionary groups infiltrating every part of society, and especially into the religious, educational, and governmental institutions. As for the press, one need hardly mention that; journalism has always been one of the most sordid types of prostitution, and American journalists have eagerly allied themselves with what they believe to be the great power of the immediate future, the Satanic powers of international Communism.
Despite the billions of dollars which Americans are spending on insurance, they are not spending one cent on any insurance against the only real threat on the horizon, that is, the certainty that all of their property will be confiscated and that they will be placed in forced labor camps to work and die.
The following quote stands for itself: "Many camp points were known for executions and mass graves; Orotukan, and Polyarny Spring, and Svistoplyas, and Annushka, and even the agricultural camp Dukcha, but the most famous of all on this account were the Zolotisty Goldfields. At Zolotisty the used to summon a brigade from the mine face in broad daylight and shoot the members down one after another. (And this was not a substitute for night executions, they took place too.) When the chief of Yuglag, Nikolai Andreyevich Aglanov, arrived, he liked, at lineup, to pick out some brigade or other which had been at fault for something or other and order it to be taken aside. And then he used to empty his pistol into the frightened, crowded mass of people, accompanying his shots with happy shouts. The corpses were left unburied."
Of course, we have read this sort of stuff many times, from the Nuremberg Trials, about the Germans mistreating the Jews, but wait, Aglanov, Zolotisty, these are not German names. This must be a quote from Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's book, The Gulag Archipelago. And on page 389, Volume Two of this work, we find a very significant passage:
"But some transports of condemned zeks arrived too late, and they continued to arrive with five to ten people at a time. A detachment of killers would receive them at the Old Brickyard station and lead them to the old bathhouse to a booth lined with three or four layers of blankets inside. There the condemned prisoners were ordered to undress in the snow and enter the bath naked. Inside, they were shot with pistols. In the course of one and a half months about two hundred persons were destroyed in this way. The corpses were burned in the tundra."
In this passage, Solzhenitsyn is describing the execution of Trotskyite prisoners at a Moscow train station in April 1938. It sounds all too familiar, because hundreds of pages of sworn testimony describing these incidents were taken down at the Nuremberg Trials and used to condemn the legally elected officials of the German nation to be executed for "war crimes"! How did this come about? When the German Army made its lighting dash into Russia in June of 1941, the Soviet Leaders realized that Jews in the captured border cities would be the first to collaborate with their conquerors. Stalin ordered all the Jews in the path of the German advance to be rounded up and hauled to the interior on cattle trains. Many of them were sealed, and most of them had no food or water. As a result, many thousands of Jews died in horrible circumstances. Also in the path of the German advance were a number of huge Soviet slave labor camps. There was no possibility of evacuating them, and the Russian guards herded prisoners into large groups and massacred them with machine gun fire. When the Germans captured these areas, they were stunned to find large mounds of unburied corpses.
In order to have proof of the savage mentality of the Communist commissars, the Germans methodically photographed the scenes of these massacres, and took statements from some survivors who had fled into the woods. At Nuremberg, in order to have a legal excuse for killing the captured Germans, the victors changed the statements and photos to read "German guards" where they had formerly read "Russian guards" and changed the locale of the massacres to read "Auschwitz", "Dachau" and other German camp areas instead of the true Russian ones.
The Henry Kissengers, German refugee Jews who swarmed into Germany with the American Army, and who became the new commissars of the defeated people, had embarked on this venture with the modest proposal of using these forged accusations as their excuse for exterminating the entire German people, a la Morgenthau. However, as usual, the Jewish duplicity paid unexpected dividends when it was decided to extort ten billion dollars in "reparations" from the vanquished Germans to pay for the Jews whom the Soviets had killed. Today, the defeated Germans are still paying vast sums of money to the State of Israel for the Jews who died in Stalin's death trains.
Solzhenitsyn does not touch upon this aspect of history, apparently because he does not know of it. However, he does expose the fact that the entire Soviet slave labor camp system was built up by Jews. On page 79, vol. II of Gulag Archipelago, he reproduces the faces of the six Jews who were responsible for designing the entire system and bringing it into being. They are Aaron Solts, Naftaly Frenkel, Yakov Rappaport, Matvei Berman, Lazar Kogan and Genrikh Yagoda. So little has been known to the West of the Soviet slave camps that the first four names are unknown to students of the Communist atrocities. Luzar Kogan (Cohen), of course, became the Commissar of Industry, and Yagoda became head of the secret police. In fact, most of the Soviet hierarchy under Stalin worked their way up from managing the slave labor camps, because this was the only part of the entire Soviet economy which was functioning! Even today, the slave labor camps are the only portion of the Soviet system which meet production norms, and the Soviet system depends on them and on aid from the Western democracies. Without these two factors, the Russian economy would collapse within a few months.
The faces of the six Jews whom Solzhenitsyn exposes as the founders of the slave labor system give a more than adequate explanation of why the German Zionist, Henry Kissinger, refused to allow President Ford to meet with Solzhenitsyn. Recruited as the Soviet agent Bor while serving with the U.S. Army in Germany, Kissenger had carried out many high-level operations for the Soviet Union, but few were more crucial than preventing Solzhenitsyn from coming to the White House. Our Washington officials have always denied any knowledge of the existence of the slave camps even though hundreds of American citizens have been imprisoned and died in them. Solzhenitsyn quotes a figure by Professor of Statistics Kurganov that from 1917 to 1959, sixty-six million people have died in Russia's slave labor camps! At the end of World War II, the Jews at Nuremberg, in casting about for a figure which they could claim as the number of Jews killed in the war, at first seized upon the then total of the victims of the Russian camps, sixty million, and seriously proposed this as the basis for negotiating their extortion of money from the defeated German people! Cooler heads among them prevailed, and they decided upon the more reasonable figure of six million Jews, which they claimed had been "exterminated" by the Germans. The actual figure, of course, was about two thousand Jews who had died from typhus in the German camps after American air strikes had cut off German supplies.
Since the Communist system could not function without slave labor, concentration camps appeared only a few months after Lenin and the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia. Solzhenitsyn reports that in August 1918, Lenin sent a telegram to the Penza Provisional Executive Committee, where the peasants were already revolting against the Bolsheviks, "Lock up all the gulag doubtful ones in a concentration camp outside this city". Ten days later, a decree was sent out ordering mass executions. It also stated, "Secure the Soviet Republic against its class enemies by isolating them in concentration camps."
In prior usage, concentration camps had referred to prisoners of war, but no nation had ever considered using such camps to imprison its won citizens. Furthermore, the "class enemies" of the new Soviet Republic were no longer the "aristocrats" and "oppressors", but the peasants and workers who were to be enslaved to support the new regime. Thus began the vast network of camps which came to be known as the Glavnoye Upravlenye Lagerei, or Office of Penal Labor Camps, whose initials were read as Gulag, and which became known as the principal part of the Soviet Empire, the Gulag Archipelago, the many millions of faceless slaves who toiled for their Soviet masters.
Maps detailing the location of these camps have been circulated in the United States since 1947, but the State Department has always denied their existence. Furthermore, the United States has persistently refused to bring up the question of these camps before the United Nations, thus sparing the largest slave holding state in the world, the Soviet Union, the public embarrassment of discussing its slave politics. No wonder Kissinger was told by Moscow that Solzhenitsyn must not be allowed to come to the White House. Suppose Ford, with one of his usual gaffes, would later refer to the slave camps in talking with reporters!
Solzhenitsyn describes the most important single official who devised the scheme of operations of the Gulag Archipelago as Naftaly Frenkel, a Turkish Jew. Frenkel had become a multi-millionaire timber king in Turkey, and after the Bolshevik Revolution, he became a resident Soviet intelligence agent in Constantinople. In his role, he created a large black market exchanging Soviet paper rubles for gold. Although he obtained millions for the Soviets through these transactions, there were large scale frauds, and in 1927, while in Russia, he was arrested and sent to prison. After a few months at Solovki prison, he arranged a personal meeting with Stalin, with whom he talked for three hours. The entire time was spent by Frenkel describing the methods he had devised for getting the most work out of the slave labor. Stalin was so impressed that he adopted the entire package. Basically it consisted of making sure that every prisoner worked every day of his entire sentence, and that a system of food rationing be adopted which he had copied from the Eskimos, a fish on a pole held out in front of the running dog team.
With Stalin's blessing, Frenkel was freed and placed in charge of the construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal, also known as the Belomor Canal. One hundred thousand prisoners died during the first winter of working under the Jew Frenkel's command. Nevertheless, foreign visitors were brought to such projects to convinced of the greatness of the Soviet Union. Supreme Court Judge Leigowitz of New York State visited one of these slave labor camps and rapturously wrote of it in Life Magazine, "What an intelligent, farsighted human administration from top to bottom. In serving out his term of punishment, the prisoner retains a feelings of dignity." Thus we come to a basic emotion of the biological parasite, which sees the gentile slave toiling for the enrichment of the parasite, and is overcome at the justice and humaneness of it all.
Solzhenitsyn gives us many descriptions of mass killings at these camps, which were usually carried out because of a failure to meet a production norm, or because some of the prisoners balked at the terrible conditions. On page 390, he writes:
"A. B. ________v has told how executions were carried out at Adak----, a camp on the Pechora River. They would take the opposition members with their things out of the camp compound on the prisoner transport at night. And outside the compound stood the small house of the Third Section. The condemned men were taken into a room one at a time, and there the camp guards sprang on them. Their mouths were stuffed with something soft and their arms were bound with cords behind their backs. Then they were led out into the courtyard, where harnessed carts were waiting. The bound prisoners were piled on the carts, from five to seven at a time, and driven off to the Gorka----, the camp cemetery. On arrival they were tipped into big pits that had already been prepared and buried alive. Not out of brutality, no. It has been ascertained that when dragging and lifting them, it was much easier to cope with living people than with corpses. The work went on for many nights Adak."
Despite many fictional accounts of the imaginary atrocities which were claimed to have occurred at German concentration camps, none of the Jewish faked stories equals the raw horror of Solzhenitsyn's true accounts of the Russian slave labor camps. The Jews must be green with envy. They had tried, to the limits of their imaginations, to invent terrible things which they could use to accuse the vanquished Germans, and Solzhenitsyn has surpassed them in horror a thousand times.
Americans may wonder why no story of the Russian concentration camps ever makes it into the movies or television. The reason is quite simple, there is no room. All of American television and movies are taken up with horror stories of the Nazis and their camps. Despite the fact that the Nazi camps have been empty since 1945, for forty years thousands of American movies and television shows have depicted fictional happenings at these camps, while not one movie has been made about the Russian camps, despite the fact that millions of slave laborers continue to die in these camps. The notorious Zionist propagandist, Bill Graham, is currently raking in millions of dollars to finance his propaganda work for Israel by distributing a movie "The Upper Room", about the supposed terrors of Nazism, yet he has ignored many letters asking why he doesn't film stories from "The Gulag Archipelago."
However, we write today of the horrors of the Soviet slave camps, not merely from pity for their victims, but because these camps are the blueprint for the America of tomorrow, the America which our educators and our preachers and our government officials are planning for us. The locations of the camps are already known, and the ingenuity of our nation is adding a new dimension in horror for our complacent white American middle class. Not only do we have thousands of clever Jewish Naftaly Frenkels to plan the operation of the American slave labor camps, but they will be staffed with the most brutal types of black guards, who can be relied upon to surpass the brutalities of the Soviet terrorists. All over America, thousands of Negroes are being recruited into "correctional" work (The legislation making the concentration camps official in Russia was called the Corrective Labor Act of 1924). These Negroes are being trained in the most advanced techniques of brutalizing and dehumanizing the white Americans who will become their victims. And perhaps our American leaders, with their genius for exceeding numerical accomplishments reached in other countries, will be able to surpass the world record of sixty-six million victims murdered in the Soviet slave labor camps. Perhaps we can murder one hundred million white Americans in the camps which are expected to be put in operation in the next several years.
Meanwhile, the white American middle class spends not one penny to avoid its certain fate, but continues to pile up savings and real estate for those who are ruthless enough and determined enough to take it away from them by force. We refer, of course, to the biological Jew and his willing ally, the Negro terrorists. It is no accident that Henry Kissinger, at this very moment in time, is in Africa hysterically preaching the destruction of the white race, for he and his colleagues intend to wipe us out, not merely in Africa, but throughout the world. It was not an idle observation when his close friend, the Jewess and writer Suzanne Langer, wrote in the New York Times, "The white race is the cancer of history."
Large Sarge
28th November 2011, 06:22 PM
Eustace was way ahead of his time....
Ponce
28th November 2011, 07:56 PM
What happened in Russia is now the beggining of what is going to happen in the US, and by the same people....... is a shame that the american people, in general, are not a little bit more educated about the past because if that was to be so we then would not be where we are now.....who will the Zionist "Jews" hired to fight the white Americans?........... I said long ago that we would see mercs walking the streets of America.
7th trump
28th November 2011, 10:25 PM
What happened in Russia is now the beggining of what is going to happen in the US, and by the same people....... is a shame that the american people, in general, are not a little bit more educated about the past because if that was to be so we then would not be where we are now.....who will the Zionist "Jews" hired to fight the white Americans?........... I said long ago that we would see mercs walking the streets of America.
Wont happen here on American soil Ponce.
This is the information age.
Its not written in the Bible for it to happen in America.
The last two battles are coming and we dont fight in them. Its them against God himself. God does the fighting ( a matter of seconds and its over!). A pathetic ending for them.
Ponce
28th November 2011, 10:34 PM
Well, as God Jr in trainning I'd better give old dad a helping hand......... crap, be better if he sits down this one and let me do all the work.
Walter Mitty
29th November 2011, 05:12 AM
How do you know it won't happen here?
What, you believe you are something special and God owes it to you not to face that type of deprivation
and terror?
You don't think there was at least one true Christian who went through the horror of the Gulags and
died horribly at the hands of evil men?
Are you better than that one Russian Christian who died in that situation?.
You are deluding yourself if you think it cannot happen here.
Your interpretations of the Bible have been perverted by the thinking of men enveloped in 100 years of relative peace and safety and infiltrated by some Satanic form of American arrogance. American Christians believe they are somehow immune and protected against the suffering experienced by Christians in other parts of the World throughout 2000 years of history.
You are deluded.
Spectrism
29th November 2011, 05:40 AM
Actually, I think it is happening here. Baraq O Bam Waw- the flash of light from the sky- is clearly a liar and deceiver. I was pretty amazed how even the Klinton machine bowed to this illegal immigrant. There is much happening under the surface with the devil's son. I expect that before the next election we will see a demonic indwelling of Baraq. The devil imitates God's ways. Almost 2000 years ago, the true Messiah was adorned with the Holy Spirit in His commissioning to ministry, at His baptism. Watch for a variant of this baptism with Baraq. There will be a supernatural event if this studdering toad is to be used.
Amerika is already being judged by God. The churches have become as corrupt as the politicians. The people are getting what they deserve... and what they asked for. The people of Amerika have told God to leave them and their country alone. And so, it is happening.
7th trump
29th November 2011, 05:54 AM
How do you know it won't happen here?
If anything like this were to happen here in America there would be a politicians skinned alive. Todays world isnt even close to the world when these events were taking place in Russia..............seriously get off your high horse and think about it!What, you believe you are something special and God owes it to you not to face that type of deprivation
and terror?
Read the Bible oh ye of little faith. No, I dont think I'm anybody special. There are those who are predestined................144,000 elect you must have overlooked. God does intervene with them. No they arent anybody special but they certainly do know whats going on and whats going to happen.
You don't think there was at least one true Christian who went through the horror of the Gulags and
died horribly at the hands of evil men? What does this have to do with the question of gulags in America and astrocities at that magnitude happening here in America?
Are you better than that one Russian Christian who died in that situation?. Again what does this have to do with anything?
You are deluding yourself if you think it cannot happen here. No not deluting myself.............just not stupid enough to think America today can be overtaken like Russsia of 1910.
Your interpretations of the Bible have been perverted by the thinking of men enveloped in 100 years of relative peace and safety and infiltrated by some Satanic form of American arrogance. American Christians believe they are somehow immune and protected against the suffering experienced by Christians in other parts of the World throughout 2000 years of history. Actually I dont listen to main stream churches of today.................I actually read the Bible and can assure you its you that is listening to man.........oh ye of little faith.
I was actually reading last night that God says when the obmination of desolation is standing in Jerusalem claiming to be God, the Elect nobody else, are warned they are going to trip...meaning they are going to stumble wheh this happens.....and to think you know everything that God hasnt told everything in advance.You are deluded.
No, you just dont know who you are addressing here grasshopper.
You have no clue of my stance on the Bible with only 36 posts................no clue at all!
Awoke
29th November 2011, 06:05 AM
Thanks for transcribing that, Panoptimist. Great read.
In fact, I'm embarrassed to admit that this is the first material I have actually sat down and read by Eustice. I have read so many books by so many authors that I burned out on reading before I heard of Eustice, so that's why. I just can;t be bothered reading more of the same.
In order to have proof of the savage mentality of the Communist commissars, the Germans methodically photographed the scenes of these massacres, and took statements from some survivors who had fled into the woods. At Nuremberg, in order to have a legal excuse for killing the captured Germans, the victors changed the statements and photos to read "German guards" where they had formerly read "Russian guards" and changed the locale of the massacres to read "Auschwitz", "Dachau" and other German camp areas instead of the true Russian ones.
This is key here. If there was a way to find the originals with the original Russian names, and then show how they were tampered with, the whole thing would fall apart.
Spectrism
29th November 2011, 06:06 AM
I guess I am stupid enough to think that Amerika can be overtaken like the Russians, the Germans, the Argentines, and even the Cubans. Of course, the Cubans are an especially stupid lot, so that is a stretch. I once met a Cuban that never understood what toilet paper was. Once he caught on to it, he bagan hoarding it. :-)
Twisted Titan
29th November 2011, 06:30 AM
Thanks for transcribing that, Panoptimist. Great read.
In fact, I'm embarrassed to admit that this is the first material I have actually sat down and read by Eustice. I have read so many books by so many authors that I burned out on reading before I heard of Eustice, so that's why. I just can;t be bothered reading more of the same.
This is key here. If there was a way to find the originals with the original Russian names, and then show how they were tampered with, the whole thing would fall apart.
They would be deem anti semetic forgies
They would also quickly be destroyed
Tumbleweed
29th November 2011, 07:03 AM
I see similarities between what happened in Russia and what is happening in this country now. It's the same tribe that are moving in to positions of power and control. We need to pay attentoin to what happened in Russia and who was behind it. This is another article naming those who were behind the Bolshevik Revolution and their actions By Mark Weber.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
part 1
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution
and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism
by Mark Weber In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia's last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.
Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.
In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.1
Radzinsky's research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky -- one of Lenin's closest colleagues -- had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote:2
My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in passing: "Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?"
"Finished," he replied. "He has been shot."
"And where is the family?"
"The family along with him."
"All of them?," I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.
"All of them," replied Sverdlov. "What about it?" He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.
"And who made the decision?," I asked.
"We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult circumstances."
I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs - originally published in 1920, and reissued in 1993 by the Institute for Historical Review -- is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of "White" (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia's imperial family.3
A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?
In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country.4 But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame "the Jews" for so much misfortune?
A Taboo Subject
Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country's total population,5 they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.
With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary and -- as chairman of the Central Executive Committee -- head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.6
Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7
A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. "An intelligent Russian," he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."8
Critical Meetings
In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.
Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.9
To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev).10 Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet -- whose chairman was Trotsky -- established an 18-member "Military Revolutionary Committee" to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews.11 Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man "Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).12
Contemporary Voices of Warning
Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality." The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:13
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."14
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a few months later: "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."15
"The Bolshevik Revolution," declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920, "was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct."16
As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment.17 Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that "because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining , particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel."18
Historians' Views
Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:19
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins
Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution -- partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.
The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka," wrote Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, "stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator."20 In Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents," reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.21 (Beginning as the [I]Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)
In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin's execution order.22
Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.
In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were "amazingly" numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:23
This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.
In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:24
The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
In the struggle for power that followed Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders - including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.
Tumbleweed
29th November 2011, 07:06 AM
part 2
Put To Death Without Trial
For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing "Nicholas Romanov" before a "Revolutionary Tribunal" that would publicize his "crimes against the people" before sentencing him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England's Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France's Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.
In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial, during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death - along with his family and staff -- in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.
Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton's view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.
For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:25
The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or total doom This Lenin sensed well.
Historical Context
In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia's subversive leftist parties.26 Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally conser-vative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the "Pale of Settlement."27
However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews."28 She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition." In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.
If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame "the Jews" for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame "white people" for Negro slavery, or "the Germans" for the Second World War or "the Holocaust."
Words of Grim Portent
Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:29
Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie -- more blood, as much as possible.
Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: "We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated."30
'The Twenty Million'
As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be much higher than Zinoviev's murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.31
Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that "from 1929 to 1952 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died."32
Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: "From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp." These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.
Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet "repression" of it own people:34
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933 famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the Russians now refer to as 'The Twenty Million'."
A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.35
The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new and more respectful look at their country's pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets -- along with many in the West -- have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire's citizens were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with remarkable leniency.36
During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled.37 Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.
Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.
Monarchist Sentiment
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.
People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours' wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor: "I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It's like a nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his family." Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many cities.
A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a despicable crime.38 Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent "Orthodox Church Abroad" canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. "The people loved Emperor Nicholas," he said. "His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy."39
On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.40
Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation's official emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures -- such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky -- have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors Empress Catherine I.
Symbolic Meaning
In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:41
The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.
Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.
The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.
The Massacre's Place in History
The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe's leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent's reigning monarchs were related by blood. England's King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin of Nicholas.
More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.
7th trump
29th November 2011, 07:07 AM
I guess I am stupid enough to think that Amerika can be overtaken like the Russians, the Germans, the Argentines, and even the Cubans. Of course, the Cubans are an especially stupid lot, so that is a stretch. I once met a Cuban that never understood what toilet paper was. Once he caught on to it, he bagan hoarding it. :-)
Apparently!
Canadian-guerilla
29th November 2011, 07:13 AM
No, you just dont know who you are addressing here grasshopper.
You have no clue of my stance on the Bible with only 36 posts................no clue at all!
judging another member by his post count
hmmmmm . . .
Book
29th November 2011, 07:16 AM
I see similarities between what happened in Russia and what is happening in this country now. It's the same tribe that are moving in to positions of power and control. We need to pay attention to what happened in Russia and who was behind it.
"To my surprise, I found buried within Sannings work the “holy grail” – hard statistical evidence of how communist society actually worked – its very core and essence exposed for all to see! Surprisingly, Sanning himself apparently missed its true significance."
http://www.toqonline.com/blog/what-is-communism/
:) This long chilling article explains it all Tumbleweed.
Twisted Titan
29th November 2011, 07:23 AM
Hindsight is always 20/20
The only thing that can be said is watch the way the grass bellows in the wind...
But one thing I know that must occur is some federal mandate on the registration of weapons.....it will quickly happen in the throes of some new FF event.
When you see that ........you better be ready for bear.
mick silver
29th November 2011, 07:36 AM
who ever thinks this could not happen here is fooling them selfs . it happen many times around the world . i dont know what there full plan for us all is going to be but i know one thing it will not be good . T T hit one thing to look for but one has to look at all the weapons are armys have ... there no way you can fight stuff you cant see . there alot of people who serve in our miltary that would pull the trigger without asking why .................... i have meet some of these guys
7th trump
29th November 2011, 08:17 AM
judging another member by his post count
hmmmmm . . .
No not judging..........merely discerning his post to me that I dont know what I'm talking about. Basically he hasnt been around long (36 posts) to know what I stand for or what I know.
Doesnt know anything about me does he?
Awoke
29th November 2011, 08:41 AM
Doesnt know anything about me does he?
Let me do him a favor then.
Walter Mitty, 7th Trump is a dogmatic cultist who claims to be Christian and insists on the re-interpretations of a false prophet. He also has selective reading comprehension.
Take for example his blind and dogmatic adherance to the cults stance the 144,000 elect:
He insists that they are the only ones who make it into heaven based on Revelation Chapter 7, verse 4.
He refuses to admit that anyone else is accepted, even though it is spelled out in the Word of the Lord in Revelation Chapter 7, verse 9.
He is also an elitist who walks around acting like he knows something you don't know, and looks down his nose at everyone who is not part of his Shepards Chapel cult.
PlatinumBlonde
29th November 2011, 09:05 AM
No not judging..........merely discerning his post to me that I dont know what I'm talking about. Basically he hasnt been around long (36 posts) to know what I stand for or what I know.
Doesnt know anything about me does he?
A post count is not relevent. I have a very low post count yet I have lurked here for months if not a year or more before registration..
DMac
29th November 2011, 09:12 AM
"To my surprise, I found buried within Sannings work the “holy grail” – hard statistical evidence of how communist society actually worked – its very core and essence exposed for all to see! Surprisingly, Sanning himself apparently missed its true significance."
http://www.toqonline.com/blog/what-is-communism/
:) This long chilling article explains it all Tumbleweed.
Thanks for the link. This is a good read.
General of Darkness
29th November 2011, 09:14 AM
A very close friend of mine that help me build www.vornetwork.com said, "If they come for you, don't go". You can interpret that anyway you want.
MAGNES
29th November 2011, 10:01 AM
Thanks for transcribing that, Panoptimist. Great read.
In fact, I'm embarrassed to admit that this is the first material I have actually sat down and read by Eustice. I have read so many books by so many authors that I burned out on reading before I heard of Eustice, so that's why. I just can;t be bothered reading more of the same.
This is key here. If there was a way to find the originals with the original Russian names, and then show how they were tampered with, the whole thing would fall apart.
I hear you, that happened to me, Eustace Mullins is key here, and Ezra Pound, at the very least the beginnings, how it all starts, I have a thread here about Eustace Mullins on history,
and this is the history and related that also gets trolled. Ezra Pound as well on this.
Isn't it interesting that Ezra Pound is taught in school but his controversial history is blacklisted, they cannot ignore the giant. It starts with the FED and questions, the FRN, and the rabbit hole never ends, goes right to the Occult.
BlueMidnight on gim was on top of these things before we were, I promised him way back I would read EM, we don't have Blue with us anymore, but we got Awoke and we got Panoptist.
Antony Sutton totally complements Eustace Mullins without the baggage. Must reading, and his material is online.
Many have ripped off Eustace Mullins without giving him credit.
I also strongly believe that many have been inspired by Eustace Mullins,
and he has directly impacted and increased interest in certain subjects.
Ponce
29th November 2011, 10:03 AM
A very close friend of mine that help me build www.vornetwork.com said, "If they come for you, don't go". You can interpret that anyway you want.
Give my thanks to your friend General.......like I said before, the only way that I will go wil be in a pine box....... there is a time in that you have to your foot down and say NO MORE, and stand your ground.
By the way General, is that your own personal site? you are the boss?
First post of the day.............good morning to one and all.
PS: Going to the big town later on.
General of Darkness
29th November 2011, 10:13 AM
Give my thanks to your friend General.......like I said before, the only way that I will go wil be in a pine box....... there is a time in that you have to your foot down and say NO MORE, and stand your ground.
By the way General, is that your own personal site? you are the boss?
First post of the day.............good morning to one and all.
PS: Going to the big town later on.
I was the boss and owner for about 3 years and gave the reins over about 10 months.
MAGNES
29th November 2011, 10:28 AM
"To my surprise, I found buried within Sannings work the “holy grail” – hard statistical evidence of how communist society actually worked – its very core and essence exposed for all to see! Surprisingly, Sanning himself apparently missed its true significance."
http://www.toqonline.com/blog/what-is-communism/
:) This long chilling article explains it all Tumbleweed.
One key name explains it all as well including our future, Jabotinsky,
founder and creator of the USSR, Israel, Turkey, and directly
connected to the NeoCons/Israel today building the Police State.
They have experience mass murdering whole peoples.
Panoptimist
29th November 2011, 12:37 PM
Useful Pound books:
The entire collection of his radio transcripts...I haven't seen any abridged versions, but I haven't seen any versions newer than the 50's or 60's.
All of his letters to and from those in his literary and poetic circle (particularly Eliot and Cummings, and his wife).
Patria Mia
Impact: Essays on Ignorance and The Decline of American Civilization
Canto 45 (Usura)
Mullins's biography of Pound, "This Difficult Individual"
The thing about Pound (and most of this field of inquiry -- or should I say fields, as it encompasses basically all of them known to man) is that it is in a way dishonest to study his politics without a firm grasp of his literary and poetic history, and the context in which it was written. Pound was a master of literary, poetic, and social history, culture (Western, though he dabbled in Eastern culture -- writing -- and religion), and a master craftsman of words. To him, and to many in the same vein, politics and finance is inseparable from the arts.
Cummings has a few poems on the Jew, on in particularly, but it's been abridged out of every edition and collection I've found except for the original.
T.S. Eliot is the probably the most associated with Anti-Semitism in the modern, culturally acceptable world (of course, any time a non-Jew mentions a Jew without licking their boots he/she is automatically labeled an antisemite). His After Strange Gods speech that was transcribed into an essay of that title is a great source. You can find it on archive.org I believe, but it he withdrew it from publication shortly after it was published because he received so much heat for it.
In that he references a work titled "I'll Take My Stand: The South and The Agrarian Tradition" I highly recommend that to any student of oligarchy.
iOWNme
29th November 2011, 04:51 PM
Thanks for posting this.......Any idea what year it was written?
I dont think the question is wether or not it will happen in America. The question is WHO will it happen to in America?
Ive got many weapons and much ammo, and a knowledge of true history, to guarantee it wont happen to me.
Panoptimist
29th November 2011, 08:25 PM
Thanks for posting this.......Any idea what year it was written?
I dont think the question is wether or not it will happen in America. The question is WHO will it happen to in America?
Ive got many weapons and much ammo, and a knowledge of true history, to guarantee it wont happen to me.
1976.
Ares
29th November 2011, 09:09 PM
The writer has the wrong person attributed to this quote "The white race is the cancer of human history." Although it was said by a female Zionist Jew. It was not Susanne Langer who said it.
It was Susan Sontag
""Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history."
Walter Mitty
29th November 2011, 10:20 PM
No not judging..........merely discerning his post to me that I dont know what I'm talking about. Basically he hasnt been around long (36 posts) to know what I stand for or what I know.
Doesnt know anything about me does he?
I can only judge by what I read.
To write that a situation similar to what occured in Russia cannot happen in these united states because Jesus is coming back to fight (by inference) the evil is what you wrote.
Then in your response to what I posted you say the people in the U.S. would not stand for it.
So which is it? It cannot happen because Jesus is coming back to fight the battles of gog and magog which will pre-empt any totalitarianism in the U.S. ? or the "People will not stand for it?.
Jesus has not come back in 2000 years. Christains have suffered quite alot in that time period.
What if He doesn't come back as soon as you seem to think?
What then?
Also I would say the "people" in the U.S.(including all of us) have stood for quite alot from this criminal Gov't we have.
You are correct. I do not believe you know what you are talking about.
Awoke
8th December 2011, 11:39 AM
I have posted this scripture quote many times on this forum, but it seems to get missed.
But of that day and hour no one knoweth, not the angels of heaven, but the Father alone.
This included Jesus Christ Himself, during the time He was here in the flesh.
So I prep to fight the satanic NWO while I wait for Christs return. It may or may not be in my lifetime. Indicators would certainly point towards apocalyptic times approaching, but this is not the first time the globe has gone through this cycle.
The only major differentiating factor is the brutal technology they can use against us these days, as opposed to those days.
PatColo
8th December 2011, 07:28 PM
Many have ripped off Eustace Mullins without giving him credit.
I also strongly believe that many have been inspired by Eustace Mullins,
and he has directly impacted and increased interest in certain subjects.
Problem with Mullins' works is, he didn't cite/footnote his sources. He apparently spent endless hours in library of congress doing research for his books, but then he didn't follow the basic academic practice of citing publication/author/page of the sources of the claims he made- he just made claim after claim, matter-of-factly. This left open the door to dismissing Mullins' work by anyone with a motive to do so.
Ponce
8th December 2011, 08:29 PM
LOLLLLLLLLLL Spect, you made me fall off my chair hahahahahahahahah.
Do you know who was incharged of the Golag camps?......those incharged of their new government......and do you know who is incharged of our government?.........same people who were incharged OF THEIR GOVERNMET......the freaking Zionist.
They won't be called Golag but Fema.......a rose by any other name?
Bigjon
9th December 2011, 05:41 AM
Problem with Mullins' works is, he didn't cite/footnote his sources. He apparently spent endless hours in library of congress doing research for his books, but then he didn't follow the basic academic practice of citing publication/author/page of the sources of the claims he made- he just made claim after claim, matter-of-factly. This left open the door to dismissing Mullins' work by anyone with a motive to do so.
I think that G. Edward Griffin's book "The Creature from Jekyll Island" does what Mullins never did and provides the paper trail to back up his words. Since Mullins never did this, Griffin's book would have to be researched all on it's own and stands alone in this regard.
Hatha Sunahara
10th December 2011, 10:00 AM
Here's a list of the Gulag facilities in place right now ready to become the homes of millions:
http://www.altnews.info/192/fema-concentration-camps/
This should sober up a few people considering that this past week the congress passed a law that allows the military to detain people without due processor regard for their constitutional rights.
I wonder what the upper limit is on the percentage of your population that you can use for slave labor before your whole society falls apart.
Makes you wonder what kind of crazy people are in positions of power in the US government. Mullins could smell them out decades ago.
Hatha
Ponce
10th December 2011, 10:40 AM
Freking bastards........there is one in my county......at least I'll be able to come home once a day to feed my cat and dog.... in the other hand.........they will probably make a meal for the Congoles troops that will be patroling my Micky Mouse of a town.
Awoke
12th December 2011, 06:28 AM
Thanks Hatha.
Spectrism
12th December 2011, 06:48 AM
LOLLLLLLLLLL Spect, you made me fall off my chair hahahahahahahahah.
Do you know who was incharged of the Golag camps?......those incharged of their new government......and do you know who is incharged of our government?.........same people who were incharged OF THEIR GOVERNMET......the freaking Zionist.
They won't be called Golag but Fema.......a rose by any other name?
Ponce- you make a nice easy target and it is fun to toy with you. All in good fun for my favorite Puerto Rican.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.