PDA

View Full Version : BP to get 1/4 billion for oil spill



Dogman
16th December 2011, 01:22 PM
What a load of horse shit, that money should go to the states that they screwed up.


BP to Get $250 Million in Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Settlement

By JULIA WERDIGIER (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/julia_werdigier/index.html?inline=nyt-per)

Published: December 16, 2011

LONDON — The British oil (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleum-and-gasoline/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier) company BP (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/bp_plc/index.html?inline=nyt-org) said Friday that Cameron International, one of its contractors in the oil well that burst last year in the Gulf of Mexico, had agreed to pay $250 million to settle claims related to the ensuing spill.

Related



Times Topic: BP Plc. (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/bp_plc/index.html)



Cameron, based in Houston, designed and manufactured the so-called blowout preventer on the drilling rig, which failed to stop the oil from spilling. The settlement, which is BP’s fourth so far with companies that worked on some parts of the well, was not an admission of liability by either party, BP said.

The “settlement allows BP and Cameron to put our legal issues behind us and move forward to improve safety in the drilling industry,” Robert W. Dudley, the BP chief executive, said in the statement. “Unfortunately, other companies persist in refusing to accept responsibility for their roles in the accident and for contributing to restoration efforts.”

BP had already agreed to similar settlements with Anadarko Petroleum and a unit of Mitsui Oil Exploration, MOEX, which had stakes in the well, and Weatherford International, which made a part of the well. Those settlements totaled about $5.1 billion.

Legal fights over claims worth tens of billions of dollars continue with Transocean, which owned and operated the rig, the Deepwater Horizon, and Halliburton, which was responsible for cement work.

BP plans to use the cash payment from Cameron to help settle individual and government claims and pay for costs related to the oil spill.

The company had set aside about $41 billion to cover all costs related to the oil spill, including a $20 billion compensation fund. It said Friday it had already paid out about $7.5 billion to local businesses and individuals.

BP said Cameron agreed that the well failure and resulting explosion of the drilling rig was the result of several complex and interlinked issues and not the fault of one single company. BP said it agreed to indemnify Cameron for compensation claims resulting from the accident as part of the settlement.

Cameron said Friday that the settlement was “the right action as it removes uncertainty facing Cameron in the litigation associated with the Deepwater Horizon event.”

“Though this agreement does not provide indemnification against fines and penalties, punitive damages or certain other potential non-compensatory claims, we do not consider these items to represent a significant risk to Cameron,” Jack Moore, the chief executive, said in a statement. Cameron said its insurance would cover at least $170 million of the settlement and that the company would have to take a charge in the fourth quarter for the remaining amount.

The explosion in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010, killed 11 workers and resulted in a spill of nearly five million barrels of oil.

BP has continued to invest in exploration in the United States and the Gulf of Mexico, and in October received its first permit from U.S. regulators since the oil spill to drill a new well in the region.



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/17/business/global/bp-to-get-250-million-in-gulf-of-mexico-oil-spill-settlement.html?_r=2

ximmy
16th December 2011, 05:50 PM
If banks can make a profit from failure... why can't oil companies?

palani
16th December 2011, 05:54 PM
BP had a contract. They took delivery of a defunct component. That defunct component cost them quite a few bucks. As a result they were injured by the company that produced the BOP.

Why shouldn't they recoup some damages?

ximmy
16th December 2011, 06:34 PM
BP had a contract. They took delivery of a defunct component. That defunct component cost them quite a few bucks. As a result they were injured by the company that produced the BOP.

Why shouldn't they recoup some damages?

"Cameron, based in Houston, designed and manufactured the so-called blowout preventer on the drilling rig, which failed to stop the oil from spilling. The
settlement, which is BP’s fourth so far with companies that worked on some parts of the well, was not an admission of liability by either party, BP said. "


"Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said the oil company told the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight privately that the well failed a key pressure test just hours before it exploded on April 20.
The test indicated pressure was building up in the well, which could indicate oil or gas was seeping in and could lead to an explosion, said Waxman.
"Yet it appears the companies did not suspend operations, and now 11 workers are dead and the Gulf faces an environmental catastrophe," he said, asking why work wasn't stopped on the well.

"It is far too early to draw conclusions about how the incident occurred," said
Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said the blowout preventer may have failed for four reasons: Modifications to it may have reduced the number of shears that can close the well; a hydraulic leak may have knocked it out of commission; it may have hit a section of pipe that was too thick to cut; and its battery power may have died.

Yeah, it appears your right... ::) ::) (double rolley eyes means your response post fails miserably)

http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/12/news/companies/bp_house_hearing/

palani
16th December 2011, 06:38 PM
Yeah, it appears your right... ::) ::) (double rolley eyes means your response post fails miserably)

So if YOU were an oil company why would you purchase a Blow Out Preventer? As a Christmas ornament?

ximmy
16th December 2011, 06:50 PM
So if YOU were an oil company why would you purchase a Blow Out Preventer? As a Christmas ornament?

::)::)::)

big country
16th December 2011, 09:27 PM
I don't often get the chance to agree with palani so I'm taking advantage of that right now. I agree with his(her?) view on this topic. :D

Sorry Ximmy!

You can go ahead and give me 4 rolly eyes if that will make you feel better.

beefsteak
17th December 2011, 05:10 AM
BP had a contract. They took delivery of a defunct component. That defunct component cost them quite a few bucks. As a result they were injured by the company that produced the BOP.

Why shouldn't they recoup some damages?

One cannot injure a "corporation." One can only injure a living man on the land. Nor can one injure a municipality of any size, shape, nor geographic location.

A vendor refund for the "broken part" a prompt replacement, plus an apology is all that should be expected...sub-rata of course. Pro-rata is too good for Blackmailing BP. Thieving elite bastards.

palani
17th December 2011, 07:17 AM
One cannot injure a "corporation." One can only injure a living man on the land. Nor can one injure a municipality of any size, shape, nor geographic location.

A vendor refund for the "broken part" a prompt replacement, plus an apology is all that should be expected...sub-rata of course. Pro-rata is too good for Blackmailing BP. Thieving elite bastards.

So if you purchase a defective car and the defect ends up killing your family you are going to be satisfied with a replacement car?