PDA

View Full Version : £22,000 nest egg from her benefits for her old age has to pay it all back



Serpo
19th December 2011, 02:17 PM
Woman, 58, who saved £22,000 nest egg from her benefits for her old age has to pay it all back, plus another £6,000



She lived frugal lifestyle to build up savings but fell foul of means-testing rules

By John Hutchinson (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=John+Hutchinson)

Last updated at 7:56 PM on 19th December 2011


(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075861/Pauline-Ford-58-saved-22k-nest-egg-benefits-pay-back.html#comments)







A frugal woman who saved more than £22,000 out of her benefits has been left penniless because she did not tell officials about her nest egg.

Pauline Ford, aged 58, lived in a rusty mobile home, never went out, smoked or drank, and only spent the bare minimum she needed to feed herself and her 15-year-old dog.

She wanted to build up her savings for her old age but fell foul of the law by failing to declare her assets when she applied for means tested benefits.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/18/article-2075861-0F384D9100000578-969_468x312.jpg Penny-pinching: Pauline Ford saved around £2,000 a year because she was worried about how she would manage in old age

Ford's miserly lifestyle meant she saved around £2,000 a year and her nest egg grew so large it affected her eligibility for council tax and housing benefits.

There would have been no problem if she had spent all the money but now she has been forced to repay more than she saved and has been left with nothing at all.

Ford, of Valley Walk, Plymouth, who is unmarried, had admitted three counts of benefit fraud and was jailed for four months, suspended for two years by Recorder Mr Jeremy Wright at Plymouth Crown Court.

More...



High 'hidden charges' in City fees are leaving pensioners and savers worse off (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075735/High-hidden-charges-City-fees-leaving-pensioners-savers-worse-off.html)


He made no order for costs or compensation after hearing she now has no savings left after repaying £28,000.

Miss Jo Martin, prosecuting, said that until 2005, Ford received incapacity benefit and disabled living allowance, neither of which were means-tested, and council tax benefits, which were.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/18/article-2075861-0F384D8900000578-776_468x286.jpg Stash: Ford was jailed for four months, suspended for two years, at Plymouth Crown Court

By 2005 her savings had grown to £15,000 which meant she should have declared them when she continued claiming the housing and council tax benefits.

In 2008, she applied for income support, which is also means-tested, without revealing she had just invested £21,000 in a Nationwide fixed bond.

Plymouth City Council carried out a 'Midas' check which revealed her savings, and in 2010, Ford was interviewed by the council and Department of Work and Pensions investigators.

She admitted she had hoarded the money and should have told the authorities about it.

Miss Martin said the total overpayment of £28,205.76 had all since been repaid, and Ford was now back living on benefits.

She said that claimants were entitled to hold savings of £3,000 to £16,000, but received lower benefits on a sliding scale.

Mr Ali Rafati, defending, said his client had a learning disability and mental health problems.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/18/article-0-0A1081EE000005DC-574_468x286.jpg Caught out: Pauline Ford saved more than £20,000 in benefits - but failed to declare it

He said: 'Miss Ford became very worried about how she would cope in old age. For many years she has been living on a shoestring in a rusty mobile home with her 15 year-old dog, saving money for her old age.

'She saved, not spent, but what she put in the bank resulted in overpayment. She has now paid back £6,000 more than she saved.

'Had she spent the money, she would never have come to court. She has no convictions or cautions, and is terrified of being here today.'
The recorder told her: 'On the face of it, this is yet another benefit fraud in a large sum of money. I accept that you have problems with mental health, but I don't accept that you didn't know what you were doing.'

He said people who accepted benefits they did not need were depriving needier people.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075861/Pauline-Ford-58-saved-22k-nest-egg-benefits-pay-back.html
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075861/Pauline-Ford-58-saved-22k-nest-egg-benefits-pay-back.html#ixzz1h19SFWrc

Joe King
19th December 2011, 03:02 PM
How much more would she have had if instead of saving paper over the past 20+ years, she'd spent it on PM's over those same years instead? £2,000 20 years ago would've bought quite a lot. By my rough calculations, she'd have gotten nearly 6 times more than half as much for £2,000 then she'd get for the whole amount, today. {forgot to carry a 1 lol}

Serpo
19th December 2011, 03:07 PM
And buried it in her backyard.

ximmy
19th December 2011, 03:52 PM
How much more would she have had if instead of saving paper over the past 20+ years, she'd spent it on PM's over those same years instead? £2,000 20 years ago would've bought quite a lot. By my rough calculations, she'd have gotten nearly 6 times more than half as much for £2,000 then she'd get for the whole amount, today. {forgot to carry a 1 lol}

They should hire a team of investment experts to determine just how much more she could have saved by investing it wisely, then calculate taxes on that "if she would have" amount and charge her accordingly...

mamboni
19th December 2011, 03:59 PM
More importantly, reprobates like this greedy woman pay the price for daring to accumulate honestly-earned wealth and daring to ask the state for $thousands, while upstanding citizens like Jon Corzine walk free after stealing $billions from private citizens. Without the government to insure fairness and protect the sanctity of private property, the opposite situation would apply.

Glass
19th December 2011, 04:31 PM
They should hire a team of investment experts to determine just how much more she could have saved by investing it wisely, then calculate taxes on that "if she would have" amount and charge her accordingly...

Ha. That's what they do down here in Oz.