PDA

View Full Version : What Is Genocide?



palani
24th December 2011, 10:17 AM
http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/whatisit.html

Punishable Acts


The following are genocidal acts when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group's existence:

Killing members of the group includes direct killing and actions causing death.

Causing serious bodily or mental harm includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation.

Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group's physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.

Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation.

Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by through fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 14 years.

Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group's existence:

It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide.
Key Terms

The crime of genocide has two elements: intent and action. "Intentional" means purposeful. Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders. But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts.

Intent is different from motive. Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorial integrity, etc.,) if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide.

The phrase "in whole or in part" is important. Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group. Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide. Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members -- mass murder. But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.

The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.

A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.

An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.

A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.

A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.

People who herd Maryland children into a courthouse for forced vaccinations that are not consented to are toying with genocide. Any doubt?

iOWNme
24th December 2011, 10:53 AM
What happened to the Lawful State Nationals of each of the respected nations that make up 'America'?

They were systematically KILLED using coercion and fraud. That is the very definition of Genocide.

palani
24th December 2011, 11:10 AM
The existence of Palestinians as a nationality is documented in the U.S. governments' own manuals from the '20s and '30s. Now they deny there ever was such a nation.

I am afraid that this is the case with the several States that originally formed The United States of America as well.

As a federation the U.S. ranks with all other federations on the face of the earth, a mental construct with no basis in reality (and bankrupt to boot).

midnight rambler
24th December 2011, 11:29 AM
The CIA Factbook has the "50 states" as "administrative divisions" of the 'United States' (expand 'government' tab)

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html


(https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html)

palani
24th December 2011, 12:02 PM
The CIA Factbook has the "50 states" as "administrative divisions" of the 'United States' (expand 'government' tab)

But undoubtably administrative divisions of the REPUBLICAN FORM.

midnight rambler
24th December 2011, 12:06 PM
But undoubtably the REPUBLICAN FORM of administrative divisions.

Kindly elaborate.

I'm under the impression that those providing the 'facts' for the CIA Factbook are working for the money powers, therefore my take on their intent regarding 'administrative divisions' is the equivalent to 'political subdivisions' of the Federal corporation known as 'United States'. As in 'administrating' a bankruptcy or as in Mandell House's socialist blueprint Philip Dru, Administrator.

palani
24th December 2011, 12:14 PM
Kindly elaborate.

I'm under the impression that those providing the 'facts' for the CIA Factbook are working for the money powers, therefore my take on their intent regarding 'administrative divisions' is the equivalent to 'political subdivisions' of the Federal corporation known as 'United States'. As in 'administrating' a bankruptcy or as in Mandell House's socialist blueprint Philip Dru, Administrator.

Merely sarcasm.

Administrative law is described in AmJur as the 4th branch of government, one that includes executive, judicial and legislative branches. Administrative divisions would follow administrative law.

Bills of attainder (and bills of pains and punishments) are outlawed by the constitution. Yet if you dig a little you will find that a bill of attainder is not allowed because it interferes with the separation of powers of government. Administrative divisions (and administrative law) blurs the lines that separate the three authorized branches of government.

So administrative government is not tolerated. You can see clearly why by the examples of government excesses and abuses this board discusses daily.

From AmJur:

Definition of Administrative law

Administrative law is concerned with the legal problems arising out of the existence of agencies which combine in a single entity legislative, executive, and judicial powers. Acts necessary to carry out legislative policies and purposes already declared by the legislature are administrative.

Cites as follows:
Mitchell v. Wright, 154 F.2d (C.C.A. 5th Cir. 1946); Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N.J. 99, 71 A.2d 624, 16 A.L.R.2d. 1118 (1950); Floyd v. Department of Labor and Industries, 44 Wash. 2d 560, 269 P.2d 563 (1954)

State ex rel. Woods v. Block, 189 Ariz 269, 942 P.2d 428 (1997)

iOWNme
24th December 2011, 12:25 PM
The existence of Palestinians as a nationality is documented in the U.S. governments' own manuals from the '20s and '30s.


Interesting...Links?

palani
24th December 2011, 12:35 PM
Interesting...Links?

Side by side comparison of the 1935 and 1973 U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual

http://i43.tinypic.com/2q8zkau.jpg

iOWNme
24th December 2011, 01:02 PM
I remember you posting that before. Thanks....

Found this while researching:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine


Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration_of_1917), by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_home_for_the_Jewish_people), it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country