What are the chances we'll have WW3?

[midnight rambler]

Pretty good I'd say, considering the Death Cult is Hell-bent for leather to get there.

http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/thirdww.jpg

[Ponce]

I would say that the chances are from good to very good.

[mick silver]

you guys need to get in line and stop talking like that ... back in line slaves . the master know best he will let us all know when it time to die

[midnight rambler]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugq-KleU8IA

[midnight rambler]

you guys need to get in line and stop talking like that ... back in line slaves

Indeed, we all must be grateful to our MIC masters for the crumbs they throw us.

[Libertarian_Guard]

Chances of something like a WWIII, pretty small. Or very, very small. Reason being, nukes. There is just no assurance of the outcome, so, I say, it won't happen. I've been right for more than 50 years, and I feel safe pressing my bet here. I am not saying nukes will never be used, but I don't beleive it would be an all out response, but rather very limited.

[palani]

Doubt it. Instead I hold the view that the historical events associated with war for the past 150 years have to do with the inability of the U.S. to settle its' (un)civil war. Silent notice is taken of the unwillingness of the southern states to voluntarily re-engage in their union duties or of congress to be seated without requiring a proclaimation from the executive branch.

Bankruptcies go in 70 year cycles. The first bankruptcy cycle resulted in the (un)civil war. The second bankruptcy cycle resulted in the great depression. The third bankruptcy cycle resulted in commercial airliners being flown into tall buildings and recognition that a nation too powerfull to be taken down by direct war might be terrified by people who were not Finigan willing to blow themselves up (evidently this type behavior is expected of the Irish).

[Ponce]

If you think of the past you wil live like in the past and your judgement will be as in the past........we are in a new world where their thinking are not as in the past and in order to move into the future we must have a war....let it be many local wars or WWIII.........I try not to think as us but rather as them.

[Hatha Sunahara]

Chances of something like a WWIII, pretty small. Or very, very small. Reason being, nukes. There is just no assurance of the outcome, so, I say, it won't happen. I've been right for more than 50 years, and I feel safe pressing my bet here. I am not saying nukes will never be used, but I don't beleive it would be an all out response, but rather very limited.

One thing that very few of us suspect, and much fewer really know is how small a nuclear weapon can be made, and the state of technology in nuclear weapons. The MSM feeds us the myth that all nukes are as powerful. or more so, and dirty as the one the US dropped on Hiroshima. Most of us believe that no nuclear weapons have been used in war since then. How do we know that if we are ignorant of the state of the art in nuclear WMDs? I have a strong suspicion that there are a variety of ways known to those in the know to make fissionable material explode. I recently read that if a mass of fissionable uranium or plutonium is saturated with deuterium, or tritium--it can be made to explode with only moderate pressure. The deuterium atoms can occupy large empty spaces between the much larger uranium atoms. Is that a myth? Or is it science? There seems to be a fairly smooth continuum in explosive forces between a cherry bomb, and a nuclear city buster. The whole idea of deterrance--mutual assured destruction applies only to the large city busters. What's to stop WW III from being waged with much smaller and different weapons?

Cyber weapons? Has there been a war yet in which cyber weapons are used? Hackers work for the military in a lot of countries. What about an EMP weapon? That would put us back in the stone age by destroying all our electronic equipment. Why would anyone think that a Third World War would resemble previous wars?

My vision of the third world war is that it will not be fought bewteen countries--but within countries. Every battle will end with the installation of a regime loyal to the NWO. Or one that does not resist the NWO. In that sense, the war will be over when the NWO wins total control of all governments and makes them all vassals of a world government. It may be followed by a prolonged people's rebellion against this global fascist empire. Ultimately it will be a struggle between freedom and enslavement by tyranny. The war will be everywhere, and everyone will be fighting it on one side or the other until the evil empire is destroyed, or humanity capitulates into slavery.

When will it start? It's already started. It started on 911. That was used as a pretense to implement regime change in Iraq, AND to remove our civil liberties at home. The war on terror dismissed all rationality in whatever was left of a social contract that existed prior to it.

This coming war will not be like any other conflict. Most of us ignore that it is going on all around us, and the tyrants are winning.


Hatha

[midnight rambler]

Great post Hatha.

There is much speculation about the blast in Bali and the assassination of Al-Hariri both being down-sized nukes - it is definitely not outside the realm of possibilities.

Also, the Chinese are known to have perfected their own neutron bomb.