Rick 'Africa is a country' Santorum's fundraising SOARS!

[midnight rambler]

up by 300-400%...so it's up to a couple of thousand now?

Note they do NOT mention any totals. lol Nor are any comparisons made to Dr. Paul's fund-raising success.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/02/santorums-fundraising-soars-along-with-his-poll-numbers/

[EE_]

I'm hoping Rick "I'll bomb the women and children of Iran" Santorum, is taking votes away from Romney, paving the way to a big Paul win.
A vote for Santorum is a vote for Obama...no way he can win the general election with only Republican evangelical votes.

I'll be glad when tomorrow night gets here and the Fox smearing and dilution of Ron Paul is over.

[Libertytree]

I'm hoping Rick "I'll bomb the women and children of Iran" Santorum, is taking votes away from Romney, paving the way to a big Paul win.
A vote for Santorum is a vote for Obama...no way he can win the general election with only Republican evangelical votes.

I'll be glad when tomorrow night gets here and the Fox smearing and dilution of Ron Paul is over.

It won't be over, it's really just starting but they will be dealt a blow that will set them back bigtime. They'll have to be very careful how to spin it, lest people get a glimpse of the reality that they are bought and paid for shills for the establishment, things we already know though.

[EE_]

It won't be over, it's really just starting but they will be dealt a blow that will set them back bigtime. They'll have to be very careful how to spin it, lest people get a glimpse of the reality that they are bought and paid for shills for the establishment, things we already know though.

It will be a major blow! The winner will see campaign money pouring in from all over!

[EE_]

People need to start writing the governor of Virginia to protest a possible change of the rules



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IizmWqVq9Cg

[Libertytree]

From what I read yesterday the Va AG has decided to not seek legislative measures to change the rules but the lawsuit filed by Perry and joined by the rest is still in the works.

[midnight rambler]

From what I read yesterday the Va AG has decided to not seek legislative measures to change the rules but the lawsuit filed by Perry and joined by the rest is still in the works.

That's positive news. The lawsuit(s) shouldn't go anywhere, afterall it was the 'two party system' which came up with those rules for 'the process'. How can it be said that those rules are now 'not fair'? More like Melonhead and Goodhair have neither the support nor the organization to get 'er done.

[Old Herb Lady]

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

[AndreaGail]

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

when you google santorum thats the 2nd thing that shows up :D

[osoab]

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

;D uu

[Old Herb Lady]

I think he is one of the most corrupted politicians ever in addition to my previous post, btw. :)

[midnight rambler]

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

Thx, that's awesome.

[JJ.G0ldD0t]

Thx, that's awesome.


I second that.


LOL

Frothy!

[midnight rambler]

'Frothy mix of lube and fecal matter' named 'most corrupt' -

http://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php/press/entry/crew-releases-second-annual-most-corrupt-members-of-congress-report/

[Libertarian_Guard]

Regarding the so called 'Santorum surge' ........ 'Any Zzzionist Will Do' it's all good, so long as the goyim sleep in a poppy field!

[Old Herb Lady]

When Rick the Prick was a senator in PA everybody I know hated him.
That frothy stuff is old news from back in the day..... like '03 or '04 , maybe further back..... can't remember...........
but Santorum blamed his last loss in PA to that internet frothy stuff cuz of his stance on the gay marriage stuff.

[madfranks]

when you google santorum thats the 2nd thing that shows up :D

If you keep going to google.com and clicking that link, it will further solidify that page to other visitors, lol.

[Old Herb Lady]

Santorum's reaction

Santorum discussed the issue in a February 2011 interview with Roll Call: "It's one guy. You know who it is. The Internet allows for this type of vulgarity to circulate. It's unfortunate that we have someone who obviously has some issues. But he has an opportunity to speak."[29] After announcing he might stand for the 2012 presidential nomination, he told The Daily Caller in April 2011 that he had not hired anyone to help move Savage's website lower in search results, but hoped his possible run for president would shift his own site to the top organically.[30] In a June 2011 interview, Santorum said, "There are foul people out there who do horrible things. It's unfortunate some people thought it would be a big joke to make fun of my name. That comes with the territory."[31] Santorum says that news coverage of this matter would be very different if he were liberal instead of conservative: "the Mainstream Media would hit the roof – and rightly so!"[32]



Santorum's request that Google intervene

In June 2011 when asked whether Google should step in to prevent the definition appearing so prominently under searches for his name, he said they should intervene only if they would normally do so in this kind of circumstance.[13] In September 2011 Santorum asked Google to intervene by altering the indexing of the content. Santorum stated, "If you're a responsible business, you don't... allow that type of filth to be purveyed through [your] website..."[35] In response to Santorum's request, a Google spokesperson asserted that Google does not "remove content from our search results, except in very limited cases such as illegal content and violations of our webmaster guidelines."[35]

According to Talking Points Memo (TPM), "Google did crack down" on google-bombing in the past.[36] In an interview with TPM, search engine expert Danny Sullivan stated that Santorum mischaracterized the campaign as a Google Bomb, when it was actually a successful redefinition of Santorum's name.[36] Sullivan argued that, in a Google bomb, pranksters persuade Google's algorithm to send the wrong results for a certain term (e.g., when pranksters caused the search term "miserable failure" to point to George W. Bush's website). In Santorum's case, on the other hand, the term "santorum" still points to a web page about a "santorum" — which happens to be Savage's neologism instead of the Senator from Pennsylvania. Sullivan concluded that, "for [Senator Santorum] to say Google could get rid of it would be like him saying, 'I don't like the word unicorn and I think that that definition should go away.'"[36]

Sources that characterize the neologism campaign as "Google bombing", as well as sources that do not characterize it that way, describe the neologism campaign as a prank.[37][38] Observers noted that search engines Bing and Yahoo have been presenting the offending links second behind Santorum's web site.[39][40]



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_%22santorum%22_neologism