PDA

View Full Version : Rick 24% ron 24% mitt 22% newt 14% wtf?



uncletonoose
3rd January 2012, 06:01 PM
RICK 24% RON 24% MITT 22% NEWT 14%

Taken from entrance polls faux news 4% reporting

learn2swim
3rd January 2012, 06:30 PM
The fix is in...

BrewTech
3rd January 2012, 06:39 PM
LOL... ya didn't think it was gonna be a fair fight did ya?

k-os
3rd January 2012, 06:42 PM
Very surprising fix . . . Rick, really? Ugh. Well, the night is still young.

Ponce
3rd January 2012, 06:46 PM
Sure k-os but I am getting older just waiting.......I think that I just lost my last blk hair.

johnlvs2run
3rd January 2012, 07:02 PM
Just place your vote right here, and it will be counted with the rest of them.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/417JmypGy2L._SL500_AA300_.jpg

joboo
3rd January 2012, 07:33 PM
Who the hell is Rick Santorum?

RU effing kidding me?

BrewTech
3rd January 2012, 07:43 PM
Couldn't they have at least made it believable by have the Romulan win?

MNeagle
3rd January 2012, 08:06 PM
Is Diebold part of caucases?

BrewTech
3rd January 2012, 08:10 PM
Is Diebold part of caucases?

Did you think any "electoral" process was legitimate anymore? Wasn't necessarily Diebold, just "we will count the votes WAAAY over here and let you know how it turned out. Promise we won't cheat!"

Silly.

Olmstein
3rd January 2012, 08:24 PM
Who the hell is Rick Santorum?

RU effing kidding me?

Just google "Santorum". You'll find out.


While I type this, Fathead Gingrich is talking about how important israel is to the US and how dangerous Dr Paul's foreign policy is. Twit.

Shami-Amourae
3rd January 2012, 08:27 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TSxm2V8aVQ

vacuum
3rd January 2012, 08:35 PM
The pattern can be seen over and over again and it's pretty clear: if Ron Paul's ideas get any airtime at all is bad for them. It doesn't matter if they try to spin it, it's just a bad outcome every time.

JohnQPublic
3rd January 2012, 08:36 PM
They will start digging dirt on Rick next. This will propel Ron Paul again (did not work on him).

BrewTech
3rd January 2012, 08:38 PM
They will start digging dirt on Rick next. This will propel Ron Paul again (did not work on him).

No. At this point all they have to do is focus a ton of "++" on the "frontrunners" on ignore RP completely, and the sheep will forget he ever existed. The war will go on as planned, comrade!

Joe King
3rd January 2012, 11:28 PM
C'mon! I can't believe thow some of you seem ready to throw in the towel after one vote. Third place for him right now is not bad. If he'd won, he'd be taking flak like never before. This way he can just keep building momentum without the truly big guns being pointed at him.
...yet.

Besides, hasn't Iowa been wrong, too? The way I see it, since '76 Iowa repubs are runnin' 50/50 on their picks. Not exactly a stellar record, IMHO

Silver Rocket Bitches!
4th January 2012, 05:55 AM
You want to know who Rick Santorum is? Check this out:


In his Senate office, on a shelf next to an autographed baseball, Sen. Rick Santorum keeps a framed photo of his son Gabriel Michael, the fourth of his seven children. Named for two archangels, Gabriel Michael was born prematurely, at 20 weeks, on Oct. 11, 1996, and lived two hours outside the womb.

Upon their son's death, Rick and Karen Santorum opted not to bring his body to a funeral home. Instead, they bundled him in a blanket and drove him to Karen's parents' home in Pittsburgh. There, they spent several hours kissing and cuddling Gabriel with his three siblings, ages 6, 4 and 1 1/2. They took photos, sang lullabies in his ear and held a private Mass.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

Shami-Amourae
4th January 2012, 06:40 AM
Umm... he's a Statist. They all are (besides Paul.)

uncletonoose
4th January 2012, 06:45 AM
I believe Santorum will go the way Huckaby did. It's all about campaign funds, unless there are some big superpac's. IMO Ron Paul will take 2nd place in NH.

Neuro
4th January 2012, 08:21 AM
You want to know who Rick Santorum is? Check this out:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

Certainly a bit odd, but I don't think this is anyone elses business, how they choose to grieve a lost baby... It is also an extreme personal situation...

EE_
4th January 2012, 08:28 AM
I thought the baby was still alive when he brought it home.
This is macabre to bring a 20 month old dead baby home for the kids to see and hold? Weird

k-os
4th January 2012, 03:04 PM
Certainly a bit odd, but I don't think this is anyone elses business, how they choose to grieve a lost baby... It is also an extreme personal situation...

I agree.

madfranks
4th January 2012, 06:20 PM
I agree.

I disagree. As a father of two kids myself, if my wife and I were faced with the horrible prospect of a still birth or a baby that couldn't survive a few hours outside the womb, the absolute last thing I'd do is take it home and make my kids hug and kiss it while singing songs and taking pictures. To me, that's the sign of a very disturbed mind.

po boy
4th January 2012, 06:23 PM
I agree Madfranks and to involve young children in the mix is strange to be nice.

Well to be fair anyone seeking to bomb another who hasn't directly done harm to you or yours is wacked.

Joe King
4th January 2012, 06:29 PM
Since when do hospitals let you take dead babies with you? Wouldn't it be treated as any other body? If not, why not?

EE_
4th January 2012, 06:31 PM
As weird as I think it is, it is still their business and part of their personal liberty to do so.
Now if Santorum used this information in a campaign speech...then it becomes everyones business and open to public opinion.
He didn't, did he?

ximmy
4th January 2012, 06:33 PM
http://eyeswideblind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/sacrif_dees2.bmp

Old Herb Lady
4th January 2012, 06:35 PM
Actually, I am very familiar with this. Usually when a baby is stillborn or dies shortly after, the parents & family get to hold the baby
and say their good-byes, have a minister come in (or not) and grieve etc. , even take pictures
it's generally always done at the hospital. I have NEVER seen anyone take the baby home and then
take the baby to the funeral home. However strange as it may be, I wouldn't do it, but I completely understand if someone else did it.
The death of a baby/ child is one of the most painful things in the entire world.
The siblings grew close to their unborn brother/sister as well.
Most families just do the funeral , but what these people were actually doing was celebrating the baby's birth
then mourning the baby's death. Sounds bizarro, but I bet it helped them to grieve.

I think they have 7 or 8 kids & they have a little girl with a severe genetic disorder.

madfranks
4th January 2012, 06:43 PM
Actually, I am very familiar with this. Usually when a baby is stillborn or dies shortly after, the parents & family get to hold the baby
and say their good-byes, have a minister come in (or not) and grieve etc. , even take pictures
it's generally always done at the hospital. I have NEVER seen anyone take the baby home and then
take the baby to the funeral home. However strange as it may be, I wouldn't do it, but I completely understand if someone else did it.
The death of a baby/ child is one of the most painful things in the entire world.
The siblings grew close to their unborn brother/sister as well.
Most families just do the funeral , but what these people were actually doing was celebrating the baby's birth
then mourning the baby's death. Sounds bizarro, but I bet it helped them to grieve.

I think they have 7 or 8 kids & they have a little girl with a severe genetic disorder.

I guess I can't say with certainty, but it just seems so disturbed to me.

Old Herb Lady
4th January 2012, 06:46 PM
As weird as I think it is, it is still their business and part of their personal liberty to do so.
Now if Santorum used this information in a campaign speech...then it becomes everyones business and open to public opinion.
He didn't, did he?

No but he talks about his special needs child, I believe.
Sarah Palin has a special needs child as well. (she used to talk about him when discussing healthcare, I think)
These are not facts, just "I thinks" . I would need to confirm it to be 100 % certain. ( memory not good on certain stuff sumtimes)

PatColo
4th January 2012, 07:00 PM
on rense radio tonight, starting about 7:08 PM PT (about 8 mins from now):
Webster Griffin Tarpley
(http://www.tarpley.net/)The Iowa Vote

Jim Condit Jr (http://watchthevote2012.com/)
Vote Fraud In Iowa?

Joel Skousen
(http://worldaffairsbrief.com/)World Affairs Brief

listen @ http://www.renseradio.com/listenlive.htm

Buddha
4th January 2012, 07:32 PM
Romney Takes a Victory Lap as Santorum Plays Catch-Up

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/us/politics/romney-showing-financial-muscle-for-next-round.html


only mention of Paul is this on the beginning of page 2 of 2: "With Mr. Santorum’s showing in Iowa on Tuesday night, and the strong third-place finish by Representative Ron Paul (http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/ron-paul?inline=nyt-per) of Texas, the Republican contest was reset as the race moved to New Hampshire."