iOWNme
13th January 2012, 02:18 PM
You gotta love this story's headline...
Listen as person after person of all ages and sexes confronts Mrs. Schwartz about her unfair reporting on Ron Paul.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geQnTX6y07Y&feature=player_embedded
On January 2, the corporate media correspondent said she was worried about the possibility of Paul doing well in the New Hampshire primary (http://www.infowars.com/cnns-dana-bash-worried-about-ron-pauls-success/).
Paul came in second behind Mitt Romney on January 10.
Near the end of the video, Bash says she has received a lot of negative email about her biased interview on January 9 that was cut short by Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign spokesman.
Oddly, she compares the criticism of her coverage to the Arab-Israeli conflict and says there is nobody in the media as fair as she is.
Bash apologists at TVNewser (http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/media-bias-or-misplaced-phrase-dana-bashed-by-ron-paul-super-pac_b106834) insists the comment made to her husband and CNN anchor John King was merely a “misplaced phrase.”
On January 10, Revolution PAC said Bash’s comments represent “strong personal bias.” Said Revolution PAC Chair Gary Franchi (http://www.prweb.com/releases/Ron-Paul-Super-PAC-calls/for-Dana-Bash-reassignmen/prweb9093274.htm) in a press release: “It is clear, when the Paul Camp has to end interviews early with her, that Dana Bash is tainting coverage of this election and deserves a reassignment.”
Listen as person after person of all ages and sexes confronts Mrs. Schwartz about her unfair reporting on Ron Paul.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geQnTX6y07Y&feature=player_embedded
On January 2, the corporate media correspondent said she was worried about the possibility of Paul doing well in the New Hampshire primary (http://www.infowars.com/cnns-dana-bash-worried-about-ron-pauls-success/).
Paul came in second behind Mitt Romney on January 10.
Near the end of the video, Bash says she has received a lot of negative email about her biased interview on January 9 that was cut short by Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign spokesman.
Oddly, she compares the criticism of her coverage to the Arab-Israeli conflict and says there is nobody in the media as fair as she is.
Bash apologists at TVNewser (http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/media-bias-or-misplaced-phrase-dana-bashed-by-ron-paul-super-pac_b106834) insists the comment made to her husband and CNN anchor John King was merely a “misplaced phrase.”
On January 10, Revolution PAC said Bash’s comments represent “strong personal bias.” Said Revolution PAC Chair Gary Franchi (http://www.prweb.com/releases/Ron-Paul-Super-PAC-calls/for-Dana-Bash-reassignmen/prweb9093274.htm) in a press release: “It is clear, when the Paul Camp has to end interviews early with her, that Dana Bash is tainting coverage of this election and deserves a reassignment.”