PDA

View Full Version : Mitt’s Income vs. Your Income



k-os
25th January 2012, 06:36 PM
How long would it take the GOP candidate to earn what you make in a year?

This is interesting . . . and sad (for me, anyway):
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/01/romney_income_calculator_how_much_does_mitt_make_h ow_long_would_it_take_him_to_earn_your_salary_.htm l

MAGNES
25th January 2012, 06:40 PM
.

His real wealth and income is hidden offshore and most likely in Israel.

There are direct links to the raping of Russian by the Oligarchs as well.

Everything you need to know about Romney.

Edit add,
Source for this is Bollyn, not just recent article,
Skeletor and Co. is involved with Stanford as well.
The rabbit hole goes deep.

http://i43.tinypic.com/339h8d1.jpg

ROMNEY'S INTELLIGENCE CHIEF AND CAMPAIGN ADVISER
Mitt Romney named Michael Chertoff (http://www.politickernj.com/51511/romney-taps-chertoff-campaign-advisor), the Israeli agent who supervised the destruction of the crucial evidence (http://www.bollyn.com/the-911-cover-up-the-destruction-of-the-steel-evidence) of 9/11, co-chair of his counterterrorism and intelligence advisory committee in October 2011. The 9/11 cover-up continues.

http://i41.tinypic.com/1zprwnr.jpg

ROMNEY'S ISRAELI HANDLER
Orit Gadiesh (age 60) is a high-level Israeli military intelligence agent at Bain & Co. who has worked closely with Mitt Romney for decades.
Orit Gadiesh (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orit_Gadiesh), former "War Room" assistant to Ezer Weizman and Moshe Dayan, is the daughter of Israeli Brigadier General Falk Gadiesh (born Falk Gruenfeld, Berlin, 1921) and his Ukrainian-born wife. Gadiesh is chairman of the management consulting firm Bain & Company (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_%28consulting%29), the parent company of Bain Capital, and was the company's managing director under CEO Mitt Romney in 1992. "She's like a Jewish mother figure to many of the people at Bain," ex-Bainie Dan Quinn told Fortune (http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1996/01/15/207161/index.htm) magazine in 1996.

palani
25th January 2012, 07:04 PM
How long would it take the GOP candidate to earn what you make in a year?


It would take him 10 years if he starts now to earn what I earn now. [He measures his wealth in terms of other peoples debt while I own what I hold].

It is a shame he is clueless (and poor).

k-os
25th January 2012, 07:07 PM
It would take him 10 years if he starts now to earn what I earn now. [He measures his wealth in terms of other peoples debt while I own what I hold].

It is a shame he is clueless (and poor).

In other words, he measures in FRNs and you measure in ounces?

Shami-Amourae
25th January 2012, 07:51 PM
Romney has about 140-280 troy ounces of gold according to the following article.

Source (http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/9968962-romney-owns-over-250000-in-gold/images)

Sparky
25th January 2012, 08:02 PM
Romney has about 140 troy ounces of gold you know.

Source (http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/9968962-romney-owns-over-250000-in-gold/images)

At least. His gold holdings are estimated at $250K-$500K. So he may own as much as 300 ounces.

In contrast, Ron Paul has declared major holdings of mining stocks, rather than physical. He may own some physical, but I'd guess less than Romney.

palani
25th January 2012, 08:03 PM
In other words, he measures in FRNs and you measure in ounces?

I prefer to believe I measure in reality rather than fiction.

k-os
25th January 2012, 08:05 PM
I prefer to believe I measure in reality rather than fiction.

Same thing! :)

palani
25th January 2012, 08:07 PM
Romney has about 140-280 troy ounces of gold according to the following article.

His use of FRNs (evidence is presented by his income tax return) means his lawform is fiction. It doesn't matter if he had a gold mine producing 100,000 ounces a day. To him it is a mere commodity.

My gold holdings is a single 1/4 ounce coin. I need no more. This is enough to establish my lawform.

Sparky
25th January 2012, 08:32 PM
His use of FRNs (evidence is presented by his income tax return) means his lawform is fiction. It doesn't matter if he had a gold mine producing 100,000 ounces a day. To him it is a mere commodity.

My gold holdings is a single 1/4 ounce coin. I need no more. This is enough to establish my lawform.

I need some kind of palani-to-English translation for this post.

k-os
25th January 2012, 08:32 PM
His use of FRNs (evidence is presented by his income tax return) means his lawform is fiction. It doesn't matter if he had a gold mine producing 100,000 ounces a day. To him it is a mere commodity.

My gold holdings is a single 1/4 ounce coin. I need no more. This is enough to establish my lawform.

I have to tell you, palani, you are one of the most interesting posters on this site, for the main reason being because I do not understand you most of the time. I wish I could have a beer with you and you could explain things to me in terms that I could understand. On second thought, I would have to skip the beer so that I could be as sharp as possible. :)

I can't tell if you write cryptically on purpose (which creates intrigue with the potential to spark critical thinking), or if you are just miles above me, mentally. Regardless, I appreciate your posts.

palani
26th January 2012, 03:55 AM
I need some kind of palani-to-English translation for this post.

Roman Law Maxim: He who would be deceived let him be deceived

Analysis: This maxim basically means that if you are ignorant enough to not know who you are [a flesh and blood spirit filled being - NOT a corporation], then you deserve to be tricked [by your/every government which is ruled by the Vatican].

FRNs are corporate coupons. They are intended for the corporate world. They are passed from corporation to corporation. They represent money to a corporation. As 12 USC 411 states they are intended for this purpose and no other. On the other hand Man creates contracts based upon consideration, specie, of gold, silver or other metals, or upon other valuable considerations or love and affection.

palani
26th January 2012, 04:09 AM
I appreciate your posts.
Thanks. I would hate to think I am boring.

Sparky
26th January 2012, 09:06 AM
Roman Law Maxim: He who would be deceived let him be deceived

Analysis: This maxim basically means that if you are ignorant enough to not know who you are [a flesh and blood spirit filled being - NOT a corporation], then you deserve to be tricked [by your/every government which is ruled by the Vatican].

FRNs are corporate coupons. They are intended for the corporate world. They are passed from corporation to corporation. They represent money to a corporation. As 12 USC 411 states they are intended for this purpose and no other. On the other hand Man creates contracts based upon consideration, specie, of gold, silver or other metals, or upon other valuable considerations or love and affection.

That's what's confusing about your commentary. He holds far more physical gold than most, and appears to be at the heart of a loving family. Other than his politics (which is a different story), why the criticism?

DMac
26th January 2012, 09:16 AM
That's what's confusing about your commentary. He holds far more physical gold than most, and appears to be at the heart of a loving family. Other than his politics (which is a different story), why the criticism?

Sparky,

Are you familiar with Vulture Capitalism?

Mitt Romney is no better than Paul Singer (do you know who he is?).

JohnQPublic
26th January 2012, 09:22 AM
Analysis: This maxim basically means that if you are ignorant enough to not know who you are [a flesh and blood spirit filled being - NOT a corporation], then you deserve to be tricked [by your/every government which is ruled by the Vatican].


Interestingly, Catholic theology teaches that we are a a "flesh and blood spirit filled being".

palani
26th January 2012, 09:28 AM
That's what's confusing about your commentary. He holds far more physical gold than most, and appears to be at the heart of a loving family. Other than his politics (which is a different story), why the criticism?

The challenge was to compare my income ($0) with his ($21,000,000 m/l). I have criticized no one. Perhaps this diagram will make the situation clearer:

http://i41.tinypic.com/ou5t2r.jpg

Awoke
26th January 2012, 10:17 AM
At least. His gold holdings are estimated at $250K-$500K. So he may own as much as 300 ounces.

In contrast, Ron Paul has declared major holdings of mining stocks, rather than physical. He may own some physical, but I'd guess less than Romney.

If the guy made 21 million last year, and his PM holdings are only $500K, he's even more retarded than most of us already anticipated.

horseshoe3
26th January 2012, 10:50 AM
At least. His gold holdings are estimated at $250K-$500K. So he may own as much as 300 ounces.

In contrast, Ron Paul has declared major holdings of mining stocks, rather than physical. He may own some physical, but I'd guess less than Romney.

I would bet RP holds more physical than Mitt. He's smart enough not to list it on the report.

Sparky
26th January 2012, 11:04 AM
I understand the general criticism; I just didn't understand how it related to his gold holdings.