PDA

View Full Version : WTF - Ranger zaps off-leash dog walker with shock weapon



General of Darkness
31st January 2012, 06:53 AM
In the fucking back too.

Ranger zaps off-leash dog walker with shock weapon


Jill Tucker, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 31, 2012




Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/30/MN921N0LQT.DTL#ixzz1l310iDTs



A Montara man walking two lapdogs off leash was hit with an electric-shock gun by a National Park Service ranger after allegedly giving a false name and trying to walk away, authorities said Monday.


The park ranger encountered Gary Hesterberg with his two small dogs Sunday afternoon at Rancho Corral de Tierra, which was recently incorporated into the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, said Howard Levitt, a spokesman for the park service.


Hesterberg, who said he didn't have identification with him, allegedly gave the ranger a false name, Levitt said.


The ranger, who wasn't identified, asked Hesterberg to remain at the scene, Levitt said. He tried several times to leave, and finally the ranger "pursued him a little bit and she did deploy her" electric-shock weapon, Levitt said. "That did stop him."
San Mateo County sheriff's deputies and paramedics then arrived and Hesterberg gave his real name, the park spokesman said.


Hesterberg, whose age was not available, was arrested on suspicion of failing to obey a lawful order, having dogs off-leash and knowingly providing false information, Levitt said.


He was then released. He did not return a phone call seeking comment.
Witnesses said the use of a stun gun and the arrest seemed excessive for someone walking two small dogs off leash.


"It was really scary," said Michelle Babcock, who said she had seen the incident as she and her husband were walking their two border collies. "I just felt so bad for him."

Babcock said Hesterberg had repeatedly asked the ranger why he was being detained. She didn't answer him, Babcock said.

"He just tried to walk away. She never gave him a reason," Babcock said.
The ranger shot Hesterberg in the back with her shock weapon as he walked off, Babcock said.


"We were like in disbelief," she said. "It didn't make any sense."
Rancho Corral de Tierra has long been an off-leash walking spot for local dog owners. In December, the area became part of the national park system, which requires that all dogs be on a leash, Levitt said.


The ranger was trying to educate residents of the rule, Levitt said.
The park service is investigating the incident, he said.
E-mail Jill Tucker at jtucker@sfchronicle.com.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/30/MN921N0LQT.DTL#ixzz1l30wvMXZ

BrewTech
31st January 2012, 07:05 AM
He tried several times to leave, and finally the ranger "pursued him a little bit and she did deploy her" electric-shock weapon, Levitt said. "That did stop him."
The ranger was trying to educate residents of the rule, Levitt said.What I find interesting is witness' response:


"We were like in disbelief," she said. "It didn't make any sense."

Not yet, honey, but in time, it will make perfect sense.

gunDriller
31st January 2012, 07:15 AM
the ranger attacked him with a weapon that frequently causes grievous bodily harm, up to and including death.

therefore, the innocent civilian had the right to defend himself - using enough force to STOP the attacker.

this creates a business opportunity - for zap-proof clothing.

JDRock
31st January 2012, 07:17 AM
whats the name of the ranger?? she need tazing by the citizenry .....public humiliation...stupid biotch.

SWRichmond
31st January 2012, 07:30 AM
I still wanna know what "detained" means. If an arrest or a Terry stop, one should invoke one's right to not self-incriminate. If a voluntary interaction, one should choose to not speak. As soon as you open your mouth, you lose. The Supreme Court has ruled that a Terry stop should last no more than about 15 minutes. What we need now is a ruling that anyone "stopped" by "authorities" has the right to demand an answer as to the nature of the stop, and the right to leave the area unmolested if an answer is not forthcoming. I honestly think this is why they never answer when you ask if you are under arrest, being detained, etc.