palani
5th February 2012, 06:18 PM
http://books.google.com/books?id=NpANAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA6647&lpg=PA6647&dq=%22A+statute,%22+says+Bish.+Cr.+Law,+%C2%A7+291 ,+%22is+simply+a+fresh++particle+of+legal+matter+d ropped+into+the+previously+existing++ocean+of+law. %22+State+v.+Rechnitz,+52+Pac.+264,+265,+20+Mont.+ 488.&source=bl&ots=owuCj60ItN&sig=jTmCC19CiBvdtTa7diX11Q8iMf0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8DcvT9a-KIetsQK0ksSDDg&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22A%20statute%2C%22%20says%20Bish.%20Cr.%20Law% 2C%20%C2%A7%20291%2C%20%22is%20simply%20a%20fresh% 20%20particle%20of%20legal%20matter%20dropped%20in to%20the%20previously%20existing%20%20ocean%20of%2 0law.%22%20State%20v.%20Rechnitz%2C%2052%20Pac.%20 264%2C%20265%2C%2020%20Mont.%20488.&f=false
"A statute," says Bish. Cr. Law, § 291, "is simply a fresh
particle of legal matter dropped into the previously existing
ocean of law." State v. Rechnitz, 52 Pac. 264, 265, 20 Mont. 488.
"A statute," says Bish. Cr. Law, § 291, "is simply a fresh
particle of legal matter dropped into the previously existing
ocean of law." State v. Rechnitz, 52 Pac. 264, 265, 20 Mont. 488.