Down1
16th February 2012, 02:17 PM
but this doesn't go far enough, according to Devi Sridhar, a health-policy expert at the University of Cambridge.Loser at a loser university.
In a commentary appearing today (Feb. 15) in the journal Nature, Sridhar argues that the WHO should regulate alcohol at the global level, enforcing such regulations as a minimum drinking age, zero-tolerance drunken driving (http://www.livescience.com/16020-parents-influence-kids-drunk-drive.html), and bans on unlimited drink specials. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) Abiding by the regulations would be mandatory for the WHO's 194 member states.http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=deadly-alcohol-needs-glob
In a commentary appearing today (Feb. 15) in the journal Nature, Sridhar argues that the WHO should regulate alcohol at the global level, enforcing such regulations as a minimum drinking age, zero-tolerance drunken driving (http://www.livescience.com/16020-parents-influence-kids-drunk-drive.html), and bans on unlimited drink specials. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) Abiding by the regulations would be mandatory for the WHO's 194 member states.http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=deadly-alcohol-needs-glob