PDA

View Full Version : Openly Homosexual Bilderberger Jew Wall Street Insider Gives Ron Paul Millions



hoarder
21st February 2012, 08:33 AM
Bilderberg Group
Thiel is listed as a member of the Steering Committee of The Bilderberg Group, a controversial group of influential business and government leaders who meet annually behind closed doors under a media blackout to discuss world issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel




Thiel, who is openly gay, has also supported gay-rights causes such as the American Foundation for Equal

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Peter_Thiel

sirgonzo420
21st February 2012, 08:38 AM
Quick, everyone off the Ron Paul bandwagon, some billionaire queer supports him!

Hatha Sunahara
21st February 2012, 10:27 AM
Thiel is the founder of Paypal--one of the major tools RP uses to raise money. He's obviously not a zionist, and with his Libertarian views, it is doubtful that he is a statist. So what if he's gay. That's his own business.


Hatha

EE_
21st February 2012, 10:42 AM
I posted his bio on another thread and he has been involved in some interesting projects.
I think once these guys reach billionaire status, they are automatically in the bilderberger group whether they like it or not
I glad someone with money is stepping up to the plate...so what if he likes to eat the poo poo.

Awoke
21st February 2012, 10:46 AM
Ron Paul has made a point of saying that homosexuality is none of governments business.

EDIT

Ziopedia

In a 2007 interview, Paul said that he supported the right of gay couples to marry, so long as they didn't "impose" their relationship on anyone else, on the grounds of supporting voluntary associations.[133] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#cite_note-132) He also said, "Matter of fact, I'd like to see all governments out of the marriage question. I don't think it's a state function, I think it's a religious function." Paul has stated that in a best case scenario, governments would enforce contracts and grant divorces but otherwise have no say in marriage.[134] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#cite_note-gaymarriage-133) He has also said he doesn't want to interfere in the free association of two individuals in a social, sexual, and religious sense.[135] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#cite_note-atgoogle-134)[136] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#cite_note-nhdebate-135) When asked if he was supportive of gay marriage, Paul responded, "I am supportive of all voluntary associations and people can call it whatever they want.

beefsteak
21st February 2012, 11:26 AM
Thanks, Awoke. Good t'know.

Hadn't seen that RP quote before, but he's just saying what I've been thinkin' all these years. Freedom of association. What a novel concept....wonder if someone will start talking freedom of speech and freedom of press and freedom of ....oh me oh, my, where WILL it end?


beefsteak

hoarder
21st February 2012, 11:28 AM
He's obviously not a zionistHe's obviously a Bilderberger, on the steering committee at that. How could he not be a zionist?

JDRock
21st February 2012, 12:01 PM
he,(theil) IS obviously zionist.....it DOESNT mean that rp is. Its just the clever tribe seeking to ingratiate themselves with the movement...a tick looking for a lil blood...

DMac
21st February 2012, 12:21 PM
I've been posting on GSUS about Thiel for almost 2 years now.

Yes: he is a Zionist, he is a bilderberger, he sits on the board of Facebook and yes he is a billionaire.

There is plenty of dirt on him around the net if you want to find it.

And no, I don't care if someone is gay.

Also, just to note, I think RP is the most gay friendly candidate out there, even though it is against his personal beliefs.

DMac
21st February 2012, 12:33 PM
The Jewish hand behind Internet (http://theunjustmedia.com/Media/Articles%20On%20media/The%20Jewish%20hand%20behind%20Internet.htm)


Who Saved Silicon Valley? (http://www.metroactive.com/metro/06.11.08/cover-supermen-0824.html)

Zionism & the Internet (http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/fester/zionism-internet)

and FWIW, some interesting links in this one:

The”Catholic” Arm of Libertarianism (http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/thecatholic-arm-of-libertarianism/)

hoarder
21st February 2012, 01:27 PM
Maybe it can all be explained away. I think it has a funny smell.

mamboni
21st February 2012, 02:23 PM
he,(theil) IS obviously zionist.....it DOESNT mean that rp is. Its just the clever tribe seeking to ingratiate themselves with the movement...a tick looking for a lil blood...

...but..but...he sucks more than blood!:o

LuckyStrike
21st February 2012, 03:05 PM
Maybe it can all be explained away. I think it has a funny smell.

I think it is very noteworthy, although I haven't seen anything about him being jewish. (not that the other indictments aren't more than enough)

Who knows what his goals are, he certainly knows better than to think he can buy RP, my guess would be he is trying to buy influence in the movement and possibly have some influence on RP's cabinet. Jews want their hand in everything.

EE_
21st February 2012, 03:30 PM
In 2012, Thiel, along with PayPal co-founder Luke Nosek and Scott Banister, an early adviser and board member, put their support behind the Endorse Liberty Super PAC, alongside Internet advertising veteran Stephen Oskoui and entrepreneur Jeffrey Harmon, who founded Endorse Liberty in November 2011. Collectively Thiel et al gave $3.9 million to Endorse Liberty, whose purpose was to promote Texas congressman Ron Paul for president in 2012. As of January 31, 2012 (2012 -01-31), Endorse Liberty reported spending about $3.3 million promoting Paul by setting up two YouTube channels, buying ads from Google and Facebook and StumbleUpon, and building a presence on the Web

hoarder
21st February 2012, 03:46 PM
Collectively Thiel et al gave $3.9 million to Endorse Liberty, whose purpose was to promote Texas congressman Ron Paul for president in 2012. There are ways to promote successfully and ways to promote unsuccessfully (on purpose). Maybe they want to "define" the liberty movement by being in a better position to promote it.