Constitution Halts Sheriff

[Serpo]

And the best part is they are Irish............;D



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUjl4LvQM8&feature=player_embedded#!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUjl4LvQM8&feature=player_embedded#!

New York's U.S. Bankruptcy Court Rules MERS's Business Model Is Illegal (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/new-yorks-us-bankruptcy-c_b_824167.html)


http://freedomfromalldebt.com/news-atricles/

[Serpo]

Since Australia wasnt uninhabited before white man there laws are based on a lie and so infact unlawful..........

The legal institutions and traditions of Australian law are monocultural in character, reflecting its English origins.[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Australia#cite_note-0) Influenced by contemporary ideas of international law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law), Sophism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophism), and private ownership, the British regarded the Aboriginal peoples (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aboriginal_people) as being too primitive to have lawful possession of the Australian continent. They chose to treat New Holland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Holland_%28Australia%29) as terra nullius (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_nullius), meaning an uninhabited land open for settlement. Since the Privy Council (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_Majesty%27s_Most_Honourable_Privy_Council) had held that uninhabited lands settled by English subjects would be governed by the laws of England,[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Australia#cite_note-1) there was no place for Aboriginal native title to land, nor for the recognition of Aboriginal custom or law. The reception of English law was clarified by the Australian Courts Act 1828, which provided that all laws and statutes in force in England at the date of the enactment of the legislation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislation) should be applied in the courts of New South Wales (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_South_Wales) and Van Diemen's Land (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Diemen%27s_Land) (Tasmania (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasmania)) so far as they were applicable. Since Queensland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queensland) and Victoria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_%28Australia%29) were originally part of New South Wales, the same date applies in those States for the reception of English law. South Australia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Australia) adopted a different date for reception,[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Australia#cite_note-2) as did Western Australia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australia).[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Australia#cite_note-3)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Australia

[Glass]

The Sheriff one has been posted before. http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59086-Constitution-Halts-Sheriff&highlight=sheriff

I also think there is another post about it here but I can't find. It's still gold though and people like Dys need to watch it and try and comprehend what is going on. It's about the process. It's always about the process when it comes to these equity or admiralty processes. If you get your process right and they don't then you win! It doesn't matter about facts so much as this video demonstrates.

The "deputy" Sheriff clearly says that he has been doing his/this process for 31 years and no one questioned it even though it was not a lawful process.

Ok as to the Australian Aboriginal situation. I think that the British did no consider Australia Terra Nullis until the 1980's when the whole land rights issue blew up in their faces. The letters patent issued for the establishment of "colonies" clearly states that the natives are not to be interferred with. The letters patent also "patently" demonstrate that the power of the issuer of said letters i.e. A Queen or King of England and Ireland (parts thereof) did not have authority as to the land and only to seas and waterways flowing thereto.

Another thing to know is that Aboriginals were not counted in any census by Law until after 1967 when a referendum of the people decided that they should be included. This was the begining of the current problems they have in the communities with alcohol etc. Same as US indians.

This is timely because they had the great Mabo case which resolved terra nullis as statutory fact. It is my contention it does not demonstrate common law fact which unfortunately for Ausrtralians and politicians and the Queen is now biting them on the backside. The Aboriginal people are awake to their rights. The Premier of Western Australia has been trying to get the local south western tribe, the Noonga people to accept $1 Billion dollars Australian and several tracts of "Crown Land" in return for the "Title" to the land on which Perth city is located plus several smaller satellite cities to the south west of the state.

This demonstrates that:


The Government has no claim to the title of the land
The citizens of Western Australia therefore also do not have title to their land because the Govt had no title to land to offer in the first place.
The aboriginal people of Australia as recognised by the Governments of Australia as being the true title holders despite the Governments won't publically admit this.


So the local tribe was offered $1 Billion and junk land in exchange for the title to all their land. An Aboriginal land comittee was setup by the Government with Aboriginal turn coats and traitors to their people who are supposed to rubber stamp the agreement so the Govt can pretend it has reached a deal with the tribe. A Whitewash. These people would not and did not stand for this and they stormed the meeting where this agreement was supposed to be signed (http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/regional/southwest/a/-/news/12847491/native-title-deal-opponents-heckle-premier/).

They reject the deal because:


Its their land
They recognise that $1 Billion is nothing and it will be made into nothing by the Govt corruption of all things measured.
The land on offer was junk land and would simply become reservations like the American Indians.


I say good on them and I support them. I think whitey has to make treaty with them and move on.

Aussies are in for a rude awakening when this finally comes out in the open. No land, no wealth, no nothing. And to top it off the Aboriginals will be the land owners. I can tell you that your average aussie is going to freak out.

We are about to have another referendum where by we will change the Federal constitution to include Aboriginal rights. I expect this proposed constitutional change will also be used to change the succession limitations on the current Royal family. I have spoken before about how the Queen does not have a valid heir because a) she can't be succeeded by a male because there is already another King and all the women are catholic which precludes them from being monarch.

So the Aboriginies will get mention styled on the 14th Amendment to the US constitution and whitey will get the shaft as well.