PDA

View Full Version : What's the next thing a dying Empire should do?



osoab
3rd March 2012, 10:02 AM
Why, get a foot hold in another country. Yemen this time.

Pentagon Confirms: US Troops in South Yemeni City of Aden (http://news.antiwar.com/2012/03/02/pentagon-confirms-us-troops-in-south-yemeni-city-of-aden/)




Pentagon officials today confirmed that a “security team” of US forces came under attack from Ansar al-Sharia loyalists in the southern Yemeni city of Aden (http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/us-security-team-attacked-in-aden-no-injuries-pentagon/), but denied any injuries as a result of the attack. Ansar al-Sharia claimed one “CIA officer” killed in the exchange.

http://news.antiwar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Yemen.jpg

The difference in versions from the two sides actually misses the much more serious revelation of the report, that US ground troops are operating inside Yemen at all. There has certainly been no announcement to that effect, and indeed, several times the Obama Administration has “ruled out” sending ground troops (http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0112/US-won-t-send-troops-to-Yemen.-How-will-it-defeat-Al-Qaeda-there) to Yemen.

With pro-democracy protesters rallying against the US-backed dictator of Yemen virtually throughout 2011, Ansar al-Sharia seized the province of Abyan, and has made inroads in Aden, the former capital city of South Yemen. The US has repeatedly launched drone strikes against Ansar al-Sharia, claiming they are an “al-Qaeda front. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16806006)”

But the drone strikes and the missile strikes and the assassination campaigns were always presented as an alternative to US boots on the ground, not a supplement to them. Talk of sending troops (http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80103&page=1) has always been followed up with denials that such a deployment was forthcoming, and what few “trainers” the Pentagon has previously admitted to having on the ground certainly wouldn’t be meandering through a major city just waiting to be ambushed. The administration has some serious explaining to do about how these troops came to be operating inside Yemen.

Horn
3rd March 2012, 10:16 AM
Another commonly used (less recorded) is support for both factions in a region, so neither wins.

The two losers then need "empirical" investment in the rebuilding process.

Of course once all profits are sucked dry towards the capitol, its time to rinse & repeat.

Bush loved Kaddaffi.

BrewTech
3rd March 2012, 10:41 AM
I remember reading in the empire's last will and testament that it didn't want life support. Respect the wishes of the dying already!!

midnight rambler
3rd March 2012, 11:32 AM
The next thing? Ramp up the death and destruction! Hoo-rah! America - FUCK YEAH!!!

Down1
3rd March 2012, 02:53 PM
What's the next thing a dying Empire should do?

Easy one. Go to India ! And Nepal ! And Bangladesh ! And Sri Lanka ! And Maldives !


We learned today that there are US ground troops in Yemen (http://news.antiwar.com/2012/03/02/2012/03/02/pentagon-confirms-us-troops-in-south-yemeni-city-of-aden/), but what about India? Depends on who you ask.
US Pacific Command head Admiral Robert Willard announced today that US special forces have been deployed to India, along with Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Maldives, as an effort to fight the Lashkar-e Taiba (LeT), (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-17229395) a militant faction mostly active in Kashmir.
http://news.antiwar.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/india.jpgThough Willard was very clear about there being teams (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/US-special-forces-assist-India-to-thwart-counter-terror-threats/articleshow/12118155.cms) deployed to India, the US Embassy and the Indian Defense Ministry later denied the claims, saying that there are no US troops of any type inside India (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2954893.ece).
The revelation is already causing political waves in India, with the opposition Communist Party demanding to know why parliament wasn’t consulted. The External Affairs Ministry’s statement that the US never sought nor had India (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2954893.ece) approved any deployment seems difficult to believe.
Admiral Willard’s admission is particularly interesting because none of the five nations he mentioned was known to have ground troops in it. With the Yemen deployment coming out today, and that only because there happened to be an attack, it seems increasingly the US is making deployments which, if not actually a “secret” they are likewise not being made public in a timely fashion.
http://news.antiwar.com/2012/03/02/admiral-willard-us-troops-in-india/