PDA

View Full Version : Digital Video of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition discovered! Please watch at 1:16 mark



mamboni
31st March 2012, 09:53 PM
Check out this recently discovered video of WTC 7. Fast forward to 1:16 - it shows the demolition charges exploding (at 1:45 to be exact) and the building crumpling just before the free fall collapse. This is direct visual proof of controlled demolition. Please circulate this widely. Who is going to deny his own two eyes?:o




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k&feature=related


Here's the link (thank you Osiris):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=k2Trj_5J02k

Osiris
31st March 2012, 10:02 PM
Link? Please

mamboni
31st March 2012, 10:04 PM
Link? Please

Link to what? It's at Youtube.

Are you blonde?;D

Osiris
31st March 2012, 10:07 PM
Link to what? It's at Youtube.

Are you blonde?;D

Hilarious! It doesn't show up for me:( I'll search youtube for it.

mamboni
31st March 2012, 10:10 PM
Hilarious! It doesn't show up for me:( I'll search youtube for it.

So sorry!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=k2Trj_5J02k

BrewTech
31st March 2012, 10:10 PM
I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.

EE_
31st March 2012, 10:13 PM
Most of us are sure Israel did 9/11
If they wired one building, they wired them all.
We can only hope one day to see Israel get burned by 10 million degree heat.

mamboni
31st March 2012, 10:16 PM
I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??


You know BrewTech, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sheesh.

BrewTech
31st March 2012, 10:17 PM
You know BrewTech, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sheesh.

I edited my comment in an attempt to better explain myself.

mamboni
31st March 2012, 10:23 PM
I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.

OK, I'll bite: what is your point?

General of Darkness
31st March 2012, 10:37 PM
Only a new investigation without any jew involvement will bring out the truth.

BrewTech
31st March 2012, 10:41 PM
OK, I'll bite: what is your point?

I thought I had made it... I must not be as good a writer as I thought.

Look, I can see with my own eyes and rational mind that WTC7 was a controlled demolition... LSstein said as much on camera. To me, that is the smoking gun. It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain who watches that video that WTC7 did not collapse due to fire.

My doubts about the authenticity of the video you posted only address the flashes and noise that would normally accompany a controlled demolition... it occurred to me that it would be easy enough to add those later (especially after nearly 11 years) for a more dramatic effect.

OTOH, those sights and sounds are exactly what one would expect to see and hear... it may be that the MSM manipulated their footage to reduce the visual and auditory evidence of CD for mass consumption, and to support the official story.

I guess my point is, with the multitude of ways that information of all types can be effectively manipulated, it's difficult to know real from fake, and it helps to stay skeptical.

LuckyStrike
31st March 2012, 10:50 PM
That video is as fake as Traficants hair.

mamboni
31st March 2012, 10:55 PM
Only a new investigation without any jew involvement will bring out the truth.

Fat chance of that.

Shami-Amourae
31st March 2012, 10:55 PM
Why does the new video cut away before the collapse?

EE_
31st March 2012, 11:04 PM
If you believe the video to be real and later have it proven a fake. Does it discredit you and show you never had a basis for a conspiracy?
I don't need anymore videos to confirm my belief that Israel did 9/11.

mamboni
1st April 2012, 12:01 AM
That video is as fake as Traficants hair.

OK, I respect your opinion. Now do me a small favor and watch this video at :44 (turn off the sound so you don't have to listen to the Conspiracy Theory theme music LOL):


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=972ETepp4GI&feature=fvwp

In my opinion, this video corroborates the first video I posted.

Cebu_4_2
1st April 2012, 12:20 AM
Conspiracy theory's are just that until they can not be proven as just a conspiracy but they become truth and then it becomes truth and then all you conspiracy fags are right in which I would be right but there is no conspiracy cause I am not a fag so there you go in your world, try to spread the filth that is true while denying the false conspiracies...

Twisted Titan
1st April 2012, 03:36 AM
Weather it is real or not can be debated until the cows come home.

What can NOT be debated is that never in the History of contruction has a fire made a building collapse in on itself at demolition speed and form.

Never is the history of construction has a building collapsed at demolition speed and form as the result of fire from another building being the root cause.


The only way the above can be true is if the laws of Physics and Demolition suspended themselves for one day in the History of Civilization.


The odds of that are pretty dam thin.

gunDriller
1st April 2012, 06:05 AM
I think this video has come up before... possibly a cgi fake?

Granted, I would LOVE to have faith in its authenticity... but 11 years later??

Something ain't right. Wouldn't the owner of the camera know how valuable the video was??

Controlled demolition is a foregone conclusion, and much of what is seen in that video is evidence of that. The flashes and the noise look as though they may have been added for effect however.


i have seen other video footage that showed the explosions in WTC1 & WTC2. i had also seen the video of WTC7 collapsing. i had heard that it was pre-announced.

and it's great to have it all in one place.


it is true that CGI can be used to simulate the 'squibs' exploding. if someone (Israel) wanted to, they could muddy the waters by making video's with 100's of squibs, like a fireworks display. and it would seem very realistic, if it was done right.

another example of CGI - 99% of the movie Avatar.


here is a map of the WTC site -

http://oi41.tinypic.com/10gxkrt.jpg

note that the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) is across the street from WTC1, with WTC6 in between them.

since the official story is that debris from WTC1 & 2 struck WTC7 & brought it down (although early after 9-11, some asshole called into NYC radio and spent a lot of time telling the world that the (magic) jet fuel went down into the underground tunnels and burned WTC7 that way) one has to wonder - if the debris knocked WTC7 down, why didn't it knock WTC6 down ?


well, WTC7 was the home of a LOT of government offices. it was basically a Fed building. it was where the records into investigations of most of the serious financial crime in NYC were kept.

one other note - on 9-10-11, Rumsfeld held a press conference admitting that the Pentagon had lost/ mis-placed over $1 Trillion.

my guess is, the looting of the US that started before 9-11 WAS being investigated, and that's why Israel & their supporters in NYC decided to bring down WTC7.

however, i think they overplayed their hand. the collapse of WTC7 awoke a LOT of people, including Jim Hoffman -
http://wtc7.net/about.html

unfortunately, Jim Hoffman has sold the website. i pray to God that I HTTrack'ed the original website from back in 2006; it was much more thorough. the original website had a section named
research.wtc7.net
that did a REAL good job investigating the physics of the collapse of WTC1 & WTC2. basically, there was not enough energy in the airplanes' jet fuel to raise the temperature of the building steel to the boiling point of water, much less to get it to 1300 F (half the melting temp, at which temp steel still has a lot of structural strength.)

woodman
1st April 2012, 06:28 AM
one other note - on 9-10-11, Rumsfeld held a press conference admitting that the Pentagon had lost/ mis-placed over $1 Trillion.

my guess is, the looting of the US that started before 9-11 WAS being investigated, and that's why Israel & their supporters in NYC decided to bring down WTC7.

however, i think they overplayed their hand.)

If memory serves, Rumsfeld announced on September 10, that 2.3 trillion was unaccounted for from the pentagon. That 2.3 trillion may have been used to pull the crime off. It took alot of money. It would fit their modus-operandi to sarcastically throw such a theft in our faces in such arrogant fashion and then use the crime it paid to produce to bury it. After 9/11 no one seemed to ever question this massive theft again. Certainly not the crime syndicate that is known as the free press in America and most of the world.

woodman
1st April 2012, 06:32 AM
It also must have taken boatloads of money to pay off all the actors and participants in the ridiculous charad known as the 9/11 commission and hide the real guilty party from sight. There is a shitload of guilty mother fuckers out there counting their ill-gotten gains and wondering when if ever they will be held accountable. I am not a believer in heaven or hell but if there was justice in an afterlife these bastards would be kissing the devil's ass for eternity.

gunDriller
1st April 2012, 07:03 AM
If memory serves, Rumsfeld announced on September 10, that 2.3 trillion was unaccounted for from the pentagon. That 2.3 trillion may have been used to pull the crime off. It took alot of money. It would fit their modus-operandi to sarcastically throw such a theft in our faces in such arrogant fashion and then use the crime it paid to produce to bury it. After 9/11 no one seemed to ever question this massive theft again. Certainly not the crime syndicate that is known as the free press in America and most of the world.

i remember 2 people making the announcement.

Dov Zakheim, big time Jew/ Israel supporter, and Rumsfeld.

i remember the Rumsfeld announcement on 9-10-01.

i remember the Zakheim announcement too, just not the exact timing.

as far as what they did with the money - $1 Trillion will finance a lot of black ops. granted 9-11 was the biggest ever, but my guess is the budget for 9-11 was $10 billion or less. building demolitions, 100 Israeli "Art students", alleged Muslims like Mohammed Atta, etc.

i think basically what was going on was, the United States was & is being looted. they put the pedal to the metal shortly before 9-11 and never stopped.

also, my GUESS is that there is considerable overlap between the 9-11 crime gang, and the 2007/8/9/10/11/12 bail-outs crime gang - all New York Bankster Jews. the "Silverstein mafia".

i'm not saying that the demolition team were given $1000 suits and jobs at Goldman Sachs, just that a coup d'etat occurred and the Jewish Mafia took over control of the Jew-S government on about 9-11.

we see the tip of the ice-berg - 9-11, TARP, etc.

woodman
1st April 2012, 07:14 AM
September 10, 2001: Defense Secretary Rumsfeld Announces Defense Department Cannot Track $2.3 Trillion in Transactions



September 10, 2001: Defense Secretary Rumsfeld Announces Defense Department Cannot Track $2.3 Trillion in Transactions (http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091001defensebudget#a091001defen sebudget)

http://www.historycommons.org/pics/icons/edit.png (http://www.historycommons.org/eventedit.jsp?oid=1626004942-97697)

In a public speech to the Department of Defense, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announces that the Department of Defense “cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions.” CBS later calculates that 25 percent of the yearly defense budget is unaccounted for, and quotes a long-time defense budget analyst: “[Their] numbers are pie in the sky. The books are cooked routinely year after year.” Coverage of this rather shocking story is nearly nonexistent given the events of the next day. [US Department of Defense, 9/10/2001 (http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=430); CBS News, 1/29/2002 (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml)] In April 2002 it will be revealed that $1.1 trillion of the missing money comes from the 2000 fiscal year. Auditors won’t even quantify how much money is missing from fiscal year 2001, causing “some [to] fear it’s worse” than 2000. The Department of the Army will state that it won’t publish a stand-alone financial statement for 2001 because of “the loss of financial-management personnel sustained during the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.” [Insight, 4/29/2002 (http://www.insightmag.com/news/246188.html)] This $1.1 trillion plus unknown additional amounts continues to remain unaccounted for, and auditors say it may take eight years of reorganization before a proper accounting can be done. [Insight, 8/21/2003 (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_2003_Sept_2/ai_106909386)]

I just wanted to set the record straight because I see a lot of different numbers thrown about. The actuall figure is 2.3 trillion.

Any comments on my speculation that a lot of funds have been neccessary to keep a tight lid on investigation, as in payoffs to individuals for their compliance?

woodman
1st April 2012, 07:26 AM
i remember 2 people making the announcement.

Dov Zakheim, big time Jew/ Israel supporter, and Rumsfeld.

i remember the Rumsfeld announcement on 9-10-01.

i remember the Zakheim announcement too, just not the exact timing.

as far as what they did with the money - $1 Trillion will finance a lot of black ops. granted 9-11 was the biggest ever, but my guess is the budget for 9-11 was $10 billion or less. building demolitions, 100 Israeli "Art students", alleged Muslims like Mohammed Atta, etc.

i think basically what was going on was, the United States was & is being looted. they put the pedal to the metal shortly before 9-11 and never stopped.

also, my GUESS is that there is considerable overlap between the 9-11 crime gang, and the 2007/8/9/10/11/12 bail-outs crime gang - all New York Bankster Jews. the "Silverstein mafia".

i'm not saying that the demolition team were given $1000 suits and jobs at Goldman Sachs, just that a coup d'etat occurred and the Jewish Mafia took over control of the Jew-S government on about 9-11.

we see the tip of the ice-berg - 9-11, TARP, etc.

No doubt we are being fed upon. It has been going on forever. Just ask Hyper-tiger, He'll tell you all about it. Competing gangs of criminals are feeding off of us like lions on a gazelle. There is infighting, but for the most part they tolerate each other out of professional courtesy. After all, how can you eat the gazelle if you are too busy fighting each other for the gazelle? They tolerate each other so they may feed. They will even cover up for each other because it is the smartest thing to do. The press is their organ of deceit. It allows them free reign to pillage by mendaciously hiding their actions from the public.

The media is the worst enemy ever known to mankind. Without the media we would be far different creatures. It is the mechanism by which the host is induced to stupour while the feeding is commencing. These parasites feed at will only because the media effectively makes their predations invisible.

midnight rambler
1st April 2012, 07:32 AM
The media is the worst enemy ever known to mankind. Without the media we would be far different creatures. It is the mechanism by which the host is induced to stupour while the feeding is commencing. These parasites feed at will only because the media effectively makes their predations invisible.The 'media' is strictly in the perception management business.

"It's not a matter of what is true that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true." --Heinz Stern aka 'Dr. Kissinger'

iOWNme
1st April 2012, 07:43 AM
If this video was fake (added special effects) How come i havent seen this video angle of WTC7? And i have watched ALL of them........Seems a bit suspicious?

chad
1st April 2012, 07:48 AM
i have a very close friend from college who is a u.s. navy super hornet pilot. he's all but told me the plane that "crashed in a field- let's roll" was shot down. according to him, "if 9/11 was in the process of happening, and i called in a visual, i promise you i would be ordered to shoot it down before it reached a population center." fwiw.

woodman
1st April 2012, 07:55 AM
The 'media' is strictly in the perception management business.

"It's not a matter of what is true that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true." --Heinz Stern aka 'Dr. Kissinger'

Hoarder once posted an interesting diatribe on 'virtual gates'. I think there is a lot of 'programming' going on in addition to the cover-up game. Perception is everything. It is what we percieve that is our reality. If we do not percieve that we are being manipulated and fed upon, even though we are in misery because of the predation, we do not percieve it as predation and therefore ascribe our misery to other sources:

I don't make enough money because my boss is a tight-wad. (not because we are living in an artificiall economy)
The hunger in the world is due to poor farming. (not because of warfare and corruption)
The loss of personal freedom is because of radical terrorism forcing us to be ultra vigilant of all citizens. (no tool of totalitarianism here)
etc, etc, etc.


I don't watch the news anymore. I haven't for years. I get most info from the web and I don't think I'd miss it at all if I didn't have the internet.

gunDriller
1st April 2012, 08:02 AM
i have a very close friend from college who is a u.s. navy super hornet pilot. he's all but told me the plane that "crashed in a field- let's roll" was shot down. according to him, "if 9/11 was in the process of happening, and i called in a visual, i promise you i would be ordered to shoot it down before it reached a population center." fwiw.

local Pennsylvania TV interviewed a local Vietnam vet over whose land a passenger jet flew.

He stated that there was an un-marked jet on its tail.

and that about a minute later, there was a loud explosion.

my guess is, the planners of 9-11, which included war-games to pull resources away from the NYC/Boston/Washington theater, made sure to leave some jets behind for damage control.

that that plane, the "Todd Beamer/ Let's Roll" plane, was shot down, i have no doubt. the debris field was not that of a plane crash. it was of a plane shot down in mid-air.


as far as why it was shot down, we are told that the passengers resisted & overcame the hi-jackers.

i wonder if they found out something at that point, like that the plane was under external control, i.e. that the "Fly-by-wire" (remote control) was being used.

had they been allowed to live & tell THAT story, it would have been mighty inconvenient.

so it had to be shot down. couldn't have Todd Beamer telling that part of the truth on National TV.


i wonder if the Jews named a street after Todd instead ? - after killing him.

Norweger
1st April 2012, 08:11 AM
This is an obvious fake to ridicule what the shill cockbags at the old gim called twoofers (man i'd love to punch those fuckers in the mouth). Most wont belive just how degenerate these mofos are and to what lengths they are willing to go in order to ensure their continued parasitic control over the rest of us.

http://oi42.tinypic.com/357g6mr.jpg

Just look at the angles.

woodman
1st April 2012, 09:54 AM
This is an obvious fake to ridicule what the shill cockbags at the old gim called twoofers (man i'd love to punch those fuckers in the mouth). Most wont belive just how degenerate these mofos are and to what lengths they are willing to go in order to ensure their continued parasitic control over the rest of us.

http://oi42.tinypic.com/357g6mr.jpg

Just look at the angles.

Not sure about the vid. I'd like to say however, in regard to the 'agents' who reviled us as 'twoofers' at the old GIM, I believe it was Zap's husband, the original Zap who came up with the best retort to their name calling. I believe it was in discussion with bs detecter, he said "if we are twoofers, what does that make you? Bewiefers? Haha, I got a kick out of that. Too bad he's gone. He was a good dude.