PDA

View Full Version : Hundreds of economists agree marijuana legalization could save US taxpayers $13.7 bil



Serpo
23rd April 2012, 04:00 PM
Hundreds of economists agree marijuana legalization could save US taxpayers $13.7 billion per year

Marijuana prohibition currently costs taxpayers billions of dollars a year to enforce, and it accomplishes little or nothing beneficial in terms of economic benefits. On the contrary, legalizing marijuana would not only save taxpayers billions of dollars a year in unnecessary costs, but it would also jumpstart the economy to the tune of $100 billion a year or more, say some economists.

In an open letter written to the President, Congress, State Governors, and State Legislators, more than 550 economists, including several nobel laureates, draw attention to a report authored by Professor Jeffrey A. Miron that highlights the potential economic benefits of marijuana decriminalization. Entitled The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition, the report states that legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana would do wonders to reduce inflated budgets and generate new revenue streams.

"[R]eplacing prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation [...] would save $7.7 billion per year in state and federal expenditures on prohibition enforcement and produce tax revenues of at least $2.4 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like most consumer goods," say the economists. "If, however, marijuana were taxed similarly to alcohol or tobacco, it might generate as much as $6.2 billion annually."

You can view the entire petition at:
http://web.archive.org

As many as 60 million Americans are already estimated to be spending upwards of $110 billion a year on marijuana, the vast majority of which ends up in the hands of organized crime units. If marijuana was legalized, honest citizens could grow and sell it instead, which would inject new life into the flailing economy, and redirect billions of dollars in cash flow from criminals to legitimate growers.

"At a minimum, this debate will force advocates of current policy to show that prohibition has benefits sufficient to justify the cost to taxpayers, foregone tax revenues, and numerous ancillary consequences that result from marijuana prohibition," add the economists.

Marijuana prohibition benefits Big Pharma, prison system
If marijuana were legalized nationwide, however, the drug industry and the prison system, much of which has now been privatized, would suffer greatly. And this, of course, is one of the primary reasons why these special interests are working hard to squelch all efforts to legalize marijuana at the national level.

According to a 2009 report published by NowPublic, the United States incarcerates the most individuals per capita compared to any other country in the world. And the "War on Drugs," which continually targets marijuana users and dealers, is largely responsible for making America the most imprisoned nation in the world (http://www.nowpublic.com).

"According to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), 30 to 40 percent of all current prison admissions involve crimes that have no direct or obvious victim other than the perpetrator," says a 2008 DOJ report. "The drug category constitutes the largest offense category, with 31 percent of all prison admissions resulting from such crimes."

If drugs like marijuana became decriminalized, the prison industry would lose a large chunk of its business -- after all, who is going to fill all those empty prison cells in all the new privately-owned prisons being erected across the country?

The other major player in the "War on Drugs" is Big Pharma, which stands to lose a significant portion of its business if marijuana is legalized as well. Marijuana, after all, is a powerful, natural medicine that can eliminate chronic pain, balance brain chemistry, mimic the regulatory system of cellular physiology, and even treat cancer, among other things.

Be sure to check out this amazing video about juicing raw marijuana for non-psychoactive medical treatment:
http://youtu.be/rDJv9OgATok

Sources for this article include:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb9414694.htm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com

Cebu_4_2
23rd April 2012, 04:03 PM
legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana

which would make it illegal to grow your own, with huge fines and prison time.

Gaillo
23rd April 2012, 07:58 PM
Save the taxpayers money? I don't think so...
Legalizing it would strip the .gov of its virtual monopoly on drug money, creating a HUGE black-budget shortfall that would need to be made up for in other taxes and/or fines. The prison-industrial complex would also suffer immensely... creating yet another "too big to fail" bailout for private industry. As much as I'd like to see "Prohibition 2.0" crash and burn, I'm afraid that the consequences might be too horrible to contemplate! :o

I grow weary of life in this "civilization" - though I've never grown tired of life itself! ;)

dys
23rd April 2012, 08:10 PM
Who was the mason that wrote in his book that one of the major goals of the elite is to eventually have all drugs legalized?

(btw I'm not arguing against legalization, just making a point that it's part of the plan)

dys

Silver Rocket Bitches!
23rd April 2012, 08:39 PM
The issue is definitely trending towards legalization.

gunDriller
24th April 2012, 05:32 AM
The issue is definitely trending towards legalization.

or, should we say, re-legalization.

before 1937 & Harry Anslinger's tantrum on behalf of the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and booze industries, the 3 most widely proscribed drugs in the US were preparations (tinctures) of -
Opium
Cocaine
Marijuana.

it worked. Dexedrine (meth) was also legal.

i'm not saying over-consumption of any of those drugs is healthy - just that targeted consumption is effective at treating the pains of child-birth, tooth problems, etc.

for those of use old enough to have grandparents that lived 1937 & before - they took opium, cocaine, & marijuana routinely, though it was usually dispensed through a drug store.

we survived under those circumstances. actually, we did better than survive - side-stepping the Talmud-worshippers' creation of the Fed, WW1, the Great Depression, and WW2, which were probably independent of our drug policy.

no one has a right to rule on what you put in your body. they are kidding themselves if they think they do.

the US drug war is the result of a massive delusion in which the general public acquiesces, because they have forgotten their past & the past of their ancestors.

SLV^GLD
24th April 2012, 05:46 AM
As usual, confusion reigns over what legalization actually means.

When it was codified into statute what could and could not be done with cannabis it was then legalized although the specific form of legalization was illegality.

The absence of any legal codification inherently means the absence of legality. Grass clippings hold no legal status for example.

Cannabis has been legalized for a long time. Unless all mention of its use or possession is stricken from the legal code it will remain legalized in one form or the other.

At this point the magic word is decriminalization. Legalization is a red herring.

Libertytree
24th April 2012, 06:50 AM
As usual, confusion reigns over what legalization actually means.

When it was codified into statute what could and could not be done with cannabis it was then legalized although the specific form of legalization was illegality.

The absence of any legal codification inherently means the absence of legality. Grass clippings hold no legal status for example.

Cannabis has been legalized for a long time. Unless all mention of its use or possession is stricken from the legal code it will remain legalized in one form or the other.

At this point the magic word is decriminalization.Legalization is a red herring.

Exactly!

Setting aside the drug aspect and the $$ that go along with it, the economic gains are immeasurable in regards to the myriad of products that can be produced via hemp. That alone would be the biggest economic boom in modern history.

DMac
24th April 2012, 06:59 AM
Decriminalization of MJ, as an issue, very closely resembles our need to build thorium nuclear reactors.

It saves money, helps the enviroment, helps provide cheaper fuel and energy and therefore will be fought tooth and nail to never let the peasants take full advantage!

As Gaillo said, this civ needs a reboot.

Santa
24th April 2012, 07:31 AM
Economists are the problem. Not drugs.

Economists sitting around figuring out new ways to tax and regulate populations. Well, economists can bite my ass.

What we aught to re-legalize is "stoning" and economists should be right behind politicians and lawyers in the queue to be stoned.

iOWNme
24th April 2012, 09:51 AM
Hundreds of Economist agree: Taxing your Private Property could save the Elite from allowing you to be self sufficient.

Maybe there should be a new tax on all Economist's? We could save BILLIONS.....

Neuro
24th April 2012, 11:23 AM
Economists are the problem. Not drugs.

Economists sitting around figuring out new ways to tax and regulate populations. Well, economists can bite my ass.

What we aught to re-legalize is "stoning" and economists should be right behind politicians and lawyers in the queue to be stoned.Well said! Economists are a plague on humanity, or was it pox? I am sure Alfred Nobel is rolling in his grave ever since the Swedish Central Bank in the late 60's decided to award "the Riksbanken Prize in Economics to the memory of Alfred Nobel", most people think it is a Nobel Prize as well... I am sure he has been rolling in the grave considering the ones awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in Norway too... Many mass murderers on that list!

Silver Rocket Bitches!
24th April 2012, 12:43 PM
or, should we say, re-legalization.

before 1937 & Harry Anslinger's tantrum on behalf of the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and booze industries, the 3 most widely proscribed drugs in the US were preparations (tinctures) of -
Opium
Cocaine
Marijuana.

it worked. Dexedrine (meth) was also legal.

i'm not saying over-consumption of any of those drugs is healthy - just that targeted consumption is effective at treating the pains of child-birth, tooth problems, etc.

for those of use old enough to have grandparents that lived 1937 & before - they took opium, cocaine, & marijuana routinely, though it was usually dispensed through a drug store.

we survived under those circumstances. actually, we did better than survive - side-stepping the Talmud-worshippers' creation of the Fed, WW1, the Great Depression, and WW2, which were probably independent of our drug policy.

no one has a right to rule on what you put in your body. they are kidding themselves if they think they do.

the US drug war is the result of a massive delusion in which the general public acquiesces, because they have forgotten their past & the past of their ancestors.

That's a good point. In the book The Emperor Wears No Clothes, it shows testimony by Anslinger before WW2 where he argues that marijuana (a fabricated name to make it sound mexican in origin) causes psychosis in the user. He argued that a man who was convicted of murder had smoked a marijuana cigarette four days prior.

During WW2 the laws were lifted and farmers were encouraged to grow hemp for the war effort.

After WW2, the same Anslinger went before Congress and testified again that marijuana should be made illegal. This time, he argued that marijuana makes the user docile and susceptible to communist takeover.

And Congress bought the argument both times leading to the illegal status we're victim to today.

Neuro
24th April 2012, 01:16 PM
There should really not be any laws attached to it at all... It is a natural plant. Period.