Log in

View Full Version : The Ancient Secret of the Swastika & The Hidden History of the White Race



steyr_m
25th April 2012, 10:18 PM
The white race has been deliberately “cut off” from its ancestral religion of Hinduism, which was practiced across prehistoric Europe for thousands of years before the rise of Christianity. As a result, whites in the world have “lost their Path” and forgotten “who they are” spiritually, discarding introspection in their wild pursuit of money and material possessions. We’ll examine the modern day censorship of Europe’s indigenous Hindu faith, and the suppression of its key symbol, the Swastika. We’ll see how, as a result, whites have lost their past, their future, and the greatness of their ancient spiritual Way.

Hinduism—with its exceptionally high spiritual concepts of the Eternal Soul, Reincarnation, Karma, Yoga, the Third Eye, and Nirvana (concepts that many whites are mysteriously embracing today)—is the lost religious tradition of Europe, long before Christianity and the Hebrew Bible arose 2,000 years ago and took its place. This is not a racist conjecture or unsupported opinion; it’s a fact grounded in academia.

Swastikas Found On Ruins Across Ancient Europe

All ancient European cultures—i.e., the Etruscans, Greeks, Romans, Gauls, Celts, etc. —practiced the same high spiritual religion of Hinduism. We can still see this religion’s central symbol, the swastika, all over European ruins, visible in this 1898 Yale University study:

Most people today associate Hinduism with India. This is correct. But Hinduism was not born in India. It was brought into India, according to scholars. Before settling in Europe, scholars believe the nomadic “Aryans” (or white race) invaded ancient India from the north, bringing Hinduism with them and introducing Hinduism into the subcontinent, where it has existed ever since.

(NOTE: We’re taught in school that the term “Aryan” signifies Hitler’s supposed belief in a blond-haired, blue-eyed “master race.” But this is a lie, plain and simple. Historically, “Aryan” has always meant “white people,” i.e., Europeans. For hundreds of years before World War II, university scholars across the world used “Aryan” to denote “whites.” Do a simple search in Google books and you’ll see.)

Hinduism is still practiced across India today. But Europe suffered a different fate. The introduction of Christianity two thousand years ago cut the Caucasian race off from its indigenous Hindu religious roots, plunging Europe into the Dark Ages from which Europeans and white people in general have tried—but in many ways failed—to emerge.

More here:

http://www.richardcassaro.com/the-ancient-secret-of-the-swastika-the-hidden-history-of-the-white-race-p-1-of-2

and there's also a part 2

http://www.richardcassaro.com/the-ancient-secret-of-the-swastika-the-hidden-history-of-the-white-race-p-2-of-2

vacuum
25th April 2012, 11:43 PM
I mostly just skimmed through this main text. If I got it all correctly, then I think the author is right in many of his details, but the overall picture isn't quite right.

The swastika isn't a symbol representing white people. Rather it is a sun cross, which is indeed seen in many celtic and white cultures (paganism). Solar symbols and allusions seem to be a common theme throughout very many religions. So the fact that an important solar symbol appears in both hinduism and other religions just points to a deeper common connection: that of the sun.

He doesn't even mention it at all. Seems like he's missing something.

edit: of course let me know if I'm missing something here

skid
25th April 2012, 11:53 PM
Very interesting, and somewhat on the lines of what I have read/felt to be true. It is sure to piss off the inane bible thumpers on this forum who so passionately believe in the Semitic biblical god version of things... Also probably why the swastika is a banned symbol.

Neuro
26th April 2012, 02:30 AM
Yeah I think he is correct. Interestingly the highest caste in India; Brahman's are oftentimes of a whiter complexion than lower castes. No doubt Hinduism is very similar to Greek/Roman/Nordic religion, but it has been taking on a distinctly Indian flavor, over the millennia...

cortez
26th April 2012, 04:39 AM
Buddhist and Native American as well

http://www.religionfacts.com/buddhism/symbols/swastika.htm

sirgonzo420
26th April 2012, 06:57 AM
Excellent thread! I've been telling people that for a long time.

DMac
26th April 2012, 08:09 AM
Nietzsche was ahead of his time.

From the article:



Nietzsche charged that the Christian religion ascendant in the West since Roman times has been a magnificent hoax perpetrated by “the Jews” (as he put it), designed to put them into a position of power, influence, and authority. The Jewish aim, he believed, was to elevate the Hebrew God into the world’s God by establishing the New Testament religion onto the foundations of their Old Testament tradition:


“…Christianity can be understood only in terms of the soil out of which it grew—it is not a counter-movement to the Jewish instinct, it is its very consequence… even today the Christian can feel anti-Jewish without realizing that he himself is the ultimate Jewish consequence…”

—Friedrich Nietzsche

steyr_m
26th April 2012, 09:22 AM
Very interesting, and somewhat on the lines of what I have read/felt to be true. It is sure to piss off the inane bible thumpers on this forum who so passionately believe in the Semitic biblical god version of things... Also probably why the swastika is a banned symbol.

I'm actually one of those "inane" bible thumpers.

I don't care about what you believe; but don't try to insult others on what they believe.

dead precedent
26th April 2012, 01:57 PM
Aryan has come To mean "white people" ,but originally it meant you made the right sacrifices, to the right gods, in the right manner according to the Rig Veda, THEN you were an Aryan. Although us blue/green eyed folks primarily were the dominant race practicing this religion. If you weren't an Aryan I cant remember what you were called,but you were either one or the other....Magnes help me out!

D sciple
26th April 2012, 02:01 PM
I'm thinking Aryan somehow comes from Assyrian. And ancient Assyrians are Germans.

iOWNme
26th April 2012, 05:46 PM
http://blavatskyarchives.com/images/esbbbb.jpg

TheNocturnalEgyptian
26th April 2012, 06:24 PM
I'm actually one of those "inane" bible thumpers.

I don't care about what you believe; but don't try to insult others on what they believe.

What you posted in the OP suggests that Christianity is directly responsible for the Dark Ages...........


Europe suffered a different fate. The introduction of Christianity two thousand years ago cut the Caucasian race off from its indigenous Hindu religious roots, plunging Europe into the Dark Ages

gunDriller
26th April 2012, 06:30 PM
Most people today associate Hinduism with India. This is correct. But Hinduism was not born in India. It was brought into India, according to scholars. Before settling in Europe, scholars believe the nomadic “Aryans” (or white race) invaded ancient India from the north, bringing Hinduism with them and introducing Hinduism into the subcontinent, where it has existed ever since.

invaded India from the North - isn't China North of India ?

http://geopolicraticus.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/china-india-map.gif?w=460

or, if it was from the Northwest - isn't that sort of the Khazaria area ?

sirgonzo420
26th April 2012, 06:35 PM
invaded India from the North - isn't China North of India ?

http://geopolicraticus.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/china-india-map.gif?w=460

or, if it was from the Northwest - isn't that sort of the Khazaria area ?

The ancient Aryans were not Khazars.

And I assume you are familiar with the white mummies in China?

skid
26th April 2012, 07:59 PM
I'm actually one of those "inane" bible thumpers.

I don't care about what you believe; but don't try to insult others on what they believe.

I respect you Steyr, and didn't mean to insult you. However, I have seen some of the other "christians" on this board pile on the insults/damnations to the non-believers, hence my comment. Those were the inane bible thumpers I was referring to.

steyr_m
26th April 2012, 08:58 PM
I respect you Steyr, and didn't mean to insult you. However, I have seen some of the other "christians" on this board pile on the insults/damnations to the non-believers, hence my comment. Those were the inane bible thumpers I was referring to.

Ok, thanks for the clarification....

steyr_m
26th April 2012, 09:01 PM
What you posted in the OP suggests that Christianity is directly responsible for the Dark Ages...........

I know it did, but because I posted it, doesn't mean I agree with every word in it. I believe Christianity created one of the greatest Civ in recorded history.

Santa
27th April 2012, 07:35 AM
Aryan, Arian, Iranian, Indis, Indian, Indo-European.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URqN0Iu64D4

gunDriller
27th April 2012, 07:46 AM
The ancient Aryans were not Khazars.

And I assume you are familiar with the white mummies in China?

not on a first name basis. :)

Horn
27th April 2012, 08:12 AM
It is really interesting to know how and where you have come from. I am an Aryan born in Nepal and right from my childhood I had a deep thought about my origin as well. Aryans are not an indigenous people of Nepal; most of them have reached Nepal migrating through India. But that was not my main concern, I was more concerned about how the whole map of Aryan people movement from the very beginning, when there were no boarders or continents.http://punkbuddhaz.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/indoeuropean-language-family-tree.jpg

http://punkbuddhaz.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/aryans-migration-to-nepal/


In the 18/19th centuries historians imagined a conquering Aryan race that spread their language from Ireland to India an idea seized upon by Hitler who insisted that Aryans are Nordic! The racial interpretation of linguistical evidence is even shakier than Hitler’s geography.

mamboni
27th April 2012, 11:42 AM
Tagg

steyr_m
27th April 2012, 02:14 PM
http://punkbuddhaz.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/aryans-migration-to-nepal/

If that was a branch on the top of the tree, what is the "Mother Tongue"?

Horn
27th April 2012, 03:48 PM
If that was a branch on the top of the tree, what is the "Mother Tongue"?

They tried, but found out that they needed an interpreter to go further down the tree.

Horn
27th April 2012, 04:14 PM
!XU!

You know as well as I, most of those British Phd. are fantasy cuckholder's coming from broken homes.

What's amazing is the Finnish language apparently has no start.

steyr_m
27th April 2012, 06:00 PM
You know as well as I, most of those British Phd. are fantasy cuckholder's coming from broken homes.

What's amazing is the Finnish language apparently has no start.

Yeah, and our PC Educational system loves the "Out of Africa" concept....

Horn
27th April 2012, 06:43 PM
Finnish language origins and Saami people

szarv = sarvi (horn) = sa (a person hears the talking from someone. the person uses tool to kill animal; pig, chicken etc.)

http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t13800.htm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WyUOlcnO_o


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYyI0BJkyNg


talvisin noihin maisemiin mereen saatettiin kipata satoja autokuormallisia Helsingin kaduilta kerättyä lunta ja sohjoa, kesäisin tosi herttaista seutua; silta Pohjoisrannasta Sörnäisten rantatielle valmistui muistaakseni 60-luvun alussa; olin tuohon aikaa hommissa Meritullintorin maisemissa sijainneessa isossa tupakkafirmassa; en viihtynyt, mieli halasi musiikin ja kirjoittamisen pariin; Taipale, Tammi ja Grön taistelivat ykkössijoista, rautalankamusiikki teki läpimurtonsa.

Horn
1st May 2012, 06:45 PM
Who Are the Gypsies?




It is not only in the highly romanticized versions of popular lore that the "Gypsies" are shrouded in mystery; scientific accounts of their origins reflect some degree of uncertainty as well.

It appears that the term "gypsy" is a corruption of "Egyptian," reflecting the widespread belief during the Middle Ages that these people were of Egyptian origin. It is most likely that they originated in northern India, in the Punjab region. Another interpretation claims that they acquired the name "gypsies" from their settlement in the Greek Peloponneseus near a village named "Gyppe" (see Burleigh and Wippermann, 1991:331n). The people fairly consistently call themselves Rom, or Roma.

What is known about the Sinti and Roma is that they arrived in Germany in the late 1400's after a series of migrations which brought them from northern India, through Persia, Asia Minor and Greece, the Balkan and Slavic States, to Austria and Germany. Along the way, they converted to Christianity. Also, along the way, they acquired a wide range of stereotypes including "accomplices to the Crucifixion," thieves, practitioners of the magic arts, beggars, etc. Their itenerant lifestyles, non-conventional behaviors and mystical image brought them under governmental suspicion from the early Middle Ages on.

They were fairly consistently defined as "stateless" wanderers, a threat to the moral order and a burden upon society.
http://frank.mtsu.edu/~baustin/gypsies.html (http://frank.mtsu.edu/%7Ebaustin/gypsies.html)

http://books.google.co.cr/books?id=ui3nAXVstroC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&dq=aryan+gypsy&source=bl&ots=-sWrK7w5Pk&sig=OAXCtxyOiodsMarlMubXwTmzIg0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fX2gT5-FH8XL2QXd-bjnAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=aryan%20gypsy&f=false