5 arrested for allegedly trying to blow up Ohio bridge

[Cebu_4_2]

Why are they all wearing lipstick?

5 arrested for allegedly trying to blow up Ohio bridge

Published May 01, 2012
FoxNews.com Why are they all wearing lipstick?




http://www.fncstatic.com/static/all/img/vp-overlay-118.pnghttp://global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/fn2/video/anr_bombplot_050112.jpg (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/01/5-arrested-for-allegedly-trying-to-blow-up-ohio-bridge/#)



http://global.fncstatic.com/static/all/img/vp-overlay-16.pnghttp://a57.foxnews.com/img.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/fn2/video/84/47/anr_bombplot_050112.jpg (http://video.foxnews.com/v/1614889669001/5-men-arrested-in-plot-to-bomb-ohio-bridge)
5 men arrested in plot to bomb Ohio bridge (http://video.foxnews.com/v/1614889669001/5-men-arrested-in-plot-to-bomb-ohio-bridge)
http://global.fncstatic.com/static/all/img/vp-overlay-16.pnghttp://a57.foxnews.com/img.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/fn2/video/84/47/050112_fbi_plot_640.jpg (http://video.foxnews.com/v/1615799960001/official-on-alleged-anarchist-bomb-plot-in-cleveland)
Official on alleged anarchist bomb plot... (http://video.foxnews.com/v/1615799960001/official-on-alleged-anarchist-bomb-plot-in-cleveland)




URGENT: Five people described as anarchists were arrested Monday in a Cleveland-area park for allegedly trying to blow up a bridge, sources tell Fox News.
The public was never in danger from the explosive devices, which were inoperable and controlled by an undercover FBI employee, according to sources close to the investigation.
A criminal complaint was filed Tuesday morning in U.S. District Court in Cleveland. Court documents say three of the suspects are self-proclaimed anarchists who formed a small group and considered a series of plots over several months.
According to the complaint, the suspects initially planned to use smoke grenades to distract law enforcement so that they could topple financial institution signs atop high-rise buildings in Cleveland. However, the plot later called for C-4 explosives contained in two improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, to be placed and remotely detonated, according to authorities.
The final plan allegedly named the Route 82 Brecksville-Northfield High Level Bridge, which crosses from Brecksville to Sagamore Hills, as the designated target. The IED drop location was reportedly under the bridge on the Ohio & Erie Canal Towpath Trail near the Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad Brecksville Station.
The suspects were identified Tuesday as Brandon Baxter, 20; Anthony Hayne, 35; Joshua Stafford, 23; Connor Stevens, 20; and Douglas Wright, 26, Fox affiliate WJW-TV reported.
Baxter, Hayne and Wright were arrested Monday night by members of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force on charges of conspiracy and attempted use of explosive materials to damage physical property affecting interstate commerce, according to the station.
"The safety of the citizens of the Northern District of Ohio is and continues to be our primary focus," Stephen D. Anthony, Special Agent in Charge of the Cleveland Division of the FBI, said in a statement Tuesday.
"The individuals charged in this plot were intent on using violence to express their ideological views. The Joint Terrorism Task Force will continue to be vigilant in its efforts to detect and disrupt any terrorism threat, domestic or international," Anthony said.
It is unknown if the bridge incident was connected to Occupy Wall Street's plans for nationwide protests Tuesday.
Fox News' Mike Levine contributed to this report.
Click for more on this story from Fox 8 (http://fox8.com/2012/05/01/source-5-arrested-in-cleveland-for-trying-to-blow-up-bridge/)

[Spectrism]

Sounds like some morons egged on by FBI.

[solid]

Sounds like some morons egged on by FBI.

Definitely, wouldn't surprise me if the FBI sold these guys the Ohio Bridge first. "it's not a crime to blow up your own bridge". The FBI is probably out with prostitutes paid for by these guy's bridge money.

[Ares]

Apparently it's not entrapment when the government does it.

[willie pete]

Apparently it's not entrapment when the government does it.

nope, just ask Randy Weaver ::)

[Book]

http://wtfman.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/1062-HomelessShelter2.jpg
"Interested in blowing up a bridge for a bottle of whiskey?"

[Celtic Rogue]

Thank god we have the FBI or hell... we wouldnt have caught all of these terrorists! LOL What a F'ing joke. EVERY last one of the so called terrorist(s) were all in control of their fbi handlers. Supplied with fake explosives and I am sure they egged them on to commit the crime.

The pace of the HLS intrusion into our lives has seemed to be put into high gear. Every day a new executive order allowing your rights to be taken away and also your freedom. I think that there might not be an election this year... and martial law enacted. and who knows what nasty business will happen then? The noose seems to be tightening!

[iOWNme]

Look at what the NYTimes is talking about now:

(Remember the dialectic)

Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1




THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
Enlarge This Image (javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2012/04/29/sunday-review/29SHIPLER.html','29SHIPLER_html','width=542,height =630,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes'))
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/04/29/sunday-review/29SHIPLER/29SHIPLER-articleInline.jpg (javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2012/04/29/sunday-review/29SHIPLER.html','29SHIPLER_html','width=542,height =630,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes'))
Clay Rodery




But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.
When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/us/28portland.html?pagewanted=all), thought of using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat. To trigger the bomb the student punched a number into a cellphone and got no boom, only a bust.
This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of themselves — too sure, perhaps.
Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court. Defendants invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because the law requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime, even when induced by government agents. To underscore their predisposition, many suspects are “warned about the seriousness of their plots and given opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman. But not always, recorded conversations show. Sometimes they are coaxed to continue.
Undercover operations, long practiced by the F.B.I., have become a mainstay of counterterrorism, and they have changed in response to the post-9/11 focus on prevention. “Prior to 9/11 it would be very unusual for the F.B.I. to present a crime opportunity that wasn’t in the scope of the activities that a person was already involved in,” said Mike German of the American Civil Liberties Union, a lawyer and former F.B.I. agent who infiltrated white supremacist groups. An alleged drug dealer would be set up to sell drugs to an undercover agent, an arms trafficker to sell weapons. That still happens routinely, but less so in counterterrorism, and for good reason.
“There isn’t a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God,” a former federal prosecutor, David Raskin, explained.
“You’re not going to be able to go to a street corner and find somebody who’s already blown something up,” he said. Therefore, the usual goal is not “to find somebody who’s already engaged in terrorism but find somebody who would jump at the opportunity if a real terrorist showed up in town.”
And that’s the gray area. Who is susceptible? Anyone who plays along with the agents, apparently. Once the snare is set, law enforcement sees no choice. “Ignoring such threats is not an option,” Mr. Boyd argued, “given the possibility that the suspect could act alone at any time or find someone else willing to help him.”
Typically, the stings initially target suspects for pure speech — comments to an informer outside a mosque, angry postings on Web sites, e-mails with radicals overseas — then woo them into relationships with informers, who are often convicted felons working in exchange for leniency, or with F.B.I. agents posing as members of Al Qaeda or other groups.
Some targets have previous involvement in more than idle talk: for example, Waad Ramadan Alwan, an Iraqi in Kentucky, whose fingerprints were found on an unexploded roadside bomb near Bayji, Iraq, and Raja Khan of Chicago (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-06/chicago-cabbie-khan-pleads-guilty-to-one-count-of-supporting-al-qaeda-ally.html), who had sent funds to an Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan.

But others seem ambivalent, incompetent and adrift, like hapless wannabes looking for a cause that the informer or undercover agent skillfully helps them find. Take the Stinger missile defendant James Cromitie, a low-level drug dealer with a criminal record that included no violence or hate crime, despite his rants against Jews. “He was searching for answers within his Islamic faith,” said his lawyer, Clinton W. Calhoun III, who has appealed his conviction. “And this informant, I think, twisted that search in a really pretty awful way, sort of misdirected Cromitie in his search and turned him towards violence.”
THE informer, Shahed Hussain, had been charged with fraud, but avoided prison and deportation by working undercover in another investigation. He was being paid by the F.B.I. to pose as a wealthy Pakistani with ties to Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group that Mr. Cromitie apparently had never heard of before they met by chance in the parking lot of a mosque.
“Brother, did you ever try to do anything for the cause of Islam?” Mr. Hussain asked at one point.
“O.K., brother,” Mr. Cromitie replied warily, “where you going with this, brother?”
Two days later, the informer told him, “Allah has more work for you to do,” and added, “Revelation is going to come in your dreams that you have to do this thing, O.K.?” About 15 minutes later, Mr. Hussain proposed the idea of using missiles, saying he could get them in a container from China. Mr. Cromitie laughed.
Reading hundreds of pages of transcripts of the recorded conversations is like looking at the inkblots of a Rorschach test. Patterns of willingness and hesitation overlap and merge. “I don’t want anyone to get hurt,” Mr. Cromitie said, and then explained that he meant women and children. “I don’t care if it’s a whole synagogue of men.” It took 11 months of meandering discussion and a promise of $250,000 to lead him, with three co-conspirators he recruited, to plant fake bombs at two Riverdale synagogues.
“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,” said Judge Colleen McMahon, sentencing him to 25 years. She branded it a “fantasy terror operation” but called his attempt “beyond despicable” and rejected his claim of entrapment.
The judge’s statement was unusual, but Mr. Cromitie’s characteristics were not. His incompetence and ambivalence could be found among other aspiring terrorists whose grandiose plans were nurtured by law enforcement. They included men who wanted to attack fuel lines at Kennedy International Airport; destroy the Sears Tower (now Willis Tower) in Chicago; carry out a suicide bombing near Tampa Bay, Fla., and bomb subways in New York and Washington. Of the 22 most frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on American soil, 14 were developed in sting operations.
Another New York City subway plot, which recently went to trial, needed no help from government. Nor did a bombing attempt in Times Square, the abortive underwear bombing in a jetliner over Detroit, a planned attack on Fort Dix, N.J., and several smaller efforts. Some threats are real, others less so. In terrorism, it’s not easy to tell the difference.