PDA

View Full Version : John TRAVOLTA: Gay Jews control Hollywood



sirgonzo420
8th May 2012, 12:10 PM
At least, that's according to a recently filed lawsuit against him in which the masseur Plaintiff claims Travolta tried to have sex with him.


Not only did Travolta allegedly try to have sex with the masseur, but he is also said to have told the plantiff -- identified only as "John Doe" -- that he "got where he is now due to sexual favors he had performed when he was in his 'Welcome Back, Kotter' days," and that "Hollywood is controlled by homosexual Jewish men who expect favors in return for sexual activity."http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/07/john-travolta-masseur-lawsuit-gay_n_1498005.html?ref=celebrity&ir=Celebrity

The full lawsuit is available here: http://images.eonline.com/static/news/pdf/TravoltaLawsuit.pdf

JohnQPublic
8th May 2012, 12:35 PM
What a scuz (either of them depending on what the actual truth is).

vacuum
8th May 2012, 12:35 PM
The allegations and the response to them just seem like the whole thing is completely true.

learn2swim
8th May 2012, 12:45 PM
Former Child Star Corey Feldman: Paedophilia Rampant in Hollywood. And, Hollywood is controlled by who?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOZQHxJlD6g

iOWNme
8th May 2012, 12:46 PM
There was a documentary called 'Dont Go West' made by the Celtic Rebel about homosexual activity in Hollywood. The premise was the exact same: You CANNOT make it in Hollywood as a male actor without going 'Both Ways'. Google and Youtube have pulled it, but i found a part II of it here:

http://www.4shared.com/video/lH3Am1-k/Celtic_Rebel-_Dont_Go_West_V20.htm


This 'Rabitt Hole' goes very deep...........No pun intended.


EDIT: Thanks Osoab!

Here is a 7 min clip from 'Dont Go West'.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwAQtgwHqRg

joboo
8th May 2012, 12:47 PM
What famous person would tell anyone they got where they did in their career due to performing sexual favors?

Riiiight...

JohnQPublic
8th May 2012, 12:48 PM
Former Child Star Corey Feldman: Paedophilia Rampant in Hollywood. And, Hollywood is controlled by who?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOZQHxJlD6g

2772

Awoke
8th May 2012, 12:50 PM
Who is that in the picture, JQP?

learn2swim
8th May 2012, 12:55 PM
What famous person would tell anyone they got where they did in their career due to performing sexual favors?

Riiiight...

It's not like he was making a public statement, he was trying to convince a dude to have sex with him.

learn2swim
8th May 2012, 12:58 PM
Who is that in the picture, JQP?


Jewish Hollywood Director Pedophile Roman Polanski.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski

joboo
8th May 2012, 01:13 PM
It's not like he was making a public statement, he was trying to convince a dude to have sex with him.

When you're famous anything you tell anyone of that caliber is one step away from becoming public.

In the same light why would anyone totally undermine themselves on such a level in any situation? It simply doesn't add up.

gunDriller
8th May 2012, 01:17 PM
not only did Travolta allegedly try to have sex with the masseur, but he is also said to have told the plantiff -- identified only as "John Doe" -- that he "got where he is now due to sexual favors he had performed when he was in his 'Welcome Back, Kotter' days," and that "Hollywood is controlled by homosexual Jewish men who expect favors in return for sexual activity."

so in exchange for blow jobs, hand jobs, or (well we'll just stop there) Travolta moved from the Hollywood third string to the Hollywood first string ? possibly about the time of Saturday Night Fever ?

and here i thought it was his dancing skills and his Scientology that helped John get ahead.


i think it's more accurate to say, Hollywood is controlled by Jews who also happen to be Zionists, AND have a high tolerance for Gays & Pedophiles. for every Geffen (gay) there's a Spielberg or 2 (straight or bisexual).

for example, one of the most influential agents in this generation - Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother. married with children.

so maybe Jerry Sandusky will resurrect his career in Hollywood ? he'd fit right in.

Libertytree
8th May 2012, 01:23 PM
The same shit happened in Nashville after tune town invited/begged for the major Cali record people to come in and give Nashville a professional makeover, it was fucking sickening! I could have got songs recorded if I was willing to do certain things..At the time there were a lot of very young country acts being lured into the biz and I for one was NOT surprised. I said fuck it and left, no amount of success is worth selling your morality and integrity. I hate those motherfuckers!!

vacuum
8th May 2012, 01:42 PM
When you're famous anything you tell anyone of that caliber is one step away from becoming public.

In the same light why would anyone totally undermine themselves on such a level in any situation? It simply doesn't add up.
From everything I know, this type of behavior seems like a common occurrence: people in these circles seem to talk freely. Generally no one will ever believe them unless they are already in the know, so there is no reason to hide anything.

willie pete
8th May 2012, 01:59 PM
I'm not even surprised, I wouldn't doubt it a second

vacuum
8th May 2012, 01:59 PM
so in exchange for blow jobs, hand jobs, or (well we'll just stop there) Travolta moved from the Hollywood third string to the Hollywood first string ? possibly about the time of Saturday Night Fever ?

and here i thought it was his dancing skills and his Scientology that helped John get ahead.


i think it's more accurate to say, Hollywood is controlled by Jews who also happen to be Zionists, AND have a high tolerance for Gays & Pedophiles. for every Geffen (gay) there's a Spielberg or 2 (straight or bisexual).

for example, one of the most influential agents in this generation - Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother. married with children.

so maybe Jerry Sandusky will resurrect his career in Hollywood ? he'd fit right in.
I view it that there are many exceptional people who go to hollywood. Of those exceptional people, the ones who become big are those who take the required step.

osoab
8th May 2012, 02:03 PM
There was a documentary called 'Dont Go West' made by the Celtic Rebel about homosexual activity in Hollywood. The premise was the exact same: You CANNOT make it in Hollywood as a male actor without going 'Both Ways'. Google and Youtube have pulled it, but i found a part II of it here:

http://www.4shared.com/video/lH3Am1-k/Celtic_Rebel-_Dont_Go_West_V20.htm




This 'Rabitt Hole' goes very deep...........No pun intended.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwAQtgwHqRg

http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/6061501/Don_t_Go_West_by_The_Celtic_Rebel

Edit, here is the page on Celtic Rebel's site.

http://celticrebel.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/dont-go-west-v-two/

There are a few links posted for the vid.

lapis
8th May 2012, 02:03 PM
Hmmm. One of the comments leads me to believe that the masseur may be gay as well:


"The suit also describes Travolta's genitalia as "roughly 8 inches in length" with pubic hair that was "wirey and unkempt."

Unkempt? What is kempt male pubic hair?

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused013.gif http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused004.gif ::)

BTW, this is a rhetorical question only! I don't really want to know. No, really. http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-laughing002.gif

Uncle Salty
8th May 2012, 02:09 PM
This is just an extension of the Monarch Programming. Sex slaves for fame. Simple.

solid
8th May 2012, 02:12 PM
I think this is purely about money. If you are man, and pursue male massage as a career, you are most likely gay. Also, if you are man who chooses another man for a massage, you are most likely gay too. There's no reason why Travolta couldn't have gotten a massage from a hot gal.

So, it seems obvious to me, that the male massager is trying to shakedown John for 2 million.

Old Herb Lady
8th May 2012, 02:15 PM
Hmmm. One of the comments leads me to believe that the masseur may be gay as well:

"The suit also describes Travolta's genitalia as "roughly 8 inches in length" with pubic hair that was "wirey and unkempt."
Unkempt? What is kempt male pubic hair?

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused013.gif http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused004.gif ::)

BTW, this is a rhetorical question only! I don't really want to know. No, really. http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-laughing002.gif


1. I hate faggots.

2. Kempt is when they keep it neatly trimmed or shaved, guys do it, too !

3. I really hate faggots !!

lapis
8th May 2012, 02:15 PM
So, it seems obvious to me, that the male massager is trying to shakedown John for 2 million.

Yes, 2 million at the least to make it all go away. And they added another masseur to the suit probably to increase the incentive for him to pay up. Creeps.

ximmy
8th May 2012, 02:40 PM
Hmmm. One of the comments leads me to believe that the masseur may be gay as well:


"The suit also describes Travolta's genitalia as "roughly 8 inches in length" with pubic hair that was "wirey and unkempt."

Unkempt? What is kempt male pubic hair?

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused013.gif http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-confused004.gif ::)

BTW, this is a rhetorical question only! I don't really want to know. No, really. http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-laughing002.gif

A pencil is roughly 8 inches in length...

Santa
8th May 2012, 02:59 PM
1. I hate faggots.

2. Kempt is when they keep it neatly trimmed or shaved, guys do it, too !

3. I really hate faggots !!

Thank you...Refreshing! I have been under the impression for some time that women love faggots as much as they love shoes and purses.

Must be all those Hollywood movies I watched.

iOWNme
8th May 2012, 03:51 PM
For those who are in denial.....

Listen to Professor Griff from Public Enemy give you the inside scoop on Hollywood.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LCybsLhVY8

Neuro
8th May 2012, 04:34 PM
The cocksucker probably refused Travolta because his pubic hair was unkempt. And he believes the trauma was worth 2 million. That is so gay! Homo Travolta was just trying to lay down the ground rules for a Hollywood carreer to the whimp.

Probably true! And nothing will come of this unless the masseuse does an incredible fellatio on the gay Jewish judge!

Book
8th May 2012, 05:55 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XcLJqZsrnJA/TOQJ8zR601I/AAAAAAAADGQ/2pEMDEjVPbs/s1600/john-travolta-and-kelly-preston.jpg

http://www.irishcentral.com/story/ent/amyandrews_gossipgirl/john-travoltas-wife-will-have-scientologists-silent-birth-108908644.html

::) My guess is some jew lawyer originally thought he could use a couple of "anonymous" homos to scare Travolta into paying a blackmail settlement.

learn2swim
8th May 2012, 05:56 PM
A second Masseur has filed a lawsuit against the faggot Scientologist.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/05/second-accuser-files-sexual-battery-lawsuit-against-john-travolta

sirgonzo420
8th May 2012, 05:57 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XcLJqZsrnJA/TOQJ8zR601I/AAAAAAAADGQ/2pEMDEjVPbs/s1600/john-travolta-and-kelly-preston.jpg

http://www.irishcentral.com/story/ent/amyandrews_gossipgirl/john-travoltas-wife-will-have-scientologists-silent-birth-108908644.html

::) My guess is some jew lawyer originally thought he could use a couple of "anonymous" homos to scare Travolta into paying a blackmail settlement.

The lawyer is not a jew, and it's pretty widely known in Hollywood circles that Travolta likes dudes. Women too maybe, but definitely dudes.

solid
8th May 2012, 06:01 PM
::) My guess is some lawyer originally thought he could use a couple of "anonymous" gay men to scare Travolta into paying a blackmail settlement.

This makes sense to me. John's sexual preference, or religious, nature is not important. His bank roll is.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
8th May 2012, 06:07 PM
The same applies to the boy bands in the music industry. I thought this was common knowledge.

freespirit
8th May 2012, 06:23 PM
1. I hate faggots.

2. Kempt is when they keep it neatly trimmed or shaved, guys do it, too !

3. I really hate faggots !!


i believe the term is "manscaping" ... lol

joboo
8th May 2012, 06:59 PM
This makes sense to me. John's sexual preference, or religious, nature is not important. His bank roll is.


The gay massage dude is probably just seeking millions to cover his unbearable trauma of having to forcibly think about gay sex. Yeah, that's it.

PatColo
8th May 2012, 07:01 PM
blackmail/shakedown, agree. JT surely got some settlement offer beforehand to keep it quiet, which is really misguided considering how widespread it is in hollywood.


For those who are in denial.....

Listen to Professor Griff from Public Enemy give you the inside scoop on Hollywood.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LCybsLhVY8

Prof. Griff was guest on Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad Radio last Nov- good interview


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Jonathan Elinoff, Professor Griff on TJ Radio Wednesday! (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2011/11/jonathan-elinoff-professor-griff-on-tj.html)


Truth Jihad Radio Wed. 11/16/11 (http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/11/19/american-social-credit-why-we-need-it-now-you-need-understand-stealth-economic-warf), 1-3 pm Central, American Fre (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)edom R (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)adio (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)(archived here (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_11.html).) Call-in: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1632985004#%21/profile.php?id=100002369316004).
[...]

http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://epic.bemoor.com/Professor_griff_true.jpeg&sa=X&ei=sC3DTqahIpGatwfW3eDTDQ&ved=0CAwQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNH4YdzQXrwki_Df3-z4zSPASwSgRw

Second hour: Professor Griff: rap artist, public intellectual, free speech icon, New World Order critic. Since leaving his post as Minister of Information with the revolutionary hip-hop group Public Enemy (http://publicenemy.com/), Professor Griff has been exposing the NWO, exploring Islam and spirituality, and generally working to wake up the planet.

The Sifting and Winnowing Club (http://www.uwsw.blogspot.com/) is working to bring Professor Griff to the University of Wisconsin next February.
Posted by Kevin Barrett (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227) at 7:16 PM (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2011/11/jonathan-elinoff-professor-griff-on-tj.html) 1 comments (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2011/11/jonathan-elinoff-professor-griff-on-tj.html#comment-form) http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif (http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=2253633813431459343&postID=4334098072602484654&from=pencil)

Labels: core of corruption (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/core%20of%20corruption), jonathan elinoff (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/jonathan%20elinoff), new world order (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/new%20world%20order), professor griff (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/professor%20griff), public enemy (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/search/label/public%20enemy)
MP3 link: 11/16/2011 (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-111611.mp3) Wednesday - 1st Hour: With Jonathan Elinoff from http://coreofcorruption.com/. 2nd Hour: With Professor Griff formerly with the legenday Hip Hop artist from "Public Enemy."

^ first hour of that show with Jonathan Ellinof is also somewhat on topic, he was instrumental in getting a CO Sheriff busted for:
Human Trafficking in Colorado, The Pat Sullivan Meth for Sex Scandal, Allegations of Underage Sex Abuse; What do they all have in common? Ready to fall down the rabbit hole with me? (http://coreofcorruption.com/Home/tabid/489/ID/9715/Human-Trafficking-in-Colorado-The-Pat-Sullivan-Meth-for-Sex-Scandal-Allegations-of-Underage-Sex-Abuse-What-do-they-all-have-in-common-Ready-to-fall-down-the-rabbit-hole-with-me.aspx)


see my thread around the time,
Thread: Former 18 Year Arapahoe CO Sheriff Arrested in Meth-for-Sex Scandal (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?56379-Former-18-Year-Arapahoe-CO-Sheriff-Arrested-in-Meth-for-Sex-Scandal)

joboo
8th May 2012, 07:16 PM
For those who are in denial.....

Listen to Professor Griff from Public Enemy give you the inside scoop on Hollywood.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LCybsLhVY8

What was I supposed to get that was conclusive from that?

Book
8th May 2012, 07:21 PM
What was I supposed to get that was conclusive from that?



We must buy his book and music CDs to find out...lol.


Professor Griff: rap artist, public intellectual, free speech icon, New World Order critic. Since leaving his post as Minister of Information with the revolutionary hip-hop group Public Enemy (http://publicenemy.com/), Professor Griff...

joboo
8th May 2012, 08:26 PM
We must buy his book and music CDs to find out...lol.

Seems like it. All I got was tupac said some guy wanted to jam him in the butt, and puff daddy could be gay, whitey got guns, and whitey got that, and harp almost moved some plates in Iraq.

??? LOL...

PatColo
8th May 2012, 08:44 PM
^ and, "are you with me?!"

as I recall his interview with Barrett last Nov was much more coherent, again:

MP3 link: 11/16/2011 (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-111611.mp3) Wednesday - 1st Hour: With Jonathan Elinoff from http://coreofcorruption.com/. 2nd Hour: With Professor Griff formerly with the legenday Hip Hop artist from "Public Enemy."

vacuum
8th May 2012, 10:08 PM
This makes sense to me. John's sexual preference, or religious, nature is not important. His bank roll is.
This is a good point.

gunDriller
9th May 2012, 03:27 AM
i believe the term is "manscaping" ... lol

as long as they remember - cornrows & dreadlocks are something you wear above the belt.


read one of those news articles about Travolta. Dude is acting like he's in prison, hitting on GUYS.

that's WIERD - he must have a million women chasing his act. all he would have to do is tell his chaffeur to drive straight west to the beach, lay out a beach towel, and wait. even if he's fat & overweight.

and instead he's hitting on GUYS ?!

what's he doing, preparing for a stay at San Quentin ?

LastResort
9th May 2012, 04:19 AM
I had a good friend that was big into pro wrestling. He never made it big but did take a couple trips down to LA and Nashville. Met quite a few older washed up wrestlers. Long story short theres alot of queer shit going on if you want to make it big in wrestling too...

Awoke
9th May 2012, 04:29 AM
Regarding John Travolta and Ari Emmanuel: Just because a famous person is married with children doesn't mean they aren't perverse cultists and/or MonProg victims. There is something to be said about appearances, and the khazar 5th columnists know the importance of a good disguise.


Take for example Roman Polanski's (likely fabricated) holohoax survival story, linked courtesy of Learn2swim:




Again in hiding without his parents, he succeeded in being sheltered by other Catholic families, where he attended church, learned to recite most Catholic prayers by heart, and behaved outwardly as a Roman Catholic, although he was never baptized. However, his efforts to assimilate into Catholic households as a member of the family often failed. In one instance, the parish priest visited the family and began to interrogate him, as Polanski recalls:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski


These cultists basically perform the most deviant sexual acts concievable, and when it gets to the very root of it, they do it for two reasons if they are active cultists:
1) Insult God and desecrate His creation
2) Fealty to lucifer and all demons of lust/gratification

Why else do you think your hear about pedo khazar rabbis performing fellatio on newborns? Newborns are the purest of the pure, as far as sinful humanity goes.

The ones who are not active cultists are performing merely for the sake of securing their success. Afaic, this is a common senerio, but this masseuse is looking to cash in, like others have mentioned.

joboo
9th May 2012, 04:33 AM
Isn't every famous male actor called gay at some point?

Colin Ferrel, Brad Pitt, Robin Williams,....heck.... pick a name....the list is endless.

Has to be true for sure.....uhhhhh

chad
9th May 2012, 04:53 AM
i had drinks with travolta & several blue angels around 1995-ish or so for about 4 hours in austin. he was in town stumping for the angles as payback for the military letting him use aircraft in his comeback film "broken arrow." he didn't strike me as even remotely gay. he was actually a pretty down to earth guy, none of the crazytown scientology stuff or any of that. we talked about cars, motorcycles, airplanes, fly fishing, stuff like that. might be a setup, who knows.

PatColo
9th May 2012, 05:06 AM
What'll be interesting about watching this tabloid scandal unfold is, how the ZSM handles it?

Consider how widespread & common homosexuality & pedophilia is in Cabalywood, as well as the standard hetero casting couch means of career improvement. So when some nobody like this masseuse pipes up seeking his payday like this, and imagining the satanists have no agenda of "destroying JT", then you'd expect them to close ranks, the ZSM blacks out the story, and the noisy masseuse is "neutralized" in some form.

Now that this tabloid-distraction has "broken" and presumably gone viral somewhat- will it become the ZSM's relentless flavor of the week? Or will future developments be blacked out?

Horn
9th May 2012, 05:58 AM
he didn't strike me as even remotely gay. he was actually a pretty down to earth guy, none of the crazytown scientology stuff or any of that. we talked about cars, motorcycles, airplanes, fly fishing, stuff like that. might be a setup, who knows.

Like an actor?

chad
9th May 2012, 06:35 AM
Like an actor?

no, like a normal person.

Horn
9th May 2012, 06:40 AM
no, like a normal person.

Case closed, certainly an act.

Santa
9th May 2012, 06:43 AM
Absolutely nothing will come of this story.

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 07:58 AM
Grease is the word. grease is the word, is the word,that you heard
It's got groove. It's got meaning. Grease is the time, is the place, is the motion. Grease is the way we are feeling.



http://i754.photobucket.com/albums/xx181/Fyyrer/Faggotry.jpg

JDRock
9th May 2012, 09:01 AM
They are ACTORS! nothing they say or do can be trusted. so also the unsaved jew.

iOWNme
9th May 2012, 09:47 AM
What was I supposed to get that was conclusive from that?

Well it wsnt for you, but it shows that this is not an isolated event. This is the RULE not the exception.

Why didnt Will Smith or anyone else he mentioned sue him if it wasnt true?

And if this guy is just in it for his '15 min of fame' why hasnt he released his name? Pretty hard to get 'famous' when nobody knows your name. LOL

joboo
9th May 2012, 12:20 PM
On a more serious note, I missed Mel Gibson by one day that time he got nabbed leaving Moon Shadows on the PCH for the whole "anti semitic" road stop thing. I was there the night before.

Even though I was off by less than 24 hours I could sense his non gay manliness in the air.

gunDriller
9th May 2012, 01:58 PM
i didn't know Travolta was that BORED.

Jeez. why doesn't he just buy a place in Malibu and hang out at the beach ?


but if he is that bored - he'd probably tried some pretty wierd stuff.

i wonder how much the Gay Jews overlap with the Scientologists. this is a job for Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise.)

ximmy
9th May 2012, 02:05 PM
i didn't know Travolta was that BORED.

Jeez. why doesn't he just buy a place in Malibu and hang out at the beach ?


but if he is that bored - he'd probably tried some pretty wierd stuff.

i wonder how much the Gay Jews overlap with the Scientologists. this is a job for Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise.)

John Travolta Assures Us That Scientology Is Ok With The Gays July 3rd, 2007
“Scientology is not homophobic in any way. In fact it’s one of the more tolerant faiths. Anyone’s accepted.”
http://socialitelife.com/john_travolta_assures_us_that_scientology_is_ok_wi th_the_gays-07-2007

TheNocturnalEgyptian
9th May 2012, 03:11 PM
I think this is purely about money. If you are man, and pursue male massage as a career, you are most likely gay. Also, if you are man who chooses another man for a massage, you are most likely gay too. There's no reason why Travolta couldn't have gotten a massage from a hot gal.

So, it seems obvious to me, that the male massager is trying to shakedown John for 2 million.

There are a lot of male masseurs. They are professional enough to work on either gender.

That's a stupid statement to make, and is out of character for you.

It'd be like assuming that every female masseuse wants to have sex with you by virtue of her being a female. It's just not a fair assumption to make. You can't assume a man is gay just because he is willing to give professional bodywork to both genders.

Bodywork is a serious field and it is possible to be a professional. Comments like yours denigrate the science of home-care or self-care. People get massages because they have intense physio-structural issues, not because they want sex. Damn man.

vacuum
9th May 2012, 03:22 PM
There are a lot of male masseurs. They are professional enough to work on either gender.

That's a stupid statement to make, and is out of character for you.

It'd be like assuming that every female masseuse wants to have sex with you by virtue of her being a female. It's just not a fair assumption to make. You can't assume a man is gay just because he is willing to give professional bodywork to both genders.

Bodywork is a serious field and it is possible to be a professional. Comments like yours denigrate the science of home-care or self-care. People get massages because they have intense physio-structural issues, not because they want sex. Damn man.
Hey....it's American culture. You're obviously right but these are just the first reactions I think a lot of people have.

solid
9th May 2012, 03:22 PM
Bodywork is a serious field and it is possible to be a professional. Comments like yours denigrate the science of home-care or self-care. People get massages because they have intense physio-structural issues, not because they want sex. Damn man.

My apologies, NE. You are right, I misspoke with that post. I still think a healthy Hollywood actor, choosing a dude for a massage is suspect. :)

Also, no offense to any male masseurs, but if I need body work done, I want it done by a woman. It's not about sex, but I'd rather have a woman's touch, a feminine healing experience, you could say.

This still sounds like a shakedown for money. Regardless of difference of opinions on massage science.

Book
9th May 2012, 03:31 PM
You can't assume a man is gay just because he is willing to give professional bodywork to both genders.

Bodywork is a serious field and it is possible to be a professional. Comments like yours denigrate the science of home-care or self-care. People get massages because they have intense physio-structural issues, not because they want sex. Damn man.



http://www.sogarab.com/photos/63191_extra3.jpg

Anyone think this photo model actually has to pay anyone to rub her tits and ass?

::) I'm not buying the "professional" "bodywork" "science" jargon unless an accredited Chiropractor degree is hanging from their wall...lol.

EE_
9th May 2012, 03:36 PM
http://www.sogarab.com/photos/63191_extra3.jpg

Anyone think this photo model actually has to pay anyone to rub her tits and ass?

::) I'm not buying the "professional" "bodywork" "science" jargon unless an accredited Chiropractor degree is hanging from their wall...lol.

I got fired on my first day as a male masseuse..
Apparently the instruction ‘finish off on her face’ didn’t mean what I thought it did

solid
9th May 2012, 03:38 PM
::) I'm not buying the "professional" "bodywork" "science" jargon unless an accredited Chiropractor degree is hanging from their wall...lol.

That's BS Book. There's professional massage therapists. My cousin is one of them. There's all types of massage out there, and I think it's more of an art than a science, but I don't know.

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 03:39 PM
Book, you don't know what the hell you are talking about !!!!!!!


Yes, Bodywork is a very serious field and a true professional is REPULSED at ANYONE --- man or woman---- saying or doing anything inappropriate during a session.

Furthermore, if rich faggot Travolta was serious about a true massage he would have had a massage therapist go to his home, but he didn't because he wasn't looking for a body massage .

If the massage therapist or (whatever title he goes by ) is suing the faggot for 2M and is telling the truth then he deserves the money.
He shouldn't have to have some fag expect sexual favors while working on him.

Also, when a man gives a massage versus a woman, a man is usually ALOT stronger so ALOT of men have to go to MEN massage therapists to be able to get deep tissue massage work done effectively that alot of women massage therapists don't do as well because it's very labor intensive.

Chiropractors don't have massage therapy degrees massage therapists do.

You don't know the healing arts very well so just chill out !

Book
9th May 2012, 04:03 PM
That's BS Book. There's professional massage therapists. My cousin is one of them.



http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/27/2769/LRJTD00Z/posters/clint-eastwood.jpg
"Thanks anyway honey, but Solid's cousin is on his way
over to professionally caress my tired naked body"

::) ...for only six bits.

solid
9th May 2012, 04:09 PM
Thanks anyway honey, but Solid's cousin is on his way
over to professionally caress my tired naked body"

My cousin is a HER Book, she's happily married and is a professional masseuse.

So, sorry to disappoint you, perhaps Travolta can recommend a good male masseuse for you? If you act nice, 6 bits is good, if you get out of line, you may need millions however.

Book
9th May 2012, 04:15 PM
Yes, Bodywork is a very serious field...



https://dianedooley.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/sex-scene.jpg

:o Don't worry...he is a professional Bodyworker resolving serious intense physio-structural issues

ximmy
9th May 2012, 04:25 PM
Do all male masseurs start their careers as flight attendants?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hIxc22Z3Lo

solid
9th May 2012, 04:27 PM
Book, you are gay! Just fucking admit it, for once. We will not hold it against you.

I hate to state the obvious, but it is very obvious! There's nothing wrong with being gay. Folks are different, that's OK.

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 04:33 PM
:o Don't worry...he is a professional Bodyworker resolving serious intense physio-structural issues

I was one of your biggest supporters on here, Book. I always stuck up for you.
I used to love your posts, all your pics, all your hilarious comments in orange. Done, gone . I just can't believe you right now.

http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/uu108/jamstermedia/assholeawardswinner2.jpg

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 05:16 PM
My apologies, NE. You are right, I misspoke with that post. I still think a healthy Hollywood actor, choosing a dude for a massage is suspect. :)

Also, no offense to any male masseurs, but if I need body work done, I want it done by a woman. It's not about sex, but I'd rather have a woman's touch, a feminine healing experience, you could say.

This still sounds like a shakedown for money. Regardless of difference of opinions on massage science.


Solid ? Really. I don't know what the hell you're talking about either. A "feminine healing experience" ?
It's the proper technique , ability & strength of the therapist that encourages the healing.

A 'feminine healing experience' doesn't necessarily mean good BODYWORK. That's sounds more like female companionship that you're paying for !

Just sayin' !

I seriously don't think that very many people here understand what bodywork really is.

solid
9th May 2012, 05:25 PM
Solid ? Really. I don't know what the hell you're talking about either. A "feminine healing experience" ?
It's the proper technique , ability & strength of the therapist that encourages the healing.

A 'feminine healing experience' doesn't necessarily mean good BODYWORK. That's sounds more like female companionship that you're paying for !

Just sayin' !

I seriously don't think that very many people here understand what bodywork really is.

OHL, I just don't want a guy's hands on me. That's all.

I couldn't relax. I never claimed to understand bodywork, but this thread is actually turning out to be a good one! One we can all learn from.

ximmy
9th May 2012, 05:29 PM
OHL, I can't speak for all women but for me, therapy or no, ...I wouldn't want a woman's hands on my body, nor a gay man. Are there any straight male masseurs?

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 05:39 PM
OHL, I can't speak for all women but for me, therapy or no, ...I wouldn't want a woman's hands on my body, nor a gay man. Are there any straight male masseurs?



OHL, I just don't want a guy's hands on me. That's all.

I couldn't relax. I never claimed to understand bodywork, but this thread is actually turning out to be a good one! One we can all learn from.

When you guys get older, you'll understand.
When you get older & if something happens to you or you just need a maasage or other bodywork , you won't care if it's a man or a woman,
you'll care about healing your body.

I've had bodywork done by both males & females. Some of the women were a million times better at their work than the men.
Sometimes the males were better.
It's about the healing not the gender of the practitioner.

Everybody has their own preference, but how would you know if you didn't give them a chance ? You have to be comfortable with yourself to be comfortable with a bodyworker. Older people just don't give a shit anymore. We're like......JUST FIX ME NOW ! No sexual thoughts even enter our brains !

Libertytree
9th May 2012, 05:45 PM
OHL, I can't speak for all women but for me, therapy or no, ...I wouldn't want a woman's hands on my body, nor a gay man. Are there any straight male masseurs?

Yes, there are, or at least there used to be. I apprenticed for a couple months and then worked for the Hilton at just such an occupation. I only served the women clientele and it was professional in every way. They always threatened to book me with the older men, maybe because they sensed my aversion? Or...maybe because I had a good rate of return female customers. I was able to mix a good massage with good conversation, with whatever they wanted to talk about, or..if they didn't want to converse I could just do my job.

solid
9th May 2012, 05:48 PM
OHL, I don't think it's sexual in any way. I think it's because of how we were raised.

Growing up, as a child, my father was the strong arm of the law. My mother, fixed us up when we got sick or injured.

I don't want to show weakness around other men, be it health-wise, or anything. I'm not comfortable with doctors who are men as well. I prefer women doctors. If I'm injured or not well, I'm more comfortable that way. A woman's touch, a woman's nature. There's a reason why in WWII all the soldiers were cared for by women nurses.

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 06:25 PM
OHL, I don't think it's sexual in any way. I think it's because of how we were raised.

Growing up, as a child, my father was the strong arm of the law. My mother, fixed us up when we got sick or injured.

I don't want to show weakness around other men, be it health-wise, or anything. I'm not comfortable with doctors who are men as well. I prefer women doctors. If I'm injured or not well, I'm more comfortable that way. A woman's touch, a woman's nature. There's a reason why in WWII all the soldiers were cared for by women nurses.

Ok thanks, I think I understand more now.

You see, I am an old fashioned herbalist. I do not believe in doctors. I wouldn't have a doctor touch me unless I was next to death & then I'd still fight to my death not to be touched by one, man or woman unless it was a trauma case, of course.

I believe in healing. I believe in healers.

To me, The healing comes from a person with the knowlegde & know-how.

Like I said, it's your preference, but you're still limiting yourself, IMO.

Let me give you an analogy, if I was hurt in a traumatic way, I wouldn't care if it was a male or a female working over top of my body as long as they HELPED ME !

That's how I see healers....they help you regardless of their gender !

My husband went to a lady MT (massage therapist). He said she was way too weak for him !! It was like she pretty much slathered some oil on his body & rubbed it all over. He wasn't impressed at all. He's a very strong, masculine manly man, but he didn't care about going to a male practitioner ! He tried one & said WOW !!
He really got to the muscles that needed work & so the fears of same-gender MT just seem to diminish as you get older.

As you get older, the mind changes ALOT.

Myself, I prefer a female massage therapist ONLY, but I have already been to both, so my decision is based on my actual healing experiences.
(but I definitely would still go to a male MT if I had to, of course.)

Book
9th May 2012, 06:25 PM
Solid ? Really. I don't know what the hell you're talking about either. A "feminine healing experience" ?

...That sounds more like female companionship that you're paying for !

Just sayin' !



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YqlBzOs7ot4/S95ji8tj5KI/AAAAAAAAAas/C2JZ0f5LY1s/s320/alone.jpg

Exactly.

::)

Book
9th May 2012, 06:32 PM
I was able to mix a good massage with good conversation, with whatever they wanted to talk about, or..if they didn't want to converse I could just do my job.



http://myondostate.com/w3/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Sleep-Position-spoon-jpg_163216.jpg

http://img.ehowcdn.com/article-new/ehow/images/a08/0r/he/comfortable-sleeping-positions-couples-800x800.jpg

http://mamamoderne.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/goodnight01.png

::) These people don't need nor pay for whatever "healing" hokum this thread is about.

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 06:36 PM
You need healed in the head, there, Booky.

What kind of meds you take ?

solid
9th May 2012, 06:38 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YqlBzOs7ot4/S95ji8tj5KI/AAAAAAAAAas/C2JZ0f5LY1s/s320/alone.jpg

Exactly.

::)

At least I'm not gay. Like you. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

But, finding peace in life, is accepting what you are. I hope you accept your gay nature, Book. Maybe then you'll stop trolling us? :)

Book
9th May 2012, 06:44 PM
I can't speak for all women but for me, therapy or no, ...I wouldn't want a woman's hands on my body, nor a gay man. Are there any straight male masseurs?



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Zuw74YQ04ws/T3RiIFvAv2I/AAAAAAAAFj8/fShLqJK5A38/s1600/casablanca.jpg

Boss...Ximmy is wantin' ta know if any of our male customers are
certified to rub their hands all over her naked body. What's I tell her?

:)

sirgonzo420
9th May 2012, 06:46 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YqlBzOs7ot4/S95ji8tj5KI/AAAAAAAAAas/C2JZ0f5LY1s/s320/alone.jpg

Exactly.

::)

What's your girlfriend look like book?

http://ficdn.fashionindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/playgirl200309.jpg

Or is BOOK's "girlfriend" a MAGAZINE? :confused:






;D

zap
9th May 2012, 06:46 PM
LOL at all these posts , well for me........ if I had to pay for bodywork I would defiantly want a man, but for a standard massage either a man or woman.

Book
9th May 2012, 06:47 PM
But, finding peace in life, is accepting what you are. I hope you accept your gay nature...



http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58846-Women&p=516201&viewfull=1#post516201

::)

solid
9th May 2012, 07:03 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58846-Women&p=516201&viewfull=1#post516201

::)

Book, that thread has to do with women. What do you know about that?

LOL. If I want hair style advise, I'll be sure to ask you.

Book
9th May 2012, 07:26 PM
Book, that thread has to do with women.



::)




Stay away from women, men.

sirgonzo420
9th May 2012, 07:30 PM
::)

What's the issue?

Mostly, men *should* stay away from women. They can be vicious and can destroy you. Hahahaha.


Men should seek the ladies. They are at least a little more tolerable than regular ole women. ;D

Old Herb Lady
9th May 2012, 08:29 PM
::)






::)








::)






::)



http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t292/smiliegirl2007/cute.gif


http://i344.photobucket.com/albums/p354/JoleneSjodin/tunnuskuva/RollingEyesSmiley5.gif


http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a19/freeTheInternet/Smiley/Medium/smiley-yawn.gif


http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii199/THETRIBEOF_5/Smiley%20Signs/s3.gif


http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii199/THETRIBEOF_5/Smiley%20Signs/s3.gif


http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii199/THETRIBEOF_5/Smiley%20Signs/s3.gif

joboo
9th May 2012, 09:08 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACDOBjPHqb8

Horn
10th May 2012, 02:26 AM
Boss...Ximmy is wantin' ta know if any of our male customers are
certified to rub their hands all over her naked body. What's I tell her?:)

Get one that uses da feet, or elbows.

2776

Awoke
10th May 2012, 04:42 AM
There's nothing wrong with being gay.

Tell natural procreation that.

Just because this shithole culture, which is run by satanists, tells you that it's OK to be gay doesn't mean that it's actually OK to be gay.

See my signature with the Berzerker (LS) quote. Don't mistake satan's version of OK with the real version of OK.
Everyone here should thenk their lucky stars that their parents weren't gay. You wouldn't be here.

Not trying to derail, just sayin.

learn2swim
10th May 2012, 06:41 AM
The penis isn't supposed to enter the anus, it's really that simple. It's obvious what the anus was created for, exit, not entry.

Tumbleweed
10th May 2012, 06:45 AM
Even if there were no such thing as queers I don't think I'd be ok with getting a massage from a man. I've had some back adjustments from chiropractors and I'm ok with that but I wouldn't want a queer putting his filthy hands on me.

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 06:50 AM
Even if there were no such thing as queers I don't think I'd be ok with getting a massage from a man. I've had some back adjustments from chiropractors and I'm ok with that but I wouldn't want a queer putting his filthy hands on me.

Ever have a prostate exam yet Tumbleweed ? Was it done by a man doctor or woman doctor ? Just wondering . I don't like faggots either.

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 06:54 AM
The penis isn't supposed to enter the anus, it's really that simple. It's obvious what the anus was created for, exit, not entry.

Exactly !


I'll never understand either, some guys just like this:

http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l48/jodilahaye/ass_man_jiggle.jpg


instead of this:

http://i537.photobucket.com/albums/ff338/MMark_photos/Ass/tumblr_ltkrbg6Hwa1qlq5kpo1_500.jpg


?

sirgonzo420
10th May 2012, 07:01 AM
I'll never understand either, some guys just like this:

http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l48/jodilahaye/ass_man_jiggle.jpg


instead of this:

http://i537.photobucket.com/albums/ff338/MMark_photos/Ass/tumblr_ltkrbg6Hwa1qlq5kpo1_500.jpg


?



Exactly.


A woman's ass and a man's ass are not the same thing. They are not interchangeable.

Santa
10th May 2012, 07:04 AM
The only way a man is gonna massage my ass is after he beats me unconscious.

Tumbleweed
10th May 2012, 07:09 AM
Ever have a prostate exam yet Tumbleweed ? Was it done by a man doctor or woman doctor ? Just wondering . I don't like faggots either.

Yes I have had a prostate exam by a male doctor and I hated it. I've had more of those exams by women and I prefer that.

Book
10th May 2012, 07:39 AM
There's nothing wrong with being gay.



::)




Stay away from women, men.

DMac
10th May 2012, 07:50 AM
There is a lot of pent up sexuality going on in this thread. Some of you have some serious issues! :D

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 08:00 AM
Gay stands for demasculinization of men. period ! If a man thinks that it is OK for another man to be gay, then WOW ! I'm speechless.
I really don't care. I just wish to God I didn't have to hear about, read about it, see them on the streets etc.

When I was younger, I never cared or ever had a problem with them either, until you look around & see the freakshits everywhere.
Dikes are NO better either. Disgusting. BARF. aagh ! NASTY !!!!!!!!!

solid
10th May 2012, 08:05 AM
Gay stands for demasculinization of men. period ! If a man thinks that it is OK for another man to be gay, then WOW ! I'm speechless.

I don't want to judge others that way, what they do behind closed doors is their business. Book's the only one who seems to flaunt his gayness. I think most gay folks don't talk about it.

The way I see it, God made each of us unique. Being gay is not a choice.

Book
10th May 2012, 08:11 AM
Stay away from women, men.



::) your conscious decision




God made each of us unique. Being gay is not a choice.

solid
10th May 2012, 08:17 AM
::) your conscious decision

Taking a break from women can be good Book. This is what single straight men do on occasion. You may have a string of gay guys waiting for their turn, I don't know, but for some of us dating women, we need a break.

Horn
10th May 2012, 08:19 AM
Stay tuned for the continuing saga of Book & Solid's journey into the unknown depths of the gay outback.

http://www.ohlalaparis.com/photos/uncategorized/allamerican_twins_01.jpg

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 08:34 AM
neither one of them are gay ! they just don't know how to fight fair .

Book you're a menace.

Solid, I don't care what they do in their private lives, NONE OF MY BUSINESS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They don't just keep it there ! They go around with their faggotry EVERYWHERE !!!!!!!!
GA-ROSSSSSSS !!!!!!!

shaved legs, purses, that talk thing, the gestures, the femininity, makeup ?, bathroom stall footsie games,

Repulsive.

I don't know, maybe there's something seriously wrong with ME !

Teach me how to be more accepting, I will try, I promise.
How ? What do I do ? Maybe it's because I'm from the country and the men are strong & tough & adore their woman & take pride in their masculinity .
Maybe I don't get to the big city anymore like I used to everyday & they didn't bother me because I was around them all the time but now I'm not.

Book
10th May 2012, 08:40 AM
Taking a break from women can be good Book.



::)

CURRENT THREADS SOLID STARTED:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58846-Women

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?60937-Online-dating

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59864-Awe...man-is-this-a-deal-breaker

ENTIRE THREADS THAT SOLID STARTED THEN DELETED AT GSUS:

Guys, would you date this gal?

How to pick up girls in New York.

Confusing response from a gal I've been talking too...

Interesting dating site

Would you guys ever consider dating a cop?

Something I thought I'd share about myself

Guys, check this gal out...

Horn
10th May 2012, 08:41 AM
Teach me how to be more accepting, I will try, I promise.

You are, "on the fence" ?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaJPNrf1DPY

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 08:47 AM
::)

CURRENT THREADS SOLID STARTED:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58846-Women

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?60937-Online-dating

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59864-Awe...man-is-this-a-deal-breaker

ENTIRE THREADS THAT SOLID STARTED THEN DELETED AT GSUS:

Guys, would you date this gal?

How to pick up girls in New York.

Confusing response from a gal I've been talking too...

Interesting dating site

Would you guys ever consider dating a cop?

Something I thought I'd share about myself

Guys, check this gal out...


great....
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t271/britneymichelle09/stalker.gif

solid
10th May 2012, 08:48 AM
Teach me how to be more accepting, I will try, I promise.
How ? What do I do ? Maybe it's because I'm from the country and the men are strong & tough & adore their woman & take pride in their masculinity .
Maybe I don't get to the big city anymore like I used to everyday & they didn't bother me because I was around them all the time but now I'm not.

Here's how I personally try to be more accepting...I try to accept what people are born with, what they can not change. Things that are not choices. If a man is born black, white, gay, etc. That's what they have to work with, what choices they make after that, how they live their lives, it's up the them.

There's a lot of gay men that keep it to themselves, it's a private issue. They are nice people, and treat others well.

Then there's a lot of gay men that just flaunt it like crazy, so obnoxiously. I really don't like that, it's disgusting imo.

You know a couple of years ago I met this really nice gal, we started dating. Had a lot of fun together, but she lived in the gayest part of San Francisco. There were gay bars there, lot's of gay dudes, well, you get the idea. She also had 3 gay roommates. She invited me up to her apt after our dates, but I just couldn't do it. I couldn't go up there, I didn't even want to park the car and get out. So, as accepting as I try to be, we all have limits I suppose.

Horn
10th May 2012, 08:54 AM
She also had 3 gay roommates. She invited me up to her apt after our dates, but I just couldn't do it. I couldn't go up there, I didn't even want to park the car and get out. So, as accepting as I try to be, we all have limits I suppose.

Sometimes others will see us for who we really are, before we can see ourselves, solid... :)

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 09:15 AM
Here's how I personally try to be more accepting...I try to accept what people are born with, what they can not change. Things that are not choices. If a man is born black, white, gay, etc. That's what they have to work with, what choices they make after that, how they live their lives, it's up the them.

There's a lot of gay men that keep it to themselves, it's a private issue. They are nice people, and treat others well.

Then there's a lot of gay men that just flaunt it like crazy, so obnoxiously. I really don't like that, it's disgusting imo.

You know a couple of years ago I met this really nice gal, we started dating. Had a lot of fun together, but she lived in the gayest part of San Francisco. There were gay bars there, lot's of gay dudes, well, you get the idea. She also had 3 gay roommates. She invited me up to her apt after our dates, but I just couldn't do it. I couldn't go up there, I didn't even want to park the car and get out. So, as accepting as I try to be, we all have limits I suppose.

That's it ! SHIVER ALL OVER !! Yiiiiiiikes ! If I was a single guy I wouldn't even be able to go out with a girl that lived with 3 fags, sorry.

I'm done now. Officially homophobic foreva !

What do they call this ? Prejudice ? Judgemental ? Homophobic ?

I am.

Horn
10th May 2012, 09:17 AM
That's it ! SHIVER ALL OVER !! Yiiiiiiikes ! If I was a single guy I wouldn't even be able to go out with a girl that lived with 3 fags, sorry.

I'm done now. Officially homophobic foreva !

What do they call this ? Prejudice ? Judgemental ? Homophobic ?

I am.

You have nothing to fear, but yourself.

JohnQPublic
10th May 2012, 09:29 AM
Here's how I personally try to be more accepting...I try to accept what people are born with, what they can not change. Things that are not choices. If a man is born black, white, gay, etc.
...

I agree with your basic premise, Solid. Black men were born black, whites are born white, etc. But I do not take it as a given that gay men were born that way. I believe that may just be a justification created by society (and its engineers) to create acceptance.

DMac
10th May 2012, 09:35 AM
You have nothing to fear, but Zionists.

fify ;)

solid
10th May 2012, 09:47 AM
I agree with your basic premise, Solid. Black men were born black, whites are born white, etc. But I do not take it as a given that gay men were born that way. I believe that may just be a justification created by society (and its engineers) to create acceptance.

Society went past trying to create acceptance, but more trying to push it as being popular. Metrosexuals are a perfect example. These are straight men, who dress and act gay, to impress women. It makes no sense, at all. Yet, somehow this culture became popular. The gay culture went past trying to stop being victims of harrassment, but onto making it a fashion statement.

Sexual preference is not a fashion statement. I believe attraction is not a choice. You can't force yourself to be attracted to someone, man or woman. That is the only way I can understand homosexuality, personally.

Horn
10th May 2012, 09:48 AM
fify ;)

Ahh Yes, the magical phallic wand of zionism.

Though there are two kinds of gaydom, those that were created thru zionist penis entry, or regretful life experience (these typically turn later in life)

And those that were Created. ( Thru Hormonal imbalance of some sort typically gay thru childhood)

chad
10th May 2012, 10:24 AM
where's occam's razor when you need him?

ximmy
10th May 2012, 10:33 AM
Hmm...

Gays rights for special places...

ximmy
10th May 2012, 10:39 AM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Zuw74YQ04ws/T3RiIFvAv2I/AAAAAAAAFj8/fShLqJK5A38/s1600/casablanca.jpg

Boss...Ximmy is wantin' ta know if any of our male customers are
certified to rub their hands all over her naked body. What's I tell her?

:)

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s222/chrisneros/booksgrin.jpg...

Awoke
10th May 2012, 10:44 AM
Stay tuned for the continuing saga of Book & Solid's journey into the unknown depths of the gay outback.


Brokeback Forum.

EE_
10th May 2012, 11:02 AM
I believe many of the homosexual males were introduced to this perversion by being molested and abused as children by other homosexuals. Yes, some are born this way too, but I think the majority are not.
For the most part, they are disgusting and thier sexual practice is disgusting as well.
If they keep it out of my sight I have nothing to say even though I disapprove...personally liberty and all that.
But they don't, so I feel I can voice my opinion.

IMO, many homosexuals are a menace to society by trying to prey on, or influence children and young people for their own perverted sexual gratification. This sick bunch are heard of trying to pick up other homo's in rest stops and in adult book stores, among other places. You don't think for a minute a lesbian invented the "glory hole" or the stall tapping signal our congressmen have made known to pick up other faggots.
IMO, homosexual males are no longer men and mostly do not act like men or talk like men. Many do not look like men. They are abhorrent, an aberration of nature and a sickness in society.

I also do believe the Jews are pushing an agenda of homosexuality on hetrosexual society. It is part of their master plan to destroy us.
They should be punished severely for this by God and/or man.

For the record, there is no such thing as a "bi-male"...they are all cock-suckers that will screw anything that might have a pulse, or not.

I have a different view toward women that have been with women, partly because of thier early history of being a repressed part of society.
A women that has been with a women can be or still is a women imo. She can still be a soft sensuous creature that still retains her womanly attributes as with any other.
I admit I can be a little biased regarding women, being a hetero-secure male, because we both like the same thing. :)

The other side of the coin, maybe homosexuals are God's way of removing these defective males from society. Natural de-selection?
In the animal world, this many males in society aren't needed.

ximmy
10th May 2012, 11:19 AM
many homosexuals are a menice to society by trying to prey on, or influence children and young people for their own perverted sexual gratification....

The other side of the coin, maybe homosexuals are God's way of removing these defective males from society. Natural de-selection?
In the animal world, this many males in society aren't needed.


Right, they can't procreate so they have to propagate their species by corrupting young minds...

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s222/chrisneros/gayrights.gif

learn2swim
10th May 2012, 11:31 AM
A great book called " Political Ponerology" the study of evil. Written by Dr. Andrzej M. Lobaczewski, from Poland. The book was blocked for many years by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Read page 231 for starters, "click to look inside" feature. It's very telling....

http://www.amazon.com/Political-Ponerology-Science-Adjusted-Purposes/dp/1897244258

Book
10th May 2012, 11:36 AM
https://everydayredflags.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/ponerology.jpg

Book
10th May 2012, 11:41 AM
http://pragmaticwitness.com/tag/cardinal-augustin-bea/

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 11:54 AM
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e48/gbennett08/john_travolta_kissing_guy.jpg



Maybe he's just a friendly guy, ya know.



http://i614.photobucket.com/albums/tt223/TZCaz/Stars/kirk-douglas-john-travolta-kiss-1.jpg


http://gawker.com/5908742/john-travoltas-allegedly-gay-penis-a-history?popular=true

solid
10th May 2012, 11:57 AM
Come on OHL, we don't want to see that!

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 11:58 AM
Come on OHL, we don't want to see that!

? I thought it was OK to be gay ?


It's not pornographic, just smooches. BARF !

just "read the article" then

solid
10th May 2012, 12:03 PM
Well, if you can post that, I can post this. Cheers guys!

2778

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 12:06 PM
Well, if you can post that, I can post this. Cheers guys!

2778


travolta pics were on topic concerning the issue at hand, TYVM. Including the link, also.

Yours was not.

Libertytree
10th May 2012, 12:12 PM
Wgaf?!!

sirgonzo420
10th May 2012, 12:43 PM
travolta pics were on topic concerning the issue at hand, TYVM. Including the link, also.

Yours was not.

As the thread-starter, I make known my acceptance of solid's picture.

We need lesbians (or at least women, as in plural) in this thread to balance out the gayness.

;D

ximmy
10th May 2012, 01:01 PM
balance out the gayness.
;D

http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4039/4207867271_fdaaa0257f_z.jpg

sirgonzo420
10th May 2012, 01:06 PM
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4039/4207867271_fdaaa0257f_z.jpg

Hahahahaha not at all what I meant, but 'A' for effort!

mick silver
10th May 2012, 01:15 PM
dam ... i got my garden in today

ximmy
10th May 2012, 01:19 PM
dam ... i got my garden in today

wtf...

My secret garden's not so secret anymore
Run from the house holding my head in my hands
Feeling dejected, feeling like a child might feel
It all seems so absurd
That this should have occurred
My very only secret
And I had to go and leak it
My secret garden's not so secret anymore

~Depeche Mode

DMac
10th May 2012, 01:19 PM
dam ... i got my garden in today

At least someone around here spent time outside today!

Horn
10th May 2012, 01:28 PM
I want a garden
I want a garden where the flowers have no flowers
I want a garden where the trees have no leaves
I want a garden where the tree weeds don't even grow
I want a garden
I want my garden
I want a garden where there are no colors
I wanna water that garden
I'll garden that with my tears
Whilst that garden
Busted trees, busted leaves
Walks to me with my own


3 characters

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 03:43 PM
As the thread-starter, I make known my acceptance of solid's picture.

We need lesbians (or at least women, as in plural) in this thread to balance out the gayness.

;D


http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj55/BrianDevero/Lesbian.jpg

http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb40/rebelned52/Lesbian.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/guttermouther/lesbian.jpg


http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e112/iwanturcum/RainbowFlag.jpg

zap
10th May 2012, 03:48 PM
Only here at GSUS.......can we take a thread and drive it into the ground, and grind it and grind it.

I betcha we can get at least 4 more pages of this crap.:D

ximmy
10th May 2012, 03:53 PM
It's about run it's course... or several courses every meal, every day, for days, months, years... It takes time to let yourself go...

http://edge.ebaumsworld.com/picture/goldiemcg/FatLesbians.png

Old Herb Lady
10th May 2012, 04:00 PM
Stop posting pics of us when we were thinner butch, I told u to never do that.

U still look hot tho, babe.

solid
10th May 2012, 04:02 PM
Where's the smite button?

zap
10th May 2012, 04:04 PM
{%$#} Lol

Golden
10th May 2012, 04:05 PM
JPM KaBoom - US or Syria via Blue Coat - GLBT or B L T)-Transgender

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvlbUyRcbs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvlbUyRcbs
Published on May 10, 2012 by wepollock
In October 2011 it was reported that the US government is looking into claims made by Telecomix that the Syrian government is using the company's products (Blue Coat) to restrict internet access. I don't need to look in Syria for that issue is closer to home at the local library. JPM Synthetic instruments go KaBoom once. JPM and other banks have a lucrative money printing press called synthetic CDO CDS's and other derivatives. They have been taking a huge vigorish as they get rich while hiding the dirt behind the illusion of risk neutrality. Why don't we just call this whole animal farm of synthetic bets fraud and be done with it. The way its stands we could face a huge monetary contraction as all this stimulative money from derivatives gets sucked out of the system thereby forcing the destruction of innocent savings. It was a matter of coincidence that I asked the rhetorical question yesterday as to why JPM was trying to capture money in the Lehman and MF Global bankruptcies. Money that,can be alleged that, it was the custodian and fiduciary of, other peoples money (aka savings). To add insult to injury our politicos are interested in the same old game of divide and conquer. This time its GLBT's; I am calling this farce BLT's a sandwich I would not want to be in between. We need to avoid the issue by recognizing that it is simply a news bomb of mass distraction.

gunDriller
10th May 2012, 04:31 PM
http://edge.ebaumsworld.com/picture/goldiemcg/FatLesbians.png


Mmmm ... i just love the smell of their sweat ! :)

Santa
10th May 2012, 04:54 PM
WTF, Golden Snake. You trying to distract us from worrying about Mo Town? :)

Libertytree
10th May 2012, 06:02 PM
If there was ever a video/song that belonged in a thread this is it!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZGqRuXYX34&feature=related

Book
10th May 2012, 06:51 PM
Growing up, as a child, my father was the strong arm of the law. My mother, fixed us up when we got sick or injured...I prefer women doctors. If I'm injured or not well, I'm more comfortable that way. A woman's touch, a woman's nature.



http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/thefw.com/files/2012/05/Time-Cover-Story-on-Attachment-Parenting2.jpg

solid
10th May 2012, 06:54 PM
What an asshole.

I think I've earned the right to say that.

vacuum
10th May 2012, 07:04 PM
I think these guys are masculine:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYpUs87ha0w

Libertytree
10th May 2012, 07:07 PM
Some might even say Fucking Asshole....I say it all the time, clear out of the blue, maybe it's Tourettes?

or.....

Buck Fooky.

solid
10th May 2012, 07:09 PM
LOL, LT, what cracks me up is he knows it too! He knows he's one.

Cheers, my friend. :)

zap
10th May 2012, 07:19 PM
I knew we could drive this thread right into the ground, keep grinding boys and girls!

Oh and I think that little boy otta get off the tit. :)

joboo
10th May 2012, 07:23 PM
at least someone around here spent time outside today!

lol

Libertytree
10th May 2012, 07:27 PM
LOL, LT, what cracks me up is he knows it too! He knows he's one.

Cheers, my friend. :)

Who knows what? Cheers to you too! it is beer:thirty!

Zap, that youngin' shoulda been off the tit awhile back. The hell of it is one has to think that it's a staged pic. Those boobs don't look none too full and the kid seems to be having a deer in the headlights kinda moment.

freespirit
10th May 2012, 07:30 PM
maybe book and solid should take the gloves off and head for the thunderdome.

someone needs to dust the cobwebs off there...lol

zap
10th May 2012, 07:32 PM
LOL LT, yes they do seem kinda small and too perky, at least the boy won't have a fetish when he grows up?

Aw.......... maybe all boys do? ;)

solid
10th May 2012, 07:34 PM
Zap, that youngin' shoulda been off the tit awhile back. The hell of it is one has to think that it's a staged pic. Those boobs don't look none too full and the kid seems to be having a deer in the headlights kinda moment.

That photo has to be Photoshopped. True, those tits don't look full, and the child is too old anyway.

Libertytree
10th May 2012, 07:38 PM
That photo has to be Photoshopped. True, those tits don't look full, and the child is too old anyway.

I know it's crazy as hell but there are women out there that breast feed kids that age.

solid
10th May 2012, 08:43 PM
maybe book and solid should take the gloves off and head for the thunderdome.

He's overly emotional right now. Must be his time of the month. I think that's common amongst folks struggling with their sexual identity. I shouldn't have made the gay remarks, he will figure all that out in time, at his own pace.

EE_
10th May 2012, 09:05 PM
I know it's crazy as hell but there are women out there that breast feed kids that age.

It's one thing that some mothers breast feed children way longer then they should...it's another when a Jewish magazine shows a photo of it. I could be wrong, but my take is that the Jews are trying to entice would-be pediphiles with a form of pediphylia, into crossing the line of acting on their impulses to molest children. Something very common and accepted in their satanic cult.
IMO, the photo on that Jewish magazine is anything but innocent.
These filthy sick degenerate Jews should be severely punished by God and/or man!

Camp Bassfish
11th May 2012, 05:25 AM
I see this thread is barely Staying Alive....... much like http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20537218,00.html

mamboni
11th May 2012, 11:00 AM
California Creamin, The Muthas and the Fookers

All the moneys gone
All the moneys gone
and the guys are gay
and the guys are gay
I've just got some pork
I've just got some pork
In my rump today
In my rump today
I'd be felching big time
I'd be felching big time
If I was in L.A.
If I was in L.A.
California creamin
California creamin
On such a queerish day

Stopped into a bar
I passed along the way
Well, I got down on my knees
Got down on my knees
And I began to blow
I began to blow
You know the owner locked the door
Owner locked the door

He knows I'm gonna suck
Knows I'm gonna suck
California creamin
California creamin
On such a faggish day

All the moneys gone
All the moneys gone
and the guys are gay
and the guys are gay

I've just got some pork
I've just got some pork
In my rump today
In my rump today
If I didn't tell him
If I didn't tell him
My gerbil died today
My gerbil died today
California creamin
California creamin
On such a felching day
California dreaming
On such a felching day
California dreaming
On such a felching day

Old Herb Lady
11th May 2012, 01:07 PM
Bwaahaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa best post of the thread next to the pic of the lesbo hunneys !!
Hahahahaha Uhhhh thank you . LMAO.

Santa
11th May 2012, 06:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GOYUBfdHn4

Libertytree
11th May 2012, 06:31 PM
If anyone thinks all this attention being given to the queers is really important given everything else that is going on then I don't know really what to say......GSUS ain't as sharp as I thought it was. crackin a beer and waitin for the flames.

joboo
11th May 2012, 11:01 PM
Cannot be unseen...


http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cp_pix_186_10.gif (http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cp_pix_186_10.gif)


(http://www.cherryplucker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cp_pix_186_10.gif)

Neuro
11th May 2012, 11:19 PM
joboo that is really freaky...

General of Darkness
11th May 2012, 11:47 PM
The 70's, pushing multiculturalism.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk7flBdDC1M

freespirit
12th May 2012, 05:23 AM
joboo that is really freaky...

Disgusting is the word I would have used

Neuro
12th May 2012, 06:44 AM
Disgusting is the word I would have used
Yeah me too. That's why I always put "..." so I can add to it at a later date, as I sort out my thoughts and vocabulary...

Not that I tend to do that either... But who knows maybe twenty years or so later I will add to the incomplete statements... ;D

Awoke
12th May 2012, 08:14 AM
Society went past trying to create acceptance, but more trying to push it as being popular. Metrosexuals are a perfect example. These are straight men, who dress and act gay, to impress women. It makes no sense, at all. Yet, somehow this culture became popular. The gay culture went past trying to stop being victims of harrassment, but onto making it a fashion statement.


Somehow? You still don't know how, after all your years with us?



Sexual preference is not a fashion statement. I believe attraction is not a choice. You can't force yourself to be attracted to someone, man or woman. That is the only way I can understand homosexuality, personally.

The cabal is trying to inculcate faggotry into our children, making them confuse a natural appreciation for handsomeness or beauty into a purely sexual attraction.

I can recognise it if another man is handsome. No big deal. Our kids are being PUSHED towards taking that recognition, and second-guessing the nature of it, and assigning more depth and importance to it that necessary. They are taught that if the see a person of the same sex, and they can appreciate that person's attractiveness, they must be queer, and they have the obligation to embrace the queer lifestyle and to force all of society and the world to accept it as normal.

The "gay rights" organization is extremely militant and extremely dogmatic.
(Much like the fetus-murder industry and all the other BLT sponsored population control/ethnic mixing agendas)

Fucking khazars are constantly dropping bogus "Scientific reports" on animals that are queer, as if a male tiger trying to hump another male tiger, or a monkey on a monkey proves that queerness is "natural", while at the same time pushing the theory of evolution and removing God from peple's thoughts. Insidious.

Awoke
12th May 2012, 08:39 AM
If anyone thinks all this attention being given to the queers is really important given everything else that is going on then I don't know really what to say......GSUS ain't as sharp as I thought it was. crackin a beer and waitin for the flames.

LT, man, I like you bro, and I appreciate your posts, but WTF is going on here?

Last week you played down the importance of the Zio-media using celebrities as a promotional tool for race-mixing by their adoption tactics, which will lead to the destruction of not only YOUR race, but all other races, excluding Khazars.

Now you are playing down the importance of the Khazar led campaign to promote homosexuality to the children of this world.

These agendas are only two of millions. But every one is just as important as the other. This attack and conspiracy is so pervasive that NOTHING goes untouched. Every single aspect of your life is under attack by satanic elite, whom want you dead or enslaved. If you keep on saying "Oh, well that's not an important issue, if doesn't affect me, and it's minor" and you just worry about the banksters and political figures, you're going to hand them a victory.

It is the secret societies that compartmentalize these agendas and have them carried out, right under our noses.

EVERY ASPECT of this diabolical plan has to be opposed and battled against. It's the little things that add up. An increase in homosexuality here, an increase in immigration there, an increase in ethnic mixing here, and increase in fluoride there, an increase of chemtrails here, an increase of mercury there, an increase of agressive GMO seed here, an increase of test-tube grown beef there...

All these things are being carried out in perfect cohesion by the cabal. Every one of these little things serves a purpose. Nothing happens without an absolute direction and goal in mind. Nothing.

Our food is poisoned, our water is poisoned, or rights to self-provide are quashed, our morals are corrupted, our nation is made Godless, our people are brainwashed, our young are invading countries and murdering locals, our medicine makes us sicker, our women are objectified, our government takes everything they can from us, our family units are being torn asunder, I could go on and on and on.

What will it take? Does the cabal have to legalize beastialty and pedophilia before people wake the fuck up? God help us all.

You better get your guard up higher, because you're leaving yourself exposed if you don't start recognizing the conspiracy in everything around you.
This is not an attack. I only posted this because I care.

solid
12th May 2012, 08:55 AM
The cabal is trying to inculcated faggotry into our children, making them confuse a natural appreciation for handsomeness or beauty into a purely sexual attraction..

Awoke, there's multiple issues going on, and you only seemed to be focused on one of them. Conveniently ignoring the rest.

Our personally lives are private. There's nothing wrong with being gay, but it's a private issue. It's none of anyone's business. When what folks do in the bedroom is used to push an agenda to us, and our kids, yes that's a problem. However, I wonder if the opposite effect is happening. Kids, especially gay kids, are being bullied at an increase rate in our schools. We shouldn't ignore that either.

Anything, when used to push an agenda, should be recognized. That doesn't mean we need to ignore the other problems as well.

ShortJohnSilver
12th May 2012, 09:17 AM
Our personally lives are private. There's nothing wrong with being gay, but it's a private issue. It's none of anyone's business. When what folks do in the bedroom is used to push an agenda to us, and our kids, yes that's a problem. However, I wonder if the opposite effect is happening. Kids, especially gay kids, are being bullied at an increase rate in our schools. We shouldn't ignore that either.
.

Well, yeah, there IS actually something wrong with being gay. If you don't understand that, you understand nothing.

Kids are NOT being bullied at an increasing rate because they are gay. It is all a fiction, a media phenomenon created by those who believe all aspects of traditional American culture are bad and need to be replaced.

Let's take "gay suicide" as a an example...it is purely a media creation, the ideas is that the pressure of being gay depresses people and they end up killing themselves due to the pain of living, or something. First article mentioning it, is from 2005 or 2007, then a spike in news, then it dwindles.

Don't believe me? Go here and have a look... http://www.google.com/trends/?q=gay+suicide

Homosexuality is a form of sexual deviancy. It occurs in less than 3% of the population, according to the most accurate studies. Why then does it appear that gay Jews have so much power? My belief is that sexual deviancy and sociopathy are correlated.

solid
12th May 2012, 09:27 AM
Well, yeah, there IS actually something wrong with being gay. If you don't understand that, you understand nothing.



Did it ever occur to you that perhaps, you are trying to push an agenda on them? Live and let live. If a gay couple wants to live in peace and not bother anyone, that's fine with me.

sirgonzo420
12th May 2012, 09:55 AM
Well, yeah, there IS actually something wrong with being gay. If you don't understand that, you understand nothing.


Did it ever occur to you that perhaps, you are trying to push an agenda on them? Live and let live. If a gay couple wants to live in peace and not bother anyone, that's fine with me.

Homosexuality can be said to be "wrong" or "unnatural" because it the sex acts do not result in pregnancy. The same can be said of masturbation.

I don't care if people are gay. I don't care if people masturbate. Ideally, they wouldn't do those things in front of me, but I don't have a say over what two adults do together behind closed doors and I don't want to have that say. People shouldn't smoke crack either, but I'm not gonna start busting down doors and throwing people in jail.

Freedom has some "baggage" with it... if you can do what you want, so can other people, as long as no one hurts anyone else (without their permission, lol) there is no problem. That's how freedom works.

So if two girls wanna get down with each other in private, who should even know about it but them? The same for dudes. That being said, how a "man" can somehow *not* be attracted to women is beyond me, and is likely indicative of some severe neurological or otherwise biological flaw or issue, as is evidenced by Nature's "punishing" them by not allowing them to reproduce.

I do however very much dislike the idea of ANY gay couple adopting children.

Nature says a gay population CANNOT reproduce. There is a reason for this. Letting gays adopt other people's children is a horrible thing to inflict on society and the children.

Tumbleweed
12th May 2012, 10:11 AM
I get a newsletter from Ed Decker at Saints Alive. This is part of the latest one and I think he lays it out pretty well why christians shouldn't be condoning or looking the other way when it comes to homosexuality.


http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001TjkVAA5htgz07y9xsF-AYBOJyAh-2e-UN7FfSiWiRGJcOmY8AJAxV9zMq9Oh84Z3exzmzueqM4ZcGAP6H oV0ApKy_G5Of1_z7iuGUeMcXc-peS2JVNaftQ==

The President, Vice President and all the rest of the Gay, Lesbian and Transgender community may be running around rejoicing that the wall against gay marriage has finally come down in America and it is now their time and place, their moment, but the Bible, God's Word to man, still calls it an abomination. I am sorry but that is the way it really is..

The Word of God will not bend to political gamesmanship or feel good, political correctness. But, many of those who stand in a pulpit with God's Word in their hands have bent to it's power.

Hold on to your warm and fuzzzies for a minute and read the endorsement God gives to this perverse lifestyle.

In The Old Testament, just one scripture of many:

22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Lev 18:22 KJV

And In the New Testament, just one scripture of many:

24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. Rom 1:24-27 KJV

And in just one of many commentaries on the subject we read from Wycliffe Bible Commentary on Romans 1:26-27:

"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

Uncleanness always generates more uncleanness. Here is a divine judgment in which God handed the Gentiles over to disgraceful passions. Women are charged with homosexuality in verse 26 and men in verse 27.

"Paul uses straightforward language to condemn perversion of sex from its rightful place in the marriage relationship. He regards the union of the sexes in marriage as a natural relationship (AV, natural use). But here women exchanged natural sex relations for that which is contrary to nature. The men did the same thing.

"Paul pictures the depravity and degradation of men inflamed with sensual desire for each other. This is followed by the note of judgment."

(from The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, Electronic Database. Copyright © 1962 by Moody Press. All rights reserved.)

Now I am going to take a 180 degree turn and talk to every pastor in the United States and all who read this blog.

I weary of pastors who will not speak against sin from their pulpits for fear of offending some, for fear that people will stop coming to their 'unfriendly' church, for fear that the government will take away their church's non-profit status for 'getting political'. For fear has captivated the preaching of the Gospel throughout America!

Here is the president of the United States of America, a man who claims he is a Christian, openly endorsing what God calls a perverse abomination and the outrage that should be coming from every pulpit in this country is, instead, a silence that is deafening.

I know a few godly pastors, zealots for truth and decency and the holiness of marriage who will speak up loudly but you and I both know they are in the tiniest minority.

I challenge every pastor and Christian leader and every Christian believer in America to stand up for what God wants for us and not what President Obama dictates for us. The time to act is now.

I challenge every Christian reading this to print it out and hand out copied to every leader and pastor a in your church and demand that they be true Christian leaders and take a stand at once. Email it to every person on your email list. Post it everywhere you can.

Do you remember the story of Sodom and Gomorrah? Is it going to be repeated in America? If not, will God have to apologize to those wicked ones.

Remember, God was going to destroy that wicked place because of the homosexual, perverse things going on and Abraham pled with the Lord not to do so if there were Fifty righteous men in the city. Abraham and the Lord finally got down to the sad fact that even ten righteous men could not be found there.

Angels finally came and saved Lot and his family from a mob of men who had surrounded their house, calling on Lot to send out his sons for their perverse use.

Well, I have to ask you, "Are there 50 righteous pastors who will stand in their pulpits this Sunday and a call sin and perversion the abomination that it is and call upon our president to repent?"

"Is there even one righteous pastor in your own church?

"Are you out there, pastors who will not bend to the politically correct filth that president Obama just called out to be the law of this land?

Please, are you out there?"

Dear Holy God, spare America from destruction.







God Bless you,

Your brother in Christ

Ed Decker

Awoke
12th May 2012, 10:59 AM
Awoke, there's multiple issues going on, and you only seemed to be focused on one of them. Conveniently ignoring the rest.


That's not a fair assessment at all. I am only focused on one thing because this thread topic is gay jews controlling hollywood. After reading all the material I have contributed to this board, I am awestruck that you could even attempt to say that.


Solid - You go ahead and continue to convince yourself that everything the satanic khazars promote to us is "OK", "normal" and/or "acceptable".

When the NWO cabal legalize beastialty and pedophilia, you will probably cheerlead that too. (Between supporting police in almost every case of police brutality and authority abuse.)

As much as I think you're a very nice guy, I'm also realizing you are as much of a statist as Book, only you just don't seem to realize it.

solid
12th May 2012, 11:16 AM
That's not a fair comment, Awoke. You are trying to put me on the defensive. Read my posts again, I stand by what I've said.

Awoke
12th May 2012, 11:20 AM
Stand by it all you want. That doesn't change the immorality and unnaturalness of it all.

solid
12th May 2012, 11:47 AM
Stand by it all you want. That doesn't change the immorality and unnaturalness of it all.

I guess you didn't read how I agree there's an agenda pushed by the media, and others, and that I think pushing any agenda is wrong.

I stand by that people have the freedom to live the lives they want to live, as well. I don't think God wants us to be as judgmental as we often are. We are all sinners, none of us has any right to be casting stones.

goldleaf
12th May 2012, 12:37 PM
This will stir the pot! Queers acting upon their urges is as wrong as single people acting upon theirs. And no, fags shouldn't be allowed to get married to justify their acts.

Awoke
12th May 2012, 12:39 PM
Seriously, marriage is an issue that the government should have zero jurisdition over anyways.

If it were left up to the Churches, and the cabal wasn't influencing the world, queers would have a hard time finding a "church" that would marry two men to each other, or two women.

Horn
12th May 2012, 01:22 PM
We are all sinners, none of us has any right to be casting stones.

You went up to the apartment with her, didn't you?

Book
12th May 2012, 02:37 PM
Homosexuality can be said to be "wrong" or "unnatural" because the sex acts do not result in pregnancy.



http://www.protias.com/Pictures/Gay/gay%20sex.jpg

What a silly premise.

Actually describe these "unnatural" acts you seem to be defending.

:o

sirgonzo420
12th May 2012, 02:56 PM
http://www.protias.com/Pictures/Gay/gay%20sex.jpg

What a silly premise.

Actually describe these "unnatural" acts you seem to be defending.

:o

Nice try booky, but you're not gonna get me to write your gay erotica for you.

;D

Book
12th May 2012, 03:01 PM
Nice try booky, but you're not gonna get me to write your gay erotica for you.



Seriously. You think people only object to homosexuals because their behavior amounts to birth control?

::)

Libertytree
12th May 2012, 03:38 PM
LT, man, I like you bro, and I appreciate your posts, but WTF is going on here?

Last week you played down the importance of the Zio-media using celebrities as a promotional tool for race-mixing by their adoption tactics, which will lead to the destruction of not only YOUR race, but all other races, excluding Khazars.

Now you are playing down the importance of the Khazar led campaign to promote homosexuality to the children of this world.

These agendas are only two of millions. But every one is just as important as the other. This attack and conspiracy is so pervasive that NOTHING goes untouched. Every single aspect of your life is under attack by satanic elite, whom want you dead or enslaved. If you keep on saying "Oh, well that's not an important issue, if doesn't affect me, and it's minor" and you just worry about the banksters and political figures, you're going to hand them a victory.

It is the secret societies that compartmentalize these agendas and have them carried out, right under our noses.

EVERY ASPECT of this diabolical plan has to be opposed and battled against. It's the little things that add up. An increase in homosexuality here, an increase in immigration there, an increase in ethnic mixing here, and increase in fluoride there, an increase of chemtrails here, an increase of mercury there, an increase of agressive GMO seed here, an increase of test-tube grown beef there...

All these things are being carried out in perfect cohesion by the cabal. Every one of these little things serves a purpose. Nothing happens without an absolute direction and goal in mind. Nothing.

Our food is poisoned, our water is poisoned, or rights to self-provide are quashed, our morals are corrupted, our nation is made Godless, our people are brainwashed, our young are invading countries and murdering locals, our medicine makes us sicker, our women are objectified, our government takes everything they can from us, our family units are being torn asunder, I could go on and on and on.

What will it take? Does the cabal have to legalize beastialty and pedophilia before people wake the fuck up? God help us all.

You better get your guard up higher, because you're leaving yourself exposed if you don't start recognizing the conspiracy in everything around you.
This is not an attack. I only posted this because I care.

I know you're not attacking me bro, and I know there's a war going on for our minds and souls through satan and his minions. I also realize one needs to at least understand that this a concerted effort on many fronts by many people and that by realizing those facts one can fight against it, at least mentally.

I think the vast majority of people view whatever is going on in Hollyweird to be complete and utter BS, most of the country just ain't that fucked up, IMO. Even most of the black folks don't like interacial relations or adaptions, is for no other reason it's really hard on the youngins.

I see these stories posted on the MSM sites like their major important news events, the fact is, again IMHO, they're not. I wade through all that tabloid horseshit to try and disseminate real data and to try and keep a pulse with how the MSM is covering (or not covering) real news. So, I think I might be a little testy when its smattered here and gone into at such great lengths and I react out of that frustration...that's my bad. Then, I watch Booky kick the anthill just to watch the show and my frustration grows even more.

Do I like or agree with any of that twisted shit? Hell No! Gonzo is right, freedom does have its baggage.

osoab
12th May 2012, 06:03 PM
That photo has to be Photoshopped. True, those tits don't look full, and the child is too old anyway.

It is a true photo. Herd "el rushbo" talking about it today.

sirgonzo420
12th May 2012, 07:15 PM
Seriously. You think people only object to homosexuals because their behavior amounts to birth control?

::)

No, people object to homosexuality for a variety of reasons.

I was just pointing out that Nature obviously doesn't endorse homosexuality by not letting them reproduce.

solid
12th May 2012, 07:17 PM
No, people object to homosexuality for a variety of reasons.

I was just pointing out that Nature obviously doesn't endorse homosexuality by not letting them reproduce.

I'm sure it's better for everyone if Booksy doesn't reproduce.;D

Cebu_4_2
12th May 2012, 07:19 PM
He can't, remember?

PatColo
12th May 2012, 09:08 PM
What will it take? Does the cabal have to legalize beastialty and pedophilia before people wake the fuck up? God help us all.

I expect you know Awoke, but all should recognize, the "normalization of pedophilia" agenda is well in motion. Check:
Thread: Paedophilia (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?40780-Paedophilia)

Thread: Manipulation Of Your Mind by Government Agenda (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?56138-Manipulation-Of-Your-Mind-by-Government-Agenda-Brian-Gerrish)

Icke headline archive: Archives http://www.davidicke.com/templates/rt_solarsentinel_j15/images/arrow.png Child Abuse (http://www.davidicke.com/articles/child-abuse-mainmenu-74)

Gerrish's stuff is most interesting, how "the state" are neck deep in pedophilia, traficking, child-stealing etc.


[B]They're Mainstreaming Paedophilia
Judith Reisman attends confab pushing orientation 'Minor-Attracted Persons'



Monday, 19 September 2011 08:52

http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/September20117/mad.jpg
'Alfred Kinsey's ongoing sexual anarchy campaign has no end in sight.


Matt Barber, associate dean of the Liberty University School of Law, and I attended the "B4U-ACT" pedophile conference Aug. 17. To eliminate the "stigma" against pedophiles, this growing sexual anarchist lobby wants the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to redefine pedophilia as a normal sexual orientation of "Minor-Attracted Persons."'
Read more: They're Mainstreaming Paedophilia (http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2011/08/theyre_mainstre.html)

As to bestiality, I saw a headline somewhere, not sure if it was a GSUS thread, but basically the US Mil was condoning, or at least decriminalizing, bestiality?

PatColo
12th May 2012, 09:40 PM
I was just browsing Icke's child abuse headlines, and missed this'n - lady was key in the swine flu hoax vaccination campaign of '09,

CDC Director Arrested for Child Molestation and Bestiality (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/28/cdc-director-arrested-for-child-molestation--bestiality.aspx?e_cid=20111028_DNL_art_1)


that page doesn't show her pic, but Icke's referring page (http://www.davidicke.com/articles/child-abuse-mainmenu-74/55365-cdc-director-arrested-for-child-molestation-and-bestiality-) does,

http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/October201194/kim_lindsey_231cc.jpg (pic is too large for here)

less flattering pic at CNN story page:
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/111012124917-kimberly-lindsey-cdc-story-body.jpg


(http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/11/justice/georiga-cdc-arrest/index.html)According to CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/11/justice/georiga-cdc-arrest/index.html):
"Authorities also charged Lindsey's live-in boyfriend, Thomas Joseph Westerman, 42, with two counts of child molestation.

The two are accused of 'immoral and indecent' sexual acts involving a 6-year-old ...

The bestiality charge says Lindsey 'did unlawfully perform or submit to any sexual act with an animal.'"
Between January and August last year, Dr. Lindsey and her boyfriend allegedly involved the child during sex, and DeKalb County police claim (http://www.inquisitr.com/149615/cdc-official-kimberly-lindsey-charged-with-bestiality-child-molestation/) they discovered photographs of Lindsey performing sex acts on a couple of her pets.

^ you figure she must've touched some live wire outside the elite control grid's parameters, that she's being outed & prosecuted. Notice they don't tell the gender or relationship of the 6yo.

BrewTech
12th May 2012, 09:49 PM
::)

CURRENT THREADS SOLID STARTED:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?58846-Women

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?60937-Online-dating

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59864-Awe...man-is-this-a-deal-breaker

ENTIRE THREADS THAT SOLID STARTED THEN DELETED AT GSUS:

Guys, would you date this gal?

How to pick up girls in New York.

Confusing response from a gal I've been talking too...

Interesting dating site

Would you guys ever consider dating a cop?

Something I thought I'd share about myself

Guys, check this gal out...

Wow, Book. You keep tabs on folks on this board like it's your job.

Is it?

Somehow I think it is.

That's a disturbing thought.

BrewTech
12th May 2012, 09:57 PM
Well, if you can post that, I can post this. Cheers guys!

2778

Ewwww!

(Not)

madfranks
12th May 2012, 11:30 PM
Whether or not someone is born gay is really besides the point. We're all born sinners, and our sinful nature is something we have to overcome every day. We can't just indulge our base instincts and call it good because it comes naturally. I may be tempted to drink to excess, because alcoholism runs in my family, but acting on it would be wrong, and I recognize that so I fight to overcome these temptations. Someone may be tempted to engage in homosexual acts, but acting on it is still a sin. Hell, I'm married and I've been tempted by other women, but even though this temptation comes naturally to me I won't act on it.

ShortJohnSilver
13th May 2012, 07:34 AM
Did it ever occur to you that perhaps, you are trying to push an agenda on them? Live and let live. If a gay couple wants to live in peace and not bother anyone, that's fine with me.

Your argument is one of "moral equivalence" or "moral relativism".

Therefore to be intellectually honest with yourself, you must admit that you find bestiality acceptable, as long as "the woman and her Rottweiler just want to live in peace and not bother anyone, that's fine with me."

solid
13th May 2012, 09:56 AM
Your argument is one of "moral equivalence" or "moral relativism".

Therefore to be intellectually honest with yourself, you must admit that you find bestiality acceptable, as long as "the woman and her Rottweiler just want to live in peace and not bother anyone, that's fine with me."

Interesting point. However, that's animal abuse. If the woman could teach the rottweiler to talk, and the rottweiler can establish himself as a consenting adult, then maybe I'd have to grumble and say "let them be". I wouldn't want them as neighbors though, nor should they be allowed to adopt.

solid
13th May 2012, 11:28 AM
Edit: to hopefully help the case, not taking sides.

That's a good question to ask. Incest with children is child abuse, a crime, get a rope...but if both are consenting adults? The real question isn't what we personally think about it, but do they have the right to live that way? Ie...do the people who think it's wrong, have the right to interfere with their lives?

Horn
13th May 2012, 12:24 PM
Whether or not someone is born gay is really besides the point. We're all born sinners, and our sinful nature is something we have to overcome every day.

You're not born a sinner, but created one by mankind's better judgement.

gunDriller
13th May 2012, 12:32 PM
Interesting point. However, that's animal abuse. If the woman could teach the rottweiler to talk, and the rottweiler can establish himself as a consenting adult, then maybe I'd have to grumble and say "let them be". I wouldn't want them as neighbors though, nor should they be allowed to adopt.


i think it's good for members to understand other members positions on Bestiality.

now this thread has surpassed the Twitching Frog Leg thread.

Book
13th May 2012, 01:16 PM
If the woman could teach the rottweiler to talk, and the rottweiler can establish himself as a consenting adult, then maybe I'd have to grumble and say "let them be". I wouldn't want them as neighbors though, nor should they be allowed to adopt.



http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/huddexaminer/mar2010/6/7/rottweiler-tia-with-owner-lynette-stothart-49456745.jpg

Solid would deny this loving couple their right adopt a child?

::)

Book
13th May 2012, 01:20 PM
Incest with children is child abuse, a crime, get a rope...but if both are consenting adults? The real question isn't what we personally think about it, but do they have the right to live that way? Ie...do the people who think it's wrong, have the right to interfere with their lives?



http://watermarked.cutcaster.com/cutcaster-photo-100655525-girl-and-dangerous-dog.jpg

In dog years this puppy is a consenting adult in three years. Then they can get married according to Solid.

::)

sirgonzo420
13th May 2012, 01:23 PM
Hahahahahahahaha.

Book
13th May 2012, 01:26 PM
http://www.indianarottweiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Alpha-Omegas-Am-I-Too-Sexy-with-owner-Jacquie-Prentice_WEB-200x300.jpg

If she waits another two years they can get married according to Solid...

::) ...with his blessing

solid
13th May 2012, 02:20 PM
LOL.....leave it to booksy for a laugh.

lapis
13th May 2012, 03:56 PM
It's one thing that some mothers breast feed children way longer then they should...it's another when a Jewish magazine shows a photo of it.

I personally think the uproar created by the photo is really silly, considering that the real natural age for weaning a child is between three and seven years of age (but after toddlerhood it's not that frequent and is more for emotional comfort).

There's been some funny and cute spoofs of the photos already.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s720x720/527687_236733539764040_131061033664625_367670_9099 42012_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/522277_3541063118790_1038799444_3292830_1054960252 _n.jpg

Horn
13th May 2012, 04:48 PM
If singular gay marriages are O.K., whattabout seven wives are they approved, solid?

If so, am I tax exempt?

solid
13th May 2012, 09:53 PM
i think it's good for members to understand other members positions on Bestiality.

now this thread has surpassed the Twitching Frog Leg thread.

That post was not meant to be taken seriously. Obviously a dog can not talk, obviously any person who wants to marry a dog is not right in the head. I shouldn't even have to make this post.

solid
13th May 2012, 09:56 PM
If singular gay marriages are O.K., whattabout seven wives are they approved, solid?

If so, am I tax exempt?

I don't fucking care. I'm not going to st. ives, as long as your 7 cats don't require food stamps, do as you wish.

solid
13th May 2012, 10:52 PM
You know, I spent the evening with my parents, and grandma. We were all celebrating, my father just turned 67, I have my birthday in a couple of days as well. Both my Mom and Grandma, we were celebrating Mother's day.

We had a good discussion. One I feel spoke to me, and my beliefs.

Our religion does not condone homosexuality. Nor abortions. Yet, we feel God is love. God does not want us to judge others, he wants us to be true to him, and ourselves. We were not given this gift of life, to spread hate and judgement, condemn others. We are here to spread God's gift of joy, happiness, and love. If we are not doing that, we are not living the life God would want of us.

Beat up on me in this thread all you want. I still love you folks.

Awoke
14th May 2012, 04:23 AM
What religion is that? Obviously not Christianity.

Awoke
14th May 2012, 04:30 AM
Thanks Patcolo. I am familiar with the agenda to normalize satanic pedophilia.


you figure she must've touched some live wire outside the elite control grid's parameters, that she's being outed & prosecuted. Notice they don't tell the gender or relationship of the 6yo.

I am also familiar with this situation as well. This just screams of "smear campaign", and I think you hit the nail on the head with your assumption: She pissed off her handlers somehow, and they are straightening her out.

I think all these cultists go through rituals that involve abhorrent acts, and they're videotaped to keep people in line with the agenda.

chad
14th May 2012, 06:00 AM
was mowing the yard friday, had the radio headphones on and was listening to some talk radio show that had the breastfeeder lady on. she struck me as having about an 80 iq. sounded like a complete moron. for the record, she also has an ADOPTED 6 year old that is still breastfeeding.

Old Herb Lady
14th May 2012, 06:11 AM
Twice Blessed ! Supports & honors homosexuals who are Jewish. March in the parade & show your support for fags & Jews ! They are twice blessed !

http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc377/Nauris_Nikans/Pride%20Parade/Pride_Parade_Vancouver_BC_2011_221.jpg


http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c241/undita/7%20Domingo%2024%20NYC%20Gay%20Parade/DSCN0402.jpg


http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa469/imagination_29/be-who-you-are-love-who-you-love.jpg
"special" bathroom for the blessed ones ahead ! (Thank YOU for your support !!!!! )
See what all your support has done.....we can do whatever we want OUT IN THE OPEN because of your help.
THANK YOU to all of the GAY SUPPORTERS ! WhoooHooo !

JohnQPublic
14th May 2012, 08:53 AM
Our religion does not condone homosexuality. Nor abortions. Yet, we feel God is love.

I can see that you may be able to twist homosexuality into being another type of "luv", but how does abortion fit into the luv picture?

Book
14th May 2012, 09:27 AM
We are here to spread God's gift of joy, happiness, and love. If we are not doing that, we are not living the life God would want of us.



http://www.findloveinagaybathhouse.com/images/findloveinagaybathhouse336280.png

::) spreading God's gift of joy, happiness, and love

ShortJohnSilver
14th May 2012, 09:28 AM
I don't fucking care. I'm not going to st. ives, as long as your 7 cats don't require food stamps, do as you wish.

My point exactly! "Do what Thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law" - this is Aleister Crowlery's religion, not the religion of Jesus.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelema

BrewTech
14th May 2012, 09:36 AM
Interesting how personal liberties take a back seat the second religion is invoked.

(This is just an observation of mine WRT this particular thread, not taking sides on the issue(s) up for discussion)

Horn
14th May 2012, 12:12 PM
I don't fucking care. I'm not going to st. ives, as long as your 7 cats don't require food stamps, do as you wish.

You must be joking, 4 of the 7 minimum would be working to over supplement a single household at any given time.

Once I have all 7 working in their fields, the Government wouldn't even be able to match the greatest of Sultans.

Awoke
14th May 2012, 12:21 PM
Interesting how personal liberties take a back seat the second religion is invoked.


There is a major diffference between Moral uprightness VS man made law.

Man made law can say what it wants, and the pigs and the establishment enforce it.

God wrote His laws on your heart. We choose to ignore it at our own peril. The prince of this world (Satan) is having his workers impliment all sorts of laws in which "government" should have no say in, such as marriage and unborn baby-murder. It's none of the government's business what two consenting adults do behind closed doors, period.

So you're wrong. (imo)

I state that matter-of-factly because God has made it clear that man should not have sex with man, and woman should not have sex with woman. It's not a question of "Liberty". If people choose to disregard the wishes of the very God who created them, they will reap what they sow.

I couldn't give a shit about man made laws when it comes to moral sexuality. God trumps all.

sirgonzo420
14th May 2012, 12:39 PM
There is a major diffference between Moral uprightness VS man made law.

Man made law can say what it wants, and the pigs and the establishment enforce it.

God wrote His laws on your heart. We choose to ignore it at our own peril. The prince of this world (Satan) is having his workers impliment all sorts of laws in which "government" should have no say in, such as marriage and unborn baby-murder. It's none of the government's business what two consenting adults do behind closed doors, period.

So you're wrong. (imo)

I state that matter-of-factly because God has made it clear that man should not have sex with man, and woman should not have sex with woman. It's not a question of "Liberty". If people choose to disregard the wishes of the very God who created them, they will reap what they sow.

I couldn't give a shit about man made laws when it comes to moral sexuality. God trumps all.

God gave Man the opportunity to sin. He gave man that "choice". Free will / Liberty / Sin are all in the same boat, in a manner of speaking.

Part of the nature of Liberty, is the liberty to do evil (of course, not without consequences).

Man's "free will" comes from his choice to obey or disobey God.

God designed this System, and he intended for sin (or at least, the opportunity of sin) to be a part of it.

It boils down to that whole "duality" thing.... can't have "light" without "dark"... can't have "front" without "back".... all that jazz. The sage mind sees through the duality and into the whole. Dark and light are front and back to each other... they cannot stand alone.

BrewTech
14th May 2012, 02:07 PM
There is a major diffference between Moral uprightness VS man made law.

Man made law can say what it wants, and the pigs and the establishment enforce it.

God wrote His laws on your heart. We choose to ignore it at our own peril. The prince of this world (Satan) is having his workers impliment all sorts of laws in which "government" should have no say in, such as marriage and unborn baby-murder. It's none of the government's business what two consenting adults do behind closed doors, period.

So you're wrong. (imo)

I state that matter-of-factly because God has made it clear that man should not have sex with man, and woman should not have sex with woman. It's not a question of "Liberty". If people choose to disregard the wishes of the very God who created them, they will reap what they sow.

I couldn't give a shit about man made laws when it comes to moral sexuality. God trumps all.

I don't take issue with anything you've said here, I just have one question.

Am I responsible for other people's actions with regard to God's law, or just my own?

solid
14th May 2012, 02:26 PM
Am I responsible for other people's actions with regard to God's law, or just my own?

Just your own, imo. Proof of that is here on this forum. If some asshole wants to post gay pictures aimed at me, am I responsible for that gayboy's posts?

No. He is responsible his own posts. All we can do, is follow what's best for us, and for those we love, and our belief in God. We are not responsible for every other hammerhead out there.

Awoke
15th May 2012, 04:20 AM
God gave Man the opportunity to sin. He gave man that "choice". Free will / Liberty / Sin are all in the same boat, in a manner of speaking.

Part of the nature of Liberty, is the liberty to do evil (of course, not without consequences).

Man's "free will" comes from his choice to obey or disobey God.

God designed this System, and he intended for sin (or at least, the opportunity of sin) to be a part of it.

It boils down to that whole "duality" thing.... can't have "light" without "dark"... can't have "front" without "back".... all that jazz. The sage mind sees through the duality and into the whole. Dark and light are front and back to each other... they cannot stand alone.

God gave man the opportunity to live in perfection.
God gave instruction that mankind was to follow.
Lucifer (The first rebel) tempted man with pantheism and self-deification (You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil)

Regarding the "duality", God never wanted us to sin. God wanted us to choose Him. But we can't choose Him unless there is an alternative available. So proud satan serves the purpose of offering an alternative to giving fealty to the Holy Creator. Satan, with all his work and all his empty promises, offers us a plethora of worldy, material riches, in exchange for turning away from God. Satan is the master of temptation and deceit. He is the father of lies. He is the absolute and extreme opposite of all that is good an holy, yet he is powerful enough to had the means to provide you with great "riches" and "fame" if you are only willing to ignore or reject God. Satan promises you everything, if only you will turn your back on God.

So the Lord rejoices when you you reject satan and his works and empty promises, and instead choose the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Lord rejoices because even though you have been offered riches and fame/infamy and material gain, you instead choose to humble yourself and serve the Lord, who is your generous and loving creator.

The thing about satan and his promises and works is that they only last as long as your life here, in the material world. But people these days are being raised to think only in the short term, not eternally.



I don't take issue with anything you've said here, I just have one question.

Am I responsible for other people's actions with regard to God's law, or just my own?

Of course you cannot be responsible for other people's actions. Only they can be responsible for their actions. If you were a Christian, you are commissioned to spread the Gospel to all nations, and if they reject you, you walk away and shake the dust off your sandals.

Blink
15th May 2012, 05:18 AM
Isn't this a thread about John Travolta..............?

Awoke
15th May 2012, 06:08 AM
It's actually about the gay satanist khazars that run hollywood.

Horn
15th May 2012, 06:16 AM
The thing about satan and his promises and works is that they only last as long as your life here, in the material world. But people these days are being raised to think only in the short term, not eternally.

Not condoning such thoughts, but bringing your brain with you into the afterlife has been spiritually proven an impossibility.

Awoke
15th May 2012, 06:42 AM
Your brain is strictly a tool for your physical body. Your soul trancends the body.

Horn
15th May 2012, 07:30 AM
Your brain is strictly a tool for your physical body. Your soul trancends the body.

Everyone should regard their human brothers as being victim to such soul coach guns.

Awoke
15th May 2012, 07:32 AM
Whatever that means.

Horn
15th May 2012, 12:46 PM
Whatever that means.

You are a victim of Biblical blunderbluss.

Awoke
16th May 2012, 04:00 AM
You are a victim of jewish-propagated goyim-focused atheism.

sirgonzo420
16th May 2012, 05:52 AM
You are a victim of jewish-propagated goyim-focused atheism.

Be careful... someone could call Christianity a "jewish- propagated goyim-focused theism".

Glass houses and whatnot.

Horn
16th May 2012, 07:08 AM
Be careful... someone could call Christianity a "jewish- propagated goyim-focused theism".

Glass houses and whatnot.

True, we should only look upon our brothers as victims, not actually call them out as victims.

Stuff gets broken that way.

Awoke
16th May 2012, 08:10 AM
Be careful... someone could call Christianity a "jewish- propagated goyim-focused theism".

Glass houses and whatnot.

What are you talking about? The jews hate Jesus. They murdered Him. They are the enemies of the Son of God. They not only never "Propagated" Christianity, but to this day they are doing their utmost to dismantle it.

As far as the "Goyim-focused" part: Christ came for all humans, jew and non-jews.

They choose to reject Him. "Glass houses" my ass.

Horn
16th May 2012, 08:35 AM
What are you talking about? The jews hate Jesus. They murdered Him.

You might get a war or hate crimes charge against them,

murder 1 would be difficult with the rising from the dead part.

PatColo
19th May 2016, 10:24 PM
This old thread has > 21K views for some reason, ~100x the average competing thread with "hollywood" in the title!! :o

I've never heard these Themes & Memes guys bang on the dinjoo problem much less their gay agenda; but their shows are always good. 1 hr pod, listen at
http://tmpodcast.com/podcast/31-talladega-nights-movie-review-themes-memes-ep29



Talladega Nights Movie Review, Themes & Memes Ep29

Category: Podcast
Published: Tuesday, 03 May 2016 17:35

On this episode, we take a serious look at a ridiculous film in 'Talladega Nights - The Ballad of Ricky Bobby' from 2006. Being the second instalment in Will Ferrell's 'Mediocre American Male' film trilogy, we deconstruct the ways in which this sub-genre of comedy mocks conservative American culture, most especially the presidency of George W. Bush and the mainstream conservative value system. We also look at the 'Sabido Method' of transposing social norms through screenplay, along with other tricks of stagecraft such as the use of comedic extremes, real-word references, and self-satirical product placement.

listen to this episode

Topics discussed include: Talladega Nights, Will Ferrell, John C. Reilly, Judd Apato, Adam McKay, 'Mediocre American Male', Comedic Actors, Genres of Comedy, Popular Culture, NASCAR, Anchorman, Deconstruction of Conservative Values, Contemporary Morality Play, Risque Humour, Conservatism, Right Wing Politics, Cultural Demographics, Christianity, George W. Bush, DuPont, DynCorp, Halliburton, Carlyle Group, KFC, McDonalds, Product Placement, Self-Satire, Sasha Baron Cohen, Perrier, France, LGBT, Sophistication, Character Archetypes, Frontrunner vs Underdog, Debasement, Degeneracy, Gender Roles, Denigration of the Male, Juvenile Behaviour, Drugs, Homoeroticism, Sexually Inappropriate Themes, Profanity, Sabido Method, Breaking Down Prejudices, Changing Moral Values, Comedic Technique, Lack of Judgement, Identification with Archetypes, Stupidity, Comedic Extremes, Pushing the Envelope, Political Statements, Dialectics, Liberalism vs Conservatism, Toilet Humour, Subversive Impact of Comedies.