PDA

View Full Version : John McCain says US should be 'ashamed'



Book
6th June 2012, 11:48 AM
https://kruitvat.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/mccain-lieberman-israel-jew-zionist.jpg

http://www.rgcombs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/dems-in-israel.jpg

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/jewishp/usa/mccain_aipac.jpg

John McCain says US should be 'ashamed' of inaction over Syria conflict

Senator John McCain (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/johnmccain) has accused Barack Obama (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/barack-obama) of a "disgraceful" abandonment of Syria (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/syria)'s revolutionaries, and called on the US administration to defy Russian objections and arm Bashar al-Assad's opponents.

The Republican former presidential candidate also called for the declaration of safe havens inside Syria, protected by US air power if necessary, after visiting refugee camps at which he said he met women who were raped and soldiers who defected to the opposition.
"The question is how many more have to die at the hands of this bloody dictator before we intervene?" he told the World at One (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qptc) on BBC Radio. "I think you have to arm the opposition. They are desperate for arms."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/06/john-mccain-us-inaction-syria?newsfeed=true

http://www.graphicsgrotto.com/emoticons/rolleyes/images/emrolleyes11.gif Arizona "voters" have kept this zionist tool in Congress since 1983

Celtic Rogue
6th June 2012, 11:52 AM
Fook him and the horse he rode in on!

Spectrism
6th June 2012, 02:35 PM
We should be ashamed that we let that crud McCain get into office. We should be ashamed that we have a toad like him representing a state. We should be ashamed that he bowed to Obama during the election and gave Obama the empire. We should be ashamed that we let little men like him trample on the constitution.

madfranks
6th June 2012, 03:07 PM
We should be ashamed that we let that crud McCain get into office. We should be ashamed that we have a toad like him representing a state. We should be ashamed that he bowed to Obama during the election and gave Obama the empire. We should be ashamed that we let little men like him trample on the constitution.

I'm not sure I'd say that we "let" him trample the constitution, it's just that if "we the people" really tried to stop him (or any of these pompous politicians) we'd be the ones getting killed. What's the great line, "experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed".

Silver Rocket Bitches!
6th June 2012, 04:40 PM
That guy was almost president.

Spectrism
6th June 2012, 07:22 PM
I'm not sure I'd say that we "let" him trample the constitution, it's just that if "we the people" really tried to stop him (or any of these pompous politicians) we'd be the ones getting killed. What's the great line, "experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed".


That guy was almost president.

He was born in Panama. Not eligible to be president and he had no grounds to challenge Obama. A traitor through and through.

Neuro
7th June 2012, 05:30 AM
May he die from horrible constipation!

Awoke
7th June 2012, 09:13 AM
He was born in Panama. Not eligible to be president and he had no grounds to challenge Obama. A traitor through and through.

What does it matter where he was born? lol.

Spectrism
7th June 2012, 01:12 PM
What does it matter where he was born? lol.

He is not a natural-born citizen when born outside the country. Disqualified from being president.... if you follow the law.

Awoke
10th June 2012, 02:15 PM
Spect. I know that. Obama has already shown you all that being a natural born citizen has no bearing on presidential candidacy. That's my point.

Even George Washington wasn't a qualifier, constitutionally speaking, so the entire thing is a sham. I am starting to think more and more that the constitution may just be another pacifying "feel good" document that is, in actual practice, null and void and powerless and has been that way from the start.

See post #5 in this thread here (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59773-A-Lawyer-Disbarred-For-Digging-Too-Deeply&p=526081&viewfull=1#post526081)

Spectrism
10th June 2012, 04:20 PM
Spect. I know that. Obama has already shown you all that being a natural born citizen has no bearing on presidential candidacy. That's my point.

Even George Washington wasn't a qualifier, constitutionally speaking, so the entire thing is a sham. I am starting to think more and more that the constitution may just be another pacifying "feel good" document that is, in actual practice, null and void and powerless and has been that way from the start.

See post #5 in this thread here (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59773-A-Lawyer-Disbarred-For-Digging-Too-Deeply&p=526081&viewfull=1#post526081)

Really? What does the constitution say?

5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

This clause made it possible to have foreign-born citizens fill that office since there were so few educated leaders born in the colonies to that point... and the requirement of natural born citizens was phased in.

Awoke
11th June 2012, 05:28 AM
Really? What does the constitution say?

5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

This clause made it possible to have foreign-born citizens fill that office since there were so few educated leaders born in the colonies to that point... and the requirement of natural born citizens was phased in.

Precisley. Washington was not a 14 year resident.

Spectrism
11th June 2012, 08:17 AM
Precisley. Washington was not a 14 year resident.

Huh? At the start of this new country, NOBODY was a one-year resident.

Awoke
11th June 2012, 10:24 AM
That's what I'm saying.

This is not my theory, I am regurgitating it for the sake of conversation.

From the time that the conditions for POTUS candidacy were drafted, the George Washington would have had to have been elected in 1790. However Washington was elected in 1789. Therefore he did not meet the requirement of being a resident of the USA for 14 years.

So the office he was elected to was the "Office of the President of the United States", which is not beholden to the constitution.
He was not elected to the "Office of President", which is beholden to this constitution.



I don't want to re-type this all over again. Check out the link I provided.
http://www.edrivera.com/?cat=155

The part I am referring to starts with "Article VII tells us, also, that the Constitution counts time from July 4th, 1776."

My point is, it seems possible at this point that the entire thing has been an act from the start, that the Government and President as we know it has never been beholden to the Constitution in a legal sense from the start. It seems possible to me that they have (again) been playing a "words game" with the usual double speak. It seems possible to me that every "President" since Washington has been a usurper who is play-acting as the leader of the country, but is actually holding a title that is no more political than "The president of BlackWater".

I'm not saying any of this is fact. Just read the article and we can discuss more.