They are getting worried about the Tampa convention

[EE_]

What the hell are "strong, principled conservatives " compared to Ron Paul, this jerk speaks of? So Paul folks are considered unprincipled non-conservatives that need counterbalancing? What a shithead!

Rick Santorum: Ron Paul supporters seeking convention fight
Posted by Felicia Sonmez at 10:39 AM ET, 06/10/2012 TheWashingtonPost

Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum on Sunday cited supporters of Rep. Ron Paul as one of the major reasons why he is aiming for a role at this summer’s Republican National Convention in Tampa.

Former GOP presidential candidate and senator Rick Santorum. (REUTERS/Brian Snyder)“I like the platform that we have right now,” Santorum said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week.” “I’m concerned that Ron Paul and some of his supporters out there are looking for a platform fight, and I want to make sure that we have strong, principled conservatives out there . . .to counterbalance the effect of the Paul folks.”

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R) last month clinched the 1,144 delegates necessary to secure the GOP nomination.

But supporters of Paul (Texas) have been rolling up delegates at the state caucus and convention level – in some cases, gaining control of entire county and state Republican Parties -- and are planning on a strong showing at the convention as well as at a separate “Paul Festival.” That sets the stage for a potential showdown at this summer’s Tampa convention.

Santorum, who dropped his own presidential bid earlier this year, also said Sunday that he hasn’t been contacted by Romney’s campaign as part of the vice-presidential vetting process.

“No one’s asked me for anything right now,” Santorum said, adding that he is focused on Patriot Voices, his new conservative group. “I’m not anxious to get back in the fray right now.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/rick-santorum-ron-paul-supporters-are-seeking-convention-fight/2012/06/10/gJQAfLPOSV_blog.html

[osoab]

What the hell are "strong, principled conservatives " compared to Ron Paul, this jerk speaks of? So Paul folks are considered unprincipled non-conservatives that need counterbalancing? What a FROTHY shithead!



fify ;D

[Libertytree]

Ol frothy thinks he's gonna get some big brownie points from flopney running interference against the RP folks, he probably had some or all of his campaign debt paid to do it.

You can bet the bank that they're scared as hell of the public relations mess that's in the works come the convention, the best thing is, it's all on primetime and they can stick unity up their ass.

[chad]

i'm confused. i've been listening to alex jones all weekend. isn't it pretty much established at this point that the pauls are endorsing romney? ron's going to retire + raise money for rand who wants to now include himself in the mainstream republican party. i mean, rand was even seen at bilderberg for lord's sake.

[osoab]

i'm confused. i've been listening to alex jones all weekend. isn't it pretty much established at this point that the pauls are endorsing romney? ron's going to retire + raise money for rand who wants to now include himself in the mainstream republican party. i mean, rand was even seen at bilderberg for lord's sake.

You got a source for Rand @ Bilderberg? First I have heard of that.

[chad]

jones says he was spotted there, no official link. check this, it's great:

http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations/

interviewer: "would you support checking in to whether or not senator kerry violated the logan act by attending bilderberg?"

rand paul: NO COMMENT.

[osoab]

jones says he was spotted there, no official link. check this, it's great:

http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations/

interviewer: "would you support checking in to whether or not senator kerry violated the logan act by attending bilderberg?"

rand paul: NO COMMENT.

Read this @ RP's board


Rand Paul "no comments" question about Bilderberg (http://www.dailypaul.com/239334/rand-paul-no-comments-question-about-bilderberg)

Submitted by end.the.fed (http://www.dailypaul.com/user/52011) on Sun, 06/10/2012 (http://www.dailypaul.com/date/2012/06/10) - 20:16in

Rand Paul (http://www.dailypaul.com/forums/rand-paul)
Florida (http://www.dailypaul.com/category/states/florida)


To be fair, he had already told the gentleman he was done answering questions after one about the Romney endorsement and another about the Iran sanctions, so he did answer some tough ones.

http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-n... (http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations/)

This is how he used to feel about Bilderberg. You'd think he'd want to shed some light on it.

http://www.infowars.com/flip-flopper-rand-paul-denounced-bil... (http://www.infowars.com/flip-flopper-rand-paul-denounced-bilderberg-goldman-before-backing-their-boys/)

[vacuum]

Rand needs to stop talking like any of his father's supporters are behind him. Or that he has any association or relation with them at all.

[chad]

i view that as apologist. it takes just as much effort to say "yes" or "no" as it does "no comment." no comment is lawyer code for "i don't want to incriminate myself by saying something that could be used against me later."

[osoab]

excellent comment from the infowars post above.




captain obvious says:

June 11, 2012 at 5:36 am (http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations/comment-page-2/#comment-3232841)
screw the pauls.
4 years ago:
“thanks for the moneybombs truthers, 911 wasnt an inside job, I’m off to write a book, seeya!”
this time:
no fight against blatant vote fraud in so many states, “ooh lets go for delegates”,
then he lets his son do the backstab sabotage crap.
how many millions have these JACKASSES raked us for?!!
Log in to Reply (http://www.infowars.com/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infowars.co m%2Frand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations%2F)

[osoab]

i'm confused. i've been listening to alex jones all weekend. isn't it pretty much established at this point that the pauls are endorsing romney? ron's going to retire + raise money for rand who wants to now include himself in the mainstream republican party. i mean, rand was even seen at bilderberg for lord's sake.

i am still leery of saying Rand was at Bilderberg. Especially if AJ and crew are the ones saying it.

[JJ.G0ldD0t]

excellent comment from the infowars post above.

thanks :)

ok.. wasn't me but it couldda been

[Awoke]

I don't trust AJ, but if he says that Rand was there, I doubt he would lie about it. AJ thrives on the LRP and keeping the illusion alive, almost as much as he thrives on protecting the identity of the khazars and the abomination of desolation that is masquerading as "zionism".

[JohnQPublic]

I think the Republican party is going to try and muzzle Paul delegates somehow.

[LuckyStrike]

i'm confused. i've been listening to alex jones all weekend.

Yeah, that is the desired effect.

[Libertytree]

jones says he was spotted there, no official link. check this, it's great:

http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-confronted-on-bilderberg-no-comment-on-logan-act-violations/

interviewer: "would you support checking in to whether or not senator kerry violated the logan act by attending bilderberg?"

rand paul: NO COMMENT.

It was mitty who was supposedly spotted at the bilderburger meeting, not randy.

[Libertytree]

I think the Republican party is going to try and muzzle Paul delegates somehow.

Good luck with that, unless they can keep them out of the building! There's a storm a brewing and it's headed for Tampa, who knows though, maybe they'll fire up HAARP and cancel the whole thing since mitty has already got it in the bag?