PDA

View Full Version : Jews Caused The Civil War



General of Darkness
18th June 2012, 10:09 PM
The truth will set you free.

Jews Caused The Civil War
Parts 1 through 6
By Willie Martin Jew Watch (http://www.jewwatch.com/index.html)
Jews Caused The Civil War - Part 1 Jews Caused The Civil War
Caleb Cushing himself was appointed minister to China to make the arrangements! In typical political fashion, he gave several speeches to the American public before he left in which he repeated, over and over, his pro-American and anti-British beliefs.
He then bought for himself a very elaborate Major General's uniform and had prepared for him a letter of introduction written by Daniel Webster and signed by President Tyler. The letter stated: "It is proper, and according to the will of heaven, that our two governments should respect each other, and act wisely. I therefore send to you Count Caleb Cushing, one of the wise and learned men of this country. We doubt not that you will be pleased that our ministry of peace shall come to Peking and that your great officers will, by your order, make a treaty with him to regulate affairs of trade, so that nothing may happen to disturb the peace between China and America."
Note that the letter called Caleb Cushing a "Count" which was in direct violation of United States policy. Notice also that Caleb stated to the people of the United States that he was pro-American and anti-British, thus, he went to China under a total misrepresentation to the American people. He set sail for China with a sizable fleet of warships. He first stopped and exchanged views with British officials in Malta, Bombay and Colombo. He was received and saluted by the British and was given the details of the British communication systems for their entire empire. When he arrive in China, the Chinese Emperor wasn't looking forward to his arrival. He didn't want another rape of Chinese sovereignty like he had just received from the British.
So Cushing sent him a letter: "It is neither the custom in China, nor consistent with the high character of its sovereign, to decline to receive the embassies of friendly states. To do so, indeed, would among western States be considered an act of national insult, and a just cause of war."
Nothing happened. The Chinese Emperor remained quiet. So, one week later he wrote another letter which said: "It is my duty, in the outset, not to omit any of the tokens of respect customary among western nations. If these demonstrations are not met in a correspondent manner, it will be the misfortune of China, but it will not be the fault of the United States."
Cushing then ordered an American warship to sail up to Canton Bay and fire a few warning shots into Whampoa. The Chinese still refused to reply. So, Cushing sent another letter: "I can assure your excellency that this is not the way for China to cultivate good will and maintain peace. The late war with England was caused by the conduct of authorities at Canton, in disregarding the rights of public officers who represented the British Government. If, in the face of the experience of the last five years, the Chinese government now reverts to antiquated customs, which have already brought such disaster upon her, it can be regarded in no other light than as evidence that she invites and desires war with the other great Western Powers." (Claude M. Fuess, The Life of Caleb Cushing, Harcourt, Brace & Co. New York 1923)
The Chinese government was no match for the armada of navy ships that arrived on the Chinese coast prepared for war. China capitulated and signed the treaty which gave to the United States the same freedoms and rights in China that the British had. Thus, Cushing arranged for the open opium trade with China by the Boston Brahmins, those very "dear" fellows who ruled America from behind the scenes then and just like their descendants do today. Of course, the American public didn't know about this, but nevertheless we were judged as a nation by Yahweh. Then, on his way home from China, he stopped in Mexico to create more havoc for the American reputation.
In addition to further destroying the American reputation, he was to set the stage for the development of a part of their new empire, not to be confused with the expansion of the United States. The Tyler administration was concurrently with the Cushing China debacle, planning on Annexing Texas to the Union. Texas had already revolted from Mexico and declared itself to be an independent republic.
John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay approved of annexing Texas but not if it would cause war between the U.S. and Mexico. Mexico flatly stated that if the U.S. annexed Texas, war would be declared. But war was exactly what the Boston Brahmins and the Essex Junto wanted. Such a move would create a large part of their proposed new empire. From the official biography of Cushing the following is extracted: "Caleb Cushing left the ship Perry at San Blas, Mexico, and rode on horseback to Guadelajara, at which he took a diligence (a form of stagecoach) for Mexico City, his route lying directly between two hostile revolutionary armies. What he had learned from his correspondents about American politics convinced him that a knowledge of Mexican affairs would undoubtedly be an asset during the next few years, and he seized every favorable opportunity for gathering information."
During this overland journey Cushing acquired a considerable knowledge of Mexican character, a knowledge which, it may be added, led him to view war with that country with approbation and even elation. What he saw of Mexican sloth, procrastination, shiftlessness, bigotry, and treachery gave him an insuperable prejudice against that nation. Cushing's report on Mexico, dated March 22, 1845, was exhaustive and authoritative, and was used extensively by the War Department two years later. (The Life of Caleb Cushing, by Claude M. Fuess)
President Tyler, Cushing and the Boston Brahmins wanted that war with Mexico. Mexico had already made their proclamation which stated, "Mexico would consider equivalent to a declaration of war against the Mexican Republic the passage of an act for the incorporation of Texas with the territory of the United States; the certainty of the fact being sufficient for the immediate proclamation of war." (Samuel Flagg Bemis, The Latin American Policy of the U.S.: An Historical Interpretation, Harcourt, Brace & Co. New York 1943)
The U.S. Senate tried to honor the Mexican government's declaration. The Senators, including 26 Southern Senators, voted 35 to 16 to reject President Tyler's recommendation to annex Texas. The number of Southern Senators voting against the proposal leaves no doubt as to the thoughts of most of the South.
That didn't stop the Brahmins. President Tyler was replaced at the polls by James Polk who defeated the pro- American and anti-British candidate Henry Clay. Another spoiler named John Slidell helped defeat Henry Clay and as a reward President Tyler sent Slidell to Mexico in the capacity, of all things, of peace commissioner! Again, just like in the case of Caleb Cushing and the Chinese Emperor, the Mexican government refused to receive Slidell. John Slidell sent a message to Polk and the war with Mexico was declared.
The war with Mexico was to serve several purposes. First, it was another excellent way to discredit the good name of the American's intentions of a republican form of government. Second, it was to provide the means to secure land for the empire of the oligarchies rather than that of the United States.
Third, it was to provide training for the generals who were later to fight the yet to be declared, but planned, Civil War between the states. The names of the generals who trained in the Mexican War included Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, William T. Sherman, and Jefferson Davis. The Civil War, of course, was to provide the land for the Brahmins to be the keystone for the Jews new empire. They then could have their nobility, their middle class serfs and then their slaves, both black and white.
General William Tecumseh Sherman, a general in the Norther Army during the Civil War, made a rather cryptic comment in his book Memoirs I: "...the truth is not always palatable and should not always be told." (The Hidden Face of the Civil War, by Otto Eisenhiml, p. 5)
A similar comment was made by the author of the biography of Senator Zachariah Chandler of Michigan, a Senator during the Civil War: "The secret history of these days...concealing many startling revelations, has yet been sparingly written; it is doubtful if the veil will ever be more than slightly lifted." (The Hidden Face of the Civil War, p. 5)
Those who have attempted to lift the veil have discovered that there are indeed many hidden truths about this fateful period in American history. One who only hinted at the truth about the real causes of the War was Colonel Edward Mandell House [A Jew], who wrote his book entitled "Philip Dru, Administrator," in 1912. In it, he has one of his characters make the following statement: "Cynical Europe said that the North would have it appear that a war had been fought for human freedom, whereas it was fought for money." (Philip Dru, Administrator, by Colonel Edward Mandell House, p. 119)




Jews Caused the Civil War - Part 2
The Civil War was actually fought over States Rights but the ownership of the media; the newspapers, magazines, publishing houses and etc., HAVE BEEN USED TO CREATE A HATRED OF THE WHITE RACE BY THE BLACKS, AND THE BLACKS HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO SEE PAST THE END OF THEIR NOSES OR THEIR NEXT WELFARE CHECK HANDED OUT BECAUSE THE JEWS USE THE WHITE RACE TO SUPPLY THE FREE FOOD, MEDICINE, CLOTHING, HOUSING AND ETC. BUT THE BLACKS HAVE REMAINED SLAVES, JUST A DIFFERENT FORM OF SLAVERY. You think not then just think about this, the old slave owners both white and black had to pay for their slaves food, clothing, medical expenses and provide housing. THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDES FOR ITS SLAVES; FOOD, CLOTHING, MEDICAL EXPENSES, AND PROVIDES HOUSING. Exactly the same thing, therefore the Blacks changed from one slavery to another and were simply too stupid to understand what happened to them. And they blamed the White Man when it was really the Jews who did it to them. Is it possible that the Civil War was fought for reasons other than those traditionally offered? Is it possible that the real reasons for the war are among the secrets that some wish not to be revealed? Is it possible that slavery and states rights were not the real causes of the War?
After the demise of the Second Bank of the United States, the state banks, those chartered by the various states in the Union, operated the banking system of the United States and issued all of the money. Almost exclusively, this money was backed by gold, not by debt and paper money.
However, the financial position of the federal government had been slowly deteriorating; "At the outbreak of the war the United States Treasury was in greater shambles than Fort. Sumter. Southern banks had been quietly withdrawing large amounts of funds on deposit in the North. When Lincoln took office, he found his Treasury almost empty." (Our Crowd, by Stephen Birmingham, p. 93)
The Civil War actually started in 1837, the year after the charter of the Second Bank had expired, when the Rothschild family sent one of their representatives to the United States. His name was August Belmont, and he arrived during the panic of 1837. He quickly made his presence felt by buying government bonds. His success and prosperity soon led him to the White House, where he became the, "...financial advisor to the President of the United States." (Our Crowd, p. 93)
Another of the pieces of this enormous puzzle fell into place in 1854 when a secret organization known as the Knights of the Golden Circle was formed by George W.L. Bickley (Confederate Agent, A Discovery in History, by James D. Horan p. 16), who; "... declared that he had created the fateful war of 1861 with an organization that had engineered and spread secession." (Klandestine, by William H. McIlhany II, p. 12)
Another leading character in the story of the Civil War was J.P. Morgan, later to become one of America's most wealthy and influential industrialists and bankers. Mr. Morgan went to Europe in 1856 to study at the University of Gottingen in Germany. It is not inconceivable that one of the people he met while in college was Karl Marx, who was active during this time writing and publicizing his ideas about Communism, since Marx was in and out of Germany on a regular basis; and because Morgan later became an agent for the Rothschild family.
At any rate, it was during this time that the European bankers began plotting the Civil War. "According to John Reeves, in an authorized biography entitled "The Rothschilds, the Financial Rulers of Nations," a pivotal meeting took place in London, in 1857. It was at this meeting that the International Banking Syndicate decided that (America) the North was to be pitted against the South under the old principle of 'divide and conquer.' This amazing agreement was corroborated by MacKenzie in his historical research entitled 'The Nineteenth Century.'" (Committee to Restore the Constitution, Fort Collins, Colorado, January, 1976 Bulletin)
The plotters realized that once again the American people would not accept a national bank without a reason for having one, and once again the plotters decided upon a war. Wars are costly, and they force governments into a position where they must borrow money to pay for them, and the decision was made once again to force the United States into a war so that it would have to deal with the issue of how to pay for its costs.
But the plotters had a difficult problem: what nation could they induce to fight against the United States Government? The United States was too powerful, and no country, or combinations of countries, could match them in a "balance of power" showdown. Canada to the north and Mexico to the south were not strong enough and couldn't raise an army adequate for the anticipated conflict, so they were discounted. England and France were 3,000 miles away and across a huge ocean that made the supplying of an invading army nearly impossible. And Russia had no central bank so the bankers had no control over that nation.
So the bankers made the decision to divide the United States into two parts, thereby creating an enemy for the government of the United States to war against. But the bankers first had to locate an issue to use in causing the Southern States to secede from the Union. The issue of slavery was ideal for that purpose.
Next the bankers had to create an organization that could promote secession amongst the southern states so that they would divide themselves away from the federal government. So the Knights of the Golden Circle was created for that purpose. Abraham Lincoln began to see the drama unfold as he was campaigning for the Presidency in 1860. He saw the war as an attempt to split the Union, not over the issue of slavery, but just for the sake of splitting the Union. He wrote: "I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence. If it (the Union) cannot be saved without giving up that principle, I was about to say I would rather be assassinated on this spot than surrender it." (Abraham Lincoln, the Boy and the Man, by James P. Morgan, pp. 174-175)
So many of his fellow Americans also saw the war as an attempt to split the Union that; "...it was not uncommon for men to declare that they would resign their officer's commission if the war was perverted into an attack on slavery." (High Crimes and Misdemeanors, The Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson, by Gene Smith, p. 98)
The Knights of the Golden Circle were successful in spreading the message of secession amongst the various Southern States. As each state withdrew from the Union, it left independently of the others. The withdrawing states then formed a Confederation of States, as separate and independent entities. The independence of each state was written into the Southern Constitution: "We, the people of the Confederate States, each state acting for itself, and in its sovereign and independent character..." (Quest of a Hemisphere, by Donzella Cross Boyle, p. 293)
This action was significant because, should the South win the war, each state could withdraw from the Confederation, re-establish its sovereign nature and set up its own central bank. The Southern States could then have a series of European-Controlled Banks, the Bank of Georgia, the Bank of South Carolina, etc., and then any two could have a series of wars, such as in Europe for centuries, in a perpetual game of Balance of Power politics. It would be a successful method of insuring that large profits could be made on the loaning of money to the states involved.
The War of 1812, was instigated by the Rothschilds to force the renewal of their Charter for the Bank of the United States. When this charter was vetoed by President Andrew Jackson in 1836, the Jews precipitated a financial panic and set up their plan to bring about the Civil War, which would simultaneously destroy the American Republic and despoil the wealthy Christian families of the South.
The Communist Manifesto of 1848, set Europe ablaze with revolutions, wars and counter-revolutions. In Aug. 1903, Max Nordau, in his address to the 6th Zionist Congress in Balse, Switzerland, revealed the plan for even greater conflagrations, the coming world wars: "Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward...The Zionist Congress; the English Uganda proposition; the future World War; the Peace Conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created." Onward and upward over the bodies of Fifty Million more Dead Christians was Max Nordau's ecstatic vision of the coming world war {World War I}, and so it came to pass!
Professional historians have never been able to offer a satisfactory explanation of how the European Nations became embroiled in the First World War. Arch-duke Ferdinand was assassinated by Gavril Princeps at Sarajevo; Austria demanded an apology from Serbia, Serbia apologized but Austria inexplicably declared war anyway.
Three Jewish advisers to Kaiser Wilhelm, Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg, Max Warburg and Albert Ballin, then had the Kaiser declare war, and the other nations were involved. Why? To carry out the Jewish plan. On February 8, 1920, Winston Churchill expressed alarm over world developments in an interview published in the Sunday Illustrated Herald, London: "From the days of Adam (Spartacus) Weishaupt, to those of Karl Marx to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman. This world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing...There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international, and for the most part, atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders."


The rest.

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-National&InternationalConspiracy&NWO/JewsCausedTheCivilWar-Parts1-6-WillieMartin.htm

Twisted Titan
19th June 2012, 07:24 AM
Of course they did as well as every other over the last 850 years

JDRock
19th June 2012, 10:05 AM
all you need to know is a guy named SOLOMON was treasurer of the south and guaranteed the cash flow (he lied- surprize)...yes they sold the slaves, launched the abolitionist propaganda while counting the $ from slave sales...and profiteered by playing both sides....then wrote the 'authentic" history! barf.

hoarder
19th June 2012, 10:48 AM
all you need to know is a guy named SOLOMON was treasurer of the south and guaranteed the cash flow (he lied- surprize)...yes they sold the slaves, launched the abolitionist propaganda while counting the $ from slave sales...and profiteered by playing both sides....then wroth the 'authentic" history! barf.

If anyone doubts the Jewish role in the slave trade:

http://www.blacksandjews.com/MarcLeeRaphael.html

Awoke
19th June 2012, 11:31 AM
Shit General, it'd be nice if you broke that up into proper paragraphs.

iOWNme
19th June 2012, 01:18 PM
I have tagged this to read later, but i did notice something.

I did a quick search on the whole page and there is no mention whatsoever about the B'nai B'rith (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%27nai_B%27rith). If you want to know how B'nai B'rith played a KEY ROLE in the assassination of Lincoln read here: The UGLY Truth about the ADL (http://www.hourofthetime.com/adltruth.htm).

Excerpt:


April 14, 1865, the day Abraham Lincoln was shot, will live forever, ladies and gentlemen, as a day of infamy for American patriots, and lovers of freedom all over the world.

But for the leadership of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and the Order of B'nai B'rith, and it's twentieth-century police arm, the Anti-Defamation League, April 14th, 1865 is a day that will be long remembered for a very different reason.

The B'nai B'rith, a pivotal player in the British Freemasonic plot to destroy the Union, was implicated in Lincoln's assassination--something that you've never been taught.

That fact does not square very well with its long-cultivated--but totally unwarranted--reputation as a Jewish social service organization, and a champion of civil rights. For that reason, B'nai B'rith and the ADL have gone to great lengths, ladies and gentlemen, to bury that history and much, much more.

Simon Wolf <sp?>, 1835-1923, was the Washington, D.C. lawyer for the Order of B'nai B'rith during the entire period of the United States Civil War. He would later head the International Order of B'nai B'rith for many years.

In 1862, Wolf was arrested by Lafayette C. Baker--the Chief of Detectives for the City of Washington, D.C., and later, Lincoln's Chief of the United States Secret Service--on charges that Wolf was involved in spying and blockade running on behalf of the Confederacy.

Baker arrested Wolf, who was the attorney representing a number of Jews accused of spying for the South, on the grounds that he was part of a conspiratorial organization working on behalf of the secessionist cause behind the lines in the nation's capitol. The conspiratorial organization named by Baker was the B'nai B'rith.

Both Baker and United States General Ulysses S. Grant targeted the Order of B'nai B'rith as a Confederate spy agency. Upon taking command of the western front in 1862, General Grant issued Order No. 11 which expelled all Jews from the military district within 24 hours of its implementation.

U.S. Grant was no anti-semite, ladies and gentlemen. He was reacting to the activities of B'nai B'rith and leading Confederates like Judah P. Benjamin.

cheka.
10th May 2017, 02:17 PM
chelsea hubbell and dc negroes claim civil war was because slavery. like a white guy is going to kill another white guy because he has an african tending crops

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/331379-trump-spurs-outrage-after-civil-war-comments

President Trump on Monday spurred outrage and mockery by questioning why the Civil War happened and suggesting that President Andrew Jackson could have prevented it.

Democrats and political pundits ripped Trump for his comments, published Monday in the Washington Examiner, and advised him to brush up on his history.

"President Trump doesn't understand why there was a Civil war," tweeted Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.).

"It's because my ancestors and millions of others were enslaved."

President Trump doesn't understand why there was a Civil War.

It's because my ancestors and millions of others were enslaved. https://t.co/dFjpbp1pUy
— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) May 1, 2017

Chelsea Clinton also had a simple response for why the Civil War happened.

"1 word answer: Slavery," she tweeted.

"Longer: When Andrew Jackson died in 1845 (16 years before the Civil War began), he owned 150 men, women and children."

1 word answer: Slavery. Longer: When Andrew Jackson died in 1845 (16 yrs before the Civil War began), he owned 150 men, women and children. https://t.co/Icg6puG2JZ
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) May 1, 2017

"UMMM... SLAVERY. The thing southern states were most concerned about in 1861 was the right to perpetuate slavery," tweeted Symone D. Sanders, a former top spokeswoman for Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

UMMM... SLAVERY. The thing southern states were most concerned about in 1861 was the right to perpetuate slavery. https://t.co/Sw3MygpvoX
— Symone D. Sanders (@SymoneDSanders) May 1, 2017

Former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (D) called the president's comments "an unfortunate remark."

"I mean, this is American history, and the president is questioning that," he said in an interview on CNN.

"I mean, the whole issue of land and slavery and sovereignty, it's clear. So I don't know why the president gets into these messes that he doesn't need to."

Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) chimed in as well.

Andrew Jackson was really pissed about Pearl Harbor#CivilWar #HistoryByTrump
— Brendan Boyle (@RepBrendanBoyle) May 1, 2017

The president made the comments during an interview with the Washington Examiner's Salena Zito, in which he compared his presidential campaign to Jackson's.

"I mean had Andrew Jackson been a little bit later you wouldn't have had the Civil War. He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart," Trump said during the interview.

"He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War, he said, 'There's no reason for this.'"

Jackson, the nation's seventh president, died in 1845. The Civil War began in 1861.

In the interview, the president further questioned why the country could not have solved the Civil War.

"People don't realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why?" Trump said during the interview, which also aired on SiriusXM's "Main Street Meets the Beltway."

"People don't ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?"

Some journalists mocked the president, questioning his knowledge of history and criticizing him for claiming no one ever asks why the Civil War began.

Lincoln. Douglass. Jackson. The Civil War. Where is Trump getting this stuff? Is he cheating on Fox and watching the History Channel?
— Binyamin Appelbaum (@BCAppelbaum) May 1, 2017

I'm excited for next year when Trump finds out about the American Revolution.
— Binyamin Appelbaum (@BCAppelbaum) May 1, 2017

The punchline is not the Jackson comment, but Trump's self congratulation on being 1st to ask why the Civil War had to happen
— David Frum (@davidfrum) May 1, 2017

Also "why was there the civil war" has been written about more than just about any subject in American history
— Mazel Tov Cocktail (@AdamSerwer) May 1, 2017

Andrew Jackson was a slaveholding plantation owner. He also died 16 years before the Civil War began. This Trump answer is astonishing. https://t.co/wdKNkUOx1t
— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) May 1, 2017

As so many other things he says, these remarks from Trump on the Civil War sound like an out-take from @drunkhistory read by a sober person https://t.co/DsvUFZrs8b
— Robert Mackey (@RobertMackey) May 1, 2017

I've started a GoFundMe to get to the bottom of that vexing question "why was there the Civil War?" https://t.co/WrtWV2KrRD pic.twitter.com/R7Ds4E4gwh
— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) May 1, 2017

The president has in the past praised Jackson. Ahead of a rally earlier this year, Trump compared his presidency to that of Jackson while marking the birthday of the nation's seventh president.

Trump referred to Jackson as the people's president.

"It was during the revolution that Jackson first confronted and defied an arrogant elite. Does that sound familiar?" the president said ahead of a rally he held earlier this year in Tennessee.

Shortly after being sworn in as president, Trump hung a portrait of Jackson in the Oval Office as an apparent nod to the populist sentiments of his administration.