PDA

View Full Version : "What it's Like to Teach Black Students?"



optionT
21st June 2012, 07:38 PM
What is it Like to Teach Black Students?

by Christopher Jackson

Until recently I taught at a predominantly
black high school in a southeastern
state.

The mainstream press gives a hint of
what conditions are like in black schools,
but only a hint. Expressions that journalists
use like “chaotic” or “poor learning
environment” or “lack of discipline” do
not capture what really happens. There
is nothing like the day-to-day experience
of teaching Black children and that is
what I will try to convey.

One of the most immediately striking
things about my students was that so many of them were
were loud. They had little conception of
ordinary decorum. It was not unusual
for five students to be screaming at
me at once.

It did no good to try to quiet them and
white women were particularly inept at
trying. I sat in on one woman’s class as
she begged the children to pipe down.
They just yelled louder so their voices
would carry over hers.

So many of them seemed to have no conception of waiting for
an appropriate time to say something.
They would get ideas in their heads and
simply had to shout them out. I might be
leading a discussion on government and
suddenly be interrupted: “We gotta get
more Democrats! Clinton, she good!”
The student may seem content with that
outburst but two minutes later, he would
suddenly start yelling again: “Clinton
good!”

It was not uncommon for 15
boys to swagger into a classroom,
bouncing their shoulders and jiving back.
They were yelling back and forth, rapping 15 different sets of
words in the same harsh, rasping dialect.
The words were almost invariably
a childish form of boasting: “Who got
dem shine rim, who got dem shine shoe,
who got dem shine grill (gold and silver
dental caps)?” The amateur rapper often
ends with a claim—in the crudest
terms imaginable—that all womankind
is sexually devoted to him. For whatever
reason, many of my students would often groan
instead of saying a particular word, as in,
“She suck dat aaahhhh (think of a long
grinding groan), she f**k dat aaaahhhh,
she lick dat aaaahhh.”

So many black girls dance in the hall, in the classroom,
on the chairs, next to the chairs, under
the chairs, everywhere. Once I had to take a
call on my cell phone and stepped
outside of class. I was away about two
minutes but when I got back,
girls had lined up at the front of the
classroom and were convulsing to the
delight of the boys.

Blacks, overall, are the most directly critical
people I have ever met: “Dat shirt stupid.
Yo’ kid a bastard. Yo’ lips big.” Unlike
whites, who tread gingerly around the
subject of race, Blacks can be brutally to
the point. Once, I needed to send a student
to the office to deliver a message. I
asked for volunteers, and suddenly you
would think my classroom was a bastion
of civic engagement. Thirty hands
shot into the air. I picked a light-skinned
boy to deliver the message. One
very dark student was indignant: “You
pick da half-breed.” And immediately
other Blacks take up the cry, and half
a dozen are screaming, “He
half-breed.”

For decades, the country has been
lamenting the poor academic performance
of Blacks and there is much to
lament. There is no question
that many Blacks come to school with a
serious handicap that is not their fault.
At home they have learned a dialect that
is almost a different language. They
not only mispronounce words; their
grammar is so often wrong. When a Black
wants to ask, “Where is the bathroom?”
he may actually say “Whar da badroom
be?” Grammatically, this is the equivalent
of “Where the bathroom is?” And
this is the way they speak in high school.
Students write the way they speak, so
this is the language that shows up in
written assignments.

It is true that some whites face a
similar handicap. They speak with
what I would call a “country” accent
that is hard to reproduce but results in
sentences such as “I’m gonna gemme
a Coke.” Some of these country whites
had to learn correct pronunciation and
usage. The difference is that most whites
overcome this handicap and learn to
speak correctly; many Blacks do not.

Most of the Blacks I taught simply
had no interest in academic subjects. I
taught history, and students would often
say they didn’t want to do an assignment
or they didn’t like history because it was
all about white people. Of course, this
was “diversity” history, in which every
cowboy’s Black cook got a special page
on how he contributed to winning the
West, but Black children still found it
inadequate. So I would throw up my
hands and assign them a project on a
real, historical black person. My favorite
was Marcus Garvey. They had never
heard of him, and I would tell them to
research him but most of them never did. They
didn’t care and they didn’t want to do
any work.

Anyone who teaches Blacks soon
learns that they have a completely different
view of government from whites.
Once I decided to have students write about one thing
the government should do to improve
America. I gave this question to three
classes totaling about 100 students,
approximately 80 of whom were Black.
My white students came back with
generally conservative ideas. “We
need to cut off people who don’t work,”
was the most common suggestion.
Nearly every Black gave a variation on
the theme of “We need more government
services.”

My students had only the vaguest
notion of who pays for government
services. For them, it was like a magical
piggy bank that never goes empty. One
Black girl was exhorting the class on
the need for more social services and I
kept trying to explain that people, real
live people, are taxed for the money to
pay for those services. “Yeah, it come
from whites,” she finally said. “They
stingy anyway.”

“Many Black people make over
$50,000 dollars a year and you would
also be taking away from your own
people,” I said.

She had an answer to that: “Dey
half breed.” The class agreed. I let the
subject drop.

Many Black girls are perfectly happy
to be welfare queens. On career day, one
girl explained to the class that she was
going to have lots of children and get fat
checks from the government. No one in
the class seemed to have any objection
to this career choice.

Surprising attitudes can come out in
class discussion. We were talking about
the crimes committed in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina and I brought up the
rape of a young girl in the bathroom of
the Superdome. A majority of my students
believed this was a horrible crime
but a few took it lightly. One Black boy
spoke up without raising his hand: “Dat
no big deal. They thought they is gonna
die so they figured they have some fun.
Dey jus’ wanna have a fun time; you
know what I’m sayin’?” A few Black
heads nodded in agreement.

My department head once asked all
the teachers to get a response from all
students to the following question: “Do
you think it is okay to break the law if it
will benefit you greatly?” By then, I had
been teaching for a while and was not
surprised by answers that left a young,
liberal, white woman colleague aghast.
“Yeah” was the favorite answer. As one
student explained, “Get dat green.”

How the world looks to Blacks
One point on which most Blacks agree
is that everything is “racis’.” This is
one message of liberalism they have
absorbed completely. Did you do your
homework? “Na, homework racis’.”
Why did you get an F on the test? “Test
racis’.”

I was trying to teach a unit on British
philosophers and the first thing the students
appeared to care about Bentham, Hobbes,
and Locke was “Dey all white! Where da
black philosophers’?” I tried to explain
there were no Blacks in eighteenth century
Britain. You can probably guess
what they said to that: “Dat racis’!”
One student accused me of deliberately
failing him on a test because I
didn’t like Black people.

“Do you think I really hate Black
people?”
“Yeah.”
“Have I done anything to make you
feel this way? How do you know?”
“You just do.”
“Why do you say that?”

He just smirked, looked out the window,
and sucked air through his teeth.
Perhaps this was a regional thing, but
the Blacks often sucked air through their
teeth as a wordless expression of disdain
or hostility.

My students were sometimes unable
to see the world except through the lens
of their own blackness. I had a class
that was host to a German exchange
student. One day he put on a Power Point
presentation with famous German landmarks
as well as his school and family.

From time to time during the presentation,
Blacks would scream, “Where da
Black folk?!” The exasperated German
tried to explain that there
were no black people where he lived in
Germany. The students did not believe
him. I told them Germany is in Europe,
where white people are from, and Africa
is where Black people are from. They
insisted that the German student was
racist and deliberately refused to associate
with Blacks.

Blacks are keenly interested in
their own racial characteristics. I have
learned, for example, that some blacks
have “good hair.” Good hair is black
parlance for black-white hybrid hair.
Apparently, it is less kinky, easier to
style, and considered more attractive.
Blacks are also proud of light skin.
Imagine two black students shouting
insults across the room. One is dark
and slim, the other light and obese. The
dark one begins the exchange: “You
fat, Ridario!” Ridario smiles, doesn’t deign to look
at his detractor, shakes his head like a
wobbling top, and says, “You wish you
light skinned.” They could go on like this, repeating
the same insults over and over.

My Black students had nothing but
contempt for Hispanic immigrants. They
would vent their feelings so crudely
that our department strongly advised us
never to talk about immigration in class
in case the principal or some outsider
might overhear.

Whites were “racis’,” of course, but
they thought of us at least as Americans.
Not the Mexicans. Blacks have a certain,
not necessarily hostile understanding of
white people. They know how whites
act, and it is clear they believe whites
are smart and are good at organizing
things. At the same time, they probably
suspect whites are just putting on an
act when they talk about equality, as if
it is all a sham that makes it easier for
whites to control Blacks. Blacks want a
bigger piece of the American pie. I’m
convinced that if it were up to them
they would give whites a considerably
smaller piece than whites get now, but
they would give us something. They
wouldn’t give Mexicans anything.

What about Black boys and white
girls? No one is supposed to
notice this or talk about it but
it is glaringly obvious: Black
boys are obsessed with white
girls. I’ve witnessed the following
drama countless times. A Black
boy saunters up to a white
girl. The cocky black dances
around her, not really in a menacing
way. It’s more a shuffle
than a threat. As he bobs and
shuffles he asks, “When you
gonna go wit’ me?”

There are two kinds of reply.
The more confident white
girl gets annoyed, looks away
from the Black and shouts, “I don’t wanna
go out with you!” The more demure
girl will look at her feet and mumble
a polite excuse but ultimately say no.

There is only one response from the
Black boy: “You racis’.” Many girls—all
too many—actually feel guilty because
they do not want to date Blacks. Most
white girls at my school stayed away
from Blacks, but a few, particularly the
ones who were addicted to drugs, fell
in with them.

There is something else that is striking
about Blacks. So many of them seem to have
no sense of romance, of falling in love.
What brings men and women together is
sex, pure and simple, and there is a crude
openness about this. There are many degenerate
whites, of course, but some of
my white students were capable of real
devotion and tenderness, emotions that
seemed absent from most Blacks—especially
the boys.

Black schools are violent and the
few whites who are too poor to escape
are caught in the storm. The violence is
astonishing, not so much that it happens,
but the atmosphere in which it happens.
Blacks can be smiling, seemingly perfectly
content with what they are doing,
having a good time, and then, suddenly
start fighting. It’s uncanny. Not long
ago, I was walking through the halls
and a group of Black boys were walking
in front of me. All of a sudden they
started fighting with another group in
the hallway.

Blacks are extraordinarily quick to
take offense. Once I accidentally scuffed
a Black boy’s white sneaker with my
shoe. He immediately rubbed his body
up against mine and threatened to attack
me. I stepped outside the class and had
a security guard escort the student to
the office. It was unusual for students
to threaten teachers physically this way,
but among themselves, they were quick
to fight for similar reasons.

The real victims are the unfortunate
whites caught in this. They are always
in danger and their educations suffer.
White weaklings are particularly susceptible,
but mostly to petty violence. They
may be slapped or get a couple of kicks
when they are trying to open a bottom
locker. Typically, Blacks save the hard,
serious violence for each other.

There was a lot of promiscuous sex
among my students and this led to
violence. Black girls were constantly
fighting over Black boys. It was not uncommon
to see two girls literally ripping
each other’s hair out with a police officer
in the middle trying to break up the
fight. The Black boy they were fighting
over would be standing by with a smile,
enjoying the show he had created. For
reasons I cannot explain, boys seldom
fought over girls.

Pregnancy was common among the
Blacks, though many Black girls were
so fat I could not tell the difference. I
don’t know how many girls got abortions,
but when they had the baby they
usually stayed in school and had their
own parents look after the child. The
school did not offer daycare.

Aside from the police officers constantly on campus, security guards are everywhere in
Black schools—we had one on every
hall. They also sat in on unruly classes
and escorted students to the office. They
were unarmed but worked closely with
the three city police officers who were
constantly on duty.

There was a lot of drug dealing at
my school. This was a way to
make a fair amount of money but it
also gave boys power over girls who
wanted drugs. An addicted girl—Black
or white—became the plaything of anyone
who could get her drugs.

One of my students was a notorious
drug dealer. Everyone knew it. He was
19 years old and in eleventh grade. Once
he got a score of three out of 100 on a
test. He had been locked up four times
since he was 13.

One day, I asked him, “Why do you
come to school?”

He wouldn’t answer. He just looked
out the window, smiled, and sucked air
through his teeth. His friend Yidarius
ventured an explanation: “He get dat
green and get dem females.”

“What is the green?” I asked. “Money
or dope?” “Both,” said Yidarius with a smile.

A very fat student interrupted from
across the room: “We get dat lunch,” Mr.
Jackson. “We gotta get dat lunch and
brickfuss.” He means the free breakfast
and lunch poor students get every day.
“Nigga, we know’d you be lovin’
brickfuss!” shouts another student.

Some readers may believe that I
have drawn a cruel caricature of Black
students. After all, according to official
figures some 85 percent of them graduate.
It would be instructive to know how
many of those scraped by with barely a
C- record. They go from grade to grade
and they finally get their diplomas
because there is so much pressure on
teachers to push them through. It saves
money to move them along, the school
looks good and the teachers look good.

Many of these children should have been
failed but the system would crack under
their weight if they were all held back.

How did my experiences make me
feel about Blacks? Ultimately, I lost
sympathy for them. In so many ways
they seem to make their own beds.
There they were in an integrationist’s
fantasy—in the same classroom with
white students, eating the same lunch,
using the same bathrooms, listening to
the same teachers—and yet the Blacks
fail while the whites pass.

One tragic outcome among whites
who have been teaching for too long
is that it can engender something close
to hatred. One teacher I knew gave up
fast food—not for health reasons but
because where he lived, most fast-food
workers were black. He had enough of
Blacks on the job. This was an extreme
example, but years of frustration can
take their toll. Many of my white colleagues
with any experience were well
on their way to that state of mind.

There is an unutterable secret among
teachers: Almost all realize that Blacks
do not respond to traditional white
instruction. Does that put the lie to environmentalism?
Not at all. It is what
brings about endless, pointless innovation
that is supposed to bring Blacks up
to the white level. The solution is more diversity, or put
more generally, the solution is "change."
Change is an almost holy word in education,
and you can fail a million times as
long as you keep changing. That is why
liberals keep revamping the curriculum
and the way it is taught.

For example, teachers are told that Blacks need hands-on
instruction and more group work. Teachers are told that Blacks are more
vocal and do not learn through reading and lectures. The implication is that they
have certain traits that lend themselves to a different kind of teaching.

Whites have learned a certain way for
centuries but it just doesn’t work with
Blacks. Of course, this implies racial
differences but if pressed, most liberal
teachers would say different racial
learning styles come from some indefinable
cultural characteristic unique to
Blacks. Therefore, schools must change,
America must change. But into what?
How do you turn quantum physics into
hands-on instruction or group work? No
one knows, but we must keep changing
until we find.........


more at link:

http://martynemko.blogspot.com/2009/06/white-teacher-speaks-out-what-is-it.html

ximmy
21st June 2012, 08:10 PM
After they finish school they go out to play...
The Big Lie on Parade


A daily roundup of the continuing and ever increasing intifada of black on white crime. Dispelling the Big Lie of the "Violent white racist America" one link at a time.

"105 black on white crimes that I personally could find in 56 days. One hundred and five!! And this is not counting the number of the victims themselves. That averages out to almost two B on W crimes per day. Yet none of the stories I have linked to have gotten major front page coverage in any major paper or television news channel akin to the Trayvon Martin case. I realize that what I am recording is a mere drop in the bucket"

http://biglieonparade.blogspot.com/

24 year old Jacqueline Gardner (http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/lake/12915290-418/family-grieves-schererville-womans-killer-still-at-large.html) of Indiana was returning home from her waitress job to her boyfriend and two small children when she was robbed by three black males for her $85 in tip money and subsequently murdered by a shotgun blast. Two savages have been caught and one is still on the loose.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LFRerjYeFvQ/T9zTOR8vsyI/AAAAAAAAAQs/4gYQpnxl0Gg/s1600/Jacqueline+Gardner.jpgKilled by negros May 19th 2012

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9OCQ7hAehK0/T9zTUTDIqfI/AAAAAAAAAQ0/8ErPYCWYNsg/s1600/Stephen+Lee+Henderson.jpghttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xH5z-SzL8LA/T9zTaRBmihI/AAAAAAAAARE/AvT9gxCUrZM/s1600/thug2.jpg<--- negroshttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bEpITYtCTDE/T9zTXNN53YI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/QB8ey4FrGx8/s1600/thug1.jpg

willie pete
21st June 2012, 08:12 PM
as one who attended a predominately negro highskrool for one year, until I turned 16, the state mandated age to legally stop going to highskrool,( and I was at the Registrar office the MORNING of my birthday withdrawing), I can attest to the accuracy of this story; it makes me laugh now, how so much is put on "bullying"...LMAO ...back then, it wasn't bullying, it was assaults, extortion, theft and intimidation....

madfranks
22nd June 2012, 08:26 AM
On career day, one
girl explained to the class that she was
going to have lots of children and get fat
checks from the government.

I don't know why, but this quote stuck out for me. In any sane society she would have forfeited any welfare claims with an admission like that.

chad
22nd June 2012, 08:50 AM
i taught english in inner city houston for 3 years. i could have written this article; it is spot on 100% correct.

gunDriller
22nd June 2012, 08:57 AM
when i was in junior high, we lived in Denver.

the Educators, in their Esteemed PC non-Wisdom, bussed a few thousand white, black, & brown students across the city for their experiment in multi-culturalism.

it sucked for the students. it was probably something the educators could put on their resume.


i remember this one black kid. he borrowed $1 from me in drafting class. i thought that meant that he agreed to pay me back. i don't think he planned to. i asked him about 15 times for my money back. he finally gave me my money back.

Heimdhal
22nd June 2012, 09:03 AM
Growing up, I was always around a few blacks, but not a lot, even when I was younger and we were dirt poor, there just werent that many around.

I then attended private school for a while and there were NONE.

I started public high school in 10th grade and was thrown to the grinder. I didnt live in a black area, but half of my schools zone covered one of the darkest neighborhoods in my town. Over 40% of the school was black.

Mind you, this wasnt that long ago I was in highschool, late 90's, early 2000's, in South East Florida




This article is 100% my experience with the high school aged black community and continues to be my experience to this day. Word for Word, I could have written that myself.

Hermie
22nd June 2012, 09:35 AM
I grew up and attended school in Chicago in the 60s and this description of blacks in schools is
a given. It is known to be this way by anyone who has had any experience teaching or attending
a school with a significant percentage of blacks.

Why this fact is ignored or unknown in all government plans regarding education is a mystery.
Or I should say would be a mystery if you believed the government was truly trying to be helpful.

Just about all official education studies and media reports are fantasy.

Sending white kids to schools with blacks is child abuse.

PlatinumBlonde
22nd June 2012, 10:32 AM
I grew up and attended school in Chicago in the 60s and this description of blacks in schools is
a given. It is known to be this way by anyone who has had any experience teaching or attending
a school with a significant percentage of blacks.

Why this fact is ignored or unknown in all government plans regarding education is a mystery.
Or I should say would be a mystery if you believed the government was truly trying to be helpful.



"It is the usurer's game to hurl the savage against the civilized opponent"--Ezra Pound

Awoke
22nd June 2012, 10:38 AM
Amazing article. A window into a world I thankfully was never thrust into.

AndreaGail
22nd June 2012, 12:06 PM
the article forgot to mention masturbating in class while watching porn

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Students-Suspended-for-Watching-Porn-in-Class-159265645.html

Book
22nd June 2012, 12:10 PM
We should have picked our own cotton.

sirgonzo420
22nd June 2012, 12:14 PM
We should have picked our own cotton.

Shoulda never even fucked with cotton, and just kept growing hemp.

Tumbleweed
22nd June 2012, 04:24 PM
We should have picked our own cotton.

It was the Jews that brought them here and used them the most.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUE0si2llTY

Buddha
22nd June 2012, 05:22 PM
Jeez some of you have been sheltered, (in a good way) maybe I should write articles like these. I attended inner city schools since kindergarten all the way up until I hit a black kid over the head with a chair in the high school lunch room for stealing my cigarettes and playing cards.

What I learned from these experiences is more valuable to me than anything I learned academically going to these quasi-prisons.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
22nd June 2012, 08:05 PM
I mentored some inner city kids this past school year in Detroit. Third to seventh grade. It was a after school program and I was the only white in the place. They were polite and respectful kids. They built lego robot kits with enthusiasm and were eager to learn MS Movie Maker and Photoshop.

I'm guessing that once they hit their later teen years they'll become thugs through conformity. It's a sad shame. Some of them have real potential but that will quickly fade once they start to believe that whitey is the cause of all their plight.

LuckyStrike
22nd June 2012, 10:13 PM
Some of them have real potential but that will quickly fade once they start to believe that whitey is the cause of all their plight.

All part of the plan.


"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to install in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."


Israel Cohen, A Racial Program For The 20th Century (1912) quoted by Congressman Abernathy, Congressional Record (1957), p. 8559

Xizang
22nd June 2012, 11:10 PM
We should have picked our own cotton.

Man, how many times I've said that in my life! I had to laugh when I read that, because it's so damned good to know other people are thinking the same thing.

woodman
23rd June 2012, 06:38 AM
Man, how many times I've said that in my life! I had to laugh when I read that, because it's so damned good to know other people are thinking the same thing.


If that's Joe talking, he's gone thruogh a spiritual revolution. Sorry Xizang, but someone pointed to a possibility of you being an old member by the name of Joe King (joking) ha, ha.

BrewTech
23rd June 2012, 07:23 AM
If that's Joe talking, he's gone thruogh a spiritual revolution. Sorry Xizang, but someone pointed to a possibility of you being an old member by the name of Joe King (joking) ha, ha.

He MAY not be JK, but he's no stranger to this board...

DMac
23rd June 2012, 08:46 AM
the article forgot to mention masturbating in class while watching porn

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Students-Suspended-for-Watching-Porn-in-Class-159265645.html

WTF

"Nine male students were suspended from Bell Middle School for allegedly masturbating while looking at pornography on their cell phones during English class."

Canadian-guerilla
23rd June 2012, 09:06 AM
isn't there a page in the Protocols about this . . .

i should reread that, this weekend

StreetsOfGold
23rd June 2012, 12:28 PM
THE only way to reform a Black man is with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

http://www.pgm.org/pages.aspx?PageName=Bible_Program_for_Resident_Men

JDRock
23rd June 2012, 01:06 PM
"It is the usurer's game to hurl the savage against the civilized opponent"--Ezra Pound

home run!!

gunDriller
23rd June 2012, 02:12 PM
WTF

"Nine male students were suspended from Bell Middle School for allegedly masturbating while looking at pornography on their cell phones during English class."

that may not be worth a movie, but it certainly warrants a SNL sketch.


as far as the entitlement mentality of many black people, many predominantly white police departments have a very similar mentality.

Canadian-guerilla
23rd June 2012, 03:04 PM
What is it Like to Teach Black Students?

by Christopher Jackson


i've read this post about 3 times now
i'm thinking maybe make this thread a sticky and make a new ( members only ) sub-forum " White Survival " or something like that

Xizang
23rd June 2012, 05:54 PM
It appears that Obama is going to impose a 40% tax on aspirin, just because it's white and it works!!! ;)

JDRock
23rd June 2012, 06:06 PM
It appears that Obama is going to impose a 40% tax on aspirin, just because it's white and it works!!! ;)AND, you have to pick cotton to get at them bwaahhahaa

Kali
24th June 2012, 01:35 AM
i'm thinking maybe make this thread a sticky and make a new ( members only ) sub-forum " White Survival " or something like that

Learn how to fight and kick some ass.

ximmy
25th June 2012, 11:20 AM
Black
boys are obsessed with white
girls. I’ve witnessed the following
drama countless times. A Black
boy saunters up to a white
girl. The cocky black dances
around her, not really in a menacing
way. It’s more a shuffle
than a threat. As he bobs and
shuffles he asks, “When you
gonna go wit’ me?”

Awoke
25th June 2012, 12:16 PM
I don't think that black men are truely obbsessed with white women at all. In fact, I think that attraction is being spoon-fed to the black culture by the SoS in the exact same fashion that our white girls are being programmed to be attracted to black men.
(Search out my post on the movie "Undercover brother")

No race is safe from the attack of the subverters. They want us all dead or enslaved, and so all non-Khazar cultures are being attacked in cohesion.

Book
25th June 2012, 12:26 PM
In fact, I think that attraction is being spoon-fed to the black culture by the SoS in the exact same fashion that our white girls are being programmed to be attracted to black men.



Maybe your pal Freespirit can chime in here.

:)

Awoke
25th June 2012, 12:47 PM
Maybe your pal Freespirit can chime in here.

:)


We've already tried to teach you that there is a major difference between two people falling in love, and jew-media attempting to program an entire nation.
(You just don't seem to catch on very quick) I already destroyed you in that last discussion, Book.
Nice try though.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 01:03 PM
We've already tried to teach you that there is a major difference between two people falling in love, and jew-media attempting to program an entire nation.
(You just don't seem to catch on at all) I already destroyed you in that last discussion, Book.
Nice try though.

...fixed it for you...

book has clearly established himself as a racist, and there is simply no getting through to someone who carries that much hate in their heart.

and fwiw, his opinions on my relationship are 100% meaningless and toothless. he's nothing more than a barking little dog that is more of a petty annoyance than anything.

horseshoe3
25th June 2012, 01:07 PM
I don't think that black men are truely obbsessed with white women at all. In fact, I think that attraction is being spoon-fed to the black culture by the SoS in the exact same fashion that our white girls are being programmed to be attracted to black men.
(Search out my post on the movie "Undercover brother")

No race is safe from the attack of the subverters. They want us all dead or enslaved, and so all non-Khazar cultures are being attacked in cohesion.


Women are attracted on the basis of security. A large part of security is social acceptance. They are an easy mark for race mixers.

Men are attracted largely on the basis of physical desirability. I don't care how many times the media tells me that black women are attractive, I'm not buying it.

Black men to white women is an easy sell. White women are naturally prettier and therefore desirable to black men. Black men can be shown as acceptable and desirable by the media, therefore making them attractive to white women. Selling it the other way around would be much more difficult for them.

Book
25th June 2012, 01:25 PM
...his opinions on my relationship are 100% meaningless...



Tell us all about it Freespirit.

:)

freespirit
25th June 2012, 01:37 PM
Tell us all about it Freespirit.

:)

...why would i? you aren't to be trusted, or the least bit interested in hearing what i have to say other than feigning interest to procure details of my personal life, which is....

NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS.

and besides you would only attempt to use anything i would tell you about it as some sort of ammunition to be used to further bait and troll me like you have in the past.

Book
25th June 2012, 01:42 PM
Oh. I didn't know you try to keep it a secret.

:)

freespirit
25th June 2012, 01:47 PM
Oh. I didn't know you try to keep it a secret.

:)

it's no secret, book...most here know my girlfriend is mixed (jamaican father/white mother), and let me just say she's a far better person than you could ever dream of being.


...you're the only board member who has ever tried to take issue with it.

Awoke
25th June 2012, 01:57 PM
Don't fall for the baiting tactics of NAMBLA-man, FS.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 02:00 PM
Don't fall for the baiting tactics of NAMBLA-man, FS.

not to worry...like i said, 100% toothless...;D

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 02:34 PM
Don't fall for the baiting tactics of NAMBLA-man, FS.

Awoke I don't like members here acusing each other of being queer or pedophiles. If you guys want to fight with each other figure out some other way to insult each other. This queer/pedophile stuff makes me sick.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 03:03 PM
Awoke I don't like members here acusing each other of being queer or pedophiles. If you guys want to fight with each other figure out some other way to insult each other. This queer/pedophile stuff makes me sick.

with all respect Tumbleweed, you mentioned to me once that i should develop a thicker skin. advice i have taken to heart. perhaps you as well need to thicken your skin, then maybe it wouldn't bother you so much.

Book
25th June 2012, 03:06 PM
No race is safe from the attack of the subverters. They want us all dead or enslaved, and so all non-Khazar cultures are being attacked in cohesion.







...most here know my girlfriend is mixed (jamaican father/white mother), and let me just say she's a far better person than...



http://www.graphicsgrotto.com/emoticons/rolleyes/images/emrolleyes11.gif which is it guys?

freespirit
25th June 2012, 03:11 PM
http://www.graphicsgrotto.com/emoticons/rolleyes/images/emrolleyes11.gif which is it guys?

i fail to see your point. but i did notice you left out the last part of my post you quoted. lol

i also fail to see how the two quoted posts contradict each other...perhaps you could enlighten us book...if you have the vocabulary for it...

Book
25th June 2012, 03:20 PM
i also fail to see how the two quoted posts contradict each other...



Awoke has previously posted his lament here about White People being destroyed. I thought you knew about his concerns.

:)

freespirit
25th June 2012, 03:25 PM
Awoke has previously posted his lament here about White People being destroyed. I thought you knew about his concerns.

:)

once again you have missed awoke's point, once again misquoted someone here to suit your needs, and once again, failed to answer my question.

Book
25th June 2012, 03:33 PM
...my girlfriend is mixed (jamaican father/white mother), and let me just say she's a far better person than...(a)



http://rlv.zcache.com/canadian_girl_tshirt-p235082626149447790b7d0l_400.jpg

I didn't realize you hate Canadian girls Freespirit.






:) how does that make your mom and sister and the girl next door feel?

gunDriller
25th June 2012, 03:35 PM
i thought we were talking about Chimp-out University.

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 03:42 PM
with all respect Tumbleweed, you mentioned to me once that i should develop a thicker skin. advice i have taken to heart. perhaps you as well need to thicken your skin, then maybe it wouldn't bother you so much.

freespirit my skin is thick enough but I don't like people accusing others of this. I've watched it happen with young people and it's bullshit. Someone accuses another of being a queer or pedophile and others jump on the bandwagon. I have a hard time respecting people that do it. I've had a couple of people try it on me in real life and I put a stop to it in a hurry. It's bullshit. I haven't looked at what Book has posted yet but I'd like to see these queer/pedophile accusations stopped. Find something else to accuse each other of.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 04:07 PM
http://rlv.zcache.com/canadian_girl_tshirt-p235082626149447790b7d0l_400.jpg

I didn't realize you hate Canadian girls Freespirit.






:) how does that make your mom and sister and the girl next door feel?

i see you are reaching now book, i'm sorry, i didn't mean to tax your brain so strenuously. it's my fault for thinking you might actually have an original thought to share, or at least something that resembles intellect.
my bad.

instead you only seem to be able to twist posts and take things out of context. it's a thin veil for such shining stupidity, book, and maybe at on time, i would have expected better from you.
and you still haven't explained to me how the two posts you quoted earlier contradict each other. if you've got nothing left to offer, i suggest you bow out now in order to save what little dignity you have left.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 04:16 PM
also, fwiw...i try not to hate anyone, although at times that can be very difficult. when i see people doing evil things, or acting in a unchristian manner, i remind myself the best thing i can do is pray for them. i can't change them, but i can pray for them. i'll pray for you too, book.

Xizang
25th June 2012, 04:27 PM
I've been thinking about the story that leads this thread. I keep wondering who in their right mind would WANT to teach black students. My daughter's a teacher. Actually, she was a high school dropout - then after a few years, she realized that cleaning toilets and moping floors at the local school wasn't what she was born for, and she went back to school and got her degree and a teaching certificate. She says, "Dad, teaching isn't what it's cracked up to be". She's now running a county owned day care in a small, rural Colorado town. No more high school brats.

Book
25th June 2012, 04:52 PM
...you still haven't explained to me how the two posts you quoted earlier contradict each other.



Maybe your bestest pal "Awoke" will explain to you the concept of cultural cohesion:




No race is safe from the attack of the subverters. They want us all dead or enslaved, and so all non-Khazar cultures are being attacked in cohesion.



https://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyzssw2HmT1qaxy4to1_500.jpg

I imagine your dad and future father-in-law are discussing the dowry and wedding expenses now while ice hole fishing and watching hockey together. Probably have become the best of mates. You get along with your future father-in-law?

:)

freespirit
25th June 2012, 04:59 PM
Maybe your bestest pal "Awoke" will explain to you the concept of cultural cohesion:



https://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyzssw2HmT1qaxy4to1_500.jpg

I imagine your dad and future father-in-law are discussing the dowry and wedding expenses now while ice hole fishing and watching hockey together. Probably have become the best of mates. You get along with your future father-in-law?

:)


i totally understand Awoke's position, you obviously do not. i don't need him to explain himself, i want you to explain yourself.

also, i think that my father and fil would get along just fine, although i doubt they could stand ice fishing, lol. and in the times i have talked to my fil, i've gotten along fine with him. which is totally irrelevant, as i don't require his approval for anything, or yours for that matter. :)

freespirit
25th June 2012, 05:15 PM
also you misconstrued Awoke's post...he said non-khazar cultures were being attacked in cohesion, meaning they were being attacked as a single group. the reference you made was to cultural cohesion, which represents unity of a culture. apples and oranges...

keep trying though, lol

Book
25th June 2012, 06:11 PM
...the reference you made was to cultural cohesion, which represents unity of a culture.



http://www.mypolice.ca/images/Diversity%20chart%202.png

http://buzzcanuck.typepad.com/agentwildfire/images/2008/04/03/465_mosaic_canada2006b.jpg

Oh. My mistake. Apparently "Awoke" does not actually care about it either.

:)

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 06:35 PM
Book,
You've reached a new low in this thread. Whatever TINY shred of respect I might have had for you up to this point is now completely gone. I also, like freespirit, try my best not to hate... but you've always made it EASY for me to hate you.

BTW, just a bit of fair warning: I will take GREAT pleasure in perma-banning you from this forum on the day you fuck up... you've made THAT MUCH of a negative impression on me.

Book
25th June 2012, 06:54 PM
BTW, just a bit of fair warning: I will take GREAT pleasure in perma-banning you from this forum on the day you fuck up... you've made THAT MUCH of a negative impression on me.



My Sig line quote speaks for itself Gaillo. You already have publicly made known your long-time feelings towards me.

My understanding is that you have given General of Darkness many many many temp bans for far more and here you are now threatening me with an instant perma-ban?

Please reiterate the Official GSUS Policy that justifies the actual conditions for a perma-ban. Every member here should have a clear understanding of the GSUS ban policy. It is currently a progressive procedure of increasing temp-bans.




:) perhaps instead, you can take issue with something specific in this thread that concerns you.

ximmy
25th June 2012, 07:01 PM
Book,
You've reached a new low in this thread. Whatever TINY shred of respect I might have had for you up to this point is now completely gone. I also, like freespirit, try my best not to hate... but you've always made it EASY for me to hate you.

BTW, just a bit of fair warning: I will take GREAT pleasure in perma-banning you from this forum on the day you fuck up... you've made THAT MUCH of a negative impression on me.

Could this be considered a personal attack by a moderator?

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:02 PM
Could this be considered a personal attack by a moderator?

Sure. You want to ban me?

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 07:11 PM
Could this be considered a personal attack by a moderator?

It's probably not a personal attack ximmy but it's something I've watched for a long time. I don't think I ever saw Book lose a debate with a moderator but he'd get banned because that was the only way a moderator could win.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:13 PM
Please reiterate the Official GSUS Policy that justifies the actual conditions for a perma-ban. Every member here should have a clear understanding of the GSUS ban policy. It is currently a progressive procedure of increasing temp-bans.

Yep. You are correct. You've been repeatedly banned in the past, so I think one more should just about do it.

You want to nitpick and twist the meaning of any other forum policies with me? ???

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:13 PM
Could this be considered a personal attack by a moderator?

Nah, no discussion of shoving something up one's ass was not typed.

Book
25th June 2012, 07:16 PM
You've been repeatedly banned in the past, so I think one more should just about do it.



I've never once been banned at GSUS.

Post the logs.

:o

Rubberchicken
25th June 2012, 07:18 PM
Bullshit Weed, book doesn't debate. He always gets the last word but he's not always right, he antagonizes members. He's wondering why he's banned from the duece. This place is next.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:19 PM
I've never once been banned at GSUS.

Post the logs.

:o

You are a liar. Here is the most recent:


Book - 3 day ban for personal attack using photo.
Post has been deleted, it showed a photo originally titled "gay.jpg" with a smoking guy, renamed "OptionT.jpg"
-JohnQPublic
Status: Ban Expires Ban Expired
Note: Haven't seen any posts by book since the ban... looks like he might be out of here. -Gaillo
Note2: Nevermind, he finally came back. -Gaillo

Santa
25th June 2012, 07:19 PM
http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/junk/a658a2c2.jpg

Book
25th June 2012, 07:23 PM
Here is the most recent:



I have never been banned at GSUS.

Post the entire log WITH DATES.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:26 PM
I have never been banned at GSUS.

Post the entire log WITH DATES.

No. The dates were lost during the forum software changeover.

You are still a liar, madfranks or JQP will verify the FACT of your being banned here. In fact, if you look at the log entry, it was JohnQPublic who banned you that time!

I knew you liked to twist the meaning of posts around, but I never took you as an outright in-your-face dishonest liar! :(

Skirnir_
25th June 2012, 07:27 PM
3007

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:27 PM
How long you banned at the deuce book?

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 07:30 PM
Bullshit Weed, book doesn't debate. He always gets the last word but he's not always right, he antagonizes members. He's wondering why he's banned from the duece. This place is next.

Bullshit yurself chicken. Books one of the smartest posters on this forum and he's damn good at debate.

Book
25th June 2012, 07:32 PM
You've been repeatedly banned in the past, so I think one more should just about do it.



http://www.co.galveston.tx.us/judgecriss/212th%20DC%20Pictures/jury2.jpg

Oh. You "lost" your Moderator Logs and can't actually prove publicly to our fellow GSUS Membership the slander that is quoted above.

:) got at least a date for the one alleged ban you posted?

drafter
25th June 2012, 07:33 PM
What was this thread about again?? Is it just me or does every thread these days seem to devolve into a "should Book be banned" thread? Wierd.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 07:33 PM
Bullshit yurself chicken. Books one of the smatest posters on this forum and he's damn good at debate.

being good at twisting people's words, and misconstruing their meanings and putting words in their mouths does not make one a good debater.

Rubberchicken
25th June 2012, 07:34 PM
Go book, you're doing great! Sue for slander! LMAO

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:35 PM
Bullshit yurself chicken. Books one of the smartest posters on this forum and he's damn good at debate.




I disagree Tubleweed. Book is great at twisting things people say to fit his own statist agenda. In the time frame that I have "known" Book, he has done nothing more than chide and manipulate posts by a few select people that are on his "shitlist". k-os and solid are two examples.

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:35 PM
being good at twisting people's words, and misconstruing their meanings and putting words in their mouths does not make one a good debater.

He's a "Master Debater". :D

BrewTech
25th June 2012, 07:39 PM
Women are attracted on the basis of security. A large part of security is social acceptance. They are an easy mark for race mixers.

Men are attracted largely on the basis of physical desirability. I don't care how many times the media tells me that black women are attractive, I'm not buying it.

Black men to white women is an easy sell. White women are naturally prettier and therefore desirable to black men. Black men can be shown as acceptable and desirable by the media, therefore making them attractive to white women. Selling it the other way around would be much more difficult for them.

Tell me about it.

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR-OIqwO6ebcg_2xNKvND2Ar-5cQAw-9WC_sEtLAfpjV4lVr8wPrPszJx1q

freespirit
25th June 2012, 07:39 PM
He's a "Master Debater". :D


...i would rather be a cunning linguist, lol ;D

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:41 PM
http://www.co.galveston.tx.us/judgecriss/212th%20DC%20Pictures/jury2.jpg

Oh. You "lost" your Moderator Logs and can't actually prove publicly to our fellow GSUS Membership the slander that is quoted above.

:) got at least a date for the one alleged ban you posted?

You listen Book, and listen VERY carefully:

The dates in the ban log were deleted due to incompatibility with the new forum software when we made the switchover to VBulletin. JohnQPublic and madfranks will confirm this... I personally did not lose ANYTHING as you claim.

I banned you shortly after GS-US began, when you posted a NAZI in pantyhose photo saying it was another member. JohnQPublic banned you about a year ago for a similar photo insult, which I showed you the ban log for.

You are a PROVEN LIAR, as of this thread, and are now headed into VERY dangerous waters by continuing to poke and prod at me about this. Think carefully before you post again.

singular_me
25th June 2012, 07:44 PM
it's no secret, book...most here know my girlfriend is mixed (jamaican father/white mother), and let me just say she's a far better person than you could ever dream of being.


...you're the only board member who has ever tried to take issue with it.

all this begins to make sense now... I am 50% caucasian and 50% african... maybe it isnt just only my belief system he is after...

edit: dont know anymore, who posted it, Magnes or Book, but one of them posted my picture on here. The one of me that was on my website....

Libertytree
25th June 2012, 07:46 PM
Awoke I don't like members here acusing each other of being queer or pedophiles. If you guys want to fight with each other figure out some other way to insult each other. This queer/pedophile stuff makes me sick.

He's made innuendos about me being queer 2 or 3 times now Tumbleweed, and I agree with ya, it's a low down damn tactic. Has he ever insinuated the mountain in the back of your avatar is "Brokeback Mountain"? He keeps drilling me on mine, maybe you're next?

Edit to add....he only pulls this shit when the debate is lost and BS/petty attacks/pics is the only recourse, so him being a great debater is utter fucking nonsense.

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 07:51 PM
I disagree Tubleweed. Book is great at twisting things people say to fit his own statist agenda. In the time frame that I have "known" Book, he has done nothing more than chide and manipulate posts by a few select people that are on his "shitlist". k-os and solid are two examples.

He's damn good osab at challenging people to think about what they are saying and their beliefs. That tends to piss some people off instead of thinking about why they are being challenged. Twisting.....I don't know about that. He does make some people squirm but alot of the time it's because they refuse to own up to the reality of what they are doing or saying and take responsibility for it.

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:52 PM
Too bad Rodney King died so young. :rolleyes:

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/cantwealljustgetalong.jpg

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 07:54 PM
...He does make some people squirm but alot of the time it's because they refuse to own up to the reality of what they are doing or saying and take responsibility for it.

Just like HE is "owning up to reality" and "taking responsibility" in this thread for having been banned in the past? Oh... wait... ::)

Book
25th June 2012, 07:57 PM
I banned you shortly after GS-US began, when you posted a NAZI in pantyhose photo saying it was another member. JohnQPublic banned you about a year ago for a similar photo insult, which I showed you the ban log for.

You are a PROVEN LIAR, as of this thread, and are now headed into VERY dangerous waters by continuing to poke and prod at me about this. Think carefully before you post again.



http://www.co.galveston.tx.us/judgecriss/212th%20DC%20Pictures/jury2.jpg

This is June 2012.

You allege banning me several years ago but can't provide us with even a date. I say it never happened. You say JQP banned me but can't provide us with even a date. Must have happened on a Sunday when I didn't log on to notice. And here you are now calling me a "Liar"?

I expect nothing more than the same progressive ban policy you show towards General of Darkness. If you take exception to something specific I posted in this thread please identify it.

You in this thread now threatening me with an arbitrary "PERMA-BAN" and calling me a "Liar" without actual proof is without cause or merit.

:) show the GSUS Membership your evidence

freespirit
25th June 2012, 07:58 PM
He's damn good osab at challenging people to think about what they are saying and their beliefs. That tends to piss some people off instead of thinking about why they are being challenged. Twisting.....I don't know about that. He does make some people squirm but alot of the time it's because they refuse to own up to the reality of what they are doing or saying and take responsibility for it.

tumbleweed, if you go and re read this thread, you will find several cases where book has twisted poster's words around and taken people out of context. you did say earlier you hadn't read all the posts...

osoab
25th June 2012, 07:59 PM
He's damn good osab at challenging people to think about what they are saying and their beliefs. That tends to piss some people off instead of thinking about why they are being challenged. Twisting.....I don't know about that. He does make some people squirm but alot of the time it's because they refuse to own up to the reality of what they are doing or saying and take responsibility for it.

I will agree to disagree with you Tumbleweed. When Book is challenged with facts (how wrong he is), he quits and moves on to the next mark.

Even if Bookster is "challenging" people, he is fairly obtuse for not recognizing his tactics are not working. More flies with honey and all that.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:00 PM
http://www.co.galveston.tx.us/judgecriss/212th%20DC%20Pictures/jury2.jpg

This is June 2012.

You allege banning me several years ago but can't provide us with even a date. I say it never happened. You say JQP banned me but can't provide us with even a date. Must have happened on a Sunday when I didn't log on to notice. And here you are now calling me a "Liar"?

I expect nothing more than the same progressive ban policy you show towards General of Darkness. If you take exception to something specific I posted in this thread please identify it.

You in this thread now threatening me with an arbitrary "PERMA-BAN" and calling me a "Liar" without actual proof is without cause or merit.

:) show the GSUS Membership your evidence

i'll trust Gaillo's word over yours any fucking day of the week, book.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 08:02 PM
You allege banning me several years ago but can't provide us with even a date. I say it never happened.

Book,

You call ME a liar?
Goodbye.

JQP or madfranks will be along in due course to verify what I've claimed.

(Don't say I didn't warn you!)

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:03 PM
Uh, why is Book now a guest?

edit, saw Gaillo's post above.

Still don't think that's a bannable offense Gaillo. I loath to come to Book's defense, but you have erred once again.

zap
25th June 2012, 08:05 PM
Must be a slow day at GSUS Happy Monday folks..... Book quit before you get Perma - Banned.

I enjoy your pics ! (once in a while.)

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 08:05 PM
He's made innuendos about me being queer 2 or 3 times now Tumbleweed, and I agree with ya, it's a low down damn tactic. Has he ever insinuated the mountain in the back of your avatar is "Brokeback Mountain"? He keeps drilling me on mine, maybe you're next?

Edit to add....he only pulls this shit when the debate is lost and BS/petty attacks/pics is the only recourse, so him being a great debater is utter fucking nonsense.

Libertytree I remember the thread where that comment about brokeback mountain came up and you were the one stirring shit. You started in on Book with enuendo accusing him of being queer and he replied in kind. You had it coming. I don't like what you did or Books reply but it was an eye for an eye. After that the General jumped in and went off on Book, then it went to the thunderdome. Book ain't perfect but he sure as hell ain't the only one here with problems with perfection.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 08:06 PM
Uh, why is Book now a guest?

edit, saw Gaillo's post above.

Still don't think that's a bannable offense Gaillo. I loath to come to Book's defense, but you have erred once again.

Maybe... maybe not. He wanted to play with fire... and I did warn him.

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:10 PM
Must be a slow day at GSUS Happy Monday folks..... Book quit before you get Perma - Banned.

I enjoy your pics ! (once in a while.)

Full Moon isn't until next Tuesday, I don't know what is going on. Summer heat?

zap
25th June 2012, 08:11 PM
Maybe... maybe not. He wanted to play with fire... and I did warn him.

Ok Gaillo your on a time out, don't let picture posters get to you, you are the voice of reason..... step away and take a deep breath. You are a good mod and we appreciate you.


Knock it off Book...... take a walk too .


I have spoken .......
$^^^$

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:11 PM
Uh, why is Book now a guest?

edit, saw Gaillo's post above.

Still don't think that's a bannable offense Gaillo. I loath to come to Book's defense, but you have erred once again.

Gaillo gave book several chances...it's not Gaillo's fault that book is too stupid to know when to quit.

I for one wholeheartedly support banning book, and could give a fuck who likes it or doesn't. should have been done a long time ago.

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:11 PM
Maybe... maybe not. He wanted to play with fire... and I did warn him.

Man, that is school yard antics. Playing with fire with one that has a ban hammer? So what was the vacation? Perma?

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 08:13 PM
Uh, why is Book now a guest?

edit, saw Gaillo's post above.

Still don't think that's a bannable offense Gaillo. I loath to come to Book's defense, but you have erred once again.

I agree with you osoab it wasn't a bannable offense.

Skirnir_
25th June 2012, 08:13 PM
It's JQP & Co.'s board, they do what they want.

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:19 PM
Gaillo gave book several chances...it's not Gaillo's fault that book is too stupid to know when to quit.

I for one wholeheartedly support banning book, and could give a fuck who likes it or doesn't. should have been done a long time ago.


I can't completely disagree with you freespirit. However, what Book just posted was not a bannable offense by forum rules.

If we are to have rules, then abide by the things. Mods and posters. Not some whimsical random day and post.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23873-**-The-Forum-Rules-From-the-Forum-Owner-**

Rule #1 - Be respectful to everyone on the board. No flaming, bashing, or baiting or attacking each other. Keep conversation on an intelligent level. If you get very angry, please sign off for a little while and think about it.

Rule #2 - No spamming, or porn. Informational linking and posting is fine. Moderators will determine where to draw the line.

Rule #3 - Stay on topic. If you want to ramble, please go to the lounge.

Rule #4 - Do not use this board for any illegal purposes. Do not endanger individuals. Vicious threats of violence will not be tolerated, whether against forum members or public figures/groups.

Rule #5 - Moderators will interpret these rules. Moderators will try to be fair.

Rule #6 - Respect the privacy of PM (private messaging).

Rule #7 - Do not reveal personal information about members, including moderators.

I cannot deny that I agree book has violated rule number one on the baiting topic at some past point in time, but the reasoning for his ban today was for arguing with a Mod. That is not in the forum rules. No swearing occurred on Books part. I don't see it the reasoning behind Gaillo's decision.

As much as it pains me to come to Book's defense, I am. Not for him/it especially, but for the damned principal. You or I could be on the next Mod shitlist to be banned over an argument with a Mod.

slowbell
25th June 2012, 08:25 PM
I cannot deny that I agree book has violated rule number one on the baiting topic at some past point in time, but the reasoning for his ban today was for arguing with a Mod. That is not in the forum rules. No swearing occurred on Books part.

Why does swearing have to be involved in a personal attack? A personal attack is personal, just like how Book insulted Freespirit and his wife. You can't get more personal than that....

Tell me to fuck off, stuff it up my ass, fine...I won't complain. But insult my girlfriend. THAT is personal.

I think this forum needs to re-evaluate what IS a personal attack.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 08:29 PM
I cannot deny that I agree book has violated rule number one on the baiting topic at some past point in time, but the reasoning for his ban today was for arguing with a Mod...

Nope. He was banned for the WORST form of personal attack... he attacked my very INTEGRITY and CHARACTER by falsely accusing me of lying.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:31 PM
I can't completely disagree with you freespirit. However, what Book just posted was not a bannable offense by forum rules.

If we are to have rules, then abide by the things. Mods and posters. Not some whimsical random day and post.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23873-**-The-Forum-Rules-From-the-Forum-Owner-**


I cannot deny that I agree book has violated rule number one on the baiting topic at some past point in time, but the reasoning for his ban today was for arguing with a Mod. That is not in the forum rules. No swearing occurred on Books part. I don't see it the reasoning behind Gaillo's decision.

As much as it pains me to come to Book's defense, I am. Not for him/it especially, but for the damned principal. You or I could be on the next Mod shitlist to be banned over an argument with a Mod.

you've got to be kidding...book breaks rule #1 at least once a day!
in this thread alone, he disrespected Gaillo, Awoke, me, just off the top of my head, i'm sure there are others i've missed...

Libertytree
25th June 2012, 08:33 PM
Libertytree I remember the thread where that comment about brokeback mountain came up and you were the one stirring shit. You started in on Book with enuendo accusing him of being queer and he replied in kind. You had it coming. I don't like what you did or Books reply but it was an eye for an eye. After that the General jumped in and went off on Book, then it went to the thunderdome. Book ain't perfect but he sure as hell ain't the only one here with problems with perfection.

Well, that wasn't the 1st time it happened and I probably did jump in feet first on that occasion. Tell me something though, after how many times do you get poked with a stick by a bully (or witness such) do you say enough is enough? I can't see you tolerating such either.

As a matter of fact, I wrote a long post to you on the thread you're referencing and that was the night the forum took a dump. It was long and very detailed, because I wanted you to see what was really going on. Most times I can care less but I respect you and it does matter what you think of me, I know that's probably stupid but, nonetheless, that's just me. It bothered me then and still does a little but I'm not the aggressor here and I never was.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:33 PM
and i will say freely i have not been very respectful to him, but he's deserved every inch of it. if any mods want to ban me for that, they can go ahead, i will wear it as a badge of honor, and hold no ill will.

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:36 PM
you've got to be kidding...book breaks rule #1 at least once a day!
in this thread alone, he disrespected Gaillo, Awoke, me, just off the top of my head, i'm sure there are others i've missed...


Disrespect is not a rule violation. Book's challenge to Gaillo was the reason for the ban as far as I can see. It's not a rule violation.

I cannot disagree that Book breaks rule 1 whenever he posts, but that rule violation is not the reason for today's ban.

Think about it freespirit. Take all of your emotion out of the process. In black and white, Book did nothing wrong.

zap
25th June 2012, 08:39 PM
Gaillo, Is book Perma Banned?

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:42 PM
Nope. He was banned for the WORST form of personal attack... he attacked my very INTEGRITY by falsely accusing me of lying.

With all due respect, get over your bad self. You got backed into a corner for log reproduction. You should have waited for madfranks or JQP to make a ruling. You have a personal bias towards Book that does skew your view of things, self admitted.

I am not backing Book per se, I am questioning your decision process. I think you decision is tainted by your loathing for Book. I don't think you can make an honest assessment without your personal viewpoints getting in the way.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 08:42 PM
Gaillo, Is book Perma Banned?

Indeed he is... never to return.

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:43 PM
Disrespect is not a rule violation. Book's challenge to Gaillo was the reason for the ban as far as I can see. It's not a rule violation.

I cannot disagree that Book breaks rule 1 whenever he posts, but that rule violation is not the reason for today's ban.

Think about it freespirit. Take all of your emotion out of the process. In black and white, Book did nothing wrong.

i submit that disrespect is a violation of rule #1:

Rule #1 - Be respectful to everyone on the board. No flaming, bashing, or baiting or attacking each other. Keep conversation on an intelligent level. If you get very angry, please sign off for a little while and think about it.


calling Gaillo a liar is simply the icing on the cake, imo...

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:45 PM
Why does swearing have to be involved in a personal attack? A personal attack is personal, just like how Book insulted Freespirit and his wife. You can't get more personal than that....

Tell me to fuck off, stuff it up my ass, fine...I won't complain. But insult my girlfriend. THAT is personal.

I think this forum needs to re-evaluate what IS a personal attack.


Spectrisim got banned for telling Norweger to stick it up his ass. That is a personal attack according to Gaillo. FTR, I also thought the banning of you and midnightrambler's was horseshit too.

I agree that a better definition needs to be decided by the chief bottle washer. It's his board.

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:49 PM
i submit that disrespect is a violation of rule #1:

Rule #1 - Be respectful to everyone on the board. No flaming, bashing, or baiting or attacking each other. Keep conversation on an intelligent level. If you get very angry, please sign off for a little while and think about it.


calling Gaillo a liar is simply the icing on the cake, imo...

Gaillo got backed into a corner in a lose/lose situation. Book said prove it. Gaillo said it couldn't be produced. I have a recollection that Bookster had been banned at least twice, but fuck it I keep records on that type of crap.

Gaillo was in a lose/lose situation. He took the easy way out of the situation.

Libertytree
25th June 2012, 08:49 PM
I don't like Booky worth a fuck but I have to defend his right to be an asshole, as much as I HATE to say it. Ain't nothin' worse than havin' to stick up for the bully but right is right.

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 08:52 PM
I don't like Booky worth a fuck but I have to defend his right to be an asshole, as much as I HATE to say it. Ain't nothin' worse than havin' to stick up for the bully but right is right.

You're a good man.

Book had EVERY right to be an asshole here, until he crossed the line. For someone who worships authority as much as he does, he sure didn't know when to STFU when actually dealing with it! :(

zap
25th June 2012, 08:55 PM
You're a good man.

Book had EVERY right to be an asshole here, until he crossed the line. For someone who worships authority as much as he does, he sure didn't know when to STFU when actually dealing with it! :(


I agree on both counts, you gots to know when to STFU. Maybe not perma banned?

freespirit
25th June 2012, 08:58 PM
I don't like Booky worth a fuck but I have to defend his right to be an asshole, as much as I HATE to say it. Ain't nothin' worse than havin' to stick up for the bully but right is right.


i stand by my earlier post...


I for one wholeheartedly support banning book, and could give a fuck who likes it or doesn't. should have been done a long time ago.

...if he comes back the prick can put THAT in his sig line!

osoab
25th June 2012, 08:58 PM
You're a good man.

Book had EVERY right to be an asshole here, until he crossed the line. For someone who worships authority as much as he does, he sure didn't know when to STFU when actually dealing with it! :(

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs3/1377854_o.gif

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 08:59 PM
Well, that wasn't the 1st time it happened and I probably did jump in feet first on that occasion. Tell me something though, after how many times do you get poked with a stick by a bully (or witness such) do you say enough is enough? I can't see you tolerating such either.

As a matter of fact, I wrote a long post to you on the thread you're referencing and that was the night the forum took a dump. It was long and very detailed, because I wanted you to see what was really going on. Most times I can care less but I respect you and it does matter what you think of me, I know that's probably stupid but, nonetheless, that's just me. It bothered me then and still does a little but I'm not the aggressor here and I never was.

I never saw that post so I don't know what your reply was. I did let Book know I didn't like these sorts of insults but he was responding in kind on that one. I'd like the queer/pedopile insults stopped. I don't think there are any here so find another insult or call them an asshole or SOB. I've been called that more than once in my life and it don't bother me to much.

osoab
25th June 2012, 09:02 PM
...i would rather be a cunning linguist, lol ;D

http://eborg3.com/Facebook-Animations/Animals/an-CatLaughing2.gif

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 09:06 PM
Just like HE is "owning up to reality" and "taking responsibility" in this thread for having been banned in the past? Oh... wait... ::)

I guess I'm having the same memory lapse Book was because I don't remember it either.

sirgonzo420
25th June 2012, 09:18 PM
I am loath to do this but.... Book shouldn't be perma-banned in my non-mod/non-owner opinion.

Give the little ADL shitstirrer a time out and then let him back.

Perhaps Gaillo could find another avenue to exact revenge for any perceived slight.... maybe a new custom user title and/or a non-permanent ban.

This forum needs Book for a reason similar to the reason why many religions require a "Satan" figure.

slowbell
25th June 2012, 09:22 PM
This forum needs Book for a reason similar to the reason why many religions require a "Satan" figure.

This is one of the funniest truths I've read in a long time! ;D

Gaillo
25th June 2012, 09:30 PM
I am loath to do this but.... Book shouldn't be perma-banned in my non-mod/non-owner opinion.

Give the little ADL shitstirrer a time out and then let him back.

Perhaps Gaillo could find another avenue to exact revenge for any perceived slight.... maybe a new custom user title and/or a non-permanent ban.

This forum needs Book for a reason similar to the reason why many religions require a "Satan" figure.

Don't worry... he'll probably figure out how to come in from some proxy as "Binder", "Tome", or some such. ;D

old steel
25th June 2012, 09:37 PM
Come on G man He may be bad boy baiting Book but he is our BOOK.

All this talk of banning and permanent banning reminds me of the old place, you trying to give me nightmares or what?

LuckyStrike
25th June 2012, 09:46 PM
You call ME a liar?
Goodbye.



Get over yourself.

You have an ax to grind with book, you make it well known. So just put him on ignore and either let the other mods take it or respond if someone reports one of his posts.

Tumbleweed
25th June 2012, 09:54 PM
Get over yourself.

You have an ax to grind with book, you make it well known. So just put him on ignore and either let the other mods take it or respond if someone reports one of his posts.

I think you've got it right LuckyStrike. I don't think this banning was anything to be proud of.

BabushkaLady
25th June 2012, 10:07 PM
I'm always saddened to see a Perma-Ban! Why not just Ban and think about it?

A Perma-Ban loses all the rich history of the posters here. You can no longer search their previous posts or retract something particularly funny or infuriating.

I'm happy to see Book's adversaries agreeing with the harshness of the Perma-Ban.

I think it's been mentioned here, but toughen up or just don't log in. We have a perfectly furnished Thunderdome that isn't getting any use!

joboo
25th June 2012, 10:21 PM
Bane him!!!

;D

ximmy
25th June 2012, 10:38 PM
Sure. You want to ban me?

Absolutely not. You know I am very much against banning. Perhaps one reason I have been a coward when asked to take a moderators position. I don't want that responsibility. Personal feelings can make a person click a few buttons on a poster they don't like. Humans are not fair.

I suppose it is too much to ask for some to reflect on themselves resulting in a change of mind. Perhaps even admit they might be wrong, or believe their pride is too precious to be dishonored.

Thank you for your service here Gaillo, Your about the best moderator I've seen on a forum but even the best are not perfect.
ximmy

Horn
25th June 2012, 11:33 PM
Someone needs to write a story like this on what its like to Try and Order a Pizza in Roanoke Virginia.

Maybe I'll do that someday... :)

Glass
26th June 2012, 01:26 AM
good to see another derailed thread and a long derailment at that....... I think we need a few trading threads around here like there was in old times. Keep people focused on something else other than bitching.

Glass
26th June 2012, 01:35 AM
ok can we let book back in now. I can't ignore it if it's on the outside......

Mouse
26th June 2012, 02:19 AM
ok can we let book back in now. I can't ignore it if it's on the outside......

ctrl-c bitchez

I don't think Book can exist without an outlet. Let us not actually kill a man.

"You Got No Right"

I fell through the ice
She won't be coming back again
It never wins to lie
She said you'll never have no rights

I've took it farther on the outside
I've took it nearly to the brink
And if you've seen me on the outside
You would have barely seen me breathe

Funny right here I find myself
Inside a paper cup
Without a warning or a reason it's a treason
With no answer
You got no right
To keep me waiting here
You got no right
To keep the pain in here
That holds the crown

And if I fall apart on the outside
(You really don't believe me)
And if I take it to the brink
And if I fall apart on the outside
(You really don't believe me)
You would have barely seen me breathe

And if I meet you out tonight
Will you be loving me forever
It's always over after the night
It's always colder after the night
I broke through the ice
She won't be coming back again
It's been a year and a night

Olmstein
26th June 2012, 02:51 AM
Took a few months off from the internet. Nice to see that things never change.

osoab
26th June 2012, 03:28 AM
Took a few months off from the internet. Nice to see that things never change.


Olmstein, how goes it? I've been wondering if you had bolted for good.

How have things been trending in Az?

Awoke
26th June 2012, 05:44 AM
Fuck Book. He skirts around the rules on a non-stop basis, trolling and baiting and dividing unrelentlingly.

Tumbleweed, I consider you a brother in arms, and I can't believe you think Book is a debater of any kind, or a contributor of even the most basic sort. He contributes nothing, ever, and does nothing but post pictures that reek of provocateur sarcasm, inciting tension in the membership and stirring up drama.

You take issue with me calling him NAMBLA man. That is an old reference from before my time, when Book admitted he was gay and liked younger folk or something like that. I wasn't around, it was before my time. Magnes might know more, and perhaps I was out of line by using that reference, BUT:

Do you think I care if I was out of line with that ONE REFERENCE?

Not a chance. Afaic, Book is "out of line" every single time he makes a post, so I will keep my NAMBLA man reference until he addresses it. Just like he keeps his divisive tactics up until (and after) I address those.

My stance (Which he continually tries to twist into something else) could not be more simple:

there is a major difference between two people falling in love, and jew-media attempting to program an entire nation.

There it is, summed up in a single sentence.
To edit that sentence for concise reading, I would say there is a major difference between:
(A) two people from different races, honestly falling in love with each other, and
(B) a satanic cabal using all forms of media, education, influence and programming to promote the destruction of the white, black, brown, yellow and red races through interracial marriage and homosexuality, specifically targeting our young children, unfairly influencing them without the consent (or knowledge) of the parents.

Book runs around here trying to make it as if I am a racist, and FreeSpirit and I shouldn't be friends because he's dating a non-caucasian. It's not only pathetic, but it's already a doomed exploit, because he's tried all these same arguements before. And lost.



Book is a deceiver, subverter, jew, provocateur, agent, and afaic a queer as well, and I don't give a shit how anyone feels about my opinion on that POS non-contributor.

I have told him all of these things in the past, so it is not as if I am "talking bout him behind his back and it's not fair because he's banned and can't reply, whaaaaaaah!"


Fuck you Book. I am glad to see you Banned. You have deserved to be banned for YEARS now, but because you are such a slippery jew, always working within the confines of the "rules", you have gotten away with more destruction on these forums than Mayhem and Skykike put together.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 05:49 AM
Fuck Book. He skirts around the rules on a non-stop basis, trolling and baiting and dividing unrelentlingly.

Tumbleweed, I consider you a brother in arms, and I can't believe you think Book is a debater of any kind, or a contributor of even the most basic sort. He contributes nothing, ever, and does nothing but post pictures that reek of provocateur sarcasm, inciting tension in the membership and stirring up drama.

You take issue with me calling him NAMBLA man. That is an old reference from before my time, when Book admitted he was gay and liked younger folk or something like that. I wasn't around, it was before my time. Magnes might know more, and perhaps I was out of line by using that reference, BUT:

Do you think I care if I was out of line with that ONE REFERENCE?

Not a chance. Afaic, Book is "out of line" every single time he makes a post, so I will keep my NAMBLA man reference until he addresses it. Just like he keeps his divisive tactics up until (and after) I address those.

My stance (Which he continually tries to twist into something else) could not be more simple:


There it is, summed up in a single sentence.
To edit that sentence for concise reading, I would say there is a major difference between:
(A) two people from different races, honestly falling in love with each other, and
(B) a satanic cabal using all forms of media, education, influence and programming to promote the destruction of the white, black, brown, yellow and red races through interracial marriage and homosexuality, specifically targeting our young children, unfairly influencing them without the consent (or knowledge) of the parents.

Book runs around here trying to make it as if I am a racist, and FreeSpirit and I shouldn't be friends because he's dating a non-caucasian. It's not only pathetic, but it's already a doomed exploit, because he's tried all these same arguements before. And lost.



Book is a deceiver, subverter, jew, provocateur, agent, and afaic a queer as well, and I don't give a shit how anyone feels about my opinion on that POS non-contributor.

I have told him all of these things in the past, so it is not as if I am "talking bout him behind his back and it's not fair because he's banned and can't reply, whaaaaaaah!"


Fuck you Book. I am glad to see you Banned. You have deserved to be banned for YEARS now, but because you are such a slippery jew, always working within the confines of the "rules", you have gotten away with more destruction on these forums than Mayhem and Skykike put together.


excellent post, Awoke... i wish i could thank it a hundred times!

Awoke
26th June 2012, 05:59 AM
Just hit the Thanks button, the remove button, then repeat 99 more times. LOL.

undgrd
26th June 2012, 07:37 AM
Well, I just finished reading through all this. You know what I think is funny?

There are posters who haven't posted in a long time, showing up to "Thank" the people bashing Book and posting no content. That's what I think is funny. Non contributing members who show up, to give the thumbs up, for a public stoning.

gunDriller
26th June 2012, 07:52 AM
good to see another derailed thread and a long derailment at that....... I think we need a few trading threads around here like there was in old times. Keep people focused on something else other than bitching.

speaking of which -

http://www.passenlaw.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/train-derailment.jpg

http://www.teex.com/usar/images/passenger%20train.jpg


and, just for the heck of it, Go Silver Go !

http://dianegottsman.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Rocket-Launch-for-rocket-scientist-blog_8.22.11.jpg

DMac
26th June 2012, 08:03 AM
Well, I just finished reading through all this. You know what I think is funny?

There are posters who haven't posted in a long time, showing up to "Thank" the people bashing Book and posting no content. That's what I think is funny. Non contributing members who show up, to give the thumbs up, for a public stoning.



The same silver art bar fan and dogman that are oh so quick to shit talk the members of this forum on goyismoney2.com.

Pathetic.

And Gaillo that was a weak ban. Instead of trying to incite just man up and kick someone off the board if that is your intent.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 08:15 AM
Well, I just finished reading through all this. You know what I think is funny?

There are posters who haven't posted in a long time, showing up to "Thank" the people bashing Book and posting no content. That's what I think is funny. Non contributing members who show up, to give the thumbs up, for a public stoning.

did you ever stop to think that maybe those absentee posters haven't been posting because they are tired of having to deal with book at every turn? and maybe they were thanking people for expressing the same thoughts that they were having?

book got his just desserts. looks good on him.

Horn
26th June 2012, 08:15 AM
Well, I just finished reading through all this. You know what I think is funny?

There are posters who haven't posted in a long time, showing up to "Thank" the people bashing Book and posting no content. That's what I think is funny. Non contributing members who show up, to give the thumbs up, for a public stoning.

Notice chief rollingweed reverse stoner thanked you there...

Its OK to tear 10 holes in the opposition.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 08:18 AM
Just hit the Thanks button, the remove button, then repeat 99 more times. LOL.

...ahhhh....too much like work, lol

instead i will thank you not once, not twice, but three times from the bottom of my feet upon which i am standing!
(to be read with hilarious east indian accent, lol)

DMac
26th June 2012, 08:24 AM
did you ever stop to think that maybe those absentee posters haven't been posting because they are tired of having to deal with book at every turn? and maybe they were thanking people for expressing the same thoughts that they were having?

book got his just desserts. looks good on him.


Jeez seriously freespirit enough with the 'I'm scared of the bully' nonsense. This board got a giant batch of sand stuck up its vagina and it's downright pathetic.

Man the **** up people! Wildcard's best advice: "Harden the fuck up."

And Awoke, for the record, even though I do not agree with his perspective on this, Book is logically right in calling you a hypocrite. I can care less who dates who and who marries who. That's why I don't lament constantly about Zionists trying to breed out whites (and other race issues).

You either stand by what you preach or STFU about it. When called on it, and this has happened several times in the past (book vs freespirit), you get your panties in a bunch - protect your friend, I get it.

But you're wrong. He calls you a hypocrite, and face it, you are! Either update your opinion (race mixing is OK) or stand by your original thought (whites are being bred out and this is bad).

People hate being shown they are holding contradictory thoughts. Book nailed solid on this often and is the source of their arguments.

This thread is a very poor example of why I thought this board was worth sticking around over the years.

It's degenerating into a drama filled waste of time, something that is probably by design.

undgrd
26th June 2012, 08:24 AM
did you ever stop to think that maybe those absentee posters haven't been posting because they are tired of having to deal with book at every turn? and maybe they were thanking people for expressing the same thoughts that they were having?

book got his just desserts. looks good on him.


Sorry. We've all had to suffer Book....did you leave? Did I? The hurt feelings department is down the hall.

Book has been dealt with. What are you going to do when the next "Book" comes along to pull your tail?

freespirit
26th June 2012, 08:30 AM
Sorry. We've all had to suffer Book....did you leave? Did I? The hurt feelings department is down the hall.

Book has been dealt with. What are you going to do when the next "Book" comes along to pull your tail?

i did leave at one point, over a year ago. i have no hurt feelings, and am not afraid to face my detractors head on. the next book will hang himself on his own merits just as this one did.

madfranks
26th June 2012, 08:31 AM
Yikes, what a mess. I invite everyone to take a closer look at rule #1:

Rule #1 - Be respectful to everyone on the board. No flaming, bashing, or baiting or attacking each other.


I can't hardly think of anything else that book does other than flaming, bashing and baiting. For instance, in Spec's goodbye thread, (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?61818-Freedom-and-Liberty-at-GS-US), book was antagonizing singular_me almost non-stop, and it drove that thread to the ground. And here he did the same thing. My honest wish would be, when book starts teasing and baiting members like he did in this thread, is for those members to ignore him, don't give him the dignity of the response, and move on. Book wouldn't have much to do if people weren't constantly feeding him, trying to satisfy him, when his only intent the whole time is to continue baiting and teasing until whole threads get derailed. I don't think I would have banned book like Gaillo did here, but that's because I tend to let things really go far before acting on them (locking threads, banning members, etc.). There's really no doubt book was breaking the rules on a constant basis, so I stand behind the ban. I wouldn't mind having JQP reinstate his membership in a month or two, to let things cool down, but I think ultimately that's a decision for JQP.

And to verify Gaillo's posts above, yes, Book was temp banned in the past, both JQP and I have access to the records showing this.

Horn
26th June 2012, 08:32 AM
What are you going to do when the next "Book" comes along to pull your tail?

I'm hoping for Kahlil Gibran, Coin was practically the same person.

Awoke
26th June 2012, 08:42 AM
And Awoke, for the record, even though I do not agree with his perspective on this, Book is logically right in calling you a hypocrite. I can care less who dates who and who marries who. That's why I don't lament constantly about Zionists trying to breed out whites (and other race issues).

You either stand by what you preach or STFU about it. When called on it, and this has happened several times in the past (book vs freespirit), you get your panties in a bunch - protect your friend, I get it.

But you're wrong. He calls you a hypocrite, and face it, you are! Either update your opinion (race mixing is OK) or stand by your original thought (whites are being bred out and this is bad).





Dmac, you are way off on this. Use your head.

I am pretty upset right now with you, so I just went over this post and deleted a bunch of swear words. Let me give you one last chance to understand what I take issue with:


I don't give a flying shit if you or Book decide you want to jump off a building into traffic on your own volition.

BUT if the satanic jew controlled media launched a campaign to teach our children that they should, no, NEED to just off a building into traffic, and they made them watch movies about jumping off buildings into traffic, and made them read books about jumping off buildings into traffic, and made every mainstream music video extol the virtues of jumping off buildings into traffic, and every classroom taught them that they should jump off buildings into traffic - YOU CAN BET I would take issue with that.

So exactly how in the fuck does that make me a hypocrite?

Tumbleweed
26th June 2012, 08:44 AM
Fuck Book. He skirts around the rules on a non-stop basis, trolling and baiting and dividing unrelentlingly.

Tumbleweed, I consider you a brother in arms, and I can't believe you think Book is a debater of any kind, or a contributor of even the most basic sort. He contributes nothing, ever, and does nothing but post pictures that reek of provocateur sarcasm, inciting tension in the membership and stirring up drama.

You take issue with me calling him NAMBLA man. That is an old reference from before my time, when Book admitted he was gay and liked younger folk or something like that. I wasn't around, it was before my time. Magnes might know more, and perhaps I was out of line by using that reference, BUT:

Do you think I care if I was out of line with that ONE REFERENCE?

Not a chance. Afaic, Book is "out of line" every single time he makes a post, so I will keep my NAMBLA man reference until he addresses it. Just like he keeps his divisive tactics up until (and after) I address those.

My stance (Which he continually tries to twist into something else) could not be more simple:


There it is, summed up in a single sentence.
To edit that sentence for concise reading, I would say there is a major difference between:
(A) two people from different races, honestly falling in love with each other, and
(B) a satanic cabal using all forms of media, education, influence and programming to promote the destruction of the white, black, brown, yellow and red races through interracial marriage and homosexuality, specifically targeting our young children, unfairly influencing them without the consent (or knowledge) of the parents.

Book runs around here trying to make it as if I am a racist, and FreeSpirit and I shouldn't be friends because he's dating a non-caucasian. It's not only pathetic, but it's already a doomed exploit, because he's tried all these same arguements before. And lost.



Book is a deceiver, subverter, jew, provocateur, agent, and afaic a queer as well, and I don't give a shit how anyone feels about my opinion on that POS non-contributor.

I have told him all of these things in the past, so it is not as if I am "talking bout him behind his back and it's not fair because he's banned and can't reply, whaaaaaaah!"


Fuck you Book. I am glad to see you Banned. You have deserved to be banned for YEARS now, but because you are such a slippery jew, always working within the confines of the "rules", you have gotten away with more destruction on these forums than Mayhem and Skykike put together.

Awoke you and I see eye to eye when it comes to religion and I've learned a lot from you. I've backed you up when I could and I still will buddy when we are in agreement on something.

I want to say right off that Book is no queer. I've gotten to know him in pm's and he's straight. Others here who know him here have confirmed to me that he is straight.

Book does bait you and freespirit when one of these threads about blacks comes up. Just feeling ornery and having time on his hands I guess. I have a similar situation in my life with a family member who has a black girlfriend. I've discussed it with Book and with freespirit. If you don't take the bait nothing comes of it. It's up to you guys to learn not to take the bait. Just let it go. Get on with your life and think about something else. This is a lesson Book can help you learn that will serve you well the rest of your life. I'm out of time and have to get to work.

Awoke
26th June 2012, 08:46 AM
This is a lesson Book is trying to help you learn that will serve you well the rest of your life.

Book has never tried to help anyone learn anything.

Book doesn't care anymore about my (or your) life than that of an ant under his jewish heel.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 08:49 AM
Jeez seriously freespirit enough with the 'I'm scared of the bully' nonsense. This board got a giant batch of sand stuck up its vagina and it's downright pathetic...

...This thread is a very poor example of why I thought this board was worth sticking around over the years...

It's degenerating into a drama filled waste of time, something that is probably by design.

get over it, dmac.

i am afraid of nothing. i am just tired of having to deal with assholes constantly badgering me without just cause.

and insulting me, my wife and my relationship just doesn't wash with me.
you don't have to like it, but you don't have the right to harangue me about it.

book called me into this fight, otherwise i would have stayed out of it.

Awoke is not a hypocrite. the racial mingling he is referring to affects ALL races, not just whites. being white, he would naturally be more concerned for the white race than others in this regard. but guess what? the black race is being attacked, so are the asians, and all other races that are mixing. not just whites.

my view on it is, heaven isn't likely segregated, and mother always told me it's what inside that counts.

if you personally don't feel like the board is worth sticking around for, you know where the door is, just like the rest of us.

Awoke
26th June 2012, 09:02 AM
It's not even the race mingling that I take issue with. It's the active campaigning that is pushing everyone towards it that I take issue with. The agenda behind it's promotion.

See post 153 in this thread.

sirgonzo420
26th June 2012, 09:06 AM
get over it, dmac.

i am afraid of nothing. i am just tired of having to deal with assholes constantly badgering me without just cause.

and insulting me, my wife and my relationship just doesn't wash with me.
you don't have to like it, but you don't have the right to harangue me about it.

book called me into this fight, otherwise i would have stayed out of it.

Awoke is not a hypocrite. the racial mingling he is referring to affects ALL races, not just whites. being white, he would naturally be more concerned for the white race than others in this regard. but guess what? the black race is being attacked, so are the asians, and all other races that are mixing. not just whites.

my view on it is, heaven isn't likely segregated, and mother always told me it's what inside that counts.

if you personally don't feel like the board is worth sticking around for, you know where the door is, just like the rest of us.

I'm white because my ancestors were white down through the ages. Not an accident. Some of my ancestors died during childbirth... some died at the age of 15, shortly after producing offspring which eventually led to me. The point is, is that there is a long chain that extends from the beginning all the way down to me, and that chain dies/ends if I do not have children. If I have non-white children, the chain is forever altered.

If I were to have children with a black woman, my child would NOT be white. It would not share my race, nor really the black woman's race, it would be mixed. That child would be incapable of producing white offspring.

Marry, date, fuck who you want, I don't care. But race-mixing doesn't do any favors for one's own race.

I like blond hair, red hair, green eyes, and blue eyes as traits that exist in the world. With race-mixing over centuries, they will die out, and leave humanity with a large brown "under" race, and a small but all-powerful "over" race.... guess who that would be....

I like you freespirit, and I don't judge you for your mate, but if every white man mated with a non-white, there would be no more whites.

Obviously race is not very important to you (those of others and of your own), and that's ok - to each his own.


It's not even the race mingling that I take issue with. It's the active campaigning that is pushing everyone towards it that I take issue with. The agenda behind it's promotion.

See post 153 in this thread.

So you don't have a problem with race-mixing if it is done "naturally"/"organically" (that is to say, without 5th column influences)?

osoab
26th June 2012, 09:21 AM
Yikes, what a mess. I invite everyone to take a closer look at rule #1:

Rule #1 - Be respectful to everyone on the board. No flaming, bashing, or baiting or attacking each other.


I can't hardly think of anything else that book does other than flaming, bashing and baiting. For instance, in Spec's goodbye thread, (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?61818-Freedom-and-Liberty-at-GS-US), book was antagonizing singular_me almost non-stop, and it drove that thread to the ground. And here he did the same thing. My honest wish would be, when book starts teasing and baiting members like he did in this thread, is for those members to ignore him, don't give him the dignity of the response, and move on. Book wouldn't have much to do if people weren't constantly feeding him, trying to satisfy him, when his only intent the whole time is to continue baiting and teasing until whole threads get derailed. I don't think I would have banned book like Gaillo did here, but that's because I tend to let things really go far before acting on them (locking threads, banning members, etc.). There's really no doubt book was breaking the rules on a constant basis, so I stand behind the ban. I wouldn't mind having JQP reinstate his membership in a month or two, to let things cool down, but I think ultimately that's a decision for JQP.

And to verify Gaillo's posts above, yes, Book was temp banned in the past, both JQP and I have access to the records showing this.

This is one of the issues that I have.

Gaillo, didn't get huffy and ban Book until Book "went" after him. If the baiting and the like are allowed to be used on a continual basis, then why is it all of a sudden a bannable offense?

Awoke
26th June 2012, 09:32 AM
I'm white because my ancestors were white down through the ages. Not an accident. Some of my ancestors died during childbirth... some died at the age of 15, shortly after producing offspring which eventually led to me. The point is, is that there is a long chain that extends from the beginning all the way down to me, and that chain dies/ends if I do not have children. If I have non-white children, the chain is forever altered.

If I were to have children with a black woman, my child would NOT be white. It would not share my race, nor really the black woman's race, it would be mixed. That child would be incapable of producing white offspring.

Marry, date, fuck who you want, I don't care. But race-mixing doesn't do any favors for one's own race.

I like blond hair, red hair, green eyes, and blue eyes as traits that exist in the world. With race-mixing over centuries, they will die out, and leave humanity with a large brown "under" race, and a small but all-powerful "over" race.... guess who that would be....

I am in agreement with all of this.




So you don't have a problem with race-mixing if it is done naturally"/"organically" (that is to say, without 5th column influences)?
I truely don't see how you can miss my point. How many ways can I make it simple?

I'm not against people eating twinkies, even though they are bad for us.

I AM against the Zio-system actively brainwashing everyone into eating twinkies. Fuck. Don't tell me you're too dense to get it Gonzo.

EDIT - Gonzo did you even read my post 153? If so, you shouldn't have any confusion.

sirgonzo420
26th June 2012, 09:39 AM
I am in agreement with all of this.

Good. I'm not surprised. :)



I truely don't see how you can miss my point. How many ways can I make it simple?

I'm not against people eating twinkies, even though they are bad for us.

I AM against the Zio-system actively brainwashing everyone into eating twinkies. Fuck. Don't tell me you're too dense to get it Gonzo.


Hahahahahahahahaha I'm sorry that just struck me as funny.

I'm pretty sure I get what you're saying, I just wanted to make sure.

I will agree that without the "Zio-system actively brainwashing everyone", there would presumably be far less people race-mixing, and so it wouldn't be as threatening an issue to the continued survival of the white race.

Awoke
26th June 2012, 10:08 AM
People here seem to have a hard time differentiating between a "Racist" and a "Person against the brainwashing of all people to racially integrate, thereby eliminating ALL races".

I don't give two poops about skin color as far as choosing friends and stuff, and I don't regard other races as "animals" or "chimps" like some other members here.
Afaic, if I held an attitude like that, I would be no different than the satanic khazar AoD elite who frown upon all non-"jews". We are all human and all God's creation.

(AoD - Abomination of Desolation, aka the babylonian satanists who are masquarading as "jews for zionism" in order to take over the Holy Place as per the scriptural prophesy of Daniel)

madfranks
26th June 2012, 10:11 AM
This is one of the issues that I have.

Gaillo, didn't get huffy and ban Book until Book "went" after him. If the baiting and the like are allowed to be used on a continual basis, then why is it all of a sudden a bannable offense?

Let me give you an example. In another thread, Book, in my opinion, went over the line antagonizing singular_me, but I didn't ban him for it, rather I closed the thread. If singular_me reported the "attacks" against her livelihood and profession (which book certainly was doing), I'd have acted on it and given him a ban. She didn't report it though, so closing the thread was the end of it. What book did was a bannable offense, I just didn't ban him for it, like I said I tend to give a lot of leniency here. If book started teasing/antagonizing me over my profession or my life, more than likely I'd ignore it, but if he kept pestering me over it, well then I wouldn't have to go report him and request a ban, I'd do it myself.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 11:06 AM
I'm white because my ancestors were white down through the ages. Not an accident. Some of my ancestors died during childbirth... some died at the age of 15, shortly after producing offspring which eventually led to me. The point is, is that there is a long chain that extends from the beginning all the way down to me, and that chain dies/ends if I do not have children. If I have non-white children, the chain is forever altered.

If I were to have children with a black woman, my child would NOT be white. It would not share my race, nor really the black woman's race, it would be mixed. That child would be incapable of producing white offspring.

Marry, date, fuck who you want, I don't care. But race-mixing doesn't do any favors for one's own race.

I like blond hair, red hair, green eyes, and blue eyes as traits that exist in the world. With race-mixing over centuries, they will die out, and leave humanity with a large brown "under" race, and a small but all-powerful "over" race.... guess who that would be....

I like you freespirit, and I don't judge you for your mate, but if every white man mated with a non-white, there would be no more whites.

Obviously race is not very important to you (those of others and of your own), and that's ok - to each his own.



So you don't have a problem with race-mixing if it is done "naturally"/"organically" (that is to say, without 5th column influences)?

i like you too, Gonzo. my family history is white also, and i have a brother who has a son to carry on both the family name, and the bloodline (for what it's worth). our time in this world is very fleeting, and personally i feel that love is more important than race, and feel very blessed to have found a wonderful woman that loves me deeply and completely accepts me for who i am. i care not what color her skin is, she is a beautiful creature of God, and for me, she is perfect, and that is enough.

i just want to add that she is actually a gift from God, about 2 years ago, i was praying and said "If you have someone in mind for me, you're gonna have to put her in front of me, i am clearly not able to do this alone"

shortly thereafter, we met. the rest as they say, is history...we'll be celebrating 2 years this August. ;)

Tumbleweed
26th June 2012, 11:20 AM
Book has never tried to help anyone learn anything.

Book doesn't care anymore about my (or your) life than that of an ant under his jewish heel.

That's wrong Awoke he has given me some good advice in pm's and I think others have made that same comment here.

joboo
26th June 2012, 11:41 AM
All I know is someone is probably completely jonesing off their nut right now with Internet forum addiction withdrawal.

Thousands of random pictures, just piling up in a folder somewhere...

freespirit
26th June 2012, 11:44 AM
(AoD - Abomination of Desolation, aka the babylonian satanists who are masquarading as "jews for zionism" in order to take over the Holy Place as per the scriptural prophesy of Daniel)

ahhh! i was thinking Army of Darkness for a minute there...lol guess it could kinda work either way, lol

sirgonzo420
26th June 2012, 11:53 AM
i like you too, Gonzo. my family history is white also, and i have a brother who has a son to carry on both the family name, and the bloodline (for what it's worth). our time in this world is very fleeting, and personally i feel that love is more important than race, and feel very blessed to have found a wonderful woman that loves me deeply and completely accepts me for who i am. i care not what color her skin is, she is a beautiful creature of God, and for me, she is perfect, and that is enough.

i just want to add that she is actually a gift from God, about 2 years ago, i was praying and said "If you have someone in mind for me, you're gonna have to put her in front of me, i am clearly not able to do this alone"

shortly thereafter, we met. the rest as they say, is history...we'll be celebrating 2 years this August. ;)

Fair enough.

That being said, enjoy your life with your wife; that's why God saw fit to give you a brother! ;D

Santa
26th June 2012, 11:57 AM
All I know is someone is probably completely jonesing off their nut right now with Internet forum addiction withdrawal.

Thousands of random pictures, just piling up in a folder somewhere...

Lol... Probably, unless, er, you know, "Beans, band aids, bullets and a BBbag full of back ups.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 12:01 PM
Fair enough.

That being said, enjoy your life with your wife; that's why God saw fit to give you a brother! ;D

yup.

i wish i could smoke one with you someday, Gonzo...until then, i will smoke one now in your honor. ;D

Santa
26th June 2012, 12:07 PM
yup.

i wish i could smoke one with you someday, Gonzo...until then, i will smoke one now in your honor. ;D

I'll join you, but just one hit. My lungs can't handle much anymore.

mick silver
26th June 2012, 12:12 PM
i was banned at GIM for asking why gaillo was ban there so does this mean i am next . if so remove all of my post and threads . why was book bannd for life . i dont alway look at what book posts so if people skin is this thin it fucking this it time to move on . get the fuck outside and do some thing

osoab
26th June 2012, 12:14 PM
i was banned at GIM for asking why gaillo was ban there so does this mean i am next . if so remove all of my post and treads . why was book bannd for life . i dont alway look at what book posts so if people skin this fucking this it time to move on . get the fuck outside and do some thing


Gaillo got sand in his hooha.

Horn
26th June 2012, 12:24 PM
Gaillo got sand in his hooha.

The thing I wonder is if they ban the IP?

I kinda like it when the bad ones have to return under a different handle.

That way you can call them by all their previous handles, if they start acting up again.

freespirit
26th June 2012, 12:35 PM
i was banned at GIM for asking why gaillo was ban there so does this mean i am next . if so remove all of my post and threads . why was book bannd for life . i dont alway look at what book posts so if people skin thin it fucking this it time to move on . get the fuck outside and do some thing


...anyone got a decoder ring i can borrow? lol

just funnin' mick! ;)

mick silver
26th June 2012, 12:56 PM
i just find it hard to see whats happen here . so much for thin skined people . i would like to know whats going to happen if there was a melt down most would just shot there selfs are would they try and live ? you called me what . fuck if thats the case i would of died many times over are someone else would of . N W O NOT FAR OFF when we cry over a picture are words

old steel
26th June 2012, 01:44 PM
Banning doesn't cut it in my book no pun intended.

Unless someone is actually making a death threat and is capable of carrying it out and i have never ever heard an instance where someone posting on a forum was murdered by someone else posting on the same forum.

Lots of people talk the talk but very few can actually back it up.

Christ Jesus what's next? Call it Godlike productions and wait for Trinity to ban your ass for life.

k-os
26th June 2012, 10:40 PM
I don't give two poops about skin color as far as choosing friends and stuff, and I don't regard other races as "animals" or "chimps" like some other members here.
Afaic, if I held an attitude like that, I would be no different than the satanic khazar AoD elite who frown upon all non-"jews". We are all human and all God's creation.


This is EXACTLY how I feel about this particular issue, and I often wonder (when away from GSUS, living my life) how those people don't realize it too.

zap
26th June 2012, 10:48 PM
We are all in the same boat, I think.......... trying to survive this nasty world that we have been thrust into.
We all gather here because we think mostly the same! I learn so much here not just about G/S life in general.

Horn
26th June 2012, 11:29 PM
Book would be envious of your personal honesty, ladies.

Wonder what the cybernetic sardonic responses would have been here?

Lemme guess,

>> Insert McDonalds clip of White Transsexual Male being beaten up by Black Women here <<

Tumbleweed
27th June 2012, 01:03 PM
Jeez seriously freespirit enough with the 'I'm scared of the bully' nonsense. This board got a giant batch of sand stuck up its vagina and it's downright pathetic.

Man the **** up people! Wildcard's best advice: "Harden the fuck up."

And Awoke, for the record, even though I do not agree with his perspective on this, Book is logically right in calling you a hypocrite. I can care less who dates who and who marries who. That's why I don't lament constantly about Zionists trying to breed out whites (and other race issues).

You either stand by what you preach or STFU about it. When called on it, and this has happened several times in the past (book vs freespirit), you get your panties in a bunch - protect your friend, I get it.

But you're wrong. He calls you a hypocrite, and face it, you are! Either update your opinion (race mixing is OK) or stand by your original thought (whites are being bred out and this is bad).

People hate being shown they are holding contradictory thoughts. Book nailed solid on this often and is the source of their arguments.

This thread is a very poor example of why I thought this board was worth sticking around over the years.

It's degenerating into a drama filled waste of time, something that is probably by design.

Damn good post DMac. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 02:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zXUQRc8zW4&amp;feature=player_embedded

Awoke
27th June 2012, 04:21 PM
Tumbleweed I have to admit that I am insulted that you would give Dmac credit for that post when Dmac couldn't give me the courtesy to address my rebuttal.

Dmac, come out and finish explaining to me how I am a hypocrite after you read post #153 in this thread.

Tumbleweed
27th June 2012, 04:46 PM
Tumbleweed I have to admit that I am insulted that you would give Dmac credit for that post when Dmac couldn't give me the courtesy to address my rebuttal.

Dmac, come out and finish explaining to me how I am a hypocrite after you read post #153 in this thread.

I think he speaks the truth on this Awoke even though it may be painful for you to hear. That's the way I see it. You can't have it both ways in my opinion.

Rubberchicken
27th June 2012, 04:58 PM
I think I get what Awoke means, correct me here if I am wrong. It's going to happen that people of different races are going to fall in love and procreate. Fine. The problem arises when so many teevee commercials and magazine ads encourage this so strongly that it conditions people to think that it is so normal and common that it you should be doing it too if you want to be in the "in crowd" . That's what he objects to- the programming end of it.

slowbell
27th June 2012, 05:10 PM
Tumbleweed I have to admit that I am insulted that you would give Dmac credit for that post when Dmac couldn't give me the courtesy to address my rebuttal.

Dmac, come out and finish explaining to me how I am a hypocrite after you read post #153 in this thread.

Awoke, you are not a hypocrite, and imo it's not right for others to accuse you of being one. There's a separation of idealism and realism here that I believe you pointed it out correctly. Ideally, if races did not mix, those races would be protected for further generations. The realism is that people fall in love with others of different races all the time, people often do not control who they fall in love with. They meet the right person, and live happy lives.

Believing in the idealism, yet accepting people because of the realism, does not make anyone a hypocrite.

Santa
27th June 2012, 05:26 PM
I'm particularly moved by FreeSpirit's love story.
It has such a strong element of Faith to it,
rather than the typical tawdry sex element.
Although, I think I may have been conditioned
to have a predilection toward the tawdry.

I guess what I'm trying to say is,
I'd breed with this girl even though she isn't white. :)

http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/f488c23e.jpg

Horn
27th June 2012, 05:32 PM
Believing in the idealism, yet accepting people because of the realism, does not make anyone a hypocrite.

Only sharing a single piece of personal information that you are a member of NAMbLA, & not providing a personal opinion on anything else,

makes you a Lizardman,, IMO.

>>Insert picture of Lizardman here<<

osoab
27th June 2012, 05:34 PM
http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/f488c23e.jpg

Did you type something?

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 05:34 PM
I have no room to talk, I went to the other side of the planet to get mine.

<(^_^)>

Horn
27th June 2012, 05:38 PM
I may have been conditioned to have a predilection toward the tawdry.

Did they also teach you Tagalog in that class?

Sorry, I'm trolling, I guess.

Santa
27th June 2012, 05:46 PM
Did they also teach you Tagalog in that class?

Sorry, I'm trolling, I guess.

I'm almost afraid to ask, but what is Tagalog?

Horn
27th June 2012, 05:54 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask, but what is Tagalog?

Quit taking pictures of me, too.

The G is silent man, and the A long...

Horn
27th June 2012, 05:58 PM
I have no room to talk, I went to the other side of the planet to get mine.

<(^_^)>

You?

I'm only 1/2 Irish...

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 05:59 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask, but what is Tagalog?

Tagalog pronunciation: [tɐˈgaːloɡ] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_Tagalog)

Tagalog is one of the main languages in the philippines. Segay?

willie pete
27th June 2012, 05:59 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask, but what is Tagalog?

it's the Filipino national language

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 06:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HfR7iiyNs8

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 06:14 PM
Quick tour around Manila:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdwrxIGXMwg&amp;feature=results_video&amp;playnext =1&amp;list=PLBA7EE8462E825AF8

Excess of 200 mph

osoab
27th June 2012, 06:20 PM
;D

http://cdn.head-fi.org/7/76/76d31508_c851d40e_Derail_1.jpeg

Cebu_4_2
27th June 2012, 06:27 PM
^Hahahaha

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/10/21/128691028646198789.jpg

Horn
27th June 2012, 06:35 PM
3034

osoab
27th June 2012, 06:42 PM
3034

Halloween costume? --)

Awoke
28th June 2012, 06:51 AM
I think he speaks the truth on this Awoke even though it may be painful for you to hear. That's the way I see it. You can't have it both ways in my opinion.

Well you obviously didn't comprehend post 153.

Rubberchicken gets it.

PlatinumBlonde
28th June 2012, 07:39 AM
Took a few months off from the internet. Nice to see that things never change.

Yeah, no shit. It's always about Book.

I was going to post a piece about the Arizona decision but decided not to because it would end up about book..

By the way there are more cliques here than at a sorority house. No it is not a compliment..

DMac
28th June 2012, 07:50 AM
Dmac, you are way off on this. Use your head.

I am pretty upset right now with you, so I just went over this post and deleted a bunch of swear words. Let me give you one last chance to understand what I take issue with:


I don't give a flying shit if you or Book decide you want to jump off a building into traffic on your own volition.

BUT if the satanic jew controlled media launched a campaign to teach our children that they should, no, NEED to just off a building into traffic, and they made them watch movies about jumping off buildings into traffic, and made them read books about jumping off buildings into traffic, and made every mainstream music video extol the virtues of jumping off buildings into traffic, and every classroom taught them that they should jump off buildings into traffic - YOU CAN BET I would take issue with that.

So exactly how in the fuck does that make me a hypocrite?

Awoke,

you are way off on this. Use your head.
I am pretty upset right now with you, so I just went over this post and deleted a bunch of swear words.

It's an internet forum with people you don't know IRL Awoke, and you're upset with me to the point of typing out who knows how many swear words that then need to be deleted - and I need to use my head? Take a look in the mirror mister, you don't see me flying off the handle online, ever. Keep calm and carry on. Why are your buttons pushed so hard for being challenged?

You are a hypocrite, as I wrote in the first post and I will try again point out to you why your logic is faulty. Let's sum up the main points you made:

*You claim freespirit and his significant other fell in love 'naturally' (without being programmed).

*You claim that others are falling in love in mixed relationships because of Zionist programming.

Please tell me how one can differentiate between the programmed race mixers and the un-programmed race mixers? You've put yourself into the position of making these judgement calls, so help me understand how this is not cognitive dissonance (which it is). TIA. Why are freespirit and his wife exempt from the brainwashing, yet say Heidi Klum/Seal isn't (insert any other famous mixed couple here)?

Using your poor example, freespirit jumped off the roof, but it was of his own volition, the mainstream push to jump had nothing to do with it, so it is OK. Those other folks that you don't know that are jumping, it is because of the Zionists not their own ability and desire to jump.

Slowbell,

You too are experiencing cognitive dissonance. You cannot be both realist and idealist. They are contradictory. If you are both, then you are a wishy-washy flip-flopper, also known as a HYPOCRITE.

I hope this means we can still be friends. I know a lot of people in real life that are hypocrites. They are everywhere and apparently all over message boards.

madfranks
28th June 2012, 08:50 AM
I get what Awoke's saying. The trend is obvious, the programming is obvious; you don't have to know each individual couple to know that this is a trend that's growing, IMO by design.

Awoke
28th June 2012, 09:33 AM
OK, last time I will try to explain this too you.
If you have your heart set on failing to understand, so be it.




*You claim freespirit and his significant other fell in love 'naturally' (without being programmed).

Yes.


Awoke,
*You claim that others are falling in love in mixed relationships because of Zionist programming.

No.

I said that there is an UNDENIABLE CAMPAIGN to try to brainwash all the people of the world into race integration leading to the destruction of the individual races as a whole.

And I have an issue with that.


Awoke,
Please tell me how one can differentiate between the programmed race mixers and the un-programmed race mixers? You've put yourself into the position of making these judgement calls, so help me understand how this is not cognitive dissonance (which it is).


I am not making judgement calls on other people's relationships. How can I?

I can only comment on the fact that the satanic cabal is constantly pushing an agenda.



TIA. Why are freespirit and his wife exempt from the brainwashing, yet say Heidi Klum/Seal isn't (insert any other famous mixed couple here)?


I don't know what TIA means.

I never said they were exempt from brainwashing, or that they had been influenced by brainwashing.

FreeSpirit put his life in Gods hands, and prayed for God to put the right woman in front of him.
The Lord blessed him with good Christian woman who was also looking for a good Christian man. I know the dynamics of the way they met. The Lord answered FreeSpirit's prayers.



Using your poor example, freespirit jumped off the roof, but it was of his own volition, the mainstream push to jump had nothing to do with it, so it is OK. Those other folks that you don't know that are jumping, it is because of the Zionists not their own ability and desire to jump.


Yes, using my poor example, FS jumped off a roof on his own volition. I support it. He made the choice based on prayer.

Those "other folks" may have jumped off the roof on their own volition as well. I don't know and I don't care.

All I take issue with is the FACT THAT THERE IS A CAMPAIGN CONSTANTLY PUSHING THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL NON-JEWISH RACES.

If you don't understand my stance by now, it would seem I gave you too much credit in the past. Rest assured, I am tired of trying to help you differentiate. You go ahead and think whatever you want.




You too are experiencing cognitive dissonance. You cannot be both realist and idealist. They are contradictory. If you are both, then you are a wishy-washy flip-flopper, also known as a HYPOCRITE.

There is nothing wishy-washy about my stance on the Campaign.



I hope this means we can still be friends. I know a lot of people in real life that are hypocrites. They are everywhere and apparently all over message boards.

With friends like that, who needs Book?

slowbell
28th June 2012, 10:47 AM
Slowbell,

You too are experiencing cognitive dissonance. You cannot be both realist and idealist. They are contradictory. If you are both, then you are a wishy-washy flip-flopper, also known as a HYPOCRITE.

I hope this means we can still be friends. I know a lot of people in real life that are hypocrites. They are everywhere and apparently all over message boards.

DMac, I fail to see how Awoke, or myself now, are hypocrites. Sure, you can be an idealist and accept realism at the same time. Like how I view marriage. Ideally, marriage would be before the church, and God alone, and not a contract with the state. Ideally, the feminists wouldn't push their agenda of destroying couples encouraging women to jump ship and cash out.

However, I am surrounded by folks who are happily married. My parents happily married for over 40 years. My brothers, all happily married. Just because I am anti marriage, doesn't mean I judge my family or love them any less.

Horn
28th June 2012, 11:19 AM
Lizardmen pretending to be human should be considered (by most humans) to be the highest form of hypocrite.

Santa
28th June 2012, 11:41 AM
You cannot be both realist and idealist. They are contradictory.

Justice is an ideal. Liberty is an ideal. Self sufficiency is an ideal. Love is an ideal.

Faith is also an ideal related to Love. The most important ideal of all. It just happens to be rather unappreciated these days. Probably by design.

All ideals are extremely hard to practice if they're ridiculed and dismissed as fools errands by YKW.

FreeSpirit is practicing a great and wondrous ideal, Faith, by accepting unconditionally what God has offered him.
You can hear the sincerity of his faith in his posts.

I would never ever ever ever get in the way of such a thing as that. It's called Grace... and it fills my heart with joy as well.

Even without herbal supplementation. :)

D sciple
28th June 2012, 12:28 PM
Excess of 200 mph

200 kilometers per hour

LuckyStrike
28th June 2012, 08:40 PM
I don't give two poops about skin color as far as choosing friends and stuff, and I don't regard other races as "animals" or "chimps" like some other members here.
Afaic, if I held an attitude like that, I would be no different than the satanic khazar AoD elite who frown upon all non-"jews". We are all human and all God's creation.



If God created Adam in his image, and Adam means in Hebrew, "ruddy complected, able to show blood in the face", and Noah was saved from the flood because he nor his family mixed with the nephilim (fallen angels), and God created a covenant with the 12 tribes of Israel (who were descendants of Adam and Noah), and when the Israelites failed to keep the covenant, God sent his Son to forgive their sins, and what is sin? John 3:4 (I think) "sin is a transgression of the law". Well who was the law given to? The chinks? The pygmies? No it was given to the 12 tribes, the descendants of Jacob. So these other races were never given the law, and had nothing to atone for. "to them it is not given" So where did the other races come from? And herein lies the crux of the Creationism/Evolution debate. So long as you think either one or the other it is fine, because both rely 100% on the idea that we all have a common ancestor, that in reality we are all just one human family. This like so many things, is the 2 sides of the same coin.

We have examples in Scripture of Jesus dealing with humbled non Israelites, a notable example is the lady whose daughter has a demon, and Jesus says "it is not right to give the CHILDRENS bread and feed it to the DOGS" and her reply "Yes lord, but don't the dogs eat the scraps from the masters table?" And he healed her daughter, end of story. He showed kindness to her. And to me he laid the example, I see no commandment that you cannot be friendly with other races (except jews), however we are all intended to be segregated, ideally on separate continents. I am nice to decent respectable blacks, but in no shape or form are they my equal. I am created in the image of God, they are not. The entirety of human history revolves 100% around Christian White Civilization. Non Whites shouldnt be killed, or beaten for no reason. But I think it is false to think that we are created for this same purpose. If the races were to be equal he would've made them equal, but they aren't.

Sure I cuss about blacks, TNB, chimpouts whathaveyou. But I ultimately do not blame them, if someone let termites out in my house I would cuss at the termites "you damn termites you are destroying my house" but in reality the termites are just doing what termites do, if one is honest, you have to blame those who brought the termites to live in your midst. I think we have discussed this before off GSUS, but if I jump into a lion enclosure I don't blame the lion for mauling me, I am not meant to live on the same level or in the same vicinity as a lion. And if I move to the ghetto in any city in the US, and all my crap is stolen, my wife raped and me beaten, do I blame the blacks or do I blame myself for being so dumb?

D sciple
28th June 2012, 09:57 PM
http://i45.tinypic.com/2n7ob2a.jpg

Sparky
28th June 2012, 10:18 PM
Lucky, what does it mean for someone to not be your equal? I mean, in practical terms. Are they not worthy of your respect? Are they less deserving? Are they less intelligent? Are you not courteous to them? Should they be of service to you? Would you deny them things that you would provide to others in time of need? Seriously, what does this mean?

LuckyStrike
28th June 2012, 10:33 PM
Lucky, what does it mean for someone to not be your equal? I mean, in practical terms. Are they not worthy of your respect? Are they less deserving? Are they less intelligent? Are you not courteous to them? Should they be of service to you? Would you deny them things that you would provide to others in time of need? Seriously, what does this mean?

I'm not really sure what you are looking for here. I have no desire to be around, see, talk to or engage in anyway shape or form with non Whites. I wouldn't take a bullet for any non White on this planet, living or deceased. I would donate to White only charities (if that were possible, if you know of any PM me)

Nobody is worthy of my respect unless they are respectable. In my experiences this is .1% of the black population, maybe less. This may be 50-60% of the White population for comparison (also perhaps less)


Should they be of service to me, I wouldn't want them to be no, I really just want 100% segregation like I said preferably on a continent (or planet) wide basis. This has proven best for all involved. But if they were in service to me I would not mistreat them and there standard of living would be higher than in their native habitat.


But I'm not looking for 1000 and 1 hypothetical questions here, it's my opinion take it or leave it, you can think whatever you want......

Sparky
28th June 2012, 10:58 PM
I'm not really sure what you are looking for here.
...
But I'm not looking for 1000 and 1 hypothetical questions here, it's my opinion take it or leave it, you can think whatever you want......

I meant my question at face value, without judgement, and not hypothetically. That's why I said in a "practical sense". I raise the question because it is one of those phrases that is very easy to say, yet difficult to interpret. Usually when we talk about someone not being our "equal", it means in terms of some specific skill or trait or knowledge. So I'm wondering what it means in terms of an entire race.

From your response, it looks like you best relate equality to worthiness, in terms of your desire to associate with, sacrifice for, contribute to, respect, etc. other people. But interestingly, a small fraction of the black population is worthy of your respect, as is maybe half the white population.

So let me ask you this: If only 1 in 1000 black people are worthy of your respect, do you still give each individual the opportunity to earn it? For instance, if you see a black person on some televised discussion panel, will you listen to what he says and consider it without prior judgment, or will you tend to dismiss him?

Not picking on you. Just trying to communicate.

LuckyStrike
29th June 2012, 08:28 AM
So let me ask you this: If only 1 in 1000 black people are worthy of your respect, do you still give each individual the opportunity to earn it? For instance, if you see a black person on some televised discussion panel, will you listen to what he says and consider it without prior judgment, or will you tend to dismiss him?


I think I've already answered this " I am nice to decent respectable blacks,"

But it depends on the situation, some nig rolls into a gas station blaring rap music leaned way back in his car, yeah it's going to take a lot to get my respect from that initial impression.

But this scenario holds true for wiggers as well.

tater
29th June 2012, 09:25 AM
I think I've already answered this " I am nice to decent respectable blacks,"

But it depends on the situation, some nig rolls into a gas station blaring rap music leaned way back in his car, yeah it's going to take a lot to get my respect from that initial impression.

But this scenario holds true for wiggers as well.

I thought you had "already" answered it as well...

Jewboo
12th November 2017, 05:06 PM
Took a few months off from the internet...



https://image.slidesharecdn.com/factsonproabtionandparole-140424235616-phpapp02/95/facts-on-proabtion-and-parole-43-638.jpg?cb=1398384612

:rolleyes:

JDRock
12th November 2017, 07:31 PM
"It is the usurer's game to hurl the savage against the civilized opponent"--Ezra Pound
Worthy repost.

Jewboo
20th November 2017, 11:37 AM
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1479/33/1479339054130.jpg

https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1489/07/1489072764270.jpg

Tumbleweed
20th November 2017, 12:48 PM
Worthy repost.

Thanks for the memories JD! A lot of people have gone missing from this forum.

Jewboo
6th December 2017, 09:22 PM
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1403/52/1403527285356.jpg