PDA

View Full Version : Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level



Buddha
12th July 2012, 12:36 PM
http://occupycorporatism.com/agenda-21-how-globalist-domination-happens-on-a-local-level/

Also see, Agenda 21 micro-apartment scheme being beta tested in NYC: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Agenda_21_Micro-Apartment_Scheme_Being_Beta-Tested_in_NYC_/20486/0/0/0/Y/M.html


The non-governmental organization (NGO) The Wildlands Project (http://www.twp.org/) (WP) is a focusing of the American landscape in preservation for “future generations to inherit a continent rich in wildlife, with plenty of room for all species to roam.”

This does not necessarily mean that there will be room for humans as we are seeing massive areas of land being placed under restrictions called “conservation easements”, “scenic byways”, “protected areas”, “biosphere reserves”, “wildlife refuges”, etc. The names are varied and plentiful, but the result is always the same: More government control; less human freedom.

The WP claims we are “experiencing the Sixth Great Extinction” because of “human population growth, climate change, resource extraction, new recreational technologies, habitat fragmentation”. Since humanity is not a “highly interactive species” (meaning species whose presence maintains the balance of other plant and animal species with the habitat they share) “we are running out of room to share with nature”.

http://occupycorporatism.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/map_wildways-_72ppi-225x300.jpg (http://occupycorporatism.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/map_wildways-_72ppi.jpg)The science-based agenda of WP has developed the solution of dividing up North America into “four Continental Wildways [of] large protected corridors of land running coast to coast . . . throughout Canada, the US and Mexico.” Agenda 21 explains why the North American Union (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union) is being pushed by the globalists.




The Eastern Wildway (http://www.twp.org/wildways/eastern-wildway) extending northward from the Everglades along the Appalachians to the Arctic
The Western Wildway (http://www.twp.org/wildways/western-wildway) spanning the continent from Mexico, through the Rockies, to Alaska
The Pacific Wildway (http://www.twp.org/wildways/pacific-wildway) running from Baja to Alaska
The Boreal Wildway (http://www.twp.org/wildways/boreal-wildway) running west-east from Alaska to the Canadian Maritimes across the forest roof of North America


The wildways are “constructed by protecting core areas connected to one another by corridors or linkages. They are essentially mosaics of connected public and private lands that provide habitat and safe passageways for wildlife to travel freely from place to place.”

In the January 2012 Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles (http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_sd21st/21_pdf/SD21_Study1_Agenda21.pdf) details the progress the UN has had on their Agenda 21 policies on the local and national levels.

Under the World Trade Organization (WTO) the UN has seen major advances in the developing countries (i.e. Africa, India, Southeast Asia) where they have “embraced the reforms of the WTO regime” where “global import tariffs” have been used as protective measures since 1995.

National subsidies have turned “agricultural commodities” over to the global Elite International cooperation and recognition of the UN’s superiority in the implementation of their schemes. Through the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the manipulation of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) uses reinvested funds that are dumped into UN approved public service programs, healthcare and education.
According to research from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (http://www.iiasa.ac.at/docs/IIASA_Info.html) (IIASA) the issues caused by man-made climate change and its impact on the environment cannot be resolved by a single country or member of academia, but through the IIASA and the UN the securitization of energy on a national level can be reworked to reflect Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.
IIASA research has turned up a strategic plan (http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/DI/docs/IIASA%20Strategic%20Plan%202011-20201.pdf?sb=14) that:


Controls the allocation of energy to individuals and businesses
Control transportation and production of global food
Control water resources used for agriculture and personal
Allocate resources under UN guidelines of mitigation of CO2 emissions


Research focuses on the “transformational nature of the modern world.” IIASA is one of the foundations of the global transformation of local communities to reflect Agenda 21.

One way Agenda 21 is manifesting right now is in Transition Towns (http://www.transitionnetwork.org/about). Under the Transition Model (http://www.transitionnetwork.org/sites/default/files/WhoWeAreAndWhatWeDo-lowres.pdf), global relocalization agendas are forefront.
http://occupycorporatism.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/In-TransitionCover-300x216.jpg (http://occupycorporatism.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/In-TransitionCover.jpg)The dangers (http://occupycorporatism.com/transition-towns-agenda-21-comes-to-life/) that Transition Towns impose on our sovereignty and individuality are:


Refocus town planning and infrastructure on implementation of Agenda 21
Appear to be grassroots operations
Promote the Peak Oil mythology as an energy scare-tactic
Support SmarthGrowth which is code for Agenda 21
Aspire to control framing, disburse ability to farm, and pressure governmental policies on farming that reflect Agenda 21
Use the hoax of man-made climate change as the purpose for imposing policy control by building cities that are designed to reduce carbon emissions
Securitize local food stores, businesses, healthcare and fuel
Ensure SmarthGrowth controls all citizens ability to acquire any needs for human survival
Create internal advocacies that band together to purvey Transition Town propaganda to elected officials and local governments


The European Union has adopted regulations (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/cls/cons_cons%282010%2905386%28rev3%29_/cons_cons%282010%2905386%28rev3%29_en.pdf) that ban the construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020. These new dwellings, called passive houses will be “zero-energy buildings”. To control (http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab087171.pdf) urban communities in so far as “tangible spatial” development and the literal process of construction, Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more “energy efficient”.

During the recent UN Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio+20, governments and private sector corporations have pledged (http://occupycorporatism.com/un-receives-agenda-21-funding-from-world-governments-and-corporations/) to fund the UN’s endeavors toward global governance with a generous $513 billion for Agenda 21 projects that will restrict the movements of humans, perverse biodiversity and assist the UN in attaining their Millennium Development Goals.
Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State supports the incorporation of the Agenda 21 movement. She remarked that “sustainability won’t happen without business investment. Governments alone cannot solve all the problems we face, from climate change to persistent poverty to chronic energy shortages. That’s why we are so strongly in favor of partnerships.”
As far as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is concerned, the money from corporations and governments cannot come at a better time. Ki-moon claims that “words must translate into action” with regard to moving the environmental governance agenda forward.
Ki-moon says that since the first UNCSD, the incremental slide toward total global governance has spawned UN conventions on climate change, biodiversity and desertification, as well as the Agenda 21 blueprint for sustainable development, yet “progress has been too slow – we have not gone far enough down the road. We are now in sight of a historic agreement – the world is waiting to see if words will translate into action, as we know they must.”

The UN Environmental Program (UNEP) has been expanded (http://occupycorporatism.com/un-creates-new-more-powerful-global-environmental-agency/) to become a “specialized agency” with a new title, UN Environmental Organization (UNEO). The UNEO will prop up the Sustainable Development division of the UN. The same agency that disseminates Agenda 21 policies to governments will be centralized into a global agency with powerful international backing.

Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General devised the global sustainability panel that includes more than 50 supporters of the creation of UNEO.
“One option is the possible transformation of UNEP into a specialized agency of the United Nations. A strengthened UNEP could enhance coherence between relevant multilateral environmental agreements, and better integrate its work with the activities of development institutions, especially the United Nations Development Program,” states one recommendation.
To fund globalization, the UN will disburse (http://occupycorporatism.com/the-un-plan-to-remake-the-world-unveiled-at-rio-summit-2012/) a global carbon tax, redistribute the world’s wealth and install programs that will place all issues concerning humanity, poverty, the securitization of resources and education under its control and command.
They will force ecological taxes to steer large amounts of money into funds designed to redesign humanity, civilization and the planet – and fit them all into their mold. A carbon cap-and-trade tax system for industrial countries could yield $250 billion per year.
Through consolidation of power within the UN, the Agenda 21 scheme is being implemented locally; and finding success as fake grassroots efforts. The global Elite have perfected the art of convincing the general public that sustainability is a good idea. By employing them to pressure their local and state governments for adherence to UN Agenda 21 schemes, their work is easy. It is up to us to recognize that the sustainable legislation we are unknowingly pushing our elected officials to approve are contributing to the loss of our independence and sovereignty as a Constitutional Republic governed by our own laws.

Once we do this, we will no longer be manipulated into supporting the UN’s global governance agenda and once again be a free nation.

BabushkaLady
12th July 2012, 07:53 PM
This is an excellent explanation that I will pass on.

On the same topic, I was recently camping at Glacier National Park (the UN Heritage Peace Park :(). I like to get up there early in the season for wildlife photos.

It had been several years since I camped inside the park, but sunrise comes fast, so I did it this time. I was very surprised to find no electricity inside the bathrooms at the campground. So for $20 a night, they disconnected all the electrical, (yes they covered the outlets with stainless covers) and they provided paper towels which I've never seen in any other rustic campground anywhere. I have no problem roughing it, but to pretend we wouldn't notice the covers? I'll stay out in the Nat'l Forest with no amenities and no charge next time!

At the top of Logan Pass in the visitor center, I found flush toilets and absolutely no sinks.

The Greenies are crazy and stupid.

FreeEnergy
13th July 2012, 07:43 PM
Promote the Peak Oil mythology as an energy scare-tactic


Can you read actual DATA, not newsletters written by dummies?
http://mazamascience.com/OilExport/

Also, just curious, why are they drilling so far offshore, go to war in Iraq, hold off for high prices to use Canadian tar sands, use distructive and short-lived fracking, if apparently there's no decline in conventional oil production? I'm sure answer is "they are all consipatorial, UN-agenda-21 globalists".

The simple math of energy, the energy returned over energy invested (ERoEI), which has steadily declined from 100:1 in the days of poking a ground with a stick oil in the 1930s in Texas, to about 15:1 today. Once this indicator is close to 1:1, there will be no way to get any energy eventhough oil could be everywhere, because you would need the same amount of energy or more to get it.



Support SmarthGrowth which is code for Agenda 21
Aspire to control framing, disburse ability to farm, and pressure governmental policies on farming that reflect Agenda 21


So which one it is , SmartGrowth or control farming?



Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more “energy efficient”.
.

Compact houses ARE more energy efficient.

hoarder
14th July 2012, 08:21 AM
Having been the world's greatest warmongers for a couple thousand years, the Khazars have learned the topographical fact that mountain people are damned difficult to conquer. Look at the map and you'll see that most of the agenda 21 areas are in mountainous areas populated by White people.
I live in one of those areas and I can attest to the fact that USFS policies incrementally all add up to one thing; keep the people out.

BabushkaLady
14th July 2012, 04:45 PM
Can you read actual DATA, not newsletters written by dummies?
http://mazamascience.com/OilExport/

Also, just curious, why are they drilling so far offshore, go to war in Iraq, hold off for high prices to use Canadian tar sands, use distructive and short-lived fracking, if apparently there's no decline in conventional oil production? I'm sure answer is "they are all consipatorial, UN-agenda-21 globalists".

The simple math of energy, the energy returned over energy invested (ERoEI), which has steadily declined from 100:1 in the days of poking a ground with a stick oil in the 1930s in Texas, to about 15:1 today. Once this indicator is close to 1:1, there will be no way to get any energy eventhough oil could be everywhere, because you would need the same amount of energy or more to get it.


Yes, FreeEnergy we can all read. Just who paid for that data site you provided? Who is paying the researchers? Just wondering.

Oil exploration? Seems it's been an Environmental fight for a longtime. Go ahead and lobby for drilling in ANWAR, I'm with ya!
http://www.anwr.org/case.htm


So which one it is , SmartGrowth or control farming?


SmartGrowth is being pushed by EPA.
http://www.epa.gov/dced/

Here's some interesting read about the EPA over stepping their own laws and intimidating an Idaho couple:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-allows-idaho-couple-to-challenge-epa-on-wetlands-ruling/2012/03/21/gIQAFgdsRS_story.html

Another EPA power grab:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/environment/2008-05-21-water-law_N.htm
I haven't researched the outcome; but believe me--they want it all.


Compact houses ARE more energy efficient.

Since I can't figure just what you are arguing here; here's some facts from the article:


The European Union has adopted regulations (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/cls/cons_cons%282010%2905386%28rev3%29_/cons_cons%282010%2905386%28rev3%29_en.pdf)that ban the construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020. These new dwellings, called passive houses will be “zero-energy buildings”. To control (http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab087171.pdf)urban communities in so far as “tangible spatial” development and the literal process of construction, Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more “energy efficient”.

It's about regulations and control, not the fact that compact house are more energy efficient.