PDA

View Full Version : rosh hashana



JDRock
16th September 2012, 09:17 AM
Hey there fellow Americans its high jewish holy days! Now is the time for the jew to sit back reflect upon the havoc they have caused ,and feast while the gentiles go kill each other....its NO coincidence this "arab" uprising happened right now. Is there anyone still so naive that they think this film was not entirely a mossad op?
A hearty MAZEL TOV to all celebrants\uu\, while Christian blood runs in the streets....:(

EE_
16th September 2012, 09:26 AM
http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/netanyahu3.jpg

LuckyStrike
16th September 2012, 09:58 AM
while the gentiles go kill each other

http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G1484&t=KJV

Gentile does not mean "non jew" like the yids want you to believe. Just FYI.

JDRock
16th September 2012, 12:12 PM
however the meaning in hebrew or greek, my post was about satire....about the irony of celebration in the midst of death and chaos! Thanx for the post though, it just shows even more how the clever tribe works.

mamboni
16th September 2012, 03:32 PM
International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia

Gentiles:

jen’-tilz (goy, plural goyim; ethnos, "people," "nation"): Goy (or Goi) is rendered "Gentiles" in the King James Version in some 30 passages, but much more frequently "heathen," and oftener still, "nation," which latter is the usual rendering in the Revised Version (British and American), but it, is commonly used for a non-Israelitish people, and thus corresponds to the meaning of Gentiles." It occurs, however, in passages referring to the Israelites, as in Ge 12:2 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Gen&c=12&v=2#2); De 32:28 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Deu&c=32&v=28#28); Jos 3:17 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jos&c=3&v=17#17); 4:1 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jos&c=4&v=1#1); 10:13 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jos&c=10&v=13#13); 2Sa 7:23 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=2Sa&c=7&v=23#23); Isa 1:4 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Isa&c=1&v=4#4); Ze 2:9 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Zep&c=2&v=9#9), but the word (‘am) is the term commonly used for the people of God. In the New Testament ethnos is the word corresponding to goy in the Old Testament and is rendered "Gentiles" by both VSS, while (laos) is the word which corresponds to ‘am. The King James Version also renders Hellenes, "Gentiles" in six passages (Joh 7:35 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jhn&c=7&v=35#35); Ro 2:9 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=2&v=9#9),10 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=2&v=10#10); 3:9 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=3&v=9#9); 1Co 10:32 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=1Cr&c=10&v=32#32); 12:13 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=1Cr&c=12&v=13#13)), but the Revised Version (British and American) renders "Greeks."
The Gentiles were far less sharply differentiated from the Israelites in Old Testament than in New Testament times. Under Old Testament regulations they were simply non-Israelites, not from the stock of Abraham, but they were not hated or despised for that reason, and were to be treated almost on a plane of equality, except certain tribes in Canaan with regard to whom there were special regulations of non-intercourse. The Gentile stranger enjoyed the hospitality of the Israelite who was commanded to love him (De 10:19 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Deu&c=10&v=19#19)), to sympathize with him, "For ye know the heart of the stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt" (Ex 23:9 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Exd&c=23&v=9#9) the King James Version). The Kenites were treated almost as brethren, especially the children of Rechab (Jud 1:16 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jud&c=1&v=16#16); 5:24 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jdg&c=5&v=24#24); Jer 35 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jer&c=35&v=1#1)). Uriah the Hittite was a trusted warrior of David (2Sa 11 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=2Sa&c=11&v=1#1)); Ittai the Gittite was captain of David’s guard (2Sa 18:2 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=2Sa&c=18&v=2#2)); Araunah the Jebusite was a respected resident of Jerusalem. The Gentiles had the right of asylum in the cities of refuge, the same as the Israelites (Nu 35:15 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Num&c=35&v=15#15)). They might even possess Israelite slaves (Le 25:47 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Lev&c=25&v=47#47)), and a Gentileservant must not be defrauded of his wage (De 24:15 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Deu&c=24&v=15#15)). They could inherit in Israel even as late as the exile (Eze 47:22 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Eze&c=47&v=22#22),23 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Eze&c=47&v=23#23)). They were allowed to offer sacrifices in the temple at Jerusalem, as is distinctly affirmed by Josephus (BJ, II, xvii, 2- 4; Ant, XI, viii, 5; XIII, viii, 2; XVI, ii, 1; XVIII, v, 3; CAp, II, 5), and it is implied in the Levitical law (Le 22:25 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Lev&c=22&v=25#25)). Prayers and sacrifices were to be offered for Gentilerulers (Jer 29:7 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jer&c=29&v=7#7); Baruch 1:10,11; Ezr 6:10 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Ezr&c=6&v=10#10); 1 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Ezr&c=1&v=1#1) Macc 7:33; Josephus, BJ, II, x, 4). Gifts might be received from them (2 Macc 5:16; Josephus, Ant, XIII, iii, 4; XVI, vi, 4; BJ, V, xiii, 6; CAp, II, 5).

But as we approach the Christian era the attitude of the Jews toward the Gentiles changes, until we find, in New Testament times, the most extreme aversion, scorn and hatred. They were regarded as unclean, with whom it was unlawful to have any friendly intercourse. They were the enemies of God and His people, to whom the knowledge of God was denied unless they became proselytes, and even then they could not, as in ancient times, be admitted to full fellowship. Jews were forbidden to counsel them, and if they asked about Divine things they were to be cursed. All children born of mixed marriages were bastards. That is what caused the Jews to be so hated by Greeks and Romans, as we have abundant evidence in the writings of Cicero, Seneca and Tacitus. Something of this is reflected in the New Testament (Joh 18:28 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jhn&c=18&v=28#28); Ac 10:28 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Act&c=10&v=28#28); 11:3 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Act&c=11&v=3#3)).

If we inquire what the reason of this change was we shall find it in the conditions of the exiled Jews, who suffered the bitterest treatment at the hands of their Gentile captors and who, after their return and establishment in Judea, were in constant conflict with neighboring tribes and especially with the Greek rulers of Syria. The fierce persecution of Antiochus IV, who attempted to blot out their religion and Hellenize the Jews, and the desperate struggle for independence, created in them a burning patriotism and zeal for their faith which culminated in the rigid exclusiveness we see in later times.

Written by H. Porter (http://gold-silver.us/search/Dictionary/viewAuthorWorks.cfm?AuthorID=138)

Libertarian_Guard
16th September 2012, 03:36 PM
http://i49.tinypic.com/ruodgi.jpg


Cheers to my fellow goys & girls.

LuckyStrike
16th September 2012, 05:35 PM
But as we approach the Christian era the attitude of the Jews toward the Gentiles changes, until we find, in New Testament times, the most extreme aversion, scorn and hatred. They were regarded as unclean, with whom it was unlawful to have any friendly intercourse. They were the enemies of God and His people, to whom the knowledge of God was denied unless they became proselytes, and even then they could not, as in ancient times, be admitted to full fellowship. Jews were forbidden to counsel them, and if they asked about Divine things they were to be cursed. All children born of mixed marriages were bastards. That is what caused the Jews to be so hated by Greeks and Romans, as we have abundant evidence in the writings of Cicero, Seneca and Tacitus. Something of this is reflected in the New Testament (Joh 18:28 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Jhn&c=18&v=28#28); Ac 10:28 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Act&c=10&v=28#28); 11:3 (http://gold-silver.us/Bible.cfm?b=Act&c=11&v=3#3)).

If we inquire what the reason of this change was we shall find it in the conditions of the exiled Jews, who suffered the bitterest treatment at the hands of their Gentile captors and who, after their return and establishment in Judea, were in constant conflict with neighboring tribes and especially with the Greek rulers of Syria. The fierce persecution of Antiochus IV, who attempted to blot out their religion and Hellenize the Jews, and the desperate struggle for independence, created in them a burning patriotism and zeal for their faith which culminated in the rigid exclusiveness we see in later times.

Written by H. Porter (http://gold-silver.us/search/Dictionary/viewAuthorWorks.cfm?AuthorID=138)



This can be a difficult subject to discern, but the reason for this change in sentiment is that after Herod assimilated the edomites (people known as jews today) into judea, they quickly took and perverted the Scripture and the law, the pharisees etc. So at this time they were already corrupting the Mosaic law even though as Jesus pointed out in John 8 "if you were of Abrahams seed you would do the works of Abraham, but you are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father you will do etc" (off the head translation). So when Jesus came it really put a kink into their plan of perverting the law and enslaving people.

It wasn't until relatively recently in history that people took the jews at their word that they were the "chosen people" even though by their own admission (you have to dig) they are edomites. I thank the so called Christian church of the last 60 years especially for this, they were bought off 100% thanks to by this time the jews having the worlds printing presses at their disposal.

Hatha Sunahara
16th September 2012, 06:34 PM
From what I have read of the history of the Jews, the exile spoken of above was their exile to Babylonia. This apparently happened because they refused to pay tribute to Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian King. So he packed off some 600,000 of them and moved them to Babylonia where he could keep a close eye on them. They assimilated well in Babylonia, and prospered there; so much so that after 70 years of exile, when Cyrus of Persia conquered Babylon, and gave them leave to return to Judea, less than 100,000 of them actually went back. The ones who remained in Babylon learned the Babylonian mystery religion, and the Babylonian commercial code, much of which is incorporated in the Talmud, which was written in Babylonia. Their exile in Babylon ended somewhere around 600 BC. After that exile, the Jewish priests became more like today's Rabbis--regarding the Talmud as 'the law' and regarding Mosaic law as primitive. I presume also, that jews outside Judea developed some expectation for being treated with deference and respect in other countries, and the standards for that treatmen came from the treatment they received in Babylonia. I got this understanding mostly from reading Elizabeth Dilling's website: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html, and a few other sources. Prior to their Babylonian exile, the Jews were not much different from other local tribes other than they were monotheistic. After Babylon, they adopted a sense of imperial superiority to all other people. The word 'goyim' comes from the Talmud, and means literally cattle. Any other word for non-jews appears to be a differentiation of the universal grouping they call goyim. Today's rabbis carry on the traditions of the Pharisees who were the upper class talmudists and wielders of power in Judea at the time of Jesus Christ, and for whom Jesus had no end of invective. Jesus was like today's constitutionalists--watching the laws he believed in--the natural laws--being ground into the dust by the Babylonian Talmudists, the Pharisees--much like our current legal system has ground up the constitution into dust. This is my sense of that history, and I could have it completely wrong, although I think it is a better explanation for what we see today. The Talmudists are worshippers of the devil, and those who reject them are true worshippers of god.


Hatha

Libertarian_Guard
16th September 2012, 06:37 PM
http://christogenea.org/Embrace