MNeagle
22nd September 2012, 09:46 AM
Take the Test to See If You Might Be Considered a “Potential Terrorist” By
Government Officials
Submitted by on 09/21/2012 17:15 -0400
national security (http://gold-silver.us/taxonomy_vtn/term/11981)
Ron Paul (http://gold-silver.us/taxonomy_vtn/term/8807)
There have been so many anti-terrorism laws passed since 9/11 that it is hard
to keep up on what kinds of things might get one on a “list” of suspected bad
guys.
We’ve prepared this quick checklist so you can see if you might be doing
something which might get hassled.
The following actions may get an American citizen living on U.S. soil labeled
as a “suspected terrorist” today:
Speaking out
against government policies (http://www.counterpunch.org/cohn09302006.html)
Protesting
anything (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Questioning
war (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html) (even though war
reduces our national security (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/four-stories-this-week-prove-that-the-war-on-terror-is-a-farce.html); and see this (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/nobel-prize-winning-economist-war-is-widely-thought-to-be-linked-to-economic-good-times-nonsense.html))
Criticizing the government’s targeting of innocent civilians with
drones (http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/top_official_drone_critics_are_al_qaeda_enablers/singleton/) (although killing innocent civilians with drones is one of the main
things which increases
terrorism (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/nice-work-creating-new-terrorists-you.html). And see this (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/10/why-were-losing-the-war-on-terror.html))
Asking
questions about pollution (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html) (even at a public Congressional hearing (http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/02/02/documentary-filmmaker-josh-fox-arrested-at-fracking-hearing)?)
Paying cash at an Internet cafe (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2012/02/06/fbi-enlists-internet-cafe-owners-to-spy-on-customers-2/)
Asking
questions about Wall Street shenanigans (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Holding
gold (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Creating alternative currencies (http://www.nysun.com/editorials/a-unique-form-of-terrorism/87269/)
Stocking up on more than 7 days of food (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXKfEsgLLRU&feature=related) (even though all Mormons are taught to stockpile food (http://jenny-evans.suite101.com/why-do-mormons-store-food-a284336), and most Hawaiians store
up on extra food (http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/156535))
Having bumper stickers saying things like “Know Your Rights Or
Lose Them” (http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/)
Investigating factory farming (http://www.latimes.com/news/local/environment/la-me-gs-fbi-tracking-animal-videotapers-as-terrorists-20111229,0,5919114.story)
Infringing
a copyright (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/ter%C2%B7ror%C2%B7ist-noun-anyone-who-disagrees-with-the-government-2.html)
Taking
pictures or videos (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2008/09/in-a-fascist-state-cameras-equal-terrorism.html)
Talking to police officers (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Wearing a hoodie (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Driving a van (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Writing on a piece of paper (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
(Not having a Facebook account (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184658/Is-joining-Facebook-sign-youre-psychopath-Some-employers-psychologists-say-suspicious.html) may soon be added)
Holding the following beliefs may also be considered grounds for suspected
terrorism:
Valuing online privacy (http://publicintelligence.net/do-you-like-online-privacy-you-may-be-a-terrorist/)
Supporting
Ron Paul or being a libertarian (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Liking the Founding
Fathers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8)
Being a Christian (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8)
Being anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold standard (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/us-usa-fbi-extremists-idUSTRE81600V20120207)
Being “reverent
of individual liberty” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-nuclear” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Believe
in conspiracy theories” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“A
belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under
attack” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Impose
strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Insert
religion into the political sphere” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Those
who seek to politicize religion” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Supported
political movements for autonomy” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-abortion” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-Catholic” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-global” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Suspicious
of centralized federal authority” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Fiercely
nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in
orientation)” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“A
belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in …
survivalism” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Opposing genetically engineered food (http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/)
Opposing surveillance (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Many Americans assume that only “bad people” have to worry about draconian
anti-terror laws.
But as the above lists show, this isn’t true.
When even Supreme Court Justices and congressmen worry
that we are drifting into dictatorship (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/2-u-s-supreme-court-justices-and-numerous-other-top-government-officials-warn-of-dictatorship.html), we should all be concerned.
http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-09-21/take-test-see-if-you-might-be-considered-%E2%80%9Cpotential-terrorist%E2%80%9D-government-off
Government Officials
Submitted by on 09/21/2012 17:15 -0400
national security (http://gold-silver.us/taxonomy_vtn/term/11981)
Ron Paul (http://gold-silver.us/taxonomy_vtn/term/8807)
There have been so many anti-terrorism laws passed since 9/11 that it is hard
to keep up on what kinds of things might get one on a “list” of suspected bad
guys.
We’ve prepared this quick checklist so you can see if you might be doing
something which might get hassled.
The following actions may get an American citizen living on U.S. soil labeled
as a “suspected terrorist” today:
Speaking out
against government policies (http://www.counterpunch.org/cohn09302006.html)
Protesting
anything (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Questioning
war (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html) (even though war
reduces our national security (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/four-stories-this-week-prove-that-the-war-on-terror-is-a-farce.html); and see this (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/nobel-prize-winning-economist-war-is-widely-thought-to-be-linked-to-economic-good-times-nonsense.html))
Criticizing the government’s targeting of innocent civilians with
drones (http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/top_official_drone_critics_are_al_qaeda_enablers/singleton/) (although killing innocent civilians with drones is one of the main
things which increases
terrorism (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/nice-work-creating-new-terrorists-you.html). And see this (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/10/why-were-losing-the-war-on-terror.html))
Asking
questions about pollution (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html) (even at a public Congressional hearing (http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/02/02/documentary-filmmaker-josh-fox-arrested-at-fracking-hearing)?)
Paying cash at an Internet cafe (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2012/02/06/fbi-enlists-internet-cafe-owners-to-spy-on-customers-2/)
Asking
questions about Wall Street shenanigans (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Holding
gold (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Creating alternative currencies (http://www.nysun.com/editorials/a-unique-form-of-terrorism/87269/)
Stocking up on more than 7 days of food (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXKfEsgLLRU&feature=related) (even though all Mormons are taught to stockpile food (http://jenny-evans.suite101.com/why-do-mormons-store-food-a284336), and most Hawaiians store
up on extra food (http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/156535))
Having bumper stickers saying things like “Know Your Rights Or
Lose Them” (http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/)
Investigating factory farming (http://www.latimes.com/news/local/environment/la-me-gs-fbi-tracking-animal-videotapers-as-terrorists-20111229,0,5919114.story)
Infringing
a copyright (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/ter%C2%B7ror%C2%B7ist-noun-anyone-who-disagrees-with-the-government-2.html)
Taking
pictures or videos (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2008/09/in-a-fascist-state-cameras-equal-terrorism.html)
Talking to police officers (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Wearing a hoodie (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Driving a van (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Writing on a piece of paper (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
(Not having a Facebook account (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184658/Is-joining-Facebook-sign-youre-psychopath-Some-employers-psychologists-say-suspicious.html) may soon be added)
Holding the following beliefs may also be considered grounds for suspected
terrorism:
Valuing online privacy (http://publicintelligence.net/do-you-like-online-privacy-you-may-be-a-terrorist/)
Supporting
Ron Paul or being a libertarian (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html)
Liking the Founding
Fathers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8)
Being a Christian (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8)
Being anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold standard (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/us-usa-fbi-extremists-idUSTRE81600V20120207)
Being “reverent
of individual liberty” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-nuclear” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Believe
in conspiracy theories” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“A
belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under
attack” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Impose
strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Insert
religion into the political sphere” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Those
who seek to politicize religion” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Supported
political movements for autonomy” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-abortion” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-Catholic” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Being “anti-global” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Suspicious
of centralized federal authority” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“Fiercely
nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in
orientation)” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
“A
belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in …
survivalism” (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html)
Opposing genetically engineered food (http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/)
Opposing surveillance (http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/)
Many Americans assume that only “bad people” have to worry about draconian
anti-terror laws.
But as the above lists show, this isn’t true.
When even Supreme Court Justices and congressmen worry
that we are drifting into dictatorship (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/2-u-s-supreme-court-justices-and-numerous-other-top-government-officials-warn-of-dictatorship.html), we should all be concerned.
http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-09-21/take-test-see-if-you-might-be-considered-%E2%80%9Cpotential-terrorist%E2%80%9D-government-off